European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences Vol. 8 No. 11, 2020 ISSN 2056-5852 INDOCTRINATION AS A MECHANISM OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MANIPULATION IN THE PROCESS OF INVOLVEMENT IN DESTRUCTIVE RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS Alyona G. Ayrapetova, doctor of philosophy (PhD) on psychological Sciences, National University of Uzbekistan ABSTRACT The article considers the mechanisms of influence on human consciousness in the process of destructive indoctrination. The classical manipulative model of influence is given. General tactics for destructive religious organizations, used in the framework of indoctrination are presented in the article. Keywords: Indoctrination, psychological manipulation, informational deprivation, sensory deprivation, religious doctrine, totalitarian sect, religious cult, destructive religious organization, neophyte, adept, verbal manipulation, group pressure. INTRODUCTION, LITERATURE REVIEW AND DISCUSSION Over the centuries, in the process of development of society, humanity has repeatedly experienced a transformation of thinking, which was caused not only by the technical and cultural revolution, but also by the emergence of new political doctrines and religious ideologies that led to the unification of thinking and behavior. The necessity for development a certain, clearly defined and if it is possible - uniform picture of the world among the members of society, as well as the achievement of control and management of the masses dictated the need to develop mechanisms of manipulation that facilitated the passage of certain ideas into the people’s minds. For many decades, enough knowledge has been accumulated to successfully manipulate on the one hand, and to avoid these manipulations effectively on the other. It should be emphasized that the word “manipulation” in its original meaning meant “to manage” in a positive sense, that is, to assist competently, to guide in the right direction. In modern literature, manipulation refers to the art of controlling people’s behavior and thinking through a targeted influence on public consciousness [1]. The analysis of existing methods and means of influencing a person, allowing to make him obedient, guided, and controlled, indicates that this process is based on the mechanism of indoctrination. Indoctrination is a special state of the human psyche in which non-critical appropriation of other people’s ideas or doctrines is realized, as well as the result of various methods of so- called mind control. Indoctrination acts as one of the tools for identifying of individual with a group through the adoption of group values, ideas, or doctrines. It should be noted that indoctrination is not always destructive. Positive examples are cultural imprinting, when a child learns the basics of culture through uncritical perception of them. Or, for example, the assimilation of the dogmas of religious faith, which occurs without coercion, Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 17 www.idpublications.org European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences Vol. 8 No. 11, 2020 ISSN 2056-5852 deception and psychological violence in the process of interaction with adult family members. In these examples, the agents of influence are close people (parents, members of the primary and secondary family), as well as people who have authority in the eyes of the child (kindergarten teachers or teachers at school). Indoctrination, which is based on the attitude towards the development and improvement of personality, is carried out correctly and smoothly. This process, as a rule, is recognized by a person as his own choice, and that being characteristic not only for conformists, but also for creative and externally social-autonomous people. Such indoctrination is constructive in nature, does not injure the psyche and promotes personality’s growth. However, negative examples of indoctrination can also be demonstrated. This mechanism is the basis of psychological manipulation used by destructive religious organizations, which take into service quite serious mechanisms of influence on the human consciousness. Let’s consider the basic elements of destructive indoctrination. Monologicality. This aspect is paramount and, for the purpose of unidirectional influence, it requires categorically unacceptable (“sinful”, “vicious”, “diabolical”, etc.) any other sources of information (mass media and communications, parents, friends). However, in the process of indoctrination, not only information deprivation is applied, but also sensory one - that is, isolation from the usual social environment, a ban on one’s own thoughts, expressing doubts about the religious doctrine of the cult, requests for argumentation and evidence of the truth of the doctrine [2]. Counter argumentation is used along with monologicality and presents itself a priori avoiding of any “uncomfortable” questions regarding the doctrines of a destructive religious cult. Recruits, neophytes, or adherents are given pre-counterarguments to possible questions and objections that call into question or discredit the authority of the cult. Members of destructive religious organizations, responsible for involving neophytes in their ranks and realizing so- called “ideological work”, undergo special training in this direction. In addition, for such situations, special brochures, booklets, video and audio clips with beforehand prepared answers to standard questions are published. Reducing of resistance is an action upon the physiological level, which requires the rejection of protein foods (partial or complete starvation), reduction or deprivation of sleep due to the obligatory presence at church services, reading of prayers or other ritual practices, prolonged being in one static pose during the ceremony (standing or sitting), which significantly increases suggestibility. Verbal multiplication. This element is implemented in two versions. The first one is the frequentative repetition of meaningless phrases that can be part of a certain religious ritual (“purification of the spirit”, “union with brothers and sisters by faith”, “reaching the next level” of something, etc.). The second version is repetition an unlimited number of meaningful prayers. Verbal multiplication in both cases leads to prohibitive inhibition, which dramatically reduces the criticality of perception of reality and resistance. Approval mythology. Leaders of destructive religious organizations (in particular pro-Christian sects) quite often declare themselves to be new prophets or even the next coming of God to Earth, which “switch on” the already verified mythological schemes that exist in the human mind. The success phenomenon of this indoctrination element is based on the particularity of Progressive Academic Publishing, UK Page 18 www.idpublications.org European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences Vol. 8 No. 11, 2020 ISSN 2056-5852 information perception. It is always easier for a person to understand and accept something already familiar, similar to what he knows, than completely new one, which has no analogues in his personal experience. Regardless of ethnic and religious affiliation, all people, starting from childhood, encounter myths and legends, where there are “light” and “dark” forces, Gods and Deities, the struggle between good and evil. That is why during the creation of the doctrine of a religious cult, a new religious movement or a totalitarian sect, images that are similar to the heroes and characters of folk art and therefore proven and already inscribed as familiar in the individual’s perception system, are used. “Mimicry”. The strategy of today's destructive religious organizations (unlike their predecessors, propagandizing various sectarian doctrines in the 90s) has its own particularities. If the first preachers of pro-Christian sects or recruiters of pro-Islamic movements spoke quite directly about the propagated religious doctrine and publicly agitated to become a member of a religious community, then modern recruiters use completely different tactics. At present time a clear and understandable for everyone formulation, including such words as “faith”, “God (Allah)”, “religion”, “religious”, etc. is absent in the organizations’ names. In order not to “frighten away” the candidate for involvement and successfully accomplish indoctrination, destructive religious cults and new religious movements mimic under organizations that at first glance have nothing to do with religion, because of using abstract concepts in their names, for example, “Seminar on Mental Perfection”, “Federation of Families for World Peace”, “Philosophy of True Love”, “The study of Arabic script”, “Modern women of the East” and others. People did not immediately understand that they have become members of a religious cult, and when indoctrination and involvement were realized, it is often too late. Emotionality. All destructive religious organizations always exploit the emotional component - both the existing modern reality and the religious segment. Any psychologically traumatized person or those, who is under the yoke of many problems is always emotionally disoriented and seeks solutions. Unable to get out of the personality crisis, sooner or later he turns to God, as to the last “instance” not only in hope to receive “miraculous help”, but also consolation - using scientific terminology - emotional stabilization. The emphasis on emotionality in the religious component is also not accidental. Emotionally depressed people or ones with broken