A Basic Introduction to the Physics of Solar Neutrinos Mike Guidry∗ Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996–1200 Jay Billings† Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 (Dated: December 4, 2018) A comprehensive introduction to the theory of the solar neutrino problem is given that is aimed at instructors who are not experts in quantum field theory but would like to incorporate these ideas into instruction of advanced undergraduate or beginning graduate students in courses like astrophysics or quantum mechanics; it is also aimed at the inquisitive student who would like to learn this topic on their own. The presentation assumes as theoretical preparation only that the reader is familiar with the basics of quantum mechanics in Dirac notation and elementary differential equations and matrices. I. INTRODUCTION teristic of an advanced undergraduate physics major. No par- ticular background in solar astrophysics, elementary particle physics, or relativistic quantum field theory is assumed, as the The resolution of the solar neutrino problem in terms of required concepts are introduced as part of the presentation. neutrino flavor oscillations has had an enormous impact on both astrophysics and elementary particle physics. On the one hand, it has demonstrated that the Standard Solar Model (SSM) works remarkably well, and has suggested profitable II. SOLAR NEUTRINOS AND THE STANDARD MODEL new directions in a number of astrophysics subfields, while on the other hand it has demonstrated conclusively that there is We begin with a concise overview of solar neutrinos and of physics beyond the Standard Model (SM) of elementary parti- the Standard Model of elementary particles, and of why neu- cle physics and has suggested possible clues for what that new trino observations led to a “solar neutrino problem” implying physics could be. It is fitting then that the importance of these that either our understanding of the Sun, or our understanding ideas was recognized in both the 2002 and 2015 Nobel Prizes of the neutrino, or perhapsboth, required fixing. The approach in Physics. Presumably for these and related reasons, we have will be decidedly pragmatic, describing only aspects of these found that solar neutrino oscillations attract more enthusiastic two fields that are directly relevant to the task at hand. responses from students in advanced undergraduate and grad- uate courses on stellar structure and stellar evolution than any other topic. A. Neutrinos in the Standard Solar Model Neutrino oscillations in vacuum and in matter are described extensively in the journal literature and in textbooks but most The Sun is powered by nuclear reactions taking place in its 1–3 of those discussions are either conceptual overviews, nec- core that convert hydrogen into helium and release energy in essarily omitting a systematic mathematical formulation of the process. Two different mechanisms can accomplish this: solar neutrino theory, or treat solar neutrino theory extensively (1) the PP chains, and (2) the CNO cycle. At its present core but are written assuming that the reader has a substantial back- temperature almost 99% of the Sun’s energy is provided by 4–6 ground in quantum field theory of the weak interactions. the PP chains, so they will be our focus. The details of these Most advanced undergraduate and beginning graduate stu- nuclear reactions are well documented and will not be of di- dents interested in this problem, and instructors who are not rect concern here, except to note that some of these reactions experts but wish to understand and incorporate this topic into are weak interactions that produce neutrinos and that these arXiv:1812.00035v1 [astro-ph.SR] 30 Nov 2018 their courses, will find neither to be ideal sources by them- can be detected on Earth. This is of large importance in as- selves. The first introduces the concepts well but omits much trophysics because the neutrinos are produced in the core and of the deep mathematical ‘why’ and ‘how’ of these beautiful leave the Sun at essentially the speed of light, with little prob- ideas; the second formulates the theory more systematically ability to react with the solar matter. Thus their detection on but typically requires a substantial remedial effort for the in- Earth provides a snapshot of conditions in the solar core ap- telligent non-expert to come up to the required speed, often proximately 8.5 minutes prior to detection, and a stringent test omitting important steps in derivations that are (relatively) ob- of solar models specifically and, by implication, of more gen- vious to the cognoscenti, but perhaps not to others. eral models for stellar structure and stellar evolution. This paper attempts to provide a systematic introduction to For our specific purposes all that is relevant concern- solar neutrino oscillations and the resolution of the solar neu- ing these solar neutrino-producing reactions are the flavor trino problem at a level that will satisfy non-specialist instruc- (neutrino type) and spectrum of the neutrinos that are pro- tor and student alike within an accessible mathematical frame- duced, and the electron density distribution in the solar inte- work. It assumes only that the reader is familiar initially with rior. These may be obtained from the semi-phenomenological mathematics and basic quantum mechanics at a level charac- Standard Solar Model, which combines the theory of stellar 2 Ga Cl Super-K 1012 flux suppression from that expected indicates that the issue is real, and implies some combination of (1) the Standard Solar pp 1010 Spectrum of Model fails to describe properly the conditions in the Sun’s ) solar neutrinos core (we don’t understand the Sun), or (2) the properties of -1 13 s N 8 neutrinos differ from that assumed in the prediction of Fig. 1 -2 10 15O (we don’t understand the neutrino). To investigate these pos- 8 17 B 6 F sibilities, let us now consider the description of neutrinos and 10 the weak interactions in the Standard Model of elementary particle physics that is implicit in the prediction of Fig. 1. 104 pep hep Flux at 1 AU (cm Be 7 2 Be 10 7 B. The Standard Model and Weak Interactions 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.0 5.0 10.0 20.0 Neutrino energy (MeV) The Standard Model of elementary particle physics is the FIG. 1: The SSM neutrino spectrum, with fluxes scaled to the dis- most comprehensive and well-tested theory yet conceived in tance of Earth from the Sun.8 Labels refer to specific reactions in the theoretical physics, and it accounts for an extremely broad PP chains and CNO cycle. The sensitive regions for various experi- range of phenomena. However, our purposes are specific ments are indicated above the graph, with Ga denoting the GALLEX and require only four basic ingredients and one speculation and SAGE gallium detectors, Cl denoting the Homestake (Davis) from the SM: (1) the generational structure of its elementary chlorine detector, and Super K denoting the Super Kamiokande wa- fermions (matter fields) and associated lepton-number con- ter Cherenkov detector (see Table I). servation laws (see §IIB1), (2) the corresponding implica- tion that neutrinos must be identically massless and that only 26 left-handed neutrinos and right-handed antineutrinos enter the Solar electron weak interactions (which builds the maximal breaking of par- 25 number density ity symmetry into the weak interactions by fiat), (3) the em- ) pirical observation that in the quark sector the weak eigen- -3 24 states are not congruent with the mass eigenstates, implying cm e 23 n flavor mixing (see §IIB2 and §IIB3), (4) the long-standing ( Neutrino speculation10 that flavor oscillations might occur in the neu- 10 production 22 trino sector also (which would imply finite masses for neu- Log trinos and thus a violation of the minimal Standard Model) n 26 -10.54(R/R ) 21 e = 1.475 x 10 e 8B pp (see §III), and (5) that the weak interactions can occur through 7 Be charged currents mediated by the W ± bosons and neutral cur- 20 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 rents mediated by the Z0 boson (see §IIIA). R/R FIG. 2: Electron number density as a function of fractional solar radius from the Standard Solar Model.8 The dashed line is an expo- 1. Generational Structure nential approximation that will be employed in discussing the MSW effect. Regions of primary neutrino production in the PP chains are indicated, using labels from Fig. 1. The fermions of the Standard Model are grouped into three families or generations, as displayed in Fig. 3. In the SM, interactions across family lines are forbidden. For the lep- structure and evolution with the values of key parameters in- tons this is implemented formally by assigning a lepton family ferred from measurements or theory to provide a comprehen- number to each particle and requiring that it be conserved by sive and predictive model for the structure and evolution of the interactions. The term flavor is used to distinguish the quarks Sun.7 The spectrum of solar neutrinos predicted by the SSM and leptons of one generation from another. Thus, (νe, νµ ,ντ ) is displayed in Fig. 1, and the electron number density as a are differentflavors of neutrinos, and (u, d, s, ...) are different function of radius from the SSM is displayed in Fig. 2. flavors of quarks. When solar neutrinos are detected on Earth by chemistry- Also displayed in Fig. 3 are characteristic mass scales for based or normal-water Cherenkov detectors, the flux is found quarks and neutrinos within each generation. The neutrino to be systematically less than that predicted by the SSM (see masses are upper limits, since no neutrino mass has yet been Fig.