An Empirical Estimate of Carrier Frequencies for 400+ Causal Mendelian Variants: Results from an Ethnically Diverse Clinical Sample of 23,453 Individuals

An Empirical Estimate of Carrier Frequencies for 400+ Causal Mendelian Variants: Results from an Ethnically Diverse Clinical Sample of 23,453 Individuals

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE ©American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Open An empirical estimate of carrier frequencies for 400+ causal Mendelian variants: results from an ethnically diverse clinical sample of 23,453 individuals Gabriel A. Lazarin, MS1, Imran S. Haque, PhD1, Shivani Nazareth, MS1, Kevin Iori, BS1, A. Scott Patterson, MA1, Jessica L. Jacobson, MD1,2, John R. Marshall, MD1,3, William K. Seltzer, PhD, FACMG1, Pasquale Patrizio, MD4, Eric A. Evans, PhD1 and Balaji S. Srinivasan, PhD1,5,6 Purpose: Recent developments in genomics have led to expanded multiple disorders. We report tabulations of carrier frequency by self- carrier screening panels capable of assessing hundreds of causal identified ethnicity and disease. mutations for genetic disease. This new technology enables simulta- Conclusion: neous measurement of carrier frequencies for many diseases. As the To our knowledge, this study of a large, ethnically resultant rank-ordering of carrier frequencies impacts the design and diverse clinical sample provides the most accurate measurements to prioritization of screening programs, the accuracy of this ranking is date of carrier frequencies for hundreds of recessive alleles. The study a public health concern. also yields information on the clinical considerations associated with routine use of expanded panels and provides support for a pan-ethnic Methods: A total of 23,453 individuals from many obstetric, genet- screening paradigm that minimizes the use of “racial” categories by ics, and infertility clinics were referred for routine recessive disease the physician, as recommended by recent guidelines. carrier screening. Multiplex carrier screening was performed and results were aggregated for this study. Genet Med 2013:15(3):178–186 Results: Twenty-four percent of individuals were identified as Key Words: carrier frequency; carrier screening; genetic testing; ­carriers for at least one of 108 disorders, and 5.2% were carriers for pan-ethnic; recessive disease INTRODUCTION recommended that screening be offered pan-ethnically.3 Carrier screening is the practice of diagnosing individuals and However, SMA screening is still not performed as routinely as couples at risk of conceiving children affected by recessive dis- CF testing,4,5 in part because of a conflicting ACOG statement eases. This practice is widespread and growing in importance, that SMA should not be offered to the general population.6 as carrier couples identified before conception may decide to In the absence of family history, carrier screening for diseases pursue a variety of preventive measures, including in vitro fer- beyond CF and SMA is typically offered based on stated ethnic- tilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis, use of donor ity. For example, hemoglobinopathy carrier screening is offered gametes, adoption, or early prenatal diagnostic testing. to individuals of African, Southeast Asian, or Mediterranean In 2001 cystic fibrosis (CF) became the first disease recom- ancestry,7 whereas a panel of 4–16 diseases is routinely offered mended for routine carrier screening in the United States when to individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry.8–10 the American Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) However, the advent of modern genomics has changed the and the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) jointly health economic calculus around genetic screening, with costs- recommended that CF screening be offered to all individuals of per-megabase for DNA sequencing falling at a rate faster than Caucasian and Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity and that it be “made Moore’s Law would indicate.11 Consequently, the amortized cost available” to individuals of all other ethnic groups.1 In 2005, of carrier screening across the population for hundreds of genetic in recognition of increasing population ethnic admixture, the diseases is now far less than the cost of treating an affected ACOG Committee on Genetics stated it was reasonable to offer child.12,13,14 Genomics has also called into question the reification CF screening pan-ethnically.2 of “racial” categories in clinical guidelines, as high-throughput Routine carrier screening for spinal muscular atrophy assays now allow a physician to prescribe the same test for every (SMA) has become more common since 2008 when ACMG patient, regardless of ethnicity, with little or no increase in cost. The first two authors contributed equally to this work. The last two authors co-advised this work. 1Department of Genetics, Counsyl, South San Francisco, California, USA; 2Department of Pathology, New York University, New York, New York, USA; 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA; 4Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; 5Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; 6Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. Correspondence: Balaji Srinivasan ([email protected]) and Eric Evans (eaevans@@counsyl.com) Submitted 3 February 2012; accepted 1 August 2012; advance online publication 13 September 2012. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.114 178 Volume 15 | Number 3 | March 2013 | GENETICS in MEDICINE Carrier screening and frequencies for 100+ recessive diseases | LAZARIN et al ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Here we present clinical data from a large-scale deployment of in the first column of Supplementary Table S1 online. All OMIM expanded carrier screening across dozens of practices. In addi- numbers are also noted in Supplementary Table S1 online. tion to providing perhaps the best estimates to date of a wide range of Mendelian allele frequencies, the deployment provides RESULTS a concrete example of how genomics may reduce the role of Data were available from 23,453 screened patients. Routine “race” in biomedicine. It also identifies a number of severe, fre- screening for a possible carrier state was the indication in all quent, and easily detected disease alleles that have been omitted individuals. Screening for other indications, including poten- to date from population screening programs but that are easily tial gamete donor, infertility, and personal or family history, included in expanded carrier testing panels. was also performed. Individuals with those indications were excluded from this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS Multiplex platform Population demographics The screening platform (Universal Genetic Test, Counsyl, South Self-reported ethnicity is summarized in Table 1. Caucasians San Francisco, CA) uses high-throughput genotyping to identify constituted 60.6%, and 75.0% were female. Most samples came disease-causing variants and corresponding wild-type alleles. In from within the United States; a minority came from Australia, total, 417 disease-causing mutations associated with 108 recessive Canada, England, or New Zealand. diseases were assayed and interpreted via fluorescent sequences. The median age was 33.0 years and mean age was 33.63 years. We consider a subset (listed in Supplementary Table S1 online) Most (n = 17,865) of the individuals were from 21–39 years of the diseases identifiable via the platform. The analytical per- of age. A small percentage was under 21 years (1.6%) or over formance has been reported previously and compares favorably 45 years (2.8%). with traditional single-gene testing methods.12 Our reported dis- ease carrier frequencies are lower bounds, as there are variants Disease carrier states for each disease that the assay platform does not test. Alleles associated with 96 recessive diseases (excluding mild con- ditions) were identified in our 23,453 patients (Supplementary Study population Table S1 online). Among the mild conditions, the most com- This study sample included 23,453 individuals. Referral sources mon was MTHFR deficiency, with a frequency of 1 in 1.9. included family practitioners, geneticists, genetic counselors, Because these conditions typically have limited reproductive obstetricians, perinatologists, and reproductive endocrinologists. decision-making significance, they will not be considered fur- Documented informed consent, including consent to research, was ther in this analysis. All subsequent analysis considers only required of all patients and is on record at our facility. Institutional those diseases listed in Supplementary Table S1 online. review board exemption is applicable due to de-identification of Of the total sample, 24.0% of individuals (n = 5,633) were the data presented (45 CFR part 46.101(b)(4)). Genetic counsel- heterozygous for at least one non-mild condition. A total of ing was made available at no cost to all tested individuals. 7,067 heterozygous states were identified. Carrier statistics are Funding was performed as fee-for-service, typically reim- fully reported in Supplementary Table S1 online. bursed through third-party payers. Seventy-eight individuals were identified as homozygotes or compound heterozygotes for the following conditions: α-1- Disease panels antitrypsin deficiency (n = 38), cystic fibrosis (n = 9), GJB2- Diseases identifiable via the test platform range in severity from related DFNB1 nonsyndromic hearing loss and deafness (n = mild to incompatible with life. Nearly every disease can be con- 6), factor XI deficiency (n = 5), Gaucher disease (n = 4), famil- sidered severe (associated with infant or child mortality), signifi- ial Mediterranean fever (n = 3), carnitine palmitoyltransferase cant (associated

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us