LA-UR-03-8735 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of δ-Stabilized Plutonium N. J. Curro Condensed Matter and Thermal Physics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, [email protected] L. Morales Nuclear Materials and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545 (Dated: July 14, 2018) Nuclear Magnetic Resonance studies of Ga stabilized δ-Pu reveal detailed information about the local distortions surrounding the Ga impurities as well as provides information about the local spin fluctuations experienced by the Ga nuclei. The Ga NMR spectrum is inhomogeneously broadened by a distribution of local electric field gradients (EFGs), which indicates that the Ga experiences local distortions from cubic symmetry. The Knight shift and spin lattice relaxation rate indicate that the Ga is dominantly coupled to the Fermi surface via core polarization, and is inconsistent with magnetic order or low frequency spin correlations. Introduction tuations of of the electron spin S relax the nuclei so fast that their signal is rendered invisible. On the other hand, The investigavtion of the low temperature properties the hyperfine coupling to the nuclei of the secondary el- of plutonium and its compounds has experienced a re- ement (Al, Ga or In) are typically one to three orders of naissance in recent years, and several important experi- magnitude smaller, so by measuring the secondary nuclei ments have revealed unusual correlated electron behavior one can gain considerable insight into the spin dynamics [1, 2, 3]. The 5f electrons in elemental plutonium are on of the system. the boundary between localized and itinerant behavior, One of the challenges facing band theorists calculating so that slight perturbations in the Pu-Pu spacing can give the electronic structure of δ-Pu is the role of the sec- rise to dramatic changes in the ground state character. ondary atoms. Recent x-ray absorbtion fine structure In fact, Pu exhibits six allotropic forms in the solid state, (XAFS) studies suggest that Pu lattice distorts locally with varying degrees of symmetry. The inability for band around the Ga sites [8]. Clearly, these local distortions structure calculations to predict all six of these forms is are caused by the electronic system, and should be cap- testament to the complexity of the correlated electron tured by band structure calculations. Therefore, a de- behavior [4, 5]. δ-Pu, which exists between 576K and tailed experimental study of these local distortions puts 720K, is the most technologically important form, and important constraints on any theory. NMR is also ideal can be stabilized down to T = 0 by doping with Al, Ga for probing these local distortions, and serves as a com- 1 or In, which substitute for the Pu sites [6]. In particular, plement to the XAFS data. Nuclei with spin I > 2 Pu1−xGax possesses the fcc structure and physical prop- experience electric quadrupolar interactions between the erties of δ-Pu for 0.020 . x . 0.085. It is not obvious why quadrupolar moment Q of the nuclei and the local elec- the small amount of the secondary element will stabilize tric field gradient (EFG), Vαα, where V is the crystal 3 the electronic structure of the δ phase, although clearly field potential. Ga (I = 2 ) is therefore sensitive to the the slight perturbation reflects the itinerant-localization EFG at the impurity site. instability of the parent material. In this paper we present Knight shift (K), spin lat- −1 Several theories have emerged to try to explain the sta- tice relaxation rate (T1 ), and linewidth (σ) data on bility of the δ phase. One technological challenge of band the Ga nucleus in a polycrystal sample of Pu1−xGax for calculations in Pu is the ability to predict local versus x = 0.017 between 4K and 100K. In the early 1970’s, itinerant behavior for the five 5f electrons, because the Fradin, Brodsky, and coworkers at Argonne performed theoretical approaches for these two extremes are funda- the first NMR experiments on δ-Pu stabilized with Al mentally different. These models typically predict either [9]. They found no evidence for any magnetic transition non-magnetic ground states, or ones where local Pu mo- or the formation of local moments. Our work on Ga sta- arXiv:cond-mat/0404626v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 26 Apr 2004 ments are retained [4, 7]. In principle, such predictions bilized δ-Pu provide the only new data since the pioneer- can be tested by various experimental techniques. ing work of Fradin, and we find similar behavior. The −1 Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is ideal for prob- Knight shift and T1 data behave as in a typical con- ing magnetic correlations and local structure. 239Pu has ductor, and we find no evidence for either local moments 1 a nuclear spin I = 2 , so in principle it can serve as a di- at the Ga sites, or for strongly temperature dependent rect probe of the magnetic correlations via the hyperfine spin fluctuations [18]. On the other hand, we do not find interaction A between the nuclear (I) and the electronic that the EFG at the Ga site vanishes, as expected for a (S) spins. However, for 4f and 5f nuclei, A is usually site with cubic symmetry. Rather, the Ga spectrum is quite large (on the order of 1000 kOe/µB), so that fluc- inhomogeneously broadened by a distribution of EFGs. 0.20 580 0.15 560 χ (x10 540 -6 emu/mol) (%) 0.10 520 K 0.20 signal 0.15 0.10 500 K (%) 0.05 0.05 0.00 400 500 600 480 χ -6 (x10 emu/mol) 460 0.00 80.9 81.0 81.1 81.2 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Freq (MHz) T (K) FIG. 1: The 69Ga NMR spectrum at 4K. The solid vertical FIG. 2: The Knight shift (•) and susceptibility (solid line) of line is the position of pure Ga metal, and the solid line through the Ga versus temperature. The susceptibility data are taken the data is a Gaussian fit as described in the text. from [10]. INSET: The Knight shift versus bulk susceptibility. This result suggests that there are local lattice distortions where with a symmetry lower than cubic at the Ga impurities. K(T )= K0 + Aiχi(T ), (3) Xi Experimental K0 is a temperature independent orbital shift contribu- th tion, and Ai is the hyperfine coupling to the i compo- In order to avoid radiological contamination of the nent of the electronic susceptibility, χ(T ). NMR probe, we constructed an epoxy assembly to en- In Fig. (1) we show the Ga spectrum at 4K. Note capsulate the NMR coil as well as the Pu sample. How- that this spectrum consists of all three nuclear transi- ever, since the Pu is subject to both self-heating as well 3 1 1 1 1 3 tions (Iz =+ 2 ↔ + 2 , Iz =+ 2 ↔− 2 , Iz = − 2 ↔− 2 ), as rf heating due to induced surface currents by the NMR since the quadrupolar Hamiltonian does not lift the de- pulses, it is crucial to establish a solid thermal contact to generacy. The spectrum is broadened, however, by a dis- the sample. We therefore bored out the epoxy along the tribution of EFG’s, as we discuss below. The center of axis of the NMR coil, and secured frits (metallic screens) the resonance is somewhat lower in frequency than that of at the ends to allow the cold He gas to enter along the axis pure Ga metal, indicating a different Knight shift. We fit of the coil and establish a thermal contact with sample. the spectra between 4K and 100K to a Gaussian; K and The mesh of the frits is sufficiently fine to prevent any the rms second moment, σ, are shown in Figs. (2,3). If external contamination. This design allows us to cool the we assume a single component of magnetic susceptibility, sample down to 2K with no significant heating problems, then following Eq. (3), we extract K0 and A by plotting as measured by the nuclear polarization. K versus χ, where T is an implicit parameter (see inset The Hamiltonian of the Ga nuclei is given by: of Fig. (2). We find K0 =0.65% and A = 80kOe/µB. hν H = γ~Iˆ· H + c (3Iˆ2 − I2 + η(Iˆ2 − Iˆ2)) + H (1) 0 6 z x y hyp Spin Lattice Relaxation where γ is the gyromagnetic ratio, H0 is the external field, ν = 3eQV /20, η = (V − V )/V , Q is the c cc aa bb cc The spin lattice relaxation measures the time scale for quadrupolar moment of the Ga, and V are the com- αα the nuclear spin system to acquire an equilibrium Boltz- ponents of the EFG tensor. The hyperfine interaction is mann distribution among the energy levels. Transitions given by H = I · A · S (r), where the sum is over hyp i i i between the nuclear levels are induced by time dependent the various spin contributions (conduction electrons, lo- P fluctuating fields that are perpendicular to H . The spin cal spins). For a site with cubic symmetry, V vanishes, 0 αα lattice relaxation rate, T −1 is give by: so the effective Hamiltonian for the Ga nuclei in δ-Pu is 1 2 simply: 1 γ kB 2 χ⊥”(q,ω) = lim A⊥(q) (4) ~ ˆ T1T 2 ω→0 ω H = γ (1 + K)IzH0, (2) Xq 20 1 15 0.1 10 (G) 0.01 σ 1.0 0.8 0.6 69 Echo Size 0.4 Ga 5 Magnetization (arb units) 0.001 0.2 71Ga Magnetization 0.0 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.1 1 10 100 2 2 τ (msec ) time (ms) 0 0.0001 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 T (K) time (ms) FIG.