Multimedia Project: Gas Pressures

Multimedia Project: Gas Pressures

Multimedia Project: Gas Pressures
Teacher name: Brenda Remus Student Name ______
CATEGORY / 4 / 3 / 2 / 1
Presentation / Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. / Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time. / Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time. / Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost.
Sources / Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documented in desired format. / Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documented in desired format. / Source information collected for graphics, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format. / Very little or no source information was collected.
Attractiveness / Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation. / Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation. / Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content. / Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentation content.
Rough Draft / Rough draft brought on due date. Student shares with peer and extensively edits based on peer feedback. / Rough draft brought on due date. Student shares with peer and peer makes edits. / Provides feedback and/or edits for peer, but own rough draft was not ready for editing. / Rough draft not ready for editing and did not participate in reviewing draft of peer.
Mechanics / No misspellings or grammatical errors. / Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors. / Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors. / More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar.
Content / Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. / Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. / Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. / Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors.
Organization / Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. / Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. / Content is logically organized for the most part. / There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.
Originality / Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive. / Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. / Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking. / Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit.
Workload / The workload is divided and shared equally by all team members. / The workload is divided and shared fairly by all team members, though workloads may vary from person to person. / The workload was divided, but one person in the group is viewed as not doing his/her fair share of the work. / The workload was not divided OR several people in the group are viewed as not doing their fair share of the work.

Copyright. © 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997 ALTec, the University of Kansas. Used with permission.