The Middle Templar
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Parole Board Annual Report 2018
The Parole Board is an independent body that works with other criminal justice agencies to protect the public by risk assessing prisoners to decide whether they can be safely released into the community. Parole Board for England and Wales Annual Report And Accounts 2017/18 HC1334 Annual Report and Accounts 2017/18 A Parole Board for England and Wales Annual Reports and Accounts 2017/18 Report Presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraph 11 of Schedule 19 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Accounts Presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraph 10 of Schedule 19 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 19 July 2018 HC1334 © Crown copyright 2018 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] ISBN 978-1-5286-0403-1 CCS0518644672 07/18 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office The Rt Hon David Gauke MP Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France London, SW1H 9AJ 16 July 2018 Dear Justice Secretary I have pleasure in presenting to you the Parole Board’s Annual Report and Accounts for 2017/18. -
The Parole Board for England and Wales Annual Report and Accounts 2011/12
The Parole Board for England and Wales Annual Report and Accounts 2011/12 HC 401 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 11 July 2012 ISBN: 9780102979572 CORRECTIONS Correction made to page 29, table “Summary of recommendations made for determinate recall cases considered under the CJIA Act 2008” 2011/12 Make no recommendation – 349 becomes 13,155 Send to oral hearing – 13,155 becomes 349 Correction made to page 32, table “DCR cases considered and released on parole by ethnic group 2011/12” Black or Black British Refused – 72% becomes 82% Correction made to page 35, table “Summary of on/post tariff and recall mandatory, discretionary and automatic life sentence prisoners, Her Majesty’s pleasure detainees considered 2005/06 – 2011/12” 2011/12 Release not directed – 275 becomes 1,326 Percentage of cases where release not directed – 14% becomes 68% January 2013 THE PAROLE BOARD Annual Report and Accounts 2011/12 1 the Parole Board for England and Wales Annual Report and Accounts 2011/12 Annual Report and Accounts 2011/12 3 the Parole Board for England and Wales Annual Report and Accounts 2011/12 Report Presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraph 11 of Schedule 19 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Accounts Presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraph 10 of Schedule 19 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 11 July 2012 HC 401 London: The Stationery Office £21.25 © Parole Board (2012) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context The material must be acknowledged as Parole Board copyright and the document title specified. -
Parole Board Annual Report 2010-2011
Annual Report and Accounts 2010/11 the Parole Board for England and Wales Annual Report and Accounts 2010/11 the Parole Board for England and Wales Presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraphs 10 and 11 of Schedule 19 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 18 July 2011 HC1363 London: The Stationery Office £20.50 © Parole Board (2011) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context The material must be acknowledged as Parole Board copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] This publication is also for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk and from our website at www.justice.gov.uk ISBN: 9780102972672 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2441899 07/11 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum The Right Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP Justice Secretary Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France London, SW1H 9AJ 11 July 2011 Dear Justice Secretary I have pleasure in presenting to you the Parole Board’s Annual Report and Accounts for 2010/11. The report records the work carried out by the Board last year to achieve our aim of making risk assessments that are rigorous, fair and timely while protecting the public and contributing to the rehabilitation of prisoners. -
Bankruptcy in the Court of Chancery, 1674-1750 Aidan Collins Phd
Bankruptcy in the Court of Chancery, 1674-1750 Aidan Collins PhD University of York History March 2020 2 Abstract This thesis examines cases involving bankruptcy brought before the court of Chancery between 1674-1750. The historiography of pre-modern England has tended to treat bankruptcy and Chancery as two distinct areas of scholarly research, meaning that Chancery has largely been overlooked in the existing historiography of early modern bankruptcy. Similarly, the scholarship on the equitable jurisdiction of Chancery has failed to account for how the bankruptcy process interacted with the court. The thesis is the first substantial work to analyse the manner in which the procedure of bankruptcy was litigated within the court. As such, the work makes an original contribution to our understanding of early modern bankruptcy by demonstrating how an initially autonomous legal procedure came to Chancery to seek the aid or assistance of the court in the wider debt-recovery process. In order to undertake such a task, it is necessary to pay close attention to the procedures of the court, and especially to the people and processes that went into creating the documents which have survived. The thesis analyses each individual stage of proceeding in isolation — which forms the basis of the chapter structure — by paying close attention to the types of documentation created and presented to the court at these different phases in the legal process. Because each stage of proceeding required a different ordering of language in order to conform to the legal requirements of the court, we can only fully understand how bankruptcy was litigated by pausing and paying detailed attention to the types of documents created at each individual stage.