DOCSLIB.ORG

Magagula Sithelo 2020.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Magagula Sithelo 2020.Pdf BALANCING THE RIGHT TO PEACEFUL USE AND ENJOYMENT OF PRIVATE PROPERTY WITH THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO ADEQUATE HOUSING AND THE GOVERNMENT’S LEGITIMATE INTEREST THERETO. University of KwaZulu-Natal College of Law and Management Studies School of Law Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws at the University of KwaZulu-Natal Student: SITHELO MAGAGULA (214503954) MASTER OF LAWS Supervisor: DR MAROPENG MPYA 2019/20 DECLARATION REGARDING ORIGINALITY I, MAGUGULA SITHELO declare that: A. The research reported in this thesis, except where otherwise indicated, is my original research. B. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other university. C. This thesis does not contain other persons’ data, pictures, graphs or other information, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other persons. D. This thesis does not contain other persons’ writing, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other researchers. Where other written sources have been quoted, then: E. their words have been re-written, but the general information attributed to them has been referenced; F. where their exact words have been used, their writing has been placed inside quotation marks, and referenced. G. Where I have reproduced a publication of which I am an author, co-author or editor, I have indicated in detail which part of the publication was written by myself alone and have fully referenced such publications. H. This thesis does not contain text, graphics or tables copied and pasted from the Internet, unless specifically acknowledged, and the sources being detailed in the thesis and in the References sections. Signed: Date: 17 December 2020 i ABSTRACT In the pre-constitutional dispensation, the courts could grant an eviction order without considering the risk of homelessness to the evictees. This was possible because there was no constitutional right of access to adequate housing, and there was no law obligating the government to provide alternative accommodation to vulnerable evictees. In this context, the owner’s right to peaceful use and enjoyment of private property to the exclusion of non-owners was absolute and it trumped the interests of the unlawful occupiers. Notably, this legal framework favoured historical landowners, while undermining the historical dispossession of land which in turn impacted on vulnerable evictees’ housing interests. In the new constitutional dispensation, there is a shift away from the pre-constitutional legal framework. The eviction landscape has been transformed by section 26 of the Constitution which gives everyone the right of access to adequate housing and not to be arbitrarily evicted. Section 26 further obliges the state to take all reasonable steps to realise the right of access to adequate housing. The subsequent promulgation of the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998 (“PIE”) gives effect to section 26 of the Constitution. Accordingly, evictions are now qualified in terms of section 26 of the Constitution. In a situation where unlawful occupiers have no prospect of finding alternative accommodation of their own, a court may order local government to provide them with temporary alternative accommodation. Therefore, in the new constitutional dispensation the government has a constitutional duty to provide alternative accommodation to vulnerable evictees. Notably, the government has a central legitimate interest in evictions. To the extent that the government cannot provide alternative accommodation, a court may refuse to grant an eviction order or may suspend it until the government makes such provision. This new development aims to infuse the principles of justice and equity into South African eviction law by balancing and reconciling the landowners’ interests with those of the unlawful occupiers. However, this transformative development is hindered by the government’s failure to play its central role, in the sense that if the government fails to provide alternative ii accommodation or provides an inadequate form of alternative accommodation the eviction will be refused or delayed. As a result, the landowners’ property rights and the unlawful occupiers’ housing rights will be compromised. Ultimately, the courts’ balancing approach will be hampered. Therefore, this study indicates that the government has failed to play its central role in evictions. As such, balancing the landowners and the unlawful occupiers’ opposed interests in the context of eviction is a complex exercise. The study concludes that it is impossible to balance the relevant rights without the meaningful involvement of government. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS “Let the LORD be magnified, who has pleasure in the prosperity of His servant”, Psalm 35:27. I thank God for giving me the strength and endurance to complete this thesis. All the glory and honour be unto your name! I am indebted to a great number of people who have played an important part in the preparation of this study. In particular and foremost, ngithanda ukubonga umama wami u Melta Funani Magagula, ngemikhuleko yakhe eyinsika yempumelelo yami. Njengo Abrahama ecwadini ka Genesisi 17:18 owakhulekela indodana yakhe kuNkulunkulu wathi, “Sengathi u-Ishmayeli angaphila phambi kwakho”, Impela imithandazo yakho mama iyangiphilisa futhi inendima enkulu ezifundweni zami nase empilweni yami nje iyonke. I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Dr Maropeng Mpya for his supervision, guidance and kindness that was indeed valuable. Without your support, I would not have been able to complete this thesis. I have learned so much from you. Thank you for being patient teacher and for your tireless contribution of time, energy, support and encouragement. I would further like to thank my girlfriend Ms Sethembiso Langazane, a very smart and disciplined woman who continues to play a significant role in my life, for reviewing and structuring my thesis. Ngyabonga kakhulu Mtolo, Ndlangamandla, nangamazwi akho nje okungiduduza nokunginika ithemba. To my boss and my colleague Mr Godfrey Lusenga, I will forever be indebted to you. Thank you for seeing potential in me as your associate attorney. It is through you that I developed interest in researching about eviction and property law. And thank you for always giving me time and days-off to focus on my discipline. It a great privilege to practice law under your supervision and I am forever grateful for all the lessons and wisdom you shared so humbly. iv Table of Contents DECLARATION REGARDING ORIGINALITY ........................................................... i ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................... iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... viii CHAPTER ONE ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction and background ............................................................................. 1 1.2 Research problem ........................................................................................... 10 1.3 Research questions ........................................................................................ 12 1.4 Preliminary literature review and research purpose ........................................ 12 1.5 Research Methodology ................................................................................... 15 1.6 Demarcation of the thesis ............................................................................... 16 1.7 Terminology .................................................................................................... 17 CHAPTER TWO....................................................................................................... 19 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 19 2.2 The legal and historical context of ownership ................................................. 20 2.2.1 The concept of ownership and the right to peaceful use and enjoyment .. 20 2.2.2 Roman Law ............................................................................................... 23 2.2.3 Roman-Dutch law ..................................................................................... 25 2.2.4 The Pandectists’ concept of ownership in South Africa ............................ 26 2.3 Common law and statutory law eviction remedies .......................................... 28 2.3.1 Common law remedy: The rei vindicatio ................................................... 28 2.3.2 Statutory remedy: The Prevention of Illegal Squatting Act 52 of 1951 (PISA) ................................................................................................................ 34 2.4 Concluding remarks ........................................................................................ 42 CHAPTER 3 ............................................................................................................. 45 v 3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 45 3. 2 The right of access to adequate housing ....................................................... 47 3.2.1 The overview, meaning and scope of section 26 of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Critical Analysis of the Approach of the Courts in the Application of Eviction Remedies in the Pre-Constitutional and Constitutional Context
    A critical analysis of the approach of the courts in the application of eviction remedies in the pre-constitutional and constitutional context Clireesh Terry Cloete Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Professor ZT Boggenpoel Co-supervisor: Professor JM Pienaar Faculty of Law Department of Private law December 2016 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the authorship owner thereof (unless to the extent explicitly otherwise stated) and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Clireesh Terry Cloete December 2016, Stellenbosch Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Summary In the pre-constitutional era courts had a very specific approach to eviction remedies. This approach was the result of legal doctrine that regulated the concept of ownership, eviction remedies and standard practices of presiding officers as entrenched in rules of interpretation and procedural rules. The advent of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (the “Constitution”) transformed the eviction landscape by way of section 26(3) of the Constitution and the subsequent promulgation of the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998 (“PIE”). After the first Constitutional Court judgment Port Elizabeth Municipality v Various Occupiers (2005 (1) SA 217 (CC) it became apparent that the PIE not only replaced the pre-constitutional eviction remedies but in fact also required that the deep-level assumptions of a landowner’s right to evict and the standard practices associated with the courts’ role in eviction cases were also revolutionised.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems of Servitude in Traditional Africa and Ancient Rome
    People as Property: Systems of Servitude in Traditional Africa and Ancient Rome Gardiol VAN NIEKERK (University of South Africa) 1. Introduction This is a discussion of two systems of servitude or bondage which are totally unrelated and which occurred in two very divergent cultures. These systems are distinguished not only in space but also in time. The understanding of time, and history, is different in African and Western/European cultures. In mainstream Western history the history of pre-literate societies is considered to be pre-history1. But, because of its pre-literate tradition, African history cannot be restricted to text-based information2. In this paper the focus will be on pre-contact African slave law. The term “pre-contact” here denotes the time before African communities came into contact with either Atlantic/European or Saharan/Arab slave traders. That was long before the so-called colonial scramble for Africa in the nineteenth century. The Arab slave trade took place from approximately AD700 to the first decade of the 20th century3, and from the seventeenth century, the Atlantic slave 1 BENGTSON, Introduction to Ancient History, Berkeley 1970, 3-4; CARY, A History of Rome, London 1970, 40-45. The beginning of the early Middle Ages is generally regarded as the upper boundary of ancient history. 2 The pre-literate tradition of the Bantu-speakers resulted from their geographical isolation at a critical stage in the development of writing. The collective name "Bantu" is derived from their ancient language, Ur-Bantu or proto-Bantu. See generally VAN NIEKERK, “Stereotyping Women in Ancient Roman and African Societies”, RIDA XLVII (2000) 366 at 367-368.
    [Show full text]
  • The De Ira: Seneca's Satire of Roman Law
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1996 The De Ira: Seneca's Satire of Roman Law William E. Wycislo Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Wycislo, William E., "The De Ira: Seneca's Satire of Roman Law" (1996). Dissertations. 3598. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/3598 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1996 William E. Wycislo LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO THE DE IRA: SENECA'S SATIRE OF ROMAN LAW A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF CLASSICAL STUDIES BY WILLIAM E. WYCISLO CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JANUARY 1996 Copyright by William E. Wycislo, 1996 All Rights Reserved 11 Parentibus Carissimis Meis Primis Magistris Meis Pietate 111 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For the completion of this study I gratefully acknowledge the direction of Drs. John F. Makowski, Alexander P. MacGregor, Jr., and Edwin P. Menes, whose criticism, advice, and inspiration have been of inestimable value. Loyola University most kindly provided a full-year fellowship for the completion of this project. I also gratefully acknowledge the suggestions and encouragement of Dr. James G. Keenan, whose generosity of time at odd hours has been unstinting, and the continuous inspiration and friendship of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Vs. Liberty: Procedural Law and Practice of Freedom Trials in Portugal and Brazil
    DOI: 10.18468/fronteiras.2017v4n1.p55-85 P á g i n a | 55 Property vs. Liberty: Procedural law and practice of freedom trials in Portugal and Brazil Sven Korzilius1 ABSTRACT: The article provides an overview of the historiographical debates on the relevance of law and courts for colonial slavery in the early modern, presenting several possible master narratives. Departing from the question about the legal sources used by the jurists of the early modern era producing “slave law in action”, the article focuses on procedural law of the freedom trials, especially on the interim situation of the person whose status the trial was about. This aspect of the proceedings is fascinating, because here the tension between the two extreme positions of the parties (liberty vs. slavery/property) is discharged for the first time. A close look at the sources proves that the jurists sought to justify the possible solutions not only with the custom of the courts (stilus curiae), but that a variety of legal formants contributed to colonial slave law, notably the authority of the Roman model, which the article presents shortly in its development, and of certain medieval forms, like the summariissimum or the actio (or execeptio) spolii. Legal doctrine was frequently quoted. As a result, Brazilian colonial slavery did not occur in a legal vacuum, but proves to have been highly institutionalized, and many aspects of the civil law of slavery appear as a relatively conservative continuation of European practice, without visible innovations to the favor or the detriment of the unfree population. Keywords: Law of slavery.
    [Show full text]