The Convention of the Hague and the Constitutional Debates in the Estates of Flanders and Brabant, 1790-1794
Early Modern Low Countries 1 (2017) 1, pp. 156-176 - eISSN: 2543-1587 156 The Convention of The Hague and the Constitutional Debates in the Estates of Flanders and Brabant, 1790-1794 Klaas Van Gelder Klaas Van Gelder is a postdoctoral fellow of the Austrian Wissenschaftsfonds and the Research Founda- tion Flanders, affiliated with both the University of Vienna and the University of Ghent. His scholarly interests encompass the Austrian Netherlands, the Austrian Habsburg Monarchy, political culture, and political ceremonies. In 2016, kvab-Press/Peeters Publishers issued his monograph Regime Change at a Distance. Austria and the Southern Netherlands Following the War of the Spanish Succession, 1716- 1725. He has published articles in, among others, the European Review of History, Revue d’Histoire moderne et contemporaine, Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis, and Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung. Abstract Following the Brabant Revolution and the declaration of independence of the Southern Netherlands, Vienna made a series of constitutional assurances to the rebels while at the same time preparing to recover the region by force. In December 1790, these promises culminated in the Convention of The Hague, in which Emperor Leopold ii – under allied pressure – pledged to restore the ancient constitutions of the Southern Nether- lands, which led to constitutional debates among the rebellious provinces. This article examines why the imperial commitments did not placate the estates of the leading prov- inces, Flanders and Brabant. The Flemish Estates grasped the opportunity to draft their own constitutional charter; Brabant primarily pursued additional safeguards to protect its charter, the Joyous Entry. I argue that these debates chiefly reflect the language of ancient constitutionalism and in essence served conservative goals even as actual cir- cumstances compelled the estates to integrate innovative concepts in their reasoning.
[Show full text]