Letter from William Penn, Proprietary Governor of Pennsylvania, Advertising for British Migration to Pennsylvania (London, 1683) by John Mcnamara
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY REPORTER Vol. 61 No. 42 10/15/2020 4 ESTATE and TRUST NOTICES FIRST PUBLICATION COMPTON, ANN LOUISE, Dec'd
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY REPORTER Vol. 61 No. 42 10/15/2020 ESTATE AND TRUST NOTICES Attorneys: Goudsouzian & Asso- Notice is hereby given that, in the ciates, 2940 William Penn estates of the decedents set forth Highway, Easton, PA 18045- below, the Register of Wills has 5227 granted letters testamentary or of MONTAGUE, MARJORIE R., administration to the persons named. dec’d. Notice is also hereby given of the Late of Northampton, Northamp- existence of the trusts of the deceased ton County, PA settlors set forth below for whom no Executrix: Erin L. Green c/o personal representatives have been appointed within 90 days of death. Robert B. Roth, Esquire, The All persons having claims or demands Roth Law Firm, 123 North Fifth against said estates or trusts are Street, Allentown, PA 18102 requested to make known the same, Attorneys: Robert B. Roth, and all persons indebted to said Esquire, The Roth Law Firm, 123 estates or trusts are requested to North Fifth Street, Allentown, PA make payment, without delay, to the 18102 executors or administrators or MOYER, SHARON L., dec’d. trustees or to their attorneys named Late of the Township of Moore, below. Northampton County, PA FIRST PUBLICATION Administrator: James Vernon COMPTON, ANN LOUISE, dec’d. Moyer c/o Daniel E. Cohen, Late of Palmer Township, North- Attorney, Hof & Reid, LLC, 3101 ampton County, PA Emrick Blvd., Suite 205, Co-Executrix: Patricia Stout c/o Bethlehem, PA 18020 Michael D. Recchiuti, Esquire, Attorneys: Daniel E. Cohen, 60 W. Broad Street, Suite 303, Attorney, Hof & Reid, LLC, 3101 Bethlehem, PA 18018 Emrick Blvd., Suite 205, Attorney: Michael D. -
Philadelphia County One of the Three Original Counties Created by William
Philadelphia County One of the three original counties created by William Penn in November 1682, and its name to him signified “brotherly love,” although the original Philadelphia in Asia Minor was actually “the city of Philadelphus.” Philadelphia was laid out in 1682 as the county seat and the capital of the Province; it was chartered as a city on October 25, 1701, and rechartered on March 11, 1789. On February 2, 1854, all municipalities within the county were consolidated with the city. The county offices were merged with the city government in 1952. Swedes and Finns first settled within the county in 1638. Dutch seized the area in 1655, but permanently lost control to England in 1674. Penn’s charter for Pennsylvania was received from the English king in 1681, and was followed by Penn’s November 1682 division of Pennsylvania into three counties. The City of Philadelphia merged (and became synonymous) with Philadelphia County in 1854. Thomas Holme made the physical plan for the City, and the Northern Liberties were designated to give urban lots to all who purchased 5,000 rural acres in Pennsylvania. The City had eighty families in 1683, 4,500 inhabitants in 1699, 10,000 in 1720, 23,700 in 1774. Philadelphia was economically the strongest city in America until surpassed by New York City in population in 1820 and in commerce by about 1830, although Philadelphia was strongest in manufacturing until the early twentieth century. It led the nation in textiles, shoes, shipbuilding, locomotives, and machinery. Leadership in transportation, both as a depot and a center for capital funding, was another Philadelphia attribute. -
William Penn's Experiment in the Wilderness: Promise and Legend Author(S): J
William Penn's Experiment in the Wilderness: Promise and Legend Author(s): J. William Frost Source: The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. 107, No. 4 (Oct., 1983), pp. 577-605 Published by: The Historical Society of Pennsylvania Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20091808 Accessed: 17-05-2017 14:08 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20091808?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms The Historical Society of Pennsylvania is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography This content downloaded from 130.58.88.100 on Wed, 17 May 2017 14:08:26 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms William Penr?s Experiment in the Wilderness: Promise and hegend A T THE CLOSE of the American War for Independence, a group /% of Quaker whalers from the island of Nantucket, who had A JL experienced wartime deprivation because of English and American embargoes, determined to immigrate to a place where they could regain prosperity. -
English Settlement and Local Governance Mary Sarah Bilder Boston College Law School, [email protected]
Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Boston College Law School Faculty Papers 11-2008 English Settlement and Local Governance Mary Sarah Bilder Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Mary Sarah Bilder. "English Settlement and Local Governance." The Cambridge History of Law in America Volume 1: Early America (1580–1815), Cambridge University Press (2008): 63-103. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law School Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cambridge Histories Online http://universitypublishingonline.org/cambridge/histories/ The Cambridge History of Law in America Edited by Michael Grossberg, Christopher Tomlins Book DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521803052 Online ISBN: 9781139054171 Hardback ISBN: 9780521803052 Paperback ISBN: 9781107605053 Chapter 3 - English Settlement and Local Governance pp. 63-103 Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521803052.004 Cambridge University Press P1:JZP 9780521803052c03 CUFX175/Grossberg 978 0 521 80305 2 August 31, 2007 3:30 3 english settlement and local governance mary sarah bilder In late 1584, as Sir Walter Raleigh began to organize an effort to send settlers to Roanoke Island, an anonymous author asked, “What manner of geouernement is to be vsed and what offics to geouerne?”1 The mysterious end to the Roanoke settlement offers no answer. -
The Scandalous Indian Policy of William Penn's Sons: Deeds and Documents of the Walking Purchase
THE SCANDALOUS INDIAN POLICY OF WILLIAM PENN'S SONS: DEEDS AND DOCUMENTS OF THE WALKING PURCHASE BY FRANCIS JENNINGS* I N1737 Thomas Penn and James Logan produced a show that came to be called the Walking Purchase or Indian Walk. This much-described incident ostensibly was the fulfillment of a con- tract by which some Lenape Indians had sold a quantity of lands to be measured by a man walking for a day and a half from a fixed starting point. Penn and Logan forced the Walk upon un- willing and resentful Indians who charged fraud consistently from the day of its performance until they finally received compensa- tion twenty-four years later. During this period the anti-proprietary forces in Pennsylvania came to believe that the Walk was a cause of Indian hostilities in the French and Indian War, and they used it as the basis for a political campaign against Thomas Penn which led to a petition by Benjamin Franklin for a royal inquiry. In 1762 the Crown's commissioner, Sir William Johnson, presided over a turbulent hearing during which the chief Indian spokesman withdrew his charge that Thomas Penn had forged the Walk deed; but Johnson paid the Indians anyway at the end of the inquiry out of Thomas Penn's funds, thus raising some suspicions about the nature and purpose of the proceedings. There has been much contention over these highly dramatic events. Using the voluminous justifications prepared by Penn's lawyers and administrators, one school has held that Penn was libeled unscrupulously for the partisan purposes of some schem- ing Quakers working with that greatest schemer of them all, Benjamin Franklin. -
A William Penn Deed
A WILLIAM PENN DEED. In answer to a referred question as to what is a " William Penn Deed," Mr. Hensel exhibited an original deed from William Penn for three hundred and seventy-five acres of land situated in that portion of the "Chester Valley" which runs through Lancaster county beginning at Quarryville. It is signed with the genuine signature of William Penn him- self and is written on stout parchment, with his seal. The full text of the deed is as follows, and the land, therein de- scribed rather indefinitely, comprises the tract upon which Ambrose Pownall now resides, east of Nobleville in the township of Sadsbury: "This Indenture witnesseth yt William Penn of Horminghurst in the county of Sussex, Elgd., for & in consideration of Twelve pounds four shillings to him in hand paid Hath by these presents granted Three Hundred Seventy-five acres of Land Cleare of Indian incom-branches in the Province of Pennsylvania (towards the Susquehanna River) to John Kenner- ley of Shavingta, County, Chester cheese factor his heirs and assignees & him there of enfeoffed every acre to be com- puted according to the statute of yc thirty-third of King Edward the First to have and to hold to him his heires and assignes for ever together with all & every the Lands Isles Islands Mynes Mineralls (Royall one Excepted) woods fishings hawkings fowlings & all other Royalltyes profits comodityes & hereditaments insoever unto the same —belonging Yielding & paying there- fore yearly and every year unto the ad William Penn his heirs and assignes imediatly from -
1 What Factors Brought Settlers to Maryland?
Educational materials were developed through the Making Master Teachers in Howard County Program, a partnership between Howard County Public School System and the Center for History Education at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. Resource Sheet #01 What Factors Brought Settlers to Maryland? Student Background Essay Cecil Calvert, the second Lord of Baltimore, founded the colony of Maryland in 1634. Calvert hoped that Maryland could be a colony where persecuted English Catholics could come to practice their religion and do business freely. Eventually, Maryland’s reputation as a tolerant haven that was good for business attracted settlers to the colony. As the population and economic opportunities in Maryland grew, it became necessary to increase immigration. There are three main factors that brought settlers to the colony of Maryland. The first factor that brought settlers to Maryland was for religious freedom. The second factor was for profit from business. The third reason that helped to populate the colony was forced migration. In the late sixteenth century, the Chesapeake Bay Region was inhabited by a variety of advanced Native American cultures. The Native American’s thrived by using the great natural resources of the area to fish and farm. When Europeans began to explore the region during this time period, they also realized the great potential of the Chesapeake Bay. England in the late 1500s was competing for power with other European nations. The British were interested in expanding their country into a global empire. The east coast of North America provided them with an opportunity to expand their economic and political influence. -
The British Empire in the Atlantic: Nova Scotia, the Board of Trade, and the Evolution of Imperial Rule in the Mid-Eighteenth Century
The British Empire in the Atlantic: Nova Scotia, the Board of Trade, and the Evolution of Imperial Rule in the Mid-Eighteenth Century by Thomas Hully Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the MA degree in History University of Ottawa © Thomas Hully, Ottawa, Canada, 2012 ii Abstract The British Empire in the Atlantic: Nova Scotia, the Board of Trade, and the Evolution of Imperial Rule in the Mid-Eighteenth Century Thomas Hully Dr. Richard Connors Submitted: May 2012 Despite considerable research on the British North American colonies and their political relationship with Britain before 1776, little is known about the administration of Nova Scotia from the perspective of Lord Halifax’s Board of Trade in London. The image that emerges from the literature is that Nova Scotia was of marginal importance to British officials, who neglected its administration. This study reintegrates Nova Scotia into the British Imperial historiography through the study of the “official mind,” to challenge this theory of neglect on three fronts: 1) civil government in Nova Scotia became an important issue during the War of the Austrian Succession; 2) The form of civil government created there after 1749 was an experiment in centralized colonial administration; 3) This experimental model of government was highly effective. This study adds nuance to our understanding of British attempts to centralize control over their overseas colonies before the American Revolution. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank the Ontario Graduate Scholarship Program for providing the funding which made this dissertation possible, as well as the University of Ottawa’s Department of History for providing me with the experience of three Teaching Assistantships. -
[J-82-2016] in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Middle District
[J-82-2016] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. WILLIAM PENN SCHOOL DISTRICT; : No. 46 MAP 2015 PANTHER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT; : THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF : Appeal from the Order of the LANCASTER; GREATER JOHNSTOWN : Commonwealth Court entered on April SCHOOL DISTRICT; WILKES-BARRE : 21, 2015 at No. 587 MD 2014. AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT; : SHENANDOAH VALLEY SCHOOL : ARGUED: September 13, 2016 DISTRICT; JAMELLA AND BRYANT : MILLER, PARENTS OF K.M., A MINOR; : SHEILA ARMSTRONG, PARENT OF : S.A., MINOR; TYESHA STRICKLAND, : PARENT OF E.T., MINOR; ANGEL : MARTINEZ, PARENT OF A.M., MINOR; : BARBARA NEMETH, PARENT OF C.M., : MINOR; TRACEY HUGHES, PARENT OF : P.M.H., MINOR; PENNSYLVANIA : ASSOCIATION OF RURAL AND SMALL : SCHOOLS; AND THE NATIONAL : ASSOCIATION FOR THE : ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED : PEOPLE—PENNSYLVANIA STATE : CONFERENCE, : : Appellants : : : v. : : : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : EDUCATION; JOSEPH B. SCARNATI III, : IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS : PRESIDENT PRO-TEMPORE OF THE : PENNSYLVANIA SENATE; MICHAEL C. : TURZAI, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS : THE SPEAKER OF THE PENNSYLVANIA : HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES; TOM : WOLF IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS : THE GOVERNOR OF THE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; : PENNSYLVANIA STATE BOARD OF : EDUCATION; AND PEDRO A. RIVERA, : IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE : SECRETARY OF EDUCATION, : : Appellees : OPINION JUSTICE WECHT1 DECIDED: September 28, 2017 Appellant-Petitioners in this case are school districts, individuals, and -
An Early Edict on Slavery in English America: the Barbados Resolution of 1636 and the Island’S Slave Laws
22 The Journal of the Barbados Museum & Historical Society − Vol. LXV An Early Edict on Slavery in English America: The Barbados Resolution of 1636 and the Island’s Slave Laws Jerome S. Handler Abstract A resolution on slavery by the Barbados Governor and Council in 1636 has been widely cited and quoted by writers on Anglo American slavery and Barbados history from the early 19th century until the present. Writers have universally accepted either explicitly or implicitly that the Resolution was the earliest slave law and was foundational in legitimizing slavery in Anglo America. No writer has attempted to explain why the Resolution was adopted or has questioned or challenged its role in the history of slave law in Barbados or Anglo America. Introduction n their 1972 social history of the early English West Indies, American colonial historians Carl and Roberta Bridenbaugh quote a 1636 Barbados Council resolution they identify as ‘the Iearliest law governing slavery in the English Dominions.’ The ‘law,’ discussed further below, specified ‘that Negroes and Indians, that came here to be sold, should serve for life, unless a contract was before made to the contrary.’ The Bridenbaughs’ observation was reiterated about two decades later by the legal historian William Wiecek in a comparative study of the origins of slave law in British An Early Edict on Slavery in English America 23 North America. Also citing the 1636 Resolution, Wiecek writes, by ‘linking the two fundamental characteristics of American slavery: race and perpetuity,’ Barbados ‘pioneered development of a statutory law of slavery’ in Britain’s New World colonies; and, more recently, for the historian Betty Wood, this law was also ‘the earliest pronouncement anywhere in English America legitimizing slavery and linking it specifically to ethnicity. -
Pennsylvania History (People, Places, Events) Record Holdings Scholars in Residence Pennsylvania History Day People Places Events Things
rruVik.. reliulsyiVUtlll L -tiestuly ratge I UI I Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission Home Programs & Events Researchr Historic Sites & Museums Records Management About Us Historic Preservation Pennsylvania State Archives CRGIS: Cultural Resources Geographic Information Doc Heritage Digital Archives (ARIAS) 0OF ExplorePAhistory.com V Land Records things Genealogy Pennsylvania History (People, Places, Events) Record Holdings Scholars in Residence Pennsylvania History Day People Places Events Things Documentary Heritaae Pennsylvania Governors Symbols and Official Designations Examples: " Keystone State," Flower, Tree Penn-sylyania Counties Outline of Pennsylvania History 1, n-n. II, ni, tv, c.tnto ~ no Ii~, ol-, /~~h nt/n. mr. on, ,t on~~con A~2 1 .rrniV1%', reiniSy1Vdaina riiSiur'y ragcaeiuo I ()I U Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission lome Programs & Events Research Historic Sites & Museums Records Management About Us Historic Preservation Pennsylvania State Archives PENNSYLVANIA STATE CRGIS: Cultural Resources Geographic Information HISTO RY Doc Heritage Digital Archives (ARIAS) ExplorePAhistory.com Land Records THE QUAKER PROVINCE: 1681-1776 Genealogy Pennsylvania History . (People, Places, Events) Record Holdings Y Scholars in Residence Pennsylvania History Day The Founding of Pennsylvania William Penn and the Quakers Penn was born in London on October 24, 1644, the son of Admiral Sir William Penn. Despite high social position and an excellent education, he shocked his upper-class associates by his conversion to the beliefs of the Society of Friends, or Quakers, then a persecuted sect. He used his inherited wealth and rank to benefit and protect his fellow believers. Despite the unpopularity of his religion, he was socially acceptable in the king's court because he was trusted by the Duke of York, later King James II. -
Copy of William Penn Subject Guide 2
William Penn Subject guide Who was William Penn? 1644 William Penn born on 24 The eldest son of prominent 17th-century October naval officer Admiral William Penn, William 1657 Penn was interested in nonconformist religion from an early age and was Hears his first Quaker convinced by Quakerism when he was 22, preacher, Thomas Loe becoming one of the religion's early 1662 theologians and legal defenders. Expelled from Oxford He advocated fundamental human rights University for religious on which laws were built and believed that 1667 nonconformity these laws should be what rules a country, not the will or power of individuals. He Becomes a Quaker spent most of his life involved in politics and argued for religious toleration in 1668 particular – largely because his own religious beliefs had seen him imprisoned 1670 Writes first book, leading numerous times and excluded from to imprisonment in the Tower of London running for any kind of office. Arrested with William Mead for creating an He is best known for founding the colony unlawful assembly. of Pennsylvania in 1681. His Frame of Subsequent trial leads to Government, which established free changes in the British elections, freedom of religion and fair legal system 1681 trials, is described as an important step Receives grant to in the development of democracy and a Pennsylvania from forerunner of the US Constitution. Charles II Penn's story is not without controversy. He 1682 espoused a doctrine of freedom and Makes his first visit to fairness, but he owned slaves. He was, in America, publishes his 1681, the largest non-royal landowner in constitution – the Frame 1708 the world, but he was terrible at managing of Government – and meets with the Lenape Thrown into debtors' his affairs and died in poverty after his Indians with whom he prison after being sued business manager defrauded him.