DOCSLIB.ORG

Key Actions for Large Carnivore Populations in Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Key Actions for Large Carnivore Populations in Europe Key actions for Large Carnivore populations in Europe January, 2015 2 Key actions for Large Carnivore populations in Europe Prepared for DG Environment, European Commission, by Istituto Ecologia Applicata, Rome under contract no. 07.0307/2013/654446/SER/B3 "Support to the European Commission's policy on large carnivores under the Habitat Directive - Phase Two”, with contributions from the Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe (SSC/IUCN) Istituto di Ecologia Applicata Via B. Eustachio 10 – IT 00161 Rome January 2015 3 This document is the final product of: Task 1 of contract ENV.B.3/SER/2013/003 Support to the European Commission’s policy on Large Carnivores under the Habitats Directive – Phase 2 Coordination: Luigi Boitani Sections coordinated by: Henrik Andren (5), Luigi Boitani (3), Djuro Huber (2), John Linnell (1), Urs Breitenmoser and Manuela Von Arx (4). Contributions by: Francisco Alvarez, Ole Anders, Henrik Andren, Elisa Avanzinelli, Vaidas Balys, Juan Carlos Blanco, Luigi Boitani, Urs Breitenmoser, Guillaume Chapron, Paolo Ciucci, Aleksander Dutsov, Claudio Groff, Djuro Huber, Ovidiu Ionescu, Felix Knauer, Ilpo Kojola, Jakub Kubala, Miroslav Kutal, John Linnell, Aleksandra Majic, Peep Mannil, Ralph Manz, Francesca Marucco, Dime Melovski, Anja Molinari, Harri Norberg, Sabina Nowak, Janis Ozolins, Santiago Palazon, Hubert Potocnik, Pierre-Yves Quenette, Ilka Reinhardt, Robin Rigg, Nuria Selva, Agnieszka Sergiel, Maryna Shkvyria, Jon Swenson, Aleksander Trajce, Manuela Von Arx, Manfred Wolfl, Ulrich Wotschikowsky, Diana Zlatanova. Contract management in DG Environment: András Demeter and Marco Cipriani Suggested citation: Boitani, L., F. Alvarez, O. Anders, H. Andren, E. Avanzinelli, V. Balys, J. C. Blanco, U. Breitenmoser, G. Chapron, P. Ciucci, A. Dutsov, C. Groff, D. Huber, O. Ionescu, F. Knauer, I. Kojola, J. Kubala, M. Kutal, J. Linnell, A. Majic, P. Mannil, R. Manz, F. Marucco, D. Melovski, A. Molinari, H. Norberg, S. Nowak, J. Ozolins, S. Palazon, H. Potocnik, P.-Y. Quenette, I. Reinhardt, R. Rigg, N. Selva, A. Sergiel, M. Shkvyria, J. Swenson, A. Trajce, M. Von Arx, M. Wolfl, U. Wotschikowsky, D. Zlatanova, 2015. Key actions for Large Carnivore populations in Europe. Institute of Applied Ecology (Rome, Italy). Report to DG Environment, European Commission, Bruxelles. Contract no. 07.0307/2013/654446/SER/B3 This document has been prepared for the European Commission, however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Cover: Photo composition by Alessandro Montemaggiori 4 Contents SECTION 1: BACKGROUND AND CROSS-CUTTING ACTIONS .......................................................................... 8 1. Background ............................................................................................................................................ 8 2. EU-level LC species action plans with a population-based approach .................................................... 9 3. Pan-European and cross-species priority actions ................................................................................. 10 4. Objectives of the lists of actions ........................................................................................................... 10 5. Cross cutting actions – across species and populations ....................................................................... 11 SECTION 2: BEARS ......................................................................................................................................... 16 PART I........................................................................................................................................................ 16 1.1. Bear Populations in Europe .............................................................................................................. 16 1.2 Status ................................................................................................................................................. 17 1.3 Legal status and management .......................................................................................................... 18 1.4 Threats ............................................................................................................................................... 19 1.5 Conflicts and conflict management ................................................................................................... 19 PART II – Actions relevant for all bear populations .................................................................................. 19 PART III - SPECIFIC ACTIONS FOR EACH BEAR POPULATION .................................................................... 28 1. Alpine population ............................................................................................................................... 28 2. Apennine population ........................................................................................................................... 30 3. East Balkan population ........................................................................................................................ 32 4. Baltic population ................................................................................................................................. 33 5. Cantabrian population......................................................................................................................... 34 6. Carpathian population......................................................................................................................... 36 7. Dinaric-Pindos population ................................................................................................................... 39 8. Finnish-Karelian population ................................................................................................................ 40 9. Pyrenees Mountains population ......................................................................................................... 41 10. Scandinavian population ................................................................................................................... 43 SECTION 3: WOLVES ..................................................................................................................................... 46 PART I........................................................................................................................................................ 46 1.1 Populations ........................................................................................................................................ 46 1.2 Status ................................................................................................................................................. 47 1.3 Legal status and management .......................................................................................................... 48 5 1.4 Threats ............................................................................................................................................... 48 1.5 Conflicts and conflict management ................................................................................................... 48 PART II – Actions for all populations ........................................................................................................ 49 PART III - SPECIFIC ACTIONS FOR EACH POPULATION .............................................................................. 58 1. Alpine population ................................................................................................................................ 58 2. Baltic population ................................................................................................................................. 60 3. Carpathian population......................................................................................................................... 62 4. Central European lowlands population ............................................................................................... 63 5. Dinara-Balkan population .................................................................................................................... 65 6. Italian Peninsula population ................................................................................................................ 67 7. Finnish-Karelian population ................................................................................................................ 69 8. North-Western Iberia Population........................................................................................................ 71 9. Scandinavian population ..................................................................................................................... 75 10. Sierra Morena population ................................................................................................................. 76 SECTION 4: LYNX ........................................................................................................................................... 80 PART I – Eurasian lynx populations in Europe .......................................................................................... 80 1.1 Populations ........................................................................................................................................ 80 1.2 Status ................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Picos De Europa National Park a Mosaic of Contrasts
    AS-115 Don´t forget that it is not allowed: A Llanes 25 km A Oviedo Corao 72 km Cangas de Soto de Onís Cangas Río Güeña Mestas Camping Hunting Throwing away Disturbing fauna Paragliding and Swimming in Having Making res Making very Using drones garbage and damaging hang-gliding rivers and lakes a picnic loud noises AS-114 Benia ora Santa Eulalia Avín de Abamia Teleña Alles Caño AS-262 Bobia de 1 Arriba A Santander 80 km Bobia de Ortiguero Abajo Següenco AS-114 Canales Gamonedo Demués Carreña Covadonga de Cangas N-625 Panes Basílica de Santa Berodia María La Real Gamonedo Mier La Molina de Onís Inguanzo Póo Las Arenas Río Cares 8 34 6 AS-114 Oceño N-621 Cuñaba Río Mildón Río Deva Río Dobra 202 Santillán AS-264 San Esteban Sames Lago Enol Vega de Enol R Lago Ercina 34 Carbes 29 2 31 Poncebos 202 Camarmeña Urdón Río Duje Tielve Tresviso 30 5 4 La Hermida Río Sella Amieva ARQUE NACIONAL ARQUE 17 P R Vega de Ario Río Cares 20 Ceneya Río Urdón EUROPA DE PICOS Vegarredonda Bejes R Bulnes 202 28 Ordiales Jultayu 1940 m 3 La Terenosa R 18 Sotres 19 Torre Santa María 13 2476 m 21 Puente Vidosa 28 7 Caín R Lebeña Cabrones R Cabañes Ándara Peña Santa de Castilla Iglesia de Santa N-625 2596 m 202 María (mozárabe) Río Dobra Pico Urriellu 201 Chorco de Torrecerredo 2518 m los Lobos 2650 m R Pico del Sagrado Corazón Vega de Urriellu 2212 m Pendes Vega Huerta Morra de Lechugales Colio 2441 m Ermita de Corona Pico Cortés 35 Pico Tesorero 2371 m Torre de Llambrión 2563 m Viñón 2647 m Torre Bermeja Río Duje 2392 m R Collado Jermoso R Peña Vieja 2614 m 16
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions in Herd Management of Semi-Domesticated Reindeer in Northern Finland
    Ann. Zool. Fennici 45: 81–101 ISSN 0003-455X (print), ISSN 1797-2450 (online) Helsinki 29 April 2008 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2008 Transitions in herd management of semi-domesticated reindeer in northern Finland Timo P. Helle1 & Lotta M. Jaakkola2 1) Finnish Forest Research Institute, Rovaniemi Research Unit, P.O. Box 16, FI-96301 Rovaniemi, Finland (e-mail: [email protected]) 2) Environmental sciences, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland Received 9 Jan. 2007, revised version received 5 Nov. 2007, accepted 2 Mar 2007 Helle, T. P. & Jaakkola, L. M. 2008: Transitions in herd management of semi-domesticated rein- deer in northern Finland. — Ann. Zool. Fennici 45: 81–101. In northern Finland, reindeer-herd management has experienced two major transitions: extensification of intensive herding, and development of supplementary/corral feeding in winter. The transitions were studied in six herding associations in different parts of the Finnish reindeer management area. It was suggested that intensive herding turns into more extensive forms as the reasons for intensive herding (predation, reindeer dis- appearing to foreign areas, protection of agricultural fields) gradually ceased to exist. The results of the study, based on interviews of elderly reindeer herders, were variable. In the three southern areas intensive herding changed to the free ranging system at the latest during WWII, whilst in the northern areas intensive herding was replaced by extensive herding with the aid of snowmobiles in the 1960s. In the southern herding associations, especially, supplementary/corral feeding in winter was considered neces- sary, from the 1970s onwards, to compensate for the loss of arboreal lichens associated with forest regeneration.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonizing the High Arctic: Mitochondrial DNA Reveals Common Origin of Eurasian Archipelagic Reindeer (Rangifer Tarandus)
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Colonizing the High Arctic: Mitochondrial DNA Reveals Common Origin of Eurasian Archipelagic Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) Kjersti S. Kvie1,2*, Jan Heggenes1, David G. Anderson3, Marina V. Kholodova4, Taras Sipko4, Ivan Mizin5, Knut H. Røed2 1 Department of Environmental Studies, University College of Southeast Norway, Bø in Telemark, Norway, 2 Department of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway, 3 Department of Anthropology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, 4 A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS, Moscow, Russia, 5 Russian Arctic National Park, Arkhangelsk, Russia a11111 * [email protected] Abstract In light of current debates on global climate change it has become important to know more on how large, roaming species have responded to environmental change in the past. Using OPEN ACCESS the highly variable mitochondrial control region, we revisit theories of Rangifer colonization Citation: Kvie KS, Heggenes J, Anderson DG, and propose that the High Arctic archipelagos of Svalbard, Franz Josef Land, and Novaia Kholodova MV, Sipko T, Mizin I, et al. (2016) Zemlia were colonized by reindeer from the Eurasian mainland after the last glacial maxi- Colonizing the High Arctic: Mitochondrial DNA Reveals Common Origin of Eurasian Archipelagic mum. Comparing mtDNA control region sequences from the three Arctic archipelagos Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). PLoS ONE 11(11): showed a strong genetic connection between the populations, supporting a common origin e0165237. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165237 in the past. A genetic connection between the three archipelagos and two Russian mainland Editor: William Barendse, CSIRO, AUSTRALIA populations was also found, suggesting colonization of the Eurasian high Arctic archipela- Received: June 21, 2016 gos from the Eurasian mainland.
    [Show full text]
  • Baby Reindeer Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    BABY REINDEER PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Yu-hsuan Huang | 12 pages | 02 Aug 2016 | CHRONICLE BOOKS | 9781452146614 | English | California, United States Baby Reindeer PDF Book Bureau of Education. Alice in Wonderland. Baby Mickey Halloween Costume M. Mongalla gazelle E. Download as PDF Printable version. According to the Igloolik Oral History Project IOHP , "Caribou antlers provided the Inuit with a myriad of implements, from snow knives and shovels to drying racks and seal-hunting tools. It was first domesticated in Siberia and Scandinavia. Finally, the North American caribou has not been domesticated and is generally a wild animal. Because of the continuing decline and expected changes in long-term weather patterns, this subspecies is at imminent risk of extinction. A complex set of terms describes each part of the antler and relates it to its various uses". Restrictions apply. Retrieved 11 October These cows are healthier than those without antlers. However, Geist and others considered it valid. Allen, [Notes 2] [34] [35]. These can, with some certainty, be dated to the Migration Period , although it is not unlikely that they have been in use since the Stone Age. In the winter, the pads shrink and tighten, exposing the rim of the hoof, which cuts into the ice and crusted snow to keep it from slipping. Scotland on Sunday. Choose options. Retrieved 17 December Morris Costumes. Carl Linnaeus chose the name Rangifer for the reindeer genus, which Albertus Magnus used in his De animalibus , fol. Mickey Mouse. The reindeer is the only deer that has been domesticated. Liber 22, Cap. There are dozens of herds of wild caribou in the state of Alaska and their population there is estimated to be more than one million strong.
    [Show full text]
  • Catálogo Florístico Del Parque Nacional Picos De Europa
    Catálogo florístico del Parque Nacional Picos de Europa DOCUMENTOS DEL JARDÍN BOTÁNICO ATLÁNTICO (GIJÓN) 8:1-312 (2011) 1 Catálogo florístico del Parque Nacional Picos de Europa J. Ignacio Alonso Felpete | Sara González Robinson Ana Fernández Rodríguez | Ivan Sanzo Rodríguez Amparo Mora Cabello de Alba | Álvaro Bueno Sánchez Tomás E. Díaz González !"#$%&'(") 8 Gijon, ./00 DOCUMENTOS DEL JARDÍN BOTÁNICO ATLÁNTICO (GIJÓN) 8:1-312 (2011) 3 Agradecimientos El desarrollo de este catálogo Xorístico ha sido posible gracias a la colaboración de un gran número de personas. Debemos destacar el apoyo prestado por el Parque Nacional Picos de Europa que ha co8nanciado la presente publicación y 8nanció durante 2007 y 2008 el desarrollo de los proyectos: Avances en el catálogo $orístico del Parque Nacional Picos de Europa y Actualización del catálogo $orístico del Parque Nacional Picos de Europa . Los autores desean expresar su agradecimiento al Dr. Herminio S. Nava, del Departamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas de la Universidad de Oviedo, por el entusiasmo con el que acogió la idea de completar el catálogo Xorístico del Parque, revisando con gusto multitud de pliegos y participando en las campañas de recolección que se han realizado durante estos últimos años, con objeto de completar algunas lagunas Xorísticas. Igualmente queremos expresar nuestro reconocimiento al Padre Manuel Laínz Gallo, por el apoyo bibliográ8co prestado y por su continuada labor como catalizador de un esfuerzo colectivo que ha sido el germen de numerosas aportaciones corológicas, siempre de alto interés para el territorio de estudio, y que han sido recogidas en un prolijo número de publicaciones.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Human Developments and Land Use on Caribou: a Literature Review Volume I: a Worldwide Perspective
    IMPACTS OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENTS AND LAND USE ON CARIBOU: A LITERATURE REVIEW VOLUME I: A WORLDWIDE PERSPECTIVE R.T. Shideler, M.H. Robus, J.F. Winters, and M. Kuwada Technical Report 86-2 Alaska Department of Fish & Game Habitat and Restoration Division The Alaslia Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of sex, color, race, religion, national origin, age, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. For information on alternative formats available for this and other department publications contact the department ADA Coordinator (voice) 9071465-4120: (TTD) 9071478-3648. Any person who believes slhe has been discriminated against should write to: ADF&G, PO Box 25526, Juneau, AK 99802-5526 or O.E.O. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington D.C. 20240. IMPACTS OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENTS AJYD LAND USE ON CARIBOU: A LITERATURE REVIEW Volume I: A Worldwide Perspective by R.T. Shideler, 1vI.H. Robus, J.F. Winters, and M. Kuwada Technical Report 86-2 Norman A. Cohen Director Division of Habitat Alaska Department of Fish and Game P.O. Box 3-2000 Juneau, Alaska 99802 June 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ....................................................... vi ACKNmmS..................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................... ix 1.0 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ............................................ 1 1.1 Scope & Organization
    [Show full text]
  • RANGIFER Ruearcht Man Jument -Md Husbandry of Reindeer and Other Northern Unguutei
    Ki ". mrir HTirciiu unn 1 1 AiJ^Uhi l'""rH nui. NjfWÉI RANGIFER Ruearcht Man jument -md Husbandry of Reindeer and other Northern UnguUtei Nd. 1-3 n lfHW - VOL XX Rangif er Published by. Nordisk Organ for Reinforskning (NOR) Nordic Council for Reindeer Research Pohjoismainen Porontutkimuselin Editor. Rolf Egil Haugerud Address: c/o NVH, Department of Arctic Veterinary Medicine Stakkevollvn. 23 B N-9292 Tromsø Norway e-mail: [email protected] Web address: www.rangifer.no Telephone: +47 77 69 48 10 Telefax: +47 77 69 49 11 Mobile telephone: +47 414 16 833 Bank account: 4760 56 92776 Postal account: 0801 2116358 Swift address: SNOWN022 Subscription prices: Ordinary subscription (2—4 issues/year), prices/year: 2000 Subscription runs until cancelled! Nordic countries NOK 160- Europe, surface mail NOK 175- Europe, air mail NOK 220- Overseas, surface mail NOK 200- Overseas, air mail NOK265- Student Nordic, surface NOK 100- Students elsewhere, surface NOK 100- Discount: Subscription agencies NOK 30- Back issues! (prices include postage and packing): Ordinary issues (> 3 years) NOK 30-each Ordinary issues (< 3 years) NOK 60 - each Proceedings of the Fifth International Reindeer/Caribou Symposium, Arvidsjaur 1988: NOK 350,-. (Subscribers to RANGIFER: NOK 250,-). Proceedings of the 6th North American Caribou Workshop, Prince George, B.C., 1994: NOK 200,-. Proceedings of the 7th North American Caribou Conference, Thunder Bay, Ontario, 1996: NOK 200,-. Other special issues NOK 165 - each Payment: Use credit card (VISA/Eurocard/Mastercard/Access) if possible. Add NOK 60 - to listed subscription and back issue prices to cover bank charges in Norway if using cheque payment or swift-address.
    [Show full text]
  • A Single Genetic Lineage of Erebia Euryale (Nymphalidae) Along the Northern Iberian Mountains
    Accepted on 20 October 2010 Ó 2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH J Zool Syst Evol Res doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2010.00587.x 1Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Corun˜a, A Corun˜a, Spain; 2Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; 3Department of Biogeography, Trier University, Trier, Germany Some butterflies do not care much about topography: a single genetic lineage of Erebia euryale (Nymphalidae) along the northern Iberian mountains Marta Vila1,Neus Marı´-Mena1,Ana Guerrero2 and Thomas Schmitt3 Abstract The phylogeography of montane species often reveals strong genetic differentiation among mountain ranges. Both classic morphological and genetic studies have indicated distinctiveness of Pyrenean populations of the butterfly Erebia euryale. This hypothesis remained inconclusive until data from the westernmost populations of the distribution area (Cantabrian Mountains) were analysed. In the present study, we set out to describe the population structure of Erebia euryale in western Cantabria, where the species occurs in scattered localities. For this goal, we estimate the genetic diversity and differentiation found in 218 individuals from six Cantabrian (North Spain) localities genotyped by 17 allozyme loci. We also sequence 816 bp of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I mitochondrial gene in 49 individuals from Cantabrian localities and 41 specimens from five other European sites. Mitochondrial data support the recognition of four major genetic groups previously suggested for the European populations based on allozyme polymorphisms. Both mitochondrial and nuclear markers reveal genetic distinctiveness of a single Pyrenean– Cantabrian lineage of E. euryale. The lack of geographical structure and the star-like topology displayed by the mitochondrial haplotypes indicate a pattern of demographic expansion in northern Iberia, probably related to Upper Pleistocene climatic oscillations.
    [Show full text]
  • 'O Neighbour, Where Art Thou?'
    Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae • 2017:24 No. Thesis Doctoral Doctoral Thesis No. 2017:24 This thesis focuses on explaining abundance and distribution of solitary carnivores, Doctoral Thesis No. 2017:24 from individual space use to distribution of animals at the population level. The Faculty of Forest Sciences thesis investigates factors influencing home range size, spatial variation in risk of mortality, and home range overlap in Eurasian lynx. The thesis also assesses ‘O Neighbour, Where Art Thou?’ Where ‘O Neighbour, wolverine home range fidelity the link between territorial dynamics and natal ‘O Neighbour, Where Art Thou?’ dispersal, reproductive timing and denning behaviour, and finally, the southwards colonisation of wolverines in Sweden. Spatial and social dynamics in wolverine and lynx, from individual space use to population distribution Malin Aronsson received her PhD education at Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala. She obtained her Master of Sciences in Forestry from SLU, Umeå. Malin Aronsson • Malin Aronsson Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae presents doctoral theses from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU). SLU generates knowledge for the sustainable use of biological natural resources. Research, education, extension, as well as environmental monitoring and assessment are used to achieve this goal. Online publication of thesis summary: http://pub.epsilon.slu.se/ ISSN 1652-6880 ISBN (print version) 978-91-576-8821-7
    [Show full text]
  • Ultraviolet Vision May Enhance the Ability of Reindeer to Discriminate Plants in Snow N.J.C
    ARCTIC VOL. 67, NO. 2 (JUNE 2014) P. 159 – 166 http://dx.doi.org/10.14430/arctic4381 Ultraviolet Vision May Enhance the Ability of Reindeer to Discriminate Plants in Snow N.J.C. TYLER,1 G. JEFFERY,2 C.R. HOGG3 and K.-A. STOKKAN4 (Received 19 March 2013; accepted in revised form 22 August 2013) ABSTRACT. In reindeer/caribou (Rangifer tarandus), the lens and cornea of the eye transmit ultraviolet (UV) light, and the retinae respond to it electrophysiologically. Here we tie this finding to the unusual visual environment experienced by these animals and propose that their sensitivity to UV light enhances vision at the low luminance characteristic of the polar winter. For such visual enhancement to occur, it is essential that functional components of the environment, such as forage plants, be visually salient under natural UV luminance. It is not self-evident, however, that this is the case. Although organic material generally absorbs UV radiation, powerful scattering of UV light by snow crystals potentially reduces contrast with the background. We therefore recorded UV images of vegetation in situ on snow-covered pasture under natural winter (March) luminance in northern Norway. For each vegetation scene, we made three monochrome digital images at 350 – 390 nm (UV-Only), 400 – 750 nm (No-UV), and 350 – 750 nm (control), respectively. Plants at the snow surface appeared in high achromatic contrast against snow in UV-Only images. The contrast was substantially greater in the UV-Only images than in corresponding images in which UV was blocked. We conclude that plants are visually salient under natural UV luminance at wavelengths to which Rangifer are sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ombudsman Summary of the Report to Parliament for 2005 June 2006
    The Ombudsman Summary of the Report to Parliament for 2005 June 2006 Complaints to the Spanish Ombudsman Rose 37.1% in 2005, Compared with 2004 Rise in Complaints Involving the Environment, Land Management, and Social Services he total number of citizens who registered complaints with the Ombudsman’s Office in 2005 was 39,750. Of these, 13,962 com- Tplaints led to individual cases being opened; 25,648 to the opening of group cases; and 140 of the Ombudsman’s actions were for- mulated as complaints in ex-officio proceedings. Therefore, the total number of complaints rose 37.1% compared with the previous year, during which there were 28,990 complaints, also bearing in mind that the latter number represented a considerable annual increase, as well. ages 7, 8, and 9 provide a breakdown of them on their own terms or presenting ade- Civil Servants and Employment Pthe complaints registered from Spain, quate reasons for disagreement with the and the 354 that came from abroad. Regard- proposal, are, in percentage terms, similar Generally speaking, especially notewor- ing the different sectors encompassed by the to former years (Tables 23, 24, and 25). In thy were complaints regarding the retire- activities of the Public Administration, wor- the summary of actions involving each area, ment benefits of full-time mayors and city thy of note is the impressive ‘take-off’ in cit- it is striking that there are several which, council members who served their terms izens’ complaints involving land manage- due to different circumstances (number of after Spain’s first municipal elections fol- ment, and specifically, the environment; persons affected, media impact, a type of lowing the restoration of democracy, but those involving economic administration; complaint hitherto unseen), had a higher who had not been able to register with the those in the realm of education and culture; profile.
    [Show full text]
  • Polar Ecology
    Woodcut by Aron of Kangeq, Nuuk, 1860 Off Ilulissat, Greenland FREDRIK EHRENSTRÖM STEFAN LUNDGREN Svalbard KUBUS 35 Polar Ecology The polar bear is hungry. Using her sensitive nose, she searches for a seal. She spots one lying on the ice, and as she creeps closer, her steps become careful. The seal has good hearing, good eyesight, and a good sense of smell. It is ready to dive into the water as soon as it senses danger nearby. So, very stealthily, the polar bear puts one paw in front of the other in the snow until she is only 30 meters from her prey. Her final rush is an explosion of energy, and she pounces on the seal. This time, luck is with her, and she enjoys a good meal of seal blubber, her favorite food. The rest of the seal is left behind when she moves on over the ice, but close behind comes the Arctic fox, like a shadow waiting for its share. This meal on the ice illustrates two key points in discussing contaminants in the Arctic. Predation is the pathway by which contaminants move from animal to animal in Arctic food webs. Moreover, it is no coincidence that the polar bear is a picky eater when hunting is good, choosing only the blubber and leav- ing the rest of the seal. Energy is important for sur- vival in cold environments and a preference for fatty foods is one of many adaptations shown by Arctic animals. This chapter discusses plant and animal life in the Arctic, with a focus on adaptations that can make Arctic ecosystems especially vulnerable to contami- nants.
    [Show full text]