Daubert standard
Top View
- The Disparate Treatment of Neuroscience Expert Testimony in Criminal Litigation Jamie Wagenheim
- The Impact of Daubert on Forensic Science
- The Supreme Court's
- Brown, Teneille, and Emily Murphy. "Through a Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging As Evidence of a Criminal Defendant's Past Mental States Emily R
- Sufficiency of the Evidence Does Not Meet Daubert Standards: a Critique of the Green- Sanders Proposal Aaron Twerski Brooklyn Law School, [email protected]
- Neurolaw: Exploring the Role of Neuroscience in the Legal Process
- Frye, Daubert, and the Ongoing Crisis of “Junk Science” in Criminal Trials Jim Hilbert Mitchell Hamline School of Law, [email protected]
- Motion in Limine to Exclude Witness Testimony California
- Daubert in Kansas: Prompting a Fresh Look at the Admissibility of Scientific Evidence
- Expert Witnesses: the Nevada Supreme Court Clarifies Adherence to NRS 50.275 and Judicial Discretion, Expressly Declining to Embrace the Federal Daubert Approach
- Admitting Doubt: a New Standard for Scientific Evidence
- Scientific Evidence and Forensic Science Since Daubert: Maine Decides to Sit out the Dance
- Forensic Science: Daubert's Failure
- How New Mexico's Daubert Standard Should Inform Its Handling Of
- Expert Depositions in the Era of Daubert and Its Progeny
- Admissibility of Expert Testimony in All 50 States
- Science, Law, and Truth: Defining the Scope of the Daubert Triology Megan Dillhoff
- Expert Testimony and the Daubert and Frye Standards