US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan 1 US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan PRIMARY CONSULTANT: Burns, Bertsch & Harris, Inc. 1460 West Lane Avenue, Suite B Columbus, Ohio 43221 614.488.1150 SUBCONSULTANTS: Kinzelman Kline Bennett & Williams Environmental Consultants Inc. Burgess & Niple, Ltd. 2 US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan AACCKKNNOOWWLLEEDDGGEEMMEENNTTSS PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Judith Shupe, County Commissioner Allan Reid, County Commissioner Jon Myers, County Commissioner Pat Harris, County Administrator Lorraine Arnold, Regional Planning Commission R. Brooks Davis, Regional Planning Commission Holly Mattei, Regional Planning Commission Carol Mackey, The Ohio State University Extension Office Richard Smith, Berne Township Peter Rockwood, Berne Township Frank Uhl, Berne Township Gail Ellinger, Hocking Township Tim Claypool, Hocking Township Shyna Gawell, Hocking Township Charles Yost, Hocking Township Paul Shaw, Hocking Township Corey Joslin, Hocking Township Barry Shafer, Greenfield Township John Hizey, Greenfield Township Lonnie Kosch, Greenfield Township Cathy Rinehart, Greenfield Township Kent Huston, City of Lancaster 3 US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan Walter Arrowsmith, City of Lancaster Mayor Art Wallace, City of Lancaster William Burns, Village of Carrroll Joe Steiger, Fairfield Soil and Water Conservation District Tony Vogel, Ohio Department of Transportation District 5 INDIVIDUALS & ORGANIZATIONS TO BE RECOGNIZED Fairfield County Board of Commissioners Judith Shupe Jon Myers Allan Reid Kerry Hogan, Fairfield County Sanitary Engineer Susan Crotti, City of Pickerington Development Director Bruce Langer, Village of Canal Winchester Development Director 4 US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Important growth pressures are being exerted upon the County that will substantially affect the type, quantity, and quality of development in the coming decade. Economic trends, population shifts, and changing preferences related to how and where we live, work, and shop will continue to impact the shape of the communities within central Ohio. The Fairfield County Commissioners and the Fairfield County Regional Planning Commission recognized the importance and impact of the US Route 33 bypass early; and, in 2001 commissioned a special study to identify issues and formulate recommendations that would promote sound development practices and mitigate negative impacts associated with the construction of the bypass. The result of the study is two documents – the US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan and the US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Design Manual. One of the primary aims of the US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan is to provide local governments and private property owners with a vision for the corridor, one that reflects the public interest. The US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan does not dictate how any specific parcel should be zoned. Rather, it provides the basis for future zoning decisions by the appropriate governing body. By following the recommendations of both the US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan and the US Route 33 Corridor Design Manual, it is possible to create economic development opportunities while also preserving the rural landscape and character of the corridor. The US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan emphasizes intergovernmental collaboration. The bypass corridor will have a direct affect on three townships and two municipalities. In order to ensure that the region is protected and to ensure that local governments are not pitted against each other in the quest for economic development and the resulting tax revenue, formal communication and coordination is critical. Each political jurisdiction should review both the US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan and the US Route 33 Corridor Design Manual and then examine their own plans, policies and regulatory tools, identifying areas for adjustment and taking any necessary action. The Fairfield County Regional Planning Commission is prepared to provide support including technical assistance to the cooperating jurisdictions in order to assure that the US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan’s goals are achieved. 5 US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan TTAABBLLEE OOFF CCOONNTTEENNTTSS I INTRODUCTION 1 History Purpose Public Participation Related Plans and Policies II. VISION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 9 Vision Goals and Objectives III. EXISTING CONDITIONS 11 Land Use Environmental Features Scenic Byway Analysis IV. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 17 Introduction Focus Group Demographic and Market Conditions V. LAND USE 23 Land Use Scenarios Future Land Use Plan VI. IMPLEMENTATION 31 Land Use and Development Visual Analysis and Design Overlay Intergovernmental Cooperation Critical Resources Transportation Infrastructure Marketing and Promotion 6 US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan APPENDIX Existing and Planned Roadways i Utilities v Public Participation xiii MAP INDEX Map 1 – Existing Land Use Following page 16 Map 2 – Land Use/Land Cover (1999) Following page 16 Map 3 – Land Use/Land Cover (1994) Following page 16 Map 4 – Critical Resource Components Following page 16 Map 5 – Future Land Use Scenario 1 Appendix Map 6 – Future Land Use Scenario 2 Appendix Map 7 – Future Land Use Plan Following page 30 Map 8 – Lancaster Bypass Detail Map Appendix Map 9 – Existing and Planned Roadways Appendix Map 10 – Existing and Planned Water Service Area Appendix Map 11 – Existing and Planned Waste Water Service Area Appendix 7 US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan ACTION BY THE FAIRFIELD COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION The US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan and US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Design Manual were both adopted by the Fairfield County Regional Planning Commission at its meeting on July 2, 2002. The US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan was adopted as an appendix to the Fairfield County Development Strategy and Land Use Plan adopted on March 5, 2002. Appropriate portions of each document will be transmitted to Berne, Greenfield and Hocking Townships as well as the Village of Carroll and the City of Lancaster for their consideration and action. 8 US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan INTRODUCTION HISTORY Fairfield County is one of the fastest growing counties in Ohio, and US Route 33 (US 33) serves as the main arterial connecting southeastern Ohio with the City of Columbus, the state capital and a major employment and commercial center. Within the City of Lancaster, US 33 frontage became prime real estate and was stripped out and developed into commercial uses with little access management. Today, this stretch of US 33 is constantly congested. To improve traffic flow on US 33, the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) announced the construction of the US 33 bypass. To further improve traffic flow in the US 33 corridor, the entire length of US 33 from Columbus to Lancaster will be upgraded to limited access over the next decade. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), several alternative routes for the US 33 bypass were explored. In 1998, the current alignment was chosen. In 2001, phase one construction began. It is estimated that phase one will be completed in the fall of 2003. The entire bypass will be completed by the summer of 2005. The schedule is included in the Appendix. PURPOSE In order to preserve the rural landscape and promote orderly development in the US 33 bypass corridor, this plan establishes a growth ethic based on citizen input and the work of the US 33 bypass corridor steering committee. Future development activities in the corridor should reflect this growth ethic as illustrated in the plan’s vision, goals, objectives and policies. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Public participation was a key element in the development of the US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan. The consultant team worked closely with a steering committee comprised of representatives from the City of Lancaster, the Village of Carroll, Berne, Hocking and Greenfield Townships, the Regional Planning Commission, and other County agencies. The steering committee met almost monthly for a year. In addition to the steering committee, three public meetings were held. A full summary of all activities related to the development of the plan is located in the appendix. In addition, a portion of the results of the second public meeting affecting the future land use plan is included in that section. 1 US Route 33 Bypass Corridor Development Plan RELATED PLANS & POLICIES Fairfield County Development Strategy and Land Use Plan As part of the 2001 Fairfield County Development Strategy and Land Use Plan, a future land use plan was developed for the entire County based upon a 20-year population projection. The plan indicates the US 33 bypass corridor will support a mixture of residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural uses. High intensity uses, such as industrial and commercial, are located closest to the bypass interchanges for ease of access and to minimize impacts on surrounding residential areas. Further from the interchanges are varying densities of residential use including mixed use residential, cluster residential, single family residential and rural residential. The Fairfield County Development Strategy and Land Use Plan seeks to guide growth to areas where appropriate public infrastructure exists or is programmed to exist in the next twenty years. Farmland preservation and preservation of the natural environment