DOCSLIB.ORG

The Biomedicalisation of Smoking Cessation: a Mixed Methods Study of Lay Perspectives on Nicotine Addiction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Biomedicalisation of Smoking Cessation: a Mixed Methods Study of Lay Perspectives on Nicotine Addiction The biomedicalisation of smoking cessation: A mixed methods study of lay perspectives on nicotine addiction Kylie Morphett BA (Hons), BPsych (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2016 School of Medicine i Abstract Biomedical models of addiction are becoming increasingly prevalent in public discourse about cigarette smoking, however there is some concern that smoking is becoming overly medicalised. Neuroscience research has revealed that nicotine use is associated with long- lasting changes in the brain, and these findings are being presented in the media and in advertising campaigns for smoking cessation pharmacotherapies. The “brain disease model of addiction”, which posits that chronic drug use leads to long-term changes in brain networks that make it very difficult to quit, is increasingly being applied to tobacco dependence. This is controversial in the tobacco control field, where population-based strategies have been successful in reducing the prevalence of smoking. Proponents of a biomedical model of tobacco dependence believe that it will lead to increased treatment seeking, more efficacious treatments, and a reduction in stigma. Critics of a biomedical model of nicotine addiction have expressed concerns that it will reduce individual responsibility for smoking, increase stigma, and undermine individuals’ beliefs in their ability to quit. While these competing views on the impacts of biomedical models of addiction have been debated in the academic literature, it is unknown to what extent members of the public endorse a biomedical model of tobacco dependence, and have incorporated it into their everyday understandings of smoking. This research examined the influence of biomedical discourses of smoking on lay beliefs of Australian smokers and non-smokers about tobacco dependence and its treatment. It also explored daily smokers’ attitudes to the labelling of nicotine addiction as a “brain disease.” A mixed methods approach was used to ascertain the extent to which biomedical understandings of smoking have been incorporated into lay discourse on smoking and quitting; how Australian smokers understand nicotine addiction and the role of the brain; and how endorsement of the brain disease model of addiction may be related to smokers’ attitudes towards smoking cessation and preferences for quitting methods. The thesis is comprised of three studies. Firstly, a secondary analysis of data from interviews with 55 members of the general public, including never smokers, ex-smokers and current smokers. The data was analysed to ascertain public attitudes on the best methods for quitting smoking. Results revealed that while cessation medications were frequently described as a helpful means to quit, the role of willpower, choice, and motivation were seen as central. ii Medications were often described as a “second line of defence”, or as aids to be used alongside counselling or behavioural strategies. A second qualitative study involved in-depth interviews with 29 daily smokers about their views on smoking cessation and their understanding of the role of the brain in smoking. The results revealed positive attitudes to quitting without assistance. Cessation medications were not perceived as magic bullets, and willpower and personal responsibility were emphasised. While many smokers were aware that smoking affected their brain, few agreed it was a brain disease. Participants expressed concerns that biomedical understandings of smoking could increase the stigma of smoking, diminish personal responsibility for cessation, and deter smokers from seeking treatment. These qualitative results informed the design of a quantitative survey completed by 1538 Australian smokers. This survey examined endorsement of neurobiological explanations of smoking, and their relationship to self-efficacy and treatment preferences. Approximately one third of participants agreed that smoking was a brain disease and more than half agreed that smoking changes the chemistry of the brain. Endorsement of the brain disease label, and agreement that smoking changes the chemistry of the brain, were associated with greater intention to use cessation medications. However the effect sizes were small, suggesting that beliefs about smoking and the brain may have modest real world impact. Contrary to the claim that promotion of brain-based explanations of smoking will increase feelings of fatalism, this survey shows that agreement with the claim that smoking is a brain disease was associated with higher self-efficacy. A medical, or chronic disease, model that emphasises the role of neurochemistry in tobacco dependence, while becoming more dominant in academic discourse, was not accepted by most Australian smokers. Concerns about negative consequences of describing smoking in this way, and wariness about the motives behind public health anti-smoking campaigns, were reasons behind this rejection. Consistent with existing literature on lay understandings of health and illness, alternatives discourses that describe it as a matter of willpower, choice, and a habit, remain strongly rooted in public dialogue about smoking. This means that smokers are unlikely to see the terminology of smoking as a “brain disease” positively. However, smokers were interested in information about the effects of smoking on the brain, and further research should investigate constructive ways of presenting this information in health promotion material and iii clinical interactions. Biomedical explanations of smoking should acknowledge the agency of individuals and the complexity of addiction to cigarettes in order to be believable and acceptable to smokers. iv Declaration by author This thesis is composed of my original work, and contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference has been made in the text. I have clearly stated the contribution by others to jointly-authored works that I have included in my thesis. I have clearly stated the contribution of others to my thesis as a whole, including statistical assistance, survey design, data analysis, significant technical procedures, professional editorial advice, and any other original research work used or reported in my thesis. The content of my thesis is the result of work I have carried out since the commencement of my research higher degree candidature and does not include a substantial part of work that has been submitted to qualify for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution. I have clearly stated which parts of my thesis, if any, have been submitted to qualify for another award. I acknowledge that an electronic copy of my thesis must be lodged with the University Library and, subject to the policy and procedures of The University of Queensland, the thesis be made available for research and study in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 unless a period of embargo has been approved by the Dean of the Graduate School. I acknowledge that copyright of all material contained in my thesis resides with the copyright holder(s) of that material. Where appropriate I have obtained copyright permission from the copyright holder to reproduce material in this thesis. v Publications during candidature Peer-reviewed papers Morphett, K., Lucke, J., Gartner, C. E., Carter, A., Meurk, C., & Hall, W. (2013). Public attitudes toward the treatment of nicotine addiction. Nicotine and Tobacco Research.15(9), 1617-1622. Meurk, C., Hall, W., Morphett, K., Carter, A., & Lucke, J. (2013). What does 'acceptance' mean? Public reflections on the idea that addiction is a brain disease. BioSocieties, 8(4), 491-506. Meurk, C., Partridge, B., Carter, A., Hall, W., Morphett, K., & Lucke, J. (2014). Public attitudes in Australia towards the claim that addiction is a (brain) disease. Drug and Alcohol Review, 33(3), 272-279. Morphett, K., Partridge, B., Gartner, C., Carter, A., & Hall, W. (2015). Why Don’t Smokers Want Help to Quit? A Qualitative Study of Smokers’ Attitudes towards Assisted vs. Unassisted Quitting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(6), 6591. Morphett, K., Carter, A., Hall, W., & Gartner, C. (2016). A qualitative study of smokers views on brain-based explanations of tobacco dependence. International Journal of Drug Policy, 29, 41-48. Meurk, C., Morphett, K., Carter, A., Weier, M., Lucke, J., & Hall, W. (2016) Scepticism and hope in a complex predicament: people with addictions deliberate about neuroscience. International Journal of Drug Policy. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.03.004 Open-Peer Commentary vi Morphett, K., & Meurk, C. (2013). The “Brain Disease” Concept in Addiction: A Cause for Ambivalence, Not Concern. AJOB Neuroscience, 4(3), 48-50. Conference abstracts Morphett, K., Lucke, J., Gartner, C., Carter, A., Meurk, C., Hall, W., (2013). Public attitudes towards the treatment of nicotine addiction. Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT), Westin Waterfront Hotel, Boston, USA. 16 March 2013, [poster presentation – presenting author]. Morphett, K., Smokers Understandings of Nicotine Addiction: A Qualitative Study. Neuroethics Down Under. University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, 4 October 2013 [oral presentation – presenting author]. Morphett K., Gartner, C., Carter, A., Lucke, J, Partridge, B., Hall, W. Is smoking a brain disease? The attitudes of smokers towards a neurobiological conceptualisation of nicotine dependence. Symposium
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CLINICAL TRIALS Safety and Immunogenicity of a Nicotine Conjugate Vaccine in Current Smokers
    CLINICAL TRIALS Safety and immunogenicity of a nicotine conjugate vaccine in current smokers Immunotherapy is a novel potential treatment for nicotine addiction. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a nicotine conjugate vaccine, NicVAX, and its effects on smoking behavior. were recruited for a noncessation treatment study and assigned to 1 of 3 doses of the (68 ؍ Smokers (N nicotine vaccine (50, 100, or 200 ␮g) or placebo. They were injected on days 0, 28, 56, and 182 and monitored for a period of 38 weeks. Results showed that the nicotine vaccine was safe and well tolerated. Vaccine immunogenicity was dose-related (P < .001), with the highest dose eliciting antibody concentrations within the anticipated range of efficacy. There was no evidence of compensatory smoking or precipitation of nicotine withdrawal with the nicotine vaccine. The 30-day abstinence rate was significantly different across with the highest rate of abstinence occurring with 200 ␮g. The nicotine vaccine appears ,(02. ؍ the 4 doses (P to be a promising medication for tobacco dependence. (Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;78:456-67.) Dorothy K. Hatsukami, PhD, Stephen Rennard, MD, Douglas Jorenby, PhD, Michael Fiore, MD, MPH, Joseph Koopmeiners, Arjen de Vos, MD, PhD, Gary Horwith, MD, and Paul R. Pentel, MD Minneapolis, Minn, Omaha, Neb, Madison, Wis, and Rockville, Md Surveys show that, although about 41% of smokers apy, is about 25% on average.2 Moreover, these per- make a quit attempt each year, less than 5% of smokers centages most likely exaggerate the efficacy of are successful at remaining abstinent for 3 months to a intervention because these trials are typically composed year.1 Smokers seeking available behavioral and phar- of subjects who are highly motivated to quit and who macologic therapies can enhance successful quit rates are free of complicating diagnoses such as depression 2 by 2- to 3-fold over control conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Smoking, Environmental Pollution, and Weather Conditions Risk Factors for COVID-19? José Miguel Chatkin1a, Irma Godoy2a
    J Bras Pneumol. 2020;46(5):e20200183 https://dx.doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20200183 REVIEW ARTICLE Are smoking, environmental pollution, and weather conditions risk factors for COVID-19? José Miguel Chatkin1a, Irma Godoy2a 1. Departamento de Medicina Interna ABSTRACT e Pneumologia, Escola de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the highly contagious severe acute Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil. respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is probably systemic, has a major 2. Disciplina de Pneumologia, respiratory component, and is transmitted by person-to-person contact, via airborne Departamento de Clínica Médica, droplets or aerosols. In the respiratory tract, the virus begins to replicate within cells, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, after which the host starts shedding the virus. The individuals recognized as being at risk Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu (SP) Brasil. for an unfavorable COVID-19 outcome are those > 60 years of age, those with chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, those with hypertension, and those with chronic lung Submitted: 20 April 2020. diseases, as well as those using chemotherapy, corticosteroids, or biological agents. Accepted: 27 May 2020. Some studies have suggested that infection with SARS-CoV-2 is associated with other Study carried out at the Escola de risk factors, such as smoking, external environmental pollution, and certain climatic Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica conditions. The purpose of this narrative review was to perform a critical assessment of do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) the relationship between COVID-19 and these potential risk factors. and at the Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Keywords: Coronavirus infections; COVID-19; Air pollution; Smoking; Tobacco use Botucatu (SP) Brasil.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Cigarette Smoking Cessation in the United States
    Tobacco Control 1993; 2 (suppl): S3-S16 S3 SESSION I TRENDS IN CESSATION Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tc.2.suppl1.S4 on 1 January 1993. Downloaded from Introduction Saul Shiftman I'm happy to welcome you here on behalf of of the National Heart, Lung and Blood the Planning Committee. It's a pleasure to see Institute's Smoking Education Program, this actually happening after almost a year of whose job it is to translate findings from planning, and I'm looking forward to the next intervention research into community action day and a half. and education programmes; he was formerly We have 2454 days left until the year 2000, the director of smoking intervention with the at which point the national goals are to have a American Heart Association. smoking prevalence of 15%. We're now at Dr Ellen Gritz is a long-time colleague of roughly 25 %. Put another way, we are 81 % of mine, although I hesitate to remind her in the way to the year 2000 from 1964, the year of public that she and I first started working the first Surgeon General's report, and we together a little over 20 years ago in Los have cut smoking prevalence roughly by half. Angeles. She is certainly one of the leading So we're doing pretty well but still have a bit experts in smoking and smoking cessation, and further to go. has particular interests in smoking among In this morning's panel, we'll be discussing women and in special populations. where we're going and how we're going to get Our last panellist, Dr Patrick O'Malley is there in terms of smoking cessation.
    [Show full text]
  • Smoking Cessation: a Report of the Surgeon General – 2020
    A SUMMARY OF SMOKING CESSATION: A REPORT OF THE SURGEON GENERAL – 2020 Smoking Cessation – The Role of Healthcare Professionals and Health Systems Smoking in the U.S. Key Findings from the 2020 Since the first Surgeon General’s report on smoking and health was Surgeon General’s Report released in 1964, cigarette smoking among U.S. adults has declined from nearly 43% to a low of nearly 14% in 2018. Despite this progress, smoking ` Smoking cessation reduces risk for many adverse health remains the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the U.S. effects, including poor reproductive health outcomes, Additionally, smoking-related illnesses continue to cost the nation more cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary than $300 billion every year. disease (COPD), and cancer. Quitting smoking is also beneficial to those who have been diagnosed with heart Smoking Cessation Saves Lives disease and COPD. ` More than three out of five U.S. adults who have ever and Money smoked cigarettes have quit. Although a majority of cigarette smokers make a quit attempt each year, less Tobacco dependence is a chronic, relapsing condition driven by than one-third use cessation medications approved addiction to nicotine. But cessation treatment can help people quit. by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or The 2020 Surgeon General’s Report highlights the latest evidence on the behavioral counseling to support quit attempts. benefits of smoking cessation. The evidence is clear – one of the most important actions people can take to improve their health is to quit ` Considerable disparities exist in the prevalence of smoking, no matter how old they are or how long they’ve been smoking.
    [Show full text]
  • Smoking Cessation for Persons with Mental Illnesses
    Smoking Cessation for Persons with Mental Illnesses A Toolkit for Mental Health Providers Updated January 2009 Table of Contents Overview 1 Why Address This Issue? 1 2 Alarming Statistics 2 3 About this Toolkit: 2 Who is this toolkit for? How do I use this toolkit? 4 Provider Pull-Out: Quick Facts Tobacco Use and Mental Illness 1 Smoking and Mental Illness: 3 Biological Predispositions, Psychological Considerations, Social Considerations, Stigma 2 Specific Psychiatric and Co-occuring Mental Disorders: 4 Depression, Schizophrenia, Co-occuring Substance Abuse and Dependance, Other Psychiatric Disorders 3 Tobacco Industry Targeting 5 Assessment and Intervention Planning 1 Readiness to Quit and Stages of Change: 6 Stages of Change, The 5 A’s (Flowchart, Actions and Strategies), The 5 R’s (Addressing Tobacco Cessation for Tobacco User Unwilling to Quit) 2 Cultural Considerations: 12 Recommendations for Mental Health Clinicians, Resources 3 Example of a Clinic Screening 4 Example of a Quitline Referral Form 5 Provider Pull-Out: The 5A’s and 2A’s & R Models Smoking Cessation Treatment for Persons with Mental Illness 1 Key Findings 14 2 Components of Successful Intensive Intervention Programs 15 3 Behavioral Interventions for Smoking Cessation: 16 Overview, SANE program, More Elements of Successful Counseling 4 Prescribing Cessation Medications 18 5 Intervening with Specific Mental Disorders: 19 Depression, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Substance Use Disorders 6 Peer-to-Peer Services 21 7 Smoke-Free Policies 22 8 Provider
    [Show full text]
  • Building Capacity for Smoking Cessation and Treatment of Tobacco
    BUILDING CAPACITY FOR SMOKING Chapter 5 CESSATION AND TREATMENT OF TOBACCO DEPENDENCE Future needs for capacity-building Considerable progress has been made in the provision of effective treatments for tobacco dependence, both behavioural and pharmacological. For many years, behavioural interventions were the only option. Although a combination of behavioural and pharmacological treatment produces the best outcomes, behavioural treatments alone can also be effective. It is critically important that a wide range of interventions be used both in general to support tobacco cessation and specifically to support those who wish to quit tobacco use even where medication is not available (Lando, 2002). Social support for quitting should be possible in all countries, even those with extremely limited resources (Lando, 2002). Success has proved possible from training lay facilitators to conduct group cessation clinics. Abstinence outcomes for those clinics compare favourably with outcomes obtained by doctoral students in counselling psychology. According to the United States Clinical Practice Guideline (United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2000), both social support as part of treatment (intra-treatment social support) and help in securing social support outside of treatment (extra-treatment social support) are especially effective in increasing quitting. All countries have lay persons who can provide informal social support for quitting and who can be trained to conduct more formal interventions. There would appear to be special challenges in countries where there are relatively few ex-smokers and where tobacco prevalence rates are high among health professionals (Lando, 2002). Ex-smokers can serve as role models in encouraging quitting, and can provide social support to individuals who are attempting to quit.
    [Show full text]
  • A Teen Smoking Cessation Initial Study in Wuhan, China
    Addictive Behaviors 29 (2004) 1725–1733 Project EX — A teen smoking cessation initial study in Wuhan, China Hong Zhenga,*, Steve Sussmana, Xinguang Chena, Yuanhong Wangb, Jiang Xiab, Jie Gongb, Chunhong Liub, Jianguo Shanb, Jennifer Ungera, C. Anderson Johnsona aInstitute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research, University of Southern California, USA bCenters for Disease Control and Prevention of Wuhan, PR China Abstract The increasing smoking prevalence in China indicates a need for effective smoking cessation programs, yet, to our knowledge, no studies have evaluated the effects of smoking cessation programs among Chinese adolescents. A group of 46 10th-grade-level cigarette smokers from two schools in Wuhan, China, were provided with Project EX, an eight-session school-based clinic smoking cessation program developed in the United States. Efforts of translation of the Project EX curriculum, verification of translation, curriculum modification, and cultural adaptation were made to adapt the curriculum to the local culture. The 46 smokers represented 71% of all the self-reported 30-day smokers among 622 10th graders at these two schools. Only one student dropped out from the clinic program. Four-month follow-up data indicated a 10.5% 30-day quit rate and a 14.3% 7-day quit rate. The students who did not quit smoking reported a 16% reduction in daily cigarette consumption at posttest and a 33% reduction at 4-month follow-up. Use of a 2 1/2-week prebaseline-to-baseline clinic assessment indicated a clinic cohort nonassisted quit rate of 3%. These data provided evidence that Project EX can be adapted in another country, such as China; can be very well received; and can lead to promising results on cessation.
    [Show full text]
  • Smoking Cessation Workbook
    My Smoking Cessation Workbook My Smoking Cessation Workbook Acknowledgements The provider manual HIV Provider Smoking Cessation Handbook and the accompanying My Smoking Cessation Workbook were developed by the HIV and Smoking Cessation (HASC) Working Group of the Veterans Affairs Clinical Public Health (CPH). The authors primary goal was to develop materials promoting smoking cessation interventions, based on published principles of evidence- and consensus-based clinical practice, for use by HIV-care providers treating HIV+ patients who smoke. With permission from Dr. Miles McFall and Dr. Andrew Saxon, several materials used in these publications were modified from smoking cessation workbooks they developed for providers of patients with post traumatic stress disorder as part of the Smoking Cessation Project of the Northwest Network Mental Illness Research, Education & Clinical Center of Excellence in Substance Abuse Treatment and Education at the VA Puget Sound Health Care System. The Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline (Fiore, 2000) and the treatment model described by Richard Brown (2003) provided the foundation for their work and therefore indirectly ours as well.1 Many thanks to Kim Hamlett-Berry, Director of the Office of Public Health Policy and Prevention of CPH, for supporting this project; Hannah-Cohen Blair and Michelle Allen, research assistants, for their help organizing materials; and Leah Stockett for editing the manual and the workbook. As well, the HASC Working Group: Ann Labriola, Pam Belperio, Maggie Chartier, Tim Chen, Linda Allen, Mai Vu, Hannah Cohen-Blair, Jane Burgess, Maggie Czarnogorski, Scott Johns, and Kim Hamlett-Berry. 1 Brown, R. A. (2003). Intensive behavioral treatment. In D.
    [Show full text]
  • Part III: Training for Primary Care Providers: Brief Tobacco Interventions; Part IV: Training for Future Trainers: Applying Adult Education Skills to Training
    WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Strengthening health systems for treating tobacco dependence in primary care. Contents: Part I: Training for policy-makers: developing and implementing health systems policy to improve the delivery of brief tobacco interventions; Part II: Training for primary care service managers: planning and implementing system changes to support the delivery of brief tobacco interventions; Part III: Training for primary care providers: brief tobacco interventions; Part IV: Training for future trainers: applying adult education skills to training. 1.Tobacco use disorder - prevention and control. 2.Smoking - prevention and control. 3.Smoking cessation. 4.Primary health care. 5.Delivery of health care. 6.Capacity building. 7.Teaching materials. I.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 150541 3 (NLM classification: HD 9130.6) © World Health Organization 2013 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO web site (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications –whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution– should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO web site (www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • How Can I Quit Smoking? (PDF)
    ANSWERS Lifestyle + Risk Reduction by heart Smoking How Can I Quit Smoking? Smoking harms almost every tissue and organ in the body, including your heart and blood vessels. Nicotine, one of the main chemicals in cigarettes, causes your heart to beat faster and your blood pressure to rise. Carbon monoxide from smoking also gets into the blood and robs your body of oxygen. Nonsmokers who are exposed to secondhand smoke are also harmed. If you smoke or vape, you have good reason to worry about its effect on your health and the health of your loved ones and others. Deciding to quit is a big step. Following through is just as important. Quitting tobacco and nicotine addiction isn’t easy, but others have done it, and you can, too. Is it too late to quit smoking or vaping? quit. Some are: It’s never too late to quit. Quitting smoking has both short- • Stopping all at once on your Quit Day. term and long-term benefits for lowering your cardiovascular • Cutting down the number of cigarettes per day or risk. No matter how much or how long you’ve smoked when how many times you vape until you stop completely. you quit, your risk of heart disease and stroke starts to drop. • Smoking only part of each cigarette. If you use this People who quit smoking generally live longer than people method, you need to count how many puffs you take who continue to smoke. from each cigarette and reduce the number every While you may crave tobacco or nicotine after quitting, most two to three days.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hidden Epidemic: Tobacco Use and Mental Illness
    1724 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20036 | T 202 454 5555 | F 202 454 5599 | legacyforhealth.org 80220_Cover.indd 3 6/21/11 9:03 AM 80220_Cover.indd 4 6/21/11 9:03 AM A Hidden Epidemic: Tobacco Use and Mental Illness June 2011 80220_book.indd 1 6/21/11 12:40 AM Legacy’s Commitment to Dissemination Legacy® is a national non-profit committed to helping Americans live longer, healthier lives. Its mission is to build a world where young people reject tobacco and anyone can quit. To further this mission, Legacy has engaged in a comprehensive dissemination effort to share lessons learned from the replicable, sustainable tobacco control projects that were implemented across the nation with the assistance of past Legacy funding. In response to the recent financial downturn and to maximize the impact of limited funds, Legacy has shifted its efforts to focus mostly on population-based strategies and suspended its competitive grant-making programs. Legacy no longer solicits or accepts competitive funding requests and all existing grants will be phased out by 2012. A Hidden Epidemic: Tobacco Use and Mental Illness is the tenth publication in Legacy’s dissemination series. This publication seeks to call attention to the issue of the high prevalence of tobacco use and nicotine dependence among people with mental illnesses and to highlight barriers to effective tobacco-cessation efforts to help people with mental illnesses quit. This publication also features examples of five projects that demonstrate how organizations across America are addressing tobacco-related disparities faced by people with mental illnesses.
    [Show full text]
  • My Tobacco Cessation Workbook
    My Tobacco Cessation Workbook A Resource for Veterans This page intentionally left blank. My Tobacco Cessation Workbook A Resource for Veterans Acknowledgements The provider manual Primary Care & Tobacco Cessation and the accompanying My Tobacco Cessation Workbook were developed by Julianne Himstreet, Pharm.D., BCPS. The author’s primary goal was to develop materials promoting tobacco cessation interventions, based on published principles of evidence- and consensus-based clinical practice, for use by primary care providers treating patients who use tobacco. With permission from the HIV and Smoking Cessation (HASC) Working Group, several materials used in the Primary Care & Tobacco Cessation provider manual were modified from HIV Provider Smoking Cessation Handbook. The U.S. Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline (Fiore, 2000) and the treatment model described by Richard Brown (2003) provided the foundation for their work and therefore indirectly ours as well.1 Many thanks to Kim Hamlett-Berry, Director of Tobacco & Health Policy in Clinical Public Health, Office of Public Health, for supporting this project and Leah Stockett for editing the manual and the workbook. In addition, much appreciation needs to be given to Dana Christofferson, Kim Hamlett-Berry, Pam Belperio, and Tim Chen for their editing and content contributions.1 1 Brown, R. A. (2003). Intensive behavioral treatment. In D. B. Abrams, R. Niaura, R. Brown, K. M. Emmons, M. G. Goldstein, & P. M. Monti, The tobacco dependence treatment handbook: A guide to best practices (pp. 118-177). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Fiore, M. C., Bailey, W. C., Cohen, S. J., Dorfman, S. F., Goldstein, M. G., Gritz, E.
    [Show full text]