Some Generalizations of One-Relator Groups

Some Generalizations of One-Relator Groups

Some generalizations of one-relator groups Yago Antol´ın University of Southampton Webinar, November 20th 2012 The main topic of this talk is Magnus' induction technique. This is one of the most important techniques to study one-relator quotients of groups. The plan of the talk is the following: Recall Magnus induction and its classical applications to one-relator groups. Extend Magnus induction to a family of 2-relator groups that include surface-plus-one-relation groups. Extend Magnus induction to study one-relation quotients of graph products. The talk is based in joint work with Warren Dicks, Ram´onFlores, Aditi Kar and Peter Linnell. Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 2 / 31 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Hempel groups 3 Locally indicability 4 Graph products Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 3 / 31 Max Dehn Max Dehn (Germany 1878- U.S.A. 1952) In 1910 publishes a paper with the decision problems. He solves the word and conjugacy problem for fundamental groups of orientable surfaces. Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 4 / 31 Wilhelm Magnus Wilhelm Magnus was a student of Dehn who asked him various questions about one-relator groups. In 1932 Wilhelm Magnus proved Theorem Every one-relator group h x1;:::; xn j r i has solvable word problem. Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 5 / 31 The Freiheitssatz Let G = h x1; x2;:::; xd j r i; and assume that r is cyclically reduced. A subset Y of fx1; x2;:::; xd g is a Magnus subset if it omits some letter of r: A subgroup generated by a Magnus subset is called a Magnus subgroup. Theorem [Freiheitssatz] A Magnus subset freely generates a subgroup of G. Moreover, the membership problem for Magnus subgroups in G is solvable. Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 6 / 31 Magnus induction (proof of the Freiheitssatz) Let G = h x1; x2;:::; xd j r i: There exists a finite chain of one-relator groups G1 6 G2 6 ··· 6 Gn = G; where G1 is cyclic. Each Gi \is" an HNN-extension of Gi−1; and the associate subgroups are generated by Magnus subgroups of Gi−1: Example h x; y j x−2yxyxy i = h x; y j (x−2yx2)(x−1yx)y i (x−2yx2)(x−1yx)y; = x; y; y1; y2 −1 −1 1 y1 = x yx; y2 = x y1x = h y; y1; y2 j y2y1y i ∗h y;y1 i x Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 7 / 31 Consequences Let G = h x1; x2;:::; xd j r i: Word problem. Since the membership problem for Magnus subgroups is solvable, the normal form for the HNN extension can be computed. Cohomology Lyndon used Magnus induction to show that there is a exact sequence of ZG-modules d 0 ! Z[G=Cr ] ! (ZG) ! ZG ! Z ! 0: Here Cr is the subgroup generated by the root of r. Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 8 / 31 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Hempel groups 3 Locally indicability 4 Graph products Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 9 / 31 Surface groups Σ compact, connected surface Σ orientable without boundary ∼ π1(Σ) = h x1;:::; xg ; y1;:::; yg j [x1; y1] · [x2; y2] ··· [xg ; yg ] i: Σ non-orientable without boundary ∼ 2 2 2 π1(Σ) = h x1;:::; xd j x1 · x2 ··· xd i: Σ with boundary, then π1(Σ) is a free group. One-relator quotients of π1(Σ) are natural generalization of one-relator groups. Among others, surface-plus-one-relation groups have been studied by Papakyriakopoulos, Hempel, Howie, Bogopolski... Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 10 / 31 Hempel trick Hempel trick Let Σ be a compact oriented surface and α a simple closed curve on Σ. Take a infinite cyclic cover p : Σ~ ! Σ s.t. every lift of α to Σ~ is a simple closed curve. Take a subsurface A of Σ~ containing only one liftα ~ of σ. Take a subsurface B of A that does not containα ~. We have that π1(Σ)=hjαji = π1(A)=hjα~ji∗π1(B) t: Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 11 / 31 Surface-plus-one relation groups fit on Magnus induction With the Hempel trick one proves that G = h x1;:::; xg ; y1;:::; yg j [x1; y1] · [x2; y2] ··· [xg ; yg ]; r i is an HNN extension of a one-relator group where the associated subgroups are Magnus subgroups. In particular one obtain G has solvable word problem. An exact sequence of ZG modules 2g 0 ! ZG ⊕ Z[G=Cr ] ! (ZG) ! ZG ! Z ! 0: Here Cr is the subgroup generated by the root of r (in the surface group). One aims to generalize this construction to non-orientable surfaces. Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 12 / 31 Hempel groups Lemma There exists an isomorphism between h x; y; z j [x; y]z2 i and h a; b; c j a2b2c2 i: Let d 2 N , let F := h x; y; z1;:::; zd j i, and let u and r be elements of F , such that u 2 h z1;:::; zd i. We will consider groups of the form h x; y; z1;:::; zd j [x; y]u = 1; r = 1 i; which generalize one-relator quotients of fundamental groups of surfaces. Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 13 / 31 Theorem (A,Dicks, Linnell) Let G = h x; y; z1;:::; zd j [x; y]u = 1; r = 1 i, where u 2 h z1;:::; zd i. Then G is either virtually a one-relator group or G is an HNN-extension of a one-relator group where the associated subgroups are Magnus subgroups. In the latter case we say that a group is a Hempel group. The proof of the theorem mimics the Hempel trick in an algebraic way. Using automorphism of the form (x 7! xy ±1, y 7! y) and (x 7! x, y 7! yx±1) one can assume that either r has zero x-exponent sum, or r = xn. Some consequences G has solvable word problem. Explicit exact sequence of ZG-modules. Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 14 / 31 More consequences Hempel groups satisfy the Baum-Connes conjecture by a theorem of Oyono-Oyono. Computing the Bredon cohomology of Hempel groups, one can describe the equivariant K-theory of EG. Theorem (A-Flores) Let G be a Hempel group h x ;:::; x j w; r i, with k ≥ 3; 1p k F w 2 [x1; x2]h x3;:::; xk i: Let r the root of r (in h x1;:::; xk j w i). Then G top ∗ Ki (EG) ' Ki (Cr (G)) for i = 0; 1, there is a split short exact sequence G F F F F RC(G) ! K0 (EG) ! (h r [ w i \ [F ; F ])=[F ; h r [ w i]; p F G there is natural isomorphism (h x1;:::; xk j w; r i)ab ' K1 (EG). Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 15 / 31 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Hempel groups 3 Locally indicability 4 Graph products Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 16 / 31 Definitions A group is indicable if it is either trivial or maps onto Z. A group is locally indicable if all its finitely generated subgroups are indicable. Equivalently, any non-trivial finitely generated subgroup has infinite abelianization. A group G is effectively locally indicable if it is locally indicable, has solvable word problem, and there exists an algorithm such that given fg1;:::; gng ⊂ G − f1g outputs a map gi ! zi 2 Z i = 1;:::; n, that extends to an epimorphism h g1;:::; gn i ! Z: Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 17 / 31 Howie and Brodskii proved independently that torsion-free one-relator groups are locally indicable. In order to prove this, Howie developed a more powerful inductive argument. Using Howie's induction we proved Theorem (A-Dicks-Linnell) Let G = h x; y; z1;:::; zd j [x; y]u = 1; r = 1 i, where u 2 h z1;:::; zd i. If G is torsion-free then G is locally indicable. Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 18 / 31 L2-Betti numbers Locally indicability is used to compute the L2-Betti numbers. Theorem (A, Dicks, Linnell) Let G be a surface-plus-one relator group. Then G is of type VFL and, for each n 2 N , 8maxfχ(G); 0g = 1 if n = 0, > jGj (2) < bn (G) = max{−χ(G); 0g if n = 1, > :0 if n ≥ 2. Yago Antol´ın (University of Southampton) Some generalizations of one-relator groups November 19 / 31 Generalization of Magnus induction to free products A one-relator group G = h x1;:::; xn; y1;:::; ym j r i can be viewed as a one-relator quotient of two free groups (h x1;:::; xn j i ∗ h y1;:::; ym j i)=hjr ji: We assume that r is not conjugate to an element of one of the factors. The Freiheitssatz can be written as Theorem (The Freiheitssatz) Let A and B be free groups and r 2 A ∗ B not conjugate to an element of A.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    31 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us