Muddy Shore to Modern Port: Redimensioning the Montréal Waterfront Time-Space
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Muddy shore to modern port: redimensioning the Montre´al waterfront time-space JASON GILLILAND Department of Geography, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A5C2, Canada (e-mail: [email protected]) For Montre´al in the nineteenth century, as for most `AMontre´al au dix-neuvie`me sie`cle, comme dans la port cities, the waterfront served as the primary plupart des villes portuaires, le havre a servi de interface between the city and the markets of the principal interface entre la ville et les marche´s d u world. This paper examines how and why the monde. Cet article examine comment et pourquoi primitive waterfront of Montre´al as of 1830was entre les anne´es 1830et 1914, le havre primitif a e´t e´ repeatedly adapted and transformed into a modern a` plusieurs reprises adapte´ et graduellement port district by 1914. Beyond a detailed examination transforme´ en zone portuaire moderne. Au-dela` d’un of the set of physical changes on the waterfront, this examen de´taille´ de l’ensemble de changements paper draws theoretical insights from geographical physiques affectant le port lui-meˆme, cet article tire interpretations of the rhythm of capital accumulation des conclusions the´oriques de I’interpre´tation to explore the formative and adaptive processes ge´ographique du rythme de l’accumulation du underlying waterfront redevelopment. Global capital dans son rapport aux processus de formation innovations in transport and cargo-handling et d’adaptation qui soutendent l’e´volution du port. technology are recognised as the preconditions for the Des innovations ge´n e´ralise´es dans le transport et la periodic redimensioning of the port of Montre´al, and it technologie de traitement du fret sont d’abord is established that these changes were driven by the identifie´es comme conditions pre´alables pour le re- perennial demands of local investors to accelerate dimensionnement pe´riodique du port de Montre´al. circulation and thus reduce the turnover time of Cet article soutient ensuite que les transformations capital. This paper offers a new perspective on physiques ont e´t e´ induites par la volonte´ sans cesse waterfront development by conceptualising the entire renouvele´e des investisseurs locaux d’acce´l e´rer la port as a comprehensive circulatory system and then vitesse de capitalisation et d’e´courter ainsi le cycle de exploring the redevelopment of various components in la plus-value. Cet article offre une nouvelle relation to others. The findings indicate that massive perspective sur le de´veloppement du port en increases in traffic—the number and size of ships— conceptualisant ce dernier comme syste`m e through the port were correlated with the circulatoire inte´gre´ et en explorant le redimensioning of all of the connected components of rede´veloppement de ses divers composants les uns the circulatory system; that is, the major arteries such par rapport aux autres. Les re´sultats indiquent que as the St Lawrence River ship channel, as well as the les augmentations massives du trafic maritime – smaller capillaries like finger piers. tant en termes de nombre de navires que de tonnage The Canadian Geographer / Le Ge´ographe canadien 48, no 4 (2004) 448–472 ß / Canadian Association of Geographers / L’Association canadienne des ge´ographes Muddy shore to modern port 449 – sont corre´l e´es avec le re-dimensionnement des composants du syste`me circulatoire; telle l’arte`r e principale que constitue le chenal du fleuve Saint- Laurent et les e´l e´ments capillaires plus petits telles les jete´es. Introduction In Montre´al, as in most port cities, the waterfront purpose was to elucidate how and why the has long been the primary interface between the primitive pre-industrial waterfront was repeatedly city and the markets of the world. Over the last adapted and transformed into a ‘modern’ port two centuries or so, since the onset of industrialisa- district. tion, cityports across the globe have been com- A port is a place where land and water-borne pelled, over and over again, to redevelop their transport systems converge, where cargo and pas- waterfronts. The focus in this paper is on the (re)de- senger traffic are exchanged across a waterfront velopment of the port of Montre´al from its formal (Figure 1). The efficiency of a port, and the health beginnings in 1830, through a period of rapid of the urban economy as a whole, is represented by industrialisation up to World War I (1914). The its ability to maximise traffic through this physical Figure 1 The port-city interface, as seen from the Canadian Pacific Railway elevator circa 1890. SOURCE: Notman Collection, McCord Museum The Canadian Geographer / Le Ge´ographe canadien 48, no 4 (2004) 450 Jason Gilliland space at minimum cost and with minimum delay. vations in transport methods were preconditions The waterfront, therefore, is at once both an inter- for the redimensioning of the Montre´al waterfront face and an impediment to exchange; its physical in the industrial era, and these changes were configuration may contribute to the efficiency of adopted in response to the perennial demands of the port or may form costly spatio-temporal bar- local investors to reduce the turnover time of capital. riers. It has been suggested that the flow of goods The turnover time (or time necessary to reconstitute and people through a city, like the circulation of the value)of a given capital is equal to the time blood in the human body, is channelled and con- devoted to production and circulation (exchange)of strained by the physical dimensions of its ‘vascu- commodities. The longer the turnover time of a cap- lar system’, that is, the entire network of streets, ital, the smaller its surplus value; therefore, by accel- canals, channels, harbours, tracks, piers, bridges erating circulation through more efficient and and elevators (Gilliland 1999). In this paper, I effective means of transport, investors are able to argue that for cities to survive and grow, they increase profits. must, again and again, accelerate circulation and The primary data for this study were drawn from expand the capacity of the urban vascular system; the annual reports of the Montreal Harbour Com- in particular, they must periodically redimension mission, the institution responsible for developing the entire waterfront time-space. While previous the waterfront and regulating port traffic during studies have described the historical development the period under study. Available since 1830, of individual physical components of the port of these comprehensive ledgers are the most author- Montre´al, such as the Lachine Canal (Desloges and itative source of information on port activities dur- Gelly 2002), St Lawrence River ship channel ing the industrial era. Furthermore, the Harbour (Corley 1967)and grain elevators (GRHPM 1981), Commission reports are an important source of this paper offers a new perspective on port devel- data on the historical geography of Canada which opment in that it considers the entire port as a has largely been untapped by researchers (Brouillard comprehensive circulatory system and examines 1979). Although this study concentrates on the (re)development of various components in Montre´al, similar stories could be (and have been) relation to others. told for other port cities. Indeed, studies of the Beyond a detailed examination of the physical historical redevelopment of the New York/New transformation, or morphogenesis, of the water- Jersey waterfront reveal processes and patterns front, this paper attempts to elucidate the forma- similar to those in Montre´al, particularly with tive and adaptive processes underlying its respect to the nature and timing (if not scale)of evolution. To understand the processes that con- the redimensioning of major arteries such as the tinually reshape the landscape of the port, we need canals (McIlwraith 1976; Sheriff 1996)and railways to turn our attention to the compelling logic of the (Condit 1980; Doig 2001). In the Canadian context, urban economy—that is, the revolutionary histori- the Toronto waterfront has undoubtedly received cal and geographical dynamics of capitalism. Pre- the most scholarly attention, presumably because vailing studies in transport geography view the the redevelopment process and associated conflicts contemporary redevelopment of cityports across among waterfront land uses have remained the globe as the spatial outcome of processes of extremely contentious public issues to this day economic restructuring, symptoms of the ever- (McIlwraith 1991; Goldrick and Merrens 1996; increasing globalisation of maritime transport Greenberg 1996; Goheen 2000). Although each (Slack 1975, 1995, 1999; Hoyle and Pinder 1981; cityport develops a distinctive set of functions and Hoyle et al. 1988; Kilian and Dodson 1995, 1996; features according to its particular historical, geo- Malone 1996; Meyer 1999; Rodrigue 1999; Slack graphical, economic and political circumstances, et al. 2002). Drawing insights from ‘spatialised’ Hoyle (1988, 4)reminds us that ‘any individual city- interpretations of the rhythm of capital accumula- port nevertheless represents to a greater or lesser tion (Harvey 1985, 1989, 2001; Smith 1990), I for- extent the overall trends that characterise all such mulate a complementary conceptual approach that locations and which reflect global rather than local recognises the circulation of capital as the driving factors’. The findings of this paper, therefore, have force behind the morphogenesis of the Montre´al a much broader relevance beyond Montre´al. waterfront. My central thesis is that periodic inno- Furthermore, it is believed that the conceptual The Canadian Geographer / Le Ge´ographe canadien 48, no 4 (2004) Muddy shore to modern port 451 framework set out in the following section can help haul the goods into the city.1 Evidently, the primi- contribute to our understanding of the redimen- tive harbour and approaches experienced by Allan sioning process in other waterfront spaces, over on his first visit to Montre´al constituted a signifi- different time periods.