<<

Information in the HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE

Theoretical results about holes suggest that the universe could be like a gigantic hologram

By Jacob D. Bekenstein

Illustrations by Alfred T. Kamajian

COPYRIGHT 2003 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. Ask anybody what the physical world is made of, and you are likely to be told “ and energy.”

Yet if we have learned anything from engi- neering, biology and , is just as crucial an ingredient. The robot at the automobile factory is supplied with metal and plastic but can make nothing useful without copious instructions telling it which part to weld to what and so on. A ribosome in a cell in your body is supplied with amino acid building blocks and is powered by en- ergy released by the conversion of ATP to ADP, but it can synthesize no proteins with- out the information brought to it from the DNA in the cell’s nucleus. Likewise, a cen- tury of developments in physics has taught us that information is a crucial player in physical systems and processes. Indeed, a current trend, initiated by John A. Wheeler of Princeton University, is to regard the physical world as made of information, with energy and matter as incidentals. This viewpoint invites a new look at ven- erable questions. The information storage capacity of devices such as hard disk drives has been increasing by leaps and bounds. When will such progress halt? What is the ultimate information capacity of a device that weighs, say, less than a gram and can fit inside a cubic centimeter (roughly the size of a computer chip)? How much information

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 59 COPYRIGHT 2003 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. does it take to describe a whole universe? croscopic states that the com- Even when reduced to common units, Could that description fit in a computer’s posing a chunk of matter could be in however, typical values of the two en- memory? Could we, as William Blake while still looking like the same macro- tropies differ vastly in magnitude. A sili- memorably penned, “see the world in a scopic chunk of matter. For example, for con microchip carrying a gigabyte of grain of sand,” or is that idea no more the air in the room around you, one data, for instance, has a Shannon than poetic license? would count all the ways that the indi- of about 1010 bits (one byte is eight bits), Remarkably, recent developments in vidual gas molecules could be distributed tremendously smaller than the chip’s ther- answer some of these in the room and all the ways they could modynamic entropy, which is about 1023 questions, and the answers might be im- be moving. bits at room . This discrep- portant clues to the ultimate of re- When Shannon cast about for a way ancy occurs because the are ality. By studying the mysterious proper- to quantify the information contained in, computed for different degrees of free- ties of black holes, physicists have de- say, a message, he was led by logic to a dom. A degree of freedom is any quanti- duced absolute limits on how much formula with the same form as Boltz- ty that can vary, such as a coordinate information a region of or a quan- mann’s. The Shannon entropy of a mes- specifying a ’s location or one tity of matter and energy can hold. Relat- sage is the number of binary digits, or bits, component of its velocity. The Shannon ed results suggest that our universe, which needed to encode it. Shannon’s entropy entropy of the chip cares only about the we perceive to have three spatial dimen- does not enlighten us about the value of overall state of each tiny transistor etched sions, might instead be “written” on a information, which is highly dependent in the silicon crystal—the transistor is on two-dimensional surface, like a holo- on context. Yet as an objective measure or off; it is a 0 or a 1—a single binary de- gram. Our everyday perceptions of the of quantity of information, it has been gree of freedom. Thermodynamic en- world as three-dimensional would then enormously useful in and tech- tropy, in contrast, depends on the states be either a profound illusion or merely nology. For instance, the design of every of all the billions of atoms (and their one of two alternative ways of viewing re- modern communications device—from roaming ) that make up each ality. A grain of sand may not encompass cellular phones to modems to compact- transistor. As miniaturization brings clos- our world, but a flat screen might. disc players—relies on Shannon entropy. er the day when each atom will store one Thermodynamic entropy and Shan- bit of information for us, the useful Shan- A Tale of Two Entropies non entropy are conceptually equivalent: non entropy of the state-of-the-art mi- FORMAL orig- the number of arrangements that are crochip will edge closer in magnitude to inated in seminal 1948 papers by Ameri- counted by Boltzmann entropy reflects its material’s thermodynamic entropy. can applied mathematician Claude E. the amount of Shannon information one When the two entropies are calculated for Shannon, who introduced today’s most would need to implement any particular the same degrees of freedom, they are widely used measure of information con- arrangement. The two entropies have two equal. tent: entropy. Entropy had long been a salient differences, though. First, the ther- What are the ultimate degrees of free- central concept of , the modynamic entropy used by a chemist or dom? Atoms, after all, are made of elec- branch of physics dealing with heat. Ther- a refrigeration engineer is expressed in trons and nuclei, nuclei are agglomera- modynamic entropy is popularly de- units of energy divided by temperature, tions of protons and , and those scribed as the disorder in a physical sys- whereas the Shannon entropy used by a in turn are composed of . Many tem. In 1877 Austrian physicist Ludwig communications engineer is in bits, es- physicists today consider electrons and Boltzmann characterized it more precise- sentially dimensionless. That difference is quarks to be excitations of superstrings, ly in terms of the number of distinct mi- merely a matter of convention. which they hypothesize to be the most fundamental entities. But the vicissitudes of a century of revelations in physics warn Overview/The World as a Hologram us not to be dogmatic. There could be ■ An astonishing theory called the holds that the universe more levels of structure in our universe is like a hologram: just as a trick of allows a fully three-dimensional image than are dreamt of in today’s physics. to be recorded on a flat piece of film, our seemingly three-dimensional universe One cannot calculate the ultimate in- could be completely equivalent to alternative quantum fields and physical laws formation capacity of a chunk of matter “painted” on a distant, vast surface. or, equivalently, its true thermodynamic ■ The physics of black holes—immensely dense concentrations of —provides entropy, without knowing the of a hint that the principle might be true. Studies of black holes show that, although the ultimate constituents of matter or of it defies common sense, the maximum entropy or of any the deepest level of structure, which I region of space is defined not by its volume but by its surface area. shall refer to as level X. (This ambiguity ■ Physicists hope that this surprising finding is a clue to the ultimate theory of reality. causes no problems in analyzing practi- cal thermodynamics, such as that of car

60 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN AUGUST 2003 COPYRIGHT 2003 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. One Planck area horizon

pearing forever into a black hole, howev- er, a piece of matter does leave some traces. Its energy (we count any mass as energy in accordance with Einstein’s E = mc2) is permanently reflected in an incre- ment in the black hole’s mass. If the mat- ter is captured while circling the hole, its associated is added to the black hole’s angular momentum. Both the mass and angular momentum of a black hole are measurable from their ef- fects on around the hole. In this way, the laws of and angular momentum are upheld by black holes. Another fundamental law, the second law of thermodynamics, ap- pears to be violated. The second law of thermodynamics summarizes the familiar observation that One unit of entropy most processes in nature are irreversible: a teacup falls from the table and shatters, but no one has ever seen shards jump up THE ENTROPY OF A BLACK HOLE is proportional to the area of its , the surface within of their own accord and assemble into a which even light cannot escape the of the hole. Specifically, a hole with a horizon spanning teacup. The second law of thermody- A A Planck areas has ⁄4 units of entropy. (The Planck area, approximately 10–66 square centimeter, namics forbids such inverse processes. It is the fundamental quantum unit of area determined by the strength of gravity, the states that the entropy of an isolated phys- and the size of quanta.) Considered as information, it is as if the entropy were written on the ical system can never decrease; at best, en- event horizon, with each bit (each digital 1 or 0) corresponding to four Planck areas. tropy remains constant, and usually it in- creases. This law is central to physical engines, for example, because the quarks caused by the presence of matter and en- chemistry and engineering; it is arguably within the atoms can be ignored—they ergy. According to Einstein’s equations, a the physical law with the greatest impact do not change their states under the rel- sufficiently dense concentration of matter outside physics. atively benign conditions in the engine.) or energy will curve spacetime so ex- As first emphasized by Wheeler, when Given the dizzying progress in miniatur- tremely that it rends, forming a black matter disappears into a black hole, its en- ization, one can playfully contemplate a hole. The laws of relativity forbid any- tropy is gone for good, and the second day when quarks will serve to store in- thing that went into a black hole from law seems to be transcended, made irrel- formation, one bit apiece perhaps. How coming out again, at least within the clas- evant. A clue to resolving this puzzle came much information would then fit into our sical (nonquantum) description of the in 1970, when Demetrious Christodou- one-centimeter cube? And how much if physics. The point of no return, called the lou, then a graduate student of Wheeler’s we harness superstrings or even deeper, event horizon of the black hole, is of cru- at Princeton, and Stephen W. Hawking of yet undreamt of levels? Surprisingly, de- cial importance. In the simplest case, the the University of Cambridge indepen- velopments in gravitation physics in the horizon is a sphere, whose surface area is dently proved that in various processes, past three decades have supplied some larger for more massive black holes. such as black hole mergers, the total area clear answers to what seem to be elusive It is impossible to determine what is of the event horizons never decreases. The questions. inside a black hole. No detailed informa- analogy with the tendency of entropy to tion can emerge across the horizon and increase led me to propose in 1972 that a Black Hole Thermodynamics escape into the outside world. In disap- black hole has entropy proportional to A CENTRAL PLAYER in these develop- ments is the black hole. Black holes are a JACOB D. BEKENSTEIN has contributed to the foundation of black hole thermodynamics and consequence of , Albert to other aspects of the connections between information and gravitation. He is Polak Pro- Einstein’s 1915 geometric theory of grav- fessor of Theoretical Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, a member of the Israel itation. In this theory, gravitation arises Academy of Sciences and Humanities, and a recipient of the Rothschild Prize. Bekenstein from the curvature of spacetime, which dedicates this article to (his Ph.D. supervisor 30 years ago). Wheel-

makes objects move as if they were pulled THE AUTHOR er belongs to the third generation of ’s students: Wheeler’s Ph.D. advis- by a force. Conversely, the curvature is er, Karl Herzfeld, was a student of Boltzmann’s student Friedrich Hasenöhrl.

www.sciam.com SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 61 COPYRIGHT 2003 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. the area of its horizon [see illustration on known as , by a quan- be valid for any conceivable process that preceding page]. I conjectured that when tum process [see “The Quantum Me- black holes undergo. His deep argument matter falls into a black hole, the increase chanics of Black Holes,” by Stephen W. makes it clear that the entropy entering in black hole entropy always compensates Hawking; Scientific American, Janu- the GSL is that calculated down to level or overcompensates for the “lost” en- ary 1977]. The Christodoulou-Hawking X, whatever that level may be. tropy of the matter. More generally, the theorem fails in the face of this phenom- Hawking’s radiation process allowed sum of black hole entropies and the ordi- enon (the mass of the black hole, and him to determine the proportionality con- nary entropy outside the black holes can- therefore its horizon area, decreases), but stant between black hole entropy and not decrease. This is the generalized sec- the GSL copes with it: the entropy of the horizon area: black hole entropy is pre- ond law—GSL for short. emergent radiation more than compen- cisely one quarter of the event horizon’s The GSL has passed a large number of sates for the decrement in black hole en- area measured in Planck areas. (The stringent, if purely theoretical, tests. tropy, so the GSL is preserved. In 1986 , about 10–33 centimeter, is When a collapses to form a black Rafael D. Sorkin of Syracuse University the fundamental length scale related to hole, the black hole entropy greatly ex- exploited the horizon’s role in barring in- gravity and . The ceeds the star’s entropy. In 1974 Hawk- formation inside the black hole from in- Planck area is its square.) Even in ther- ing demonstrated that a black hole spon- fluencing affairs outside to show that the modynamic terms, this is a vast quantity taneously emits , now GSL (or something very similar to it) must of entropy. The entropy of a black hole LIMITS ON INFORMATION

Surface area A Black hole a THE THERMODYNAMICS OF BLACK HOLES allows one to deduce limits on the density of entropy or information in various circumstances. The holographic bound defines how much information can be contained in a specified region of space. It can be derived by considering a roughly spherical distribution of matter that is contained within a surface of area A. The matter is induced to collapse to form a black hole (a). The black hole’s area must be A b Mass m is sucked into smaller than A, so its entropy must be less than ⁄4 black hole [see illustration on preceding page]. Because entropy Diameter d cannot decrease, one infers that the original distrib- A ution of matter also must carry less than ⁄4 units of entropy or information. This result—that the maximum information content of a region of space is fixed by its area—defies the commonsense expectation that the capacity of a region should depend on its volume. Mass M Mass M + m The universal entropy bound defines how much information can be carried by a mass m of diameter d. c It is derived by imagining that a capsule of matter is 1070 engulfed by a black hole not much wider than it (b). The 60 10 Holographic bound increase in the black hole’s size places a limit on how much entropy the capsule could have contained. This 1050 Universal entropy bound limit is tighter than the holographic bound, except 40 (for an object with 10 density of water) when the capsule is almost as dense as a black hole 1030 (in which case the two bounds are equivalent). Liter of water The holographic and universal information bounds 1020 (thermodynamic entropy)

are far beyond the data storage capacities of any ) Internet 1010 Library of current technology, and they greatly exceed the Human graph Information Capacity (bits) Capacity Information Congress chromosome Music CD density of information on chromosomes and the 1 10– 4 0.011 100 104 106 108 thermodynamic entropy of water (c). —J.D.B. Size (centimeters) LAURIE GRACE (

62 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN AUGUST 2003 COPYRIGHT 2003 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. THE INFORMATION CONTENT of a pile of computer chips increases in proportion with the number of chips or, equivalently, the volume they occupy. That simple rule must break down for a large enough pile of chips because eventually the information would exceed the holographic bound, which depends on the surface area, not the volume. The “breakdown” occurs when the immense pile of chips collapses to form a black hole.

one centimeter in diameter would be therefore independent of the constitution increase the mass and surface area of the about 1066 bits, roughly equal to the ther- of the system or of the nature of level X. black hole in a way that would continue modynamic entropy of a cube of water 10 It just depends on the GSL. to preserve the GSL. billion kilometers on a side. We can now answer some of those elu- This surprising result—that informa- sive questions about the ultimate limits of tion capacity depends on surface area— The World as a Hologram information storage. A device measuring has a natural explanation if the holo- THE GSL ALLOWS US to set bounds on a centimeter across could in principle hold graphic principle (proposed in 1993 by the information capacity of any isolated up to 1066 bits—a mind-boggling amount. Nobelist Gerard ’t Hooft of the Univer- physical system, limits that refer to the in- The visible universe contains at least 10100 sity of Utrecht in the Netherlands and formation at all levels of structure down bits of entropy, which could in principle elaborated by Susskind) is true. In the to level X. In 1980 I began studying the be packed inside a sphere a tenth of a everyday world, a hologram is a special first such bound, called the universal en- light-year across. Estimating the entropy kind of photograph that generates a full tropy bound, which limits how much en- of the universe is a difficult problem, how- three-dimensional image when it is illu- tropy can be carried by a specified mass ever, and much larger numbers, requiring minated in the right manner. All the in- of a specified size [see box on opposite a sphere almost as big as the universe it- formation describing the 3-D scene is en- page]. A related idea, the holographic self, are entirely plausible. coded into the pattern of light and dark bound, was devised in 1995 by Leonard But it is another aspect of the holo- areas on the two-dimensional piece of Susskind of Stanford University. It lim- graphic bound that is truly astonishing. film, ready to be regenerated. The holo- its how much entropy can be contained Namely, that the maximum possible en- graphic principle contends that an ana- in matter and energy occupying a speci- tropy depends on the boundary area in- logue of this visual applies to the fied volume of space. stead of the volume. Imagine that we are full physical description of any system oc- In his work on the holographic bound, piling up computer memory chips in a big cupying a 3-D region: it proposes that an- Susskind considered any approximately heap. The number of transistors—the to- other physical theory defined only on the spherical isolated mass that is not itself a tal data storage capacity—increases with 2-D boundary of the region completely black hole and that fits inside a closed sur- the volume of the heap. So, too, does the describes the 3-D physics. If a 3-D system face of area A. If the mass can collapse to total thermodynamic entropy of all the can be fully described by a physical theo- a black hole, that hole will end up with a chips. Remarkably, though, the theoreti- ry operating solely on its 2-D boundary, horizon area smaller than A. The black cal ultimate information capacity of the one would expect the information con- A hole entropy is therefore smaller than ⁄ 4. space occupied by the heap increases only tent of the system not to exceed that of the According to the GSL, the entropy of the with the surface area. Because volume in- description on the boundary. system cannot decrease, so the mass’s creases more rapidly than surface area, at original entropy cannot have been bigger some point the entropy of all the chips A Universe Painted A than ⁄ 4. It follows that the entropy of an would exceed the holographic bound. It on Its Boundary isolated physical system with boundary would seem that either the GSL or our CAN WE APPLY the holographic prin- A area A is necessarily less than ⁄ 4. What if commonsense ideas of entropy and infor- ciple to the universe at large? The real the mass does not spontaneously col- mation capacity must fail. In fact, what universe is a 4-D system: it has volume lapse? In 2000 I showed that a tiny black fails is the pile itself: it would collapse un- and extends in . If the physics of our hole can be used to convert the system to der its own gravity and form a black hole universe is holographic, there would be a black hole not much different from the before that impasse was reached. There- an alternative set of physical laws, oper- one in Susskind’s argument. The bound is after each additional memory chip would ating on a 3-D boundary of spacetime

www.sciam.com SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 63 COPYRIGHT 2003 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. A HOLOGRAPHIC SPACETIME

TWO UNIVERSES of different dimension and 4-Dimensional flat spacetime obeying disparate physical laws are rendered 5-Dimensional anti–de Sitter spacetime (hologram) completely equivalent by the holographic Superstrings principle. Theorists have demonstrated this principle mathematically for a specific type of five-dimensional spacetime (“anti–de Sitter”) and its four-dimensional boundary. In effect, the Black hole 5-D universe is recorded like a hologram on the 4-D surface at its periphery. rules in the 5-D spacetime, but a so-called conformal theory of point particles operates on the 4-D hologram. A black hole in the 5-D spacetime is equivalent to hot radiation on the hologram—for example, the hole and the radiation have the same entropy even though the physical origin of the entropy is completely different for each case. Although these two descriptions of the universe seem utterly unalike, no experiment could distinguish between them, even in principle. —J.D.B. Conformal fields Hot radiation somewhere, that would be equivalent to Using anti–de Sitter spacetime, the- whelming “commonsense” prejudice in our known 4-D physics. We do not yet orists have devised a concrete example favor of one description or another, in know of any such 3-D theory that works of the holographic principle at work: a just the way that our brains construct an in that way. Indeed, what surface should universe described by superstring theory innate perception that our universe has we use as the boundary of the universe? functioning in an anti–de Sitter space- three spatial dimensions; see the illustra- One step toward realizing these ideas is time is completely equivalent to a quan- tion on the opposite page.) to study models that are simpler than our tum field theory operating on the bound- The holographic equivalence can al- real universe. ary of that spacetime [see box above]. low a difficult calculation in the 4-D A class of concrete examples of the Thus, the full majesty of superstring the- boundary spacetime, such as the behavior holographic principle at work involves ory in an anti–de Sitter universe is paint- of quarks and gluons, to be traded for an- so-called anti–de Sitter . The ed on the boundary of the universe. Juan other, easier calculation in the highly sym- original de Sitter spacetime is a model uni- Maldacena, then at Harvard University, metric, 5-D anti–de Sitter spacetime. The verse first obtained by Dutch astronomer first conjectured such a relation in 1997 correspondence works the other way, in 1917 as a solution of for the 5-D anti–de Sitter case, and it was too. Witten has shown that a black hole Einstein’s equations, including the repul- later confirmed for many situations by in anti–de Sitter spacetime corresponds to sive force known as the cosmological con- of the Institute for Ad- hot radiation in the alternative physics stant. De Sitter’s spacetime is empty, ex- vanced Study in Princeton, N.J., and operating on the bounding spacetime. pands at an accelerating rate and is very Steven S. Gubser, Igor R. Klebanov and The entropy of the hole—a deeply myste- highly symmetrical. In 1997 astronomers Alexander M. Polyakov of Princeton rious concept—equals the radiation’s en- studying distant University. Examples of this holograph- tropy, which is quite mundane. concluded that our universe now expands ic correspondence are now known for in an accelerated fashion and will proba- spacetimes with a variety of dimensions. The Expanding Universe bly become increasingly like a de Sitter This result means that two ostensibly HIGHLY SYMMETRIC and empty, the spacetime in the future. Now, if the re- very different —not even acting 5-D anti–de Sitter universe is hardly like pulsion in Einstein’s equations is changed in of the same dimension—are our universe existing in 4-D, filled with to attraction, de Sitter’s solution turns equivalent. Creatures living in one of these matter and radiation, and riddled with vi- into the anti–de Sitter spacetime, which universes would be incapable of deter- olent events. Even if we approximate our has equally as much symmetry. More im- mining if they inhabited a 5-D universe real universe with one that has matter and portant for the holographic concept, it described by theory or a 4-D one radiation spread uniformly throughout, possesses a boundary, which is located described by a quantum field theory of we get not an anti–de Sitter universe but “at infinity” and is a lot like our everyday point particles. (Of course, the structures rather a “Friedmann-Robertson-Walker” spacetime. of their brains might give them an over- universe. Most cosmologists today concur

64 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN AUGUST 2003 COPYRIGHT 2003 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. that our universe resembles an FRW uni- ally fail, whereas Bousso’s bound con- theory also embraces an infinite number verse, one that is infinite, has no boundary tinues to hold. Bousso has also shown of degrees of freedom. re- and will go on expanding ad infinitum. that his strategy can be used to locate the stricts the number of degrees of freedom Does such a universe conform to the 2-D surfaces on which holograms of the that can be present inside a bounding holographic principle or the holographic world can be set up. surface to a finite number; field theory bound? Susskind’s argument based on with its infinity cannot be the final story. collapse to a black hole is of no help here. Augurs of a Revolution Furthermore, even if the infinity is tamed, Indeed, the holographic bound deduced RESEARCHERS HAVE proposed many the mysterious dependence of informa- from black holes must break down in a other entropy bounds. The proliferation tion on surface area must be somehow uniform expanding universe. The entropy of variations on the holographic motif accommodated. of a region uniformly filled with matter makes it clear that the subject has not yet Holography may be a guide to a better and radiation is truly proportional to its reached the status of physical law. But theory. What is the fundamental theory volume. A sufficiently large region will although the holographic way of think- like? The chain of reasoning involving therefore violate the holographic bound. ing is not yet fully understood, it seems holography suggests to some, notably Lee In 1999 , then at Stan- to be here to stay. And with it comes a Smolin of the Perimeter Institute for The- ford, proposed a modified holographic realization that the fundamental belief, oretical Physics in Waterloo, that such a fi- bound, which has since been found to prevalent for 50 years, that field theory nal theory must be concerned not with work even in situations where the bounds is the ultimate language of physics must fields, not even with spacetime, but rather we discussed earlier cannot be applied. give way. Fields, such as the electromag- with information exchange among physi- Bousso’s formulation starts with any suit- netic field, vary continuously from point cal processes. If so, the vision of informa- able 2-D surface; it may be closed like a to point, and they thereby describe an in- tion as the stuff the world is made of will sphere or open like a sheet of paper. One finity of degrees of freedom. Superstring have found a worthy embodiment. then imagines a brief burst of light issuing simultaneously and perpendicularly from all over one side of the surface. The only demand is that the imaginary light rays are converging to start with. Light emit- ted from the inner surface of a spherical shell, for instance, satisfies that require- ment. One then considers the entropy of the matter and radiation that these imag- inary rays traverse, up to the points where they start crossing. Bousso conjectured that this entropy cannot exceed the en- tropy represented by the initial surface— one quarter of its area, measured in Planck areas. This is a different way of tal- lying up the entropy than that used in the original holographic bound. Bousso’s bound refers not to the entropy of a re- OUR INNATE PERCEPTION gion at one time but rather to the sum of that the world is three- entropies of locales at a variety of : dimensional could be an those that are “illuminated” by the light extraordinary illusion. burst from the surface. Bousso’s bound subsumes other en- tropy bounds while avoiding their limi- tations. Both the universal entropy bound and the ’t Hooft-Susskind form of MORE TO EXPLORE the holographic bound can be deduced Black Hole Thermodynamics. Jacob D. Bekenstein in Physics Today, Vol. 33, No. 1, from Bousso’s for any isolated system pages 24–31; January 1980. that is not evolving rapidly and whose Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein’s Outrageous Legacy. Kip S. Thorne. W. W. Norton, 1995. gravitational field is not strong. When Black Holes and the Information Paradox. in Scientific American, Vol. 276, these conditions are overstepped—as for No. 4, pages 52–57; April 1997. a collapsing sphere of matter already in- The Universe in a Nutshell. . Bantam Books, 2001. side a black hole—these bounds eventu- Three Roads to . . Basic Books, 2002.

www.sciam.com SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 65 COPYRIGHT 2003 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC.