DOCSLIB.ORG

Small Intestinal Tuft Cell Specification and Behavior in Homeostasis and Intestinal Inflammatory Disease

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Small Intestinal Tuft Cell Specification and Behavior in Homeostasis and Intestinal Inflammatory Disease SMALL INTESTINAL TUFT CELL SPECIFICATION AND BEHAVIOR IN HOMEOSTASIS AND INTESTINAL INFLAMMATORY DISEASE By Amrita Banerjee Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Cell and Developmental Biology May 10, 2019 Nashville, TN Approved: Guoqiang Gu, Ph.D. Christopher Wright, D.Phil. Robert J. Coffey, M.D. Christopher Williams, M.D., Ph.D. Ken S. Lau, Ph.D. For my family, without whose support this work would not have been possible. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am deeply indebted to my mentor Dr. Ken Lau for his support and guidance during my five years in his lab. He has afforded me every opportunity to develop my research, writing, and computational skills. He encourages me to think deeply about my experiments without forgetting about the big picture. My progress in all aspects of my training are due to his patience and tutelage. Thank you for giving me the freedom to explore my intellectual curiosity as well as the support to ensure that I did not go astray. I would like to thank my committee members: my chair Dr. Guoqiang Gu, my co-chair Dr. Chris Wright, Dr. Robert Coffey, and Dr. Christopher Williams for their many years of guidance and encouragement. From my first class with Dr. Gu, he has always expressed a willingness to offer his mentorship and assistance in making me a better scientist. I am grateful to Dr. Wright for acting as the co-chair of my committee and providing his support to ensure that everything remained on track. I am thankful to Dr. Coffey, who in classes, one-on-one meetings, and presentations, has always asked the most perspicacious questions to broaden my thinking. And finally, I am thankful toward Dr. Williams, whose insight into my work I have always valued. I am deeply grateful for all the constructive criticism, insight, and encouragement each has offered towards my science and my career. Science does not happen in a vacuum and my work is no exception. I am incredibly thankful for the supportive and collaborative atmosphere that Dr. Lau has fostered in his lab, which made all the difference during my training. Chuck, thank you for your scientific contributions to my work but also for offering your wit and humor from as near as the next bay over to as far as Western Australia. Joey, I cannot overstate how valuable your help and advice has been to my graduate training. Cherie’, thanks for always thinking the same and keeping your Slack window open at all times. Hyeyon, my undergraduate extraordinaire, I appreciate your persistence with any project that I handed you as your efforts were invaluable in the completion of this dissertation. Thank you all for your friendship and support these past four and a half years. I also want to thank iii all the members of the Lau, Coffey, and Goldenring labs, past and present, for their advice, encouragement, and guidance throughout my graduate training. I am incredibly fortunate to have been a part of the Cell and Developmental Biology Department and the Epithelial Biology Center these past years. I also want to acknowledge the funding sources that have supported my graduate training, including NIH Grant RO1 DK103831 as well as support from the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America and the Vanderbilt Microbiome Institute. Finally, the shared resources from the Vanderbilt DDRC, Flow Cytometry Core, TPSR, and DAC were essential to this work. Outside of the lab, I have been blessed with the most wonderful friends and family. Joan, thank you for your friendship from our first days in Alspaugh on East Campus to graduate school in Nashville for me and medical school in Cleveland for you. I am so excited to see and share in all the amazing things you are sure to accomplish. I want to thank my family, both present and absent, for shaping me into the person I am. To the memory of Lt. Col. Bimal Chandra Banerjee and Smt. Amita Roy, who left behind a wonderful legacy as well as the finest parents a person could ask for. To the late Dr. Minakshi Midya, whose presence and wisdom is still felt after more than a decade. To my grandmother, Smt. Anjali Banerjee, who always keeps me in her thoughts and lets me recite Keats to her. To my grandfather, Dr. Indra Shekhar Roy, whose devotion to the health and welfare of his community has been an inspiration. I am also grateful to my entire family in Kolkata and elsewhere who, despite the distance, have shown me nothing but support and encouragement. Finally, to Ma, Baba, and Dada – I cannot say enough times or with sufficient accuracy what our foursome means to me. Thank you for all the “one last thing(s)” you have to say to me and for celebrating all the highs and cheering me on through the lows. I cherish the adventures we have experienced thus far and am so excited for the numerous that lie ahead. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Dedication ................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ ix List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. xi Preface ..................................................................................................................................... xii Chapter I. Background – The small intestinal epithelium in health and disease ..................................... 1 Inflammatory bowel disease .................................................................................................... 1 The intestinal stem cell niche ................................................................................................... 3 Paneth cell differentiation and function .................................................................................... 5 The commensal microbiome and microbial-derived metabolites .............................................. 7 Population-level microbiome analysis ...................................................................................... 9 Host metabolites .................................................................................................................... 10 Organoid culture .................................................................................................................... 12 Systems biology and single-cell analysis .............................................................................. 14 Background on DISSECT-CyTOF ......................................................................................... 15 Background on droplet-based single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) .............................. 15 Background on p-Creode ....................................................................................................... 16 Mouse models ....................................................................................................................... 17 TNFΔARE/+ model of Crohn’s-like ileitis .................................................................................... 17 II. Background – Specification and function of small intestinal tuft cells .................................. 19 Small intestinal tuft cells are a rare chemosensory cell type .................................................. 19 Tuft cell morphology .............................................................................................................. 20 Intracellular tuft cell structure ................................................................................................. 22 v Small intestinal tuft cell specification ...................................................................................... 25 Tuft cell gene signature ......................................................................................................... 28 Colonic tuft cells .................................................................................................................... 29 Tuft cells in intestinal epithelial damage response ................................................................. 30 Tuft cells in gastrointestinal helminth infection ....................................................................... 34 III. Single-cell analysis of differential response to inflammatory stimuli ..................................... 40 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 40 Results .................................................................................................................................. 43 A novel disaggregation procedure for investigating epithelial signaling heterogeneity ........ 43 DISSECT application of CyTOF identifies a differentially signaling enterocyte subpopulation that is sensitized to TNF-α-induced cell death .................................................................... 44 Divergently responding enterocytes are neighbors within the intestinal epithelium ............. 48 Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 50 Methods ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Induced Quiescence of Lgr5+ Stem Cells in Intestinal Organoids Enables Differentiation of Hormone-Producing Enteroendocrine Cells
    Article Induced Quiescence of Lgr5+ Stem Cells in Intestinal Organoids Enables Differentiation of Hormone- Producing Enteroendocrine Cells Graphical Abstract Authors Onur Basak, Joep Beumer, Kay Wiebrands, Hiroshi Seno, Alexander van Oudenaarden, Hans Clevers Correspondence [email protected] In Brief Basak et al. identify signals to generate rare enteroendocrine cells (EECs) at high purity through manipulation of intestinal stem cell quiescence. Single-cell sequencing reveals a high level of heterogeneity in hormonal production, which is influenced by the regional identity of the intestinal organoid cultures. Highlights Data Resources d EGFR inhibition halts DNA replication and proliferation of GSE80636 Lgr5+ ISCs through MEK d Lgr5+ ISCs reactivated from quiescence retain multilineage differentiation potential d Combined EGFR/Wnt/Notch inhibition produces enteroendocrine cells with high purity d RNA sequencing shows regional identity and heterogeneity in hormone-producing EECs Basak et al., 2017, Cell Stem Cell 20, 177–190 February 2, 2017 ª 2016 Elsevier Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.11.001 Cell Stem Cell Article Induced Quiescence of Lgr5+ Stem Cells in Intestinal Organoids Enables Differentiation of Hormone-Producing Enteroendocrine Cells Onur Basak,1,2,5 Joep Beumer,1,2,5 Kay Wiebrands,1,2,5 Hiroshi Seno,4 Alexander van Oudenaarden,1,2 and Hans Clevers1,2,3,6,* 1Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT, Utrecht the Netherlands 2Cancer Genomics Netherlands, UMC
    [Show full text]
  • The Intestinal Epithelium Tuft Cells: Specification and Function
    Cell. Mol. Life Sci. (2012) 69:2907–2917 DOI 10.1007/s00018-012-0984-7 Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences REVIEW The intestinal epithelium tuft cells: specification and function Franc¸ois Gerbe • Catherine Legraverend • Philippe Jay Received: 23 February 2012 / Revised: 21 March 2012 / Accepted: 26 March 2012 / Published online: 19 April 2012 Ó The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract The intestinal epithelium, composed of at least Abbreviations seven differentiated cell types, represents an extraordinary Ac-tubulin Acetylated tubulin model to understand the details of multi-lineage differen- Atoh1 Atonal homolog 1 tiation, a question that is highly relevant in developmental BrdU 5-Bromo-20-deoxyuridine biology as well as for clinical applications. This review CFTR Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance focuses on intestinal epithelial tuft cells that have been regulator homolog acknowledged as a separate entity for more than 60 years CK-18 Cytokeratin 18 but whose function remains a mystery. We discuss what is DCLK1 Doublecortin-like kinase 1 currently known about the molecular basis of tuft cell fate Dll Delta-like and differentiation and why elucidating tuft cell function F-actin Fibrillar actin has been so difficult. Finally, we summarize the current Gfi1 Growth factor independent 1 hypotheses on their potential involvement in diseases of the Gfi1b Growth factor independent 1b gastro-intestinal tract. GI Gastro-intestinal GIP Gastric inhibitory polypeptide Keywords Tuft cells Á Brush cells Á Intestinal epithelium Á GLP-1 Glucagon-like peptide 1 Atoh1 Á Cell differentiation Á Dclk1 Hes1 Hairy and enhancer of split 1 Hpgds Hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase Klf4 Kruppel-like factor 4 L-FABP Fatty acid-binding protein 1, liver Lgr5 Leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded on 27 May 2020
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.07.438755; this version posted April 7, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Title: Cells of the human intestinal tract mapped across space and time Elmentaite R1, Kumasaka N1, King HW2, Roberts K1, Dabrowska M1, Pritchard S1, Bolt L1, Vieira SF1, Mamanova L1, Huang N1, Goh Kai’En I3, Stephenson E3, Engelbert J3, Botting RA3, Fleming A1,4, Dann E1, Lisgo SN3, Katan M7, Leonard S1, Oliver TRW1,8, Hook CE8, Nayak K10, Perrone F10, Campos LS1, Dominguez-Conde C1, Polanski K1, Van Dongen S1, Patel M1, Morgan MD5,6, Marioni JC1,5,6, Bayraktar OA1, Meyer KB1, Zilbauer M9,10,11, Uhlig H12,13,14, Clatworthy MR1,4, Mahbubani KT15, Saeb Parsy K15, Haniffa M1,3, James KR1* & Teichmann SA1,16* Affiliations: 1. Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK. 2. Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AT, UK 3. Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK. 4. Molecular Immunity Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK 5. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK. 6. Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 7. Structural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, University College London WC1E 6BT, UK 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Classification of Chromatin Dynamics Reveals Regulators of Intestinal Stem Cell Differentiation
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/637181; this version posted November 2, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Quantitative classification of chromatin dynamics reveals regulators of intestinal stem cell differentiation Jesse R Raab1,2, Deepthi Y Tulasi1, Kortney E Wager1, Jeremy M Morowitz1, Scott T Magness,3,4,5, Adam D Gracz1,2,6 Affiliations: 1 Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2 Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 3 Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 4 Department of Cell Biology & Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 5 Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill/North Carolina State University 6 Lead contact: [email protected] The authors declare no conflicts of interest Author contributions: ADG and STM conceived the study. JRR, STM, and ADG designed experiments. JRR, DYT, KW, JMM, and ADG performed experiments and analyzed data. JRR and ADG wrote and edited the manuscript. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/637181; this version posted November 2, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. ABSTRACT Intestinal stem cell (ISC) plasticity is thought to be regulated by broadly-permissive chromatin shared between ISCs and their progeny. Here, we utilize a Sox9EGFP reporter to examine chromatin across ISC differentiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of Tight Junction Protein Claudin-18 Promotes Rapid Cancer Development in Mouse Stomach
    Loss of Tight Junction Protein Claudin 18 Promotes Progressive Neoplasia Development in Mouse Stomach The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Hagan, Susan J. et al. "Loss of Tight Junction Protein Claudin 18 Promotes Progressive Neoplasia Development in Mouse Stomach." Gastroenterology 155, 6 (December 2018): P1852-1867 © 2018 AGA Institute As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.041 Publisher Elsevier BV Version Author's final manuscript Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/126290 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Gastroenterology Manuscript Author . Author Manuscript Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 July 08. Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2018 December ; 155(6): 1852–1867. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.041. Loss of Tight Junction Protein Claudin-18 Promotes Rapid Cancer Development in Mouse Stomach Susan J. Hagen1,2, Lay-Hong Ang1,2, Yi Zheng1,2,6, Salih N. Karahan1,7, Jessica Wu1,8, Yaoyu E. Wang2,3, Tyler Caron1,4,9, Aniket Gad1, Sureshkumar Muthupalani4, and James G. Fox4,5 1Department of Surgery/Division of General Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA 3Center for Cancer Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02130 USA 4Division of Comparative Medicine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 5Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 6Present address: Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA 7Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Roles of Intestinal Epithelial Cells in the Maintenance of Gut Homeostasis
    OPEN Experimental & Molecular Medicine (2017) 49, e338; doi:10.1038/emm.2017.20 & 2017 KSBMB. All rights reserved 2092-6413/17 www.nature.com/emm REVIEW Roles of intestinal epithelial cells in the maintenance of gut homeostasis Ryu Okumura and Kiyoshi Takeda The intestine is a unique organ inhabited by a tremendous number of microorganisms. Intestinal epithelial cells greatly contribute to the maintenance of the symbiotic relationship between gut microbiota and the host by constructing mucosal barriers, secreting various immunological mediators and delivering bacterial antigens. Mucosal barriers, including physical barriers and chemical barriers, spatially segregate gut microbiota and the host immune system to avoid unnecessary immune responses to gut microbes, leading to the intestinal inflammation. In addition, various immunological mediators, including cytokines and chemokines, secreted from intestinal epithelial cells stimulated by gut microbiota modulate host immune responses, maintaining a well-balanced relationship between gut microbes and the host immune system. Therefore, impairment of the innate immune functions of intestinal epithelial cells is associated with intestinal inflammation. Experimental & Molecular Medicine (2017) 49, e338; doi:10.1038/emm.2017.20; published online 26 May 2017 INTRODUCTION two types of mucosal barriers, physical barriers and chemical The gastrointestinal tract is an organ that takes in food, digests it barriers, to spatially segregate gut microbiota in the intestinal and absorbs food-derived nutrients. Therefore, exogenous lumen and immune cells in the lamina propria. These barriers microorganisms, such as bacteria, fungi and viruses, can also prevent conflict between gut microbiota and host immune cells enter the gut, accompanying food intake. Some of the micro- that would result in intestinal inflammation.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Systems Theory: What Does It Explain, and How Does It Explain It?
    CHAPTER THREE Developmental Systems Theory: What Does It Explain, and How Does It Explain It? Paul E. Griffiths*,1, James Tabery† *Department of Philosophy and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia †Department of Philosophy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 1Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Contents 1. Origins of Developmental Systems Theory 66 1.1. Waddington and the “Developmental System” 66 1.2. Gottlieb and Probabilistic Epigenesis 68 1.3. Oyama and the Ontogeny of Information 71 1.4. Ford, Lerner, and a “DST” 72 2. What Developmental Systems Theory Is Not 73 2.1. Quantitative Behavioral Genetics and Its Developmental Critics 73 2.2. Nativist Cognitive Psychology and Its Developmental Critics 76 3. Core Concepts 78 3.1. Epigenesis 78 3.2. Developmental Dynamics 82 4. Mechanisms—A Philosophy for Developmental Systems Theory 84 4.1. The Philosophy of Mechanism 84 4.2. Bidirectionality 85 4.3. Dynamic Interactionism 86 4.4. Truly Developmental Explanations 88 5. Conclusions 89 References 90 We are indebted to Susan Oyama for reading and providing very useful feedback on an earlier version of this article. Griffiths’ work on this paper was supported as part of an Australian Research Council Discovery Project DP0878650. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Volume 44 © 2013 Elsevier Inc. ISSN 0065-2407, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397947-6.00003-9 All rights reserved. 65 66 Paul E. Griffiths and James Tabery Abstract We examine developmental systems theory (DST) with two questions in mind: What does DST explain? How does DST explain it? To answer these questions, we start by reviewing major contributions to the origins of DST: the introduction of the idea of a “developmental system”, the idea of probabilistic epigenesis, the attention to the role of information in the developmental system, and finally the explicit identification of a DST.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural and Functional Development of Rat and Mouse Gastric Mucous Cells in Relation to Their Proliferative Activity 17 Oktober 1978
    STELLINGEN 1. De op onjuist geïnterpreteerde waarnemingen gebaseerde konklusie van Nabeyama en Leblond omtrent de sekretorische funktie van de z.g. "caveolae" in "caveolated cells" gaat voorbij aan de algemeen gangbare opvattingen over het verloop van sekretieprocessen. A. Nabeyama en C.P. Leblond: Amer. J. Anat. JjiO, 147-166 (1974) Dit proefschrift 2. De wijze waarop door membraan omsloten sekreetkorrels worden ontledigd is in essentie altijd exocytotisch. Schijnbare afwijkingen van deze regel zijn te- rug te voeren op fixatie-artefakten. 3. Het feit dat bij de "explosieve exocytose" in allerlei slijmcellen delen van het cytoplasma geïsoleerd raken en met het sekreet de cel verlaten, is nog geen reden om deze sekretie als apokrien aan te duiden. B. Tandler et al.: J. Morphol. _12!7, 383-408 (1969) 4. De theorie van Pearse c.s., dat de entero-endokriene cellen van neuroektoder- male oorsprong zouden zijn, is niet houdbaar. A.G.E. Pearse: Digestion j», 372-375 (1973) H. Cheng en C.P. Leblond: Amer. J. Anat. _14J_, 503-520, 539-562 (1974) 5. De myosinefilamenten in het "terminal web" van darmepithee1cellen kunnen, ge- zien hun geringe lengte, slechts belangrijke betekenis voor de beweging van de microvilli hebben, als ze zijdelings polair zijn volgens het model van Craig en Megerman. M.S. Mooseker en L.G. Tilney: J. Cell Biol. 67, 725-743 (1975) R. Craig en J. Megerman: J. Cell Biol. 75, 990-996 (1977) 6. Meistrich c.s. gaan bij hun berekening van een verdubbelingstijd voor sperma- -1 togenetische stamcellen tijdens de regeneratie na bestraling ten onrechte uit .; van een exponentieel groeimodel.
    [Show full text]
  • A Single-Cell Survey of the Small Intestinal Epithelium
    A single-cell survey of the small intestinal epithelium The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Haber, A. L., M. Biton, N. Rogel, R. H. Herbst, K. Shekhar, C. Smillie, G. Burgin, et al. 2018. “A single-cell survey of the small intestinal epithelium.” Nature 551 (7680): 333-339. doi:10.1038/nature24489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature24489. Published Version doi:10.1038/nature24489 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37298517 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Nature. Manuscript Author Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2018 June 28. Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2017 November 16; 551(7680): 333–339. doi:10.1038/nature24489. A single-cell survey of the small intestinal epithelium Adam L. Haber1,*, Moshe Biton1,2,*,§, Noga Rogel1,*, Rebecca H. Herbst1,3, Karthik Shekhar1, Christopher Smillie1, Grace Burgin1, Toni M. Delorey1,4, Michael R. Howitt5, Yarden Katz3, Itay Tirosh1, Semir Beyaz6,7, Danielle Dionne1, Mei Zhang8, Raktima Raychowdhury1, Wendy S. Garrett1,5, Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen1, Hai Ning Shi8, Omer Yilmaz1,6,11, Ramnik J. Xavier1,2,12,§, and Aviv Regev1,13,§ 1Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA 2Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA 3Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA 4Department of Biology and Biotechnology, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA 5Departments of Immunology and Infectious Diseases and Genetics and Complex Diseases, Harvard T.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Pattern and Molecular Signature of Cholinergic Tuft Cells In
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Distribution pattern and molecular signature of cholinergic tuft cells in human gastro-intestinal and pancreatic-biliary tract Burkhard Schütz1, Anna-Lena Ruppert1, Oliver Strobel2,3, Michael Lazarus 4, Yoshihiro Urade5,6, Markus W. Büchler2,3 & Eberhard Weihe1* Despite considerable recent insight into the molecular phenotypes and type 2 innate immune functions of tuft cells in rodents, there is sparse knowledge about the region-specifc presence and molecular phenotypes of tuft cells in the human digestive tract. Here, we traced cholinergic tuft cells throughout the human alimentary tract with immunohistochemistry and deciphered their region-specifc distribution and biomolecule coexistence patterns. While absent from the human stomach, cholinergic tuft cells localized to villi and crypts in the small and large intestines. In the biliary tract, they were present in the epithelium of extra-hepatic peribiliary glands, but not observed in the epithelia of the gall bladder and the common duct of the biliary tract. In the pancreas, solitary cholinergic tuft cells were frequently observed in the epithelia of small and medium-size intra- and inter-lobular ducts, while they were absent from acinar cells and from the main pancreatic duct. Double immunofuorescence revealed co-expression of choline acetyltransferase with structural (cytokeratin 18, villin, advillin) tuft cell markers and eicosanoid signaling (cyclooxygenase 1, hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase, 5-lipoxygenase activating protein) biomolecules. Our results indicate that region-specifc cholinergic signaling of tuft cells plays a role in mucosal immunity in health and disease, especially in infection and cancer. Tuf cells represent a minor sub-population of post-mitotic epithelial cells in the mucosal lining of the mamma- lian alimentary tract1,2.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting Heterogeneity in Intestinal Tuft Cell Structure and Function
    The Journal of Clinical Investigation REVIEW Interpreting heterogeneity in intestinal tuft cell structure and function Amrita Banerjee,1,2 Eliot T. McKinley,1,3 Jakob von Moltke,4 Robert J. Coffey,1,3 and Ken S. Lau1,2 1Epithelial Biology Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 2Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 3Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 4Department of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. Intestinal tuft cells are a morphologically unique cell type, best characterized by striking microvilli that form an apical tuft. These cells represent approximately 0.5% of gut epithelial cells depending on location. While they are known to express chemosensory receptors, their function has remained unclear. Recently, numerous groups have revealed startling insights into intestinal tuft cell biology. Here, we review the latest developments in understanding this peculiar cell type’s structure and function. Recent advances in volumetric microscopy have begun to elucidate tuft cell ultrastructure with respect to its cellular neighbors. Moreover, single-cell approaches have revealed greater diversity in the tuft cell population than previously appreciated and uncovered novel markers to characterize this heterogeneity. Finally, advanced model systems have revealed tuft cells’ roles in mucosal healing and orchestrating type 2 immunity against eukaryotic infection. While much remains unknown about intestinal tuft cells, these critical advances have illuminated the physiological importance of these previously understudied cells and provided experimentally tractable tools to interrogate this rare cell population. Tuft cells act as luminal sensors, linking the luminal microbiome to the host immune system, which may make them a potent clinical target for modulating host response to a variety of acute or chronic immune-driven conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • High Glucose Exposure Impairs L-Cell Differentiation in Intestinal Organoids: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article High Glucose Exposure Impairs L-Cell Differentiation in Intestinal Organoids: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications Agnese Filippello 1 , Stefania Di Mauro 1, Alessandra Scamporrino 1 , Roberta Malaguarnera 2 , Sebastiano Alfio Torrisi 3 , Gian Marco Leggio 3 , Antonino Di Pino 1, Roberto Scicali 1 , Francesco Purrello 1,* and Salvatore Piro 1 1 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Internal Medicine, Garibaldi-Nesima Hospital, University of Catania, Via Palermo, 636, 95122 Catania, Italy; agnese.fi[email protected] (A.F.); [email protected] (S.D.M.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (A.D.P.); [email protected] (R.S.); [email protected] (S.P.) 2 Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, “Kore” University of Enna, 94100 Enna, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia, 64, 95123 Catania, Italy; [email protected] (S.A.T.); [email protected] (G.M.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-095-7598402 Abstract: Intestinal organoids are used to analyze the differentiation of enteroendocrine cells (EECs) and to manipulate their density for treating type 2 diabetes. EEC differentiation is a continuous Citation: Filippello, A.; Di Mauro, S.; process tightly regulated in the gut by a complex regulatory network. However, the effect of chronic Scamporrino, A.; Malaguarnera, R.; hyperglycemia, in the modulation of regulatory networks controlling identity and differentiation Torrisi, S.A.; Leggio, G.M.; Di Pino, of EECs, has not been analyzed. This study aimed to investigate the effect of glucotoxicity on EEC A.; Scicali, R.; Purrello, F.; Piro, S.
    [Show full text]