DOCSLIB.ORG

Does Everyone Have a Price? the Demand Side of Clientelism and Vote-Buying in An

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Does Everyone Have a Price? the Demand Side of Clientelism and Vote-Buying in An Does Everyone Have a Price? The Demand Side of Clientelism and Vote-Buying in an Emerging Democracy by Elda Lorena Becerra Mizuno Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Karen L. Remmer, Supervisor ___________________________ John H. Aldrich ___________________________ Margaret A. McKean ___________________________ Christopher Johnston ___________________________ Guillermo Rosas Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2012 ABSTRACT Does Everyone Have a Price? The Demand Side of Clientelism and Vote-Buying in an Emerging Democracy by Elda Lorena Becerra Mizuno Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Karen L. Remmer, Supervisor ___________________________ John H. Aldrich ___________________________ Margaret A. McKean ___________________________ Christopher Johnston ___________________________ Guillermo Rosas An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2012 Copyright by Elda Lorena Becerra Mizuno 2012 Abstract The overarching question of this dissertation is what explains the prevalence of clientelistic practices in emerging democracies, and do these represent a threat to the quality of the regime. This research seeks to contribute to the literature on clientelism and democracy by providing an assessment of the voter’s role in encouraging clientelistic and vote-buying practices. By focusing on the demand side of clientelism and vote-buying, this dissertation portrays voters as active agents in the clientelistic exchange as opposed to mere price-takers as they have been primarily depicted in the extant literature. Additionally, it provides important insights into the potential mechanisms underlying the voter’s decision to sell her vote. Evidence for this dissertation is based on public opinion data from Mexico using a mixed-method approach composed of surveys, focus groups and in-depth interviews. The main hypothesis refers to the relationship between the structure of competition and the incidence of clientelism and vote-buying. Mexico represents a very useful scenario to study this hypothesis because it is politically decentralized at the state level and thus exhibits wide variation in political competition across subnational units while holding the national structural variables constant. The first part of this dissertation uses a national survey with state-level representativeness to assess the incidence of clientelism and vote-buying across different structures of competition and the types of goods used to buy votes. The main findings of suggest that the incidence of clientelism and vote-buying varies significantly across iv different structures of competition. Systems where two clientelistic parties compete exhibit higher levels of vote-selling than systems where there is a programmatic competitor, while multiparty systems of competition are associated to the highest incidence of clientelism and vote-selling overall. Additionally, the types of goods used to buy votes also vary across structures of competition. The second part of the dissertation uses evidence from list experiments to measure the amount of vote-buying that took place in Mexico’s past presidential election. List experiments are a survey instrument used to curtail desirability biases commonly associated to sensitive issues. Additionally, this section makes use of qualitative evidence to uncover the causal mechanisms leading voters to engage in vote-selling in the aforementioned election. The findings suggest that clientelism is very much a common practice in today’s Mexico. Moreover, the parties classified as more clientelistic made use of their local political machines to buy votes to benefit their respective candidates. Findings also indicate that perceiving no difference between competing parties and perceiving little or no benefit from a programmatic offer tend to make voters more clientelistic, ceteris paribus. Finally, the research also looks at potential inhibitors of clientelistic behavior, in particular, conditional cash programs and low-cost health benefits. Whereas conditional cash programs have the benefit of insulating their beneficiaries from clientelistic parties, affiliates of other types of entitlements are more susceptible to the implementation of each program and thus provide mixed results. v This dissertation is dedicated to Elda Mizuno García de la Cadena. Your courage, strength and kindness have been the greatest inspiration in my life. vi Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iv List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... x List of Figures .................................................................................................................... xi Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... xii 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 What Makes Voters Clientelistic? .......................................................................... 6 1.2 Structure of the Dissertation ................................................................................... 9 2. Theoretical Perspectives on the Study of Clientelism .................................................. 13 2.1 Relevance of the Study of Clientelism .................................................................. 13 2.2 The Demand and Supply Sides of Clientelism ..................................................... 15 2.3 Whom do Clientelistic Parties Target? ................................................................. 17 2.4 Monitoring and Compliance ................................................................................. 20 2.5 Vote-Buying, Turnout-Buying and Abstention-Buying ....................................... 22 2.6 The Impact of Competition on Clientelism .......................................................... 25 2.7 Programmatic versus Clientelistic Linkages ......................................................... 29 2.8 Why Parties Become Programmatic ..................................................................... 31 2.9 The Empirical Study of Clientelism ..................................................................... 33 2.9.1 Measuring Clientelism ..................................................................................... 33 2.9.2 Government Expenditures and Social Programs ............................................. 34 2.9.3 Operationalization and Main Findings ............................................................. 37 2.9.4 Elite Surveys and Public Opinion .................................................................... 43 vii 2.9.5 Curtailing Desirability Bias in Clientelism ...................................................... 49 3. The Determinants of Vote-Selling ................................................................................ 51 3.1 Mexico: Political Decentralization and Fiscal Liberty ......................................... 52 3.1.1 State-Level Elections ....................................................................................... 57 3.1.2 Fiscal Decentralization ..................................................................................... 62 3.2 Theory and Testable Hypotheses .......................................................................... 66 3.2.1 Willingness to Engage in Clientelism and Vote-Selling .................................. 70 3.2.2 Voter Reservation Prices .................................................................................. 74 3.2.3 The Demand Side of Clientelism and Vote-Buying ........................................ 74 3.3 Data and Methodology .......................................................................................... 75 3.3.1 Control Variables ............................................................................................. 81 3.4 Results: Likelihood to Sell the Vote ..................................................................... 86 3.4.1 Non-Parametric Estimations for Likelihood to Sell the Vote .......................... 91 3.5 Concluding Remarks ............................................................................................. 96 4. Voter Reservation Prices and the Structure of Political Competition ........................... 98 4.1 The Price of Votes ................................................................................................ 98 4.2 Results: Voter Reservation Prices ....................................................................... 107 4.2.1 Ascertaining the Effects of the Main Variables ............................................. 113 4.2.2 Non-Parametric Estimation: Voter Reservation Prices .................................. 120 4.3 Concluding Remarks ........................................................................................... 123 5. Why Voters Become Clientelistic ..............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • As If in a Foreign Country, Curated by Chris Sharp 9 SEP – 22 OCT 2016
    As if in a foreign country, curated by_Chris Sharp 9 SEP – 22 OCT 2016 Polly Apfelbaum (*1955 in Abington, Pennsylvania, lives and works in New York City) Lucas Arruda (*1983 in São Paulo, Brazil, lives and works in São Paulo) Michael Berryhill (*1972 in El Paso, Texas, lives and works in Brooklyn, New York) Juliette Blightman (*1980 London, lives and works in Berlin) Rodrigo Hernández (*1983 in Mexico City, lives and works in Paris) Ann Cathrin November Høibo (*1979 in Kristiansand, Norway, lives and works in Kristiansand) Sonia Leimer (*1977 in Meran, Italy, lives and works in Vienna) José Antonio Suárez Londoño (*1955 in Medellín, Colombia, lives and works in Medellín) Jimena Mendoza (*1979 in Mexico City, lives and works in Prague) Aliza Nisenbaum (*1977 in Mexico City, lives and works in New York City) Scott Olson (*1976 in New York City, lives and works in Kent, Ohio) Arlene Shechet (*1951 in New York City, lives and works in New York City) Patricia Treib (*1979 in Saginaw, Michigan, lives and works in New York City) As if in a foreign country is a group exhibition which approaches the idea of homage from a variety of perspectives: historically, geographically, culturally, architecturally, and perhaps most importantly, ironically. Playing with L.P. Hartley’s famous and much quoted opening sentence to The Go-Between (1953), "The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there,” the exhibition reverently collapses a number of assumptions, from the idea of the “past” to the notion of foreignness imbedded within the anachronistic designation “foreign country.” This happens through the fact that all of the artists featured here are working within a classically modernist tradition– a past that is still very much present– which they either idiosyncratically elaborate upon or hybridize with other indigenous and arts and crafts traditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Artists from Mexico and Latin America Abel Jiménez
    Emerging Artists from Mexico and Latin America Biography Notes Abel Jiménez Abel Jiménez was born in Oaxaca (Mexico) in 1955. He trained at La Esmeralda School of Arts under the guidance of professors Arturo Estrada and Arnold Belkin. His work has been shown in most galleries in Mexico City as well as in the United States, France, Argentina, Puerto Rico and Bolivia. Abel’s paintings have been seen in collective exhibitions alongside masters such as David Alfaro Siqueiros, José Clemente Orozco, Raúl Anguiano, Francisco Toledo, Feliciano Béjar or José Luis Cuevas. His work also features in private collections in Germany, Brazil, Italy, Spain, Japan, and Poland. Abel has been recognized as a member of the Mexican Plastic Arts Salon, where he has exhibited his work throughout the years. He is also a member of ARTAC, UNESCO’s International Association of Art. Alfonso Martí Alfonso Marti, an architect by training, was born in Guadalajara (Mexico) in 1973. From a very young age Alfonso felt attracted to the arts and, years later, he would choose this path: he studied both music and painting in Rome and Paris In France he had an exceptional start to his painting career when the Mayor of Paris inaugurated his first solo show, and pop singer and former Dali muse Amanda Lear became one of his collectors. Nowadays Alfonso lives in San Miguel de Allende (Mexico). His work has been shown in solo and collective exhibitions in Mexico, Miami, Rome and Paris. Through his art Alfonso seeks to reconcile age-old techniques used by classical painters with contemporary visual synthesis, while seeking to erase the line between art and life.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Inventory No. 208 Is the Official Listing of Plant Materials Accepted Into the U.S
    United States Department of Agriculture Plant Inventory Agricultural Research Service No. 208 Plant Materials Introduced in 1999 (Nos. 606708 - 612386) Foreword Plant Inventory No. 208 is the official listing of plant materials accepted into the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS) between January 1 and December 31, 1999 and includes PI 606708 to PI 612386. The NPGS is managed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS). The information on each accession is essentially the information provided with the plant material when it was obtained by the NPGS. The information on an accession in the NPGS database may change as additional knowledge is obtained. The Germplasm Resources Information Network (http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/index.html) is the database for the NPGS and should be consulted for the current accession and evaluation information and to request germplasm. While the USDA/ARS attempts to maintain accurate information on all NPGS accessions, it is not responsible for the quality of the information it has been provided. For questions about this volume, contact the USDA/ARS/National Germplasm Resources Laboratory/Database Management Unit: [email protected] The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA Office of Communications at (202) 720-2791. To file a complaint, write the Secretary of Agriculture, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A77-31? Ecj~1!
    POLICY ISSUES IN ADDESSING THE EMPOYMNT PROBLEM IN LATIN AERICA Peter Gregory University of Ne Mexico. j C506) a77-31? ecJ~1!. February, 1985 Submitted to the United States Agency for International Development in fulfillment of Order No. OTR-0091-0-00-4291-01 Policy Issues in Addressing the Employment Problem in Latin America Peter Gregory I. Introduction During the past fifteen years, a concern with "the employ­ nt problem" has emerged as one of the principal eoccupations of hemispheric governments. An increasing volume research and analyses of employment issues has made an ap­ arance, and many prescriptive measures have beeen proposed. wever, I believe it is fair to say that the empirical founda­ ons on which many of the prescriptive measures are based are t as firm as we would like, and the empirical testing of the fect of public policy initiatives on employment has not re­ ived the attention it deserves. Indeed, I would go a step :ther and hold that the conceptualization of the nature of the ?loyment problem is often faulty anC misleading, giving rise to Sguided.policy responses. In this paper, I propose to explore ! state of our current understanding of the employment problem I the impact that government policies and development strate­ -s have had on employment conditions in Latin America. I wish :ould promise a survey that is as informative as we would all <e. Unfortunately, this paper is limited in its approach to existing body of literature on the subject, a literature that ives much to be desired. To be sure, much has been written about "the employment problem," but much of that is based on casual empiricism or on inadequately tested theoretical con­ structs about economic relationships and their relevance for employment.
    [Show full text]