Download Download

Download Download

1999/2000. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 108/109: 1 1-18 GEOLOGY OF THE GRAND CALUMET RIVER REGION Timothy G. Fisher: Department of Geoseiences, Indiana University Northwest, 3400 Broadway, Gary, Indiana 46408 USA ABSTRACT. The geology of the Calumet River region is briefly reviewed to provide a background for applied research in the area. The review relies heavily upon research conducted by scientists affiliated with the Indiana and Illinois Geological Surveys. At the end of the Late Wisconsinan glacial epoch, fluctuations in the Lake Michigan Lobe of the Laurentide Ice Sheet resulted in the formation of three moraine systems around the south end of the Lake Michigan basin: in decreasing age, the Valparaiso. Tinley and Lake Border ridges. High stands of ancestral Lake Michigan (also known as glacial Lake Chicago) are named the Glenwood, Calumet and Algonquin high phases that formed when the north end of the basin was blocked by ice. Retreat of the glacier from the basin caused the lake level to drop during the Two Creek low phase. The Chippewa low occurred at the beginning of the Holocene when ancestral Lake Michigan was as much as 107 m below modern levels. Lake level then rose in response to isostatic rebound of the outlet in southern Ontario until the Nipissing high was reached about 5000 years ago. At this time, the Toleston Beach in northern Indiana and Illinois was developing as a complex of sand dunes and more than 100 beach ridges. The Grand Calumet River came into existence about 2600 years ago as spits deflected the Little Calumet River eastwards upon closure of the Sag channel. Eastward migration of the Grand Calumet River ceased when the coastline was modified following European settlement in the late 19 th century. Keywords: Indiana, Lake Michigan, Grand Calumet River, geology The geology of the Grand Calumet River Time (radiocarbon dates) within the text region (hereafter referred to as 'the region') is older than 6300 ybp (years before present closely tied to glacial events that began about [1950]) is in radiocarbon years, while dates 1,600,000 years ago. During the Pleistocene younger than 6300 ybp are reported in cal- epoch (« 1,600,000-10,000 years ago) the re- endar ybp. gion was impacted by numerous glacial ad- vances and retreats. Because successive gla- GLACIAL AND GLACIAL LAKE cial advances destroyed the evidence of HISTORY previous advances, the number of glaciations The region is underlain by sediment depos- is unknown. The presence of older glacial sed- ited by glaciers and glacial lakes. The Grand iment throughout the Midwest beyond the Calumet River is located on lacustrine sedi- limit of the late Wisconsinan glaciation (Fig. ment of the Toleston Beach that is less than 1), which peaked about 20,000 years ago 6300 years old, which in turn lies upon older (Mickelson et al. 1983), is testament to earlier, glacial, and finer-grained glaciolacustrine sed- more extensive glaciations. In the region there iment. The distribution and character of this appears to be sedimentary evidence for only older sediment is best understood by linking the most recent glacial episode (Brown et al. the history of the recessional ice margin with 1996), although there may be some uncertain- glacial lakes in the Lake Michigan basin. ty about this. The geology of the region is by the last no means only a result of glacial erosion and During ice age, known as the Wis- consinan in the sedimentation. Much of the sediment in the Midwest, the Laurentide Ice region was deposited as littoral sand or off- Sheet advanced across much of Indiana. Illi- shore mud from various levels of glacial Lake nois, and Ohio (Fig. 1 ); and the maximum ex- Chicago and mid-Holocene age Lake Michi- tent of ice was reached about 20.000 ybp. gan. The variable levels of these lakes devel- Across Indiana, there are series of recessional oped in response to the presence of ice in the moraines that record stationary ice-margins Lake Michigan basin and isostatic rebound in (Gray 1989) composed of glacigenic material Ontario. (sand, gravel, and till). By about 14,000 ybp I I 12 PROCEEDINGS OF THE INDIANA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE extending into Michigan and Wisconsin; and O N in Indiana, the moraine forms the sub-conti- nental drainage divide between the St. **/. Lawrence and Mississippi drainage systems. Set inside the Valparaiso Moraine are two oth- i ~T. _ Ml er recessional moraines known as the Tinley and Lake Border Moraines. All three ridges were likely deposited in a short period of time around 14,000 ybp by successive and less ex- Wl V tensive readvances (Fig. 5). Glacial lakes Ml (l formed between the ice and the ridges as the k glacier receded northwards, opening up the N Study Area lake basin. Because the glaciers were in lake 10 j basins, they rested on fine-grained sediment well-lubricated with water, and this low-resis- IN OH tive state (Clarke 1987) likely aided the gla- ciers ability to respond quickly to variations IL in climatic conditions and/or glaciologic con- J v- trols. These responses are illustrated in Figs. 2—4, where four different positions of the ice Late Wisconsinan glacial extent margin are illustrated. The dated phases are averages and simplifications. For example, the . Figure 1 Location of the Grand Calumet River — Glenwood phase has been interpreted to con- region at the southern end of Lake Michigan, and sist of two separate advances with a low-lake the extent of Late Wisconsinan glaciation in the phase between them (Hansel et al. 1985). Fig- Great Lakes region. ures 2—4 are designed to provide the reader with only an overview of late-glacial events. (Hansel et al. 1985) much of the Laurentide When the Lake Michigan lobe of the Lau- Ice Sheet was confined to the Great Lake ba- rentide Ice Sheet occupied the lake basin, the sins, giving a lobate pattern to the ice margin Straits of Mackinac were blocked by ice. Gla- (e.g., Fig. 2). The Valparaiso Moraine wraps cial Lake Chicago was dammed by the glacier around the southern end of Lake Michigan, (hence the term: glacial lake) and the outlet ice lake 14 WKH3 Chippewa phase -9800 C B.P. 14 Calumet phase -11,500 'TB.P. J Nipissing phase -4500 C B.P. Figures 2-4.—Position of lake levels (phases) as controlled by ice margins. Note that lake phases are not drafted for the Lake Huron basin, other than for the Glenwood phase. Dates are averages and along with the figures are based on Hansel et al. (1985) and Eschman & Karrow (1985). Note that the ice margin fluctuated over hundreds of kilometers over relatively short periods of time. FISHER—GEOLOGY OF THE GRAND CALUMET 13 was located on the lowest point of the drain- dicates glacigenic sediment (tills, debris flows, age divide (Leverett 1897). During the Glen- sand and gravel, and ice-contact glacial lake wood phase (Fig. 2), the Chicago outlet was sediment) of the Lake Border sequence (Tin- active, with water flowing through the Sag ley and Lake Border Moraines) and Valparai- and Des Plains channels. Once the glacier re- so Megasequence (Brown et al. 1996). The ceded northwards enough to deglaciate the Glenwood-age sediment consists of two main Straits of Mackinac or Indiana River low- types. First, the most obvious landforms are lands, lake level dropped and was controlled the extensive spits that built across northwest by outlets to the northeast (Hansel et al. Indiana by the westerly transport of sand by 1985). The Chicago outlet was abandoned at littoral currents. Although not shown on Fig. this time, and forests grew on the newly ex- 5, Glenwood-age spits are prevalent in Illi- posed lake plain between the Glenwood nois; and they indicate an easterly transport shoreline and the much lower lake of the Two direction. The spits record migration of sand Creeks phase (Fig. 2). The northeast outlets southward along both sides of the lake, fo- were glaciated once more during a readvance cusing sediment to its southern end. The spits of the Lake Michigan lobe, causing the lake record a lake level between about 195-189 m to rise to the Calumet level. The rising lake suggesting that the Chicago outlet was slowly buried a forest at Two Creeks, Wisconsin being eroded during Glenwood time. The sec- (Broecker & Farrand 1963) and other woody ond type of Glenwood sediment is fine- material in the Chicago region (Hansel et al. grained lacustrine sediment of laminated and 1985) and northwest Indiana (Schneider & massive silty-clay. This unit is mapped as part Reshkin 1982; Schneider & Hansel 1990). of the Lake Border sequence and consists of The radiocarbon dates indicate flooding of the approximately 16 m of laminated clay, silt, land started at about 11,800 ybp. The higher and silty clay and fine-grained till over bed- lake level is known as the Calumet phase, and rock (Bleuer and Woodfield 1993; Brown & the Chicago outlet was reoccupied (Fig. 3). By Thompson 1995; Brown et al. 1996). about 1 1,200 ybp the Lake Michigan lobe had There are no sediments mapped for the Two begun to retreat northwards of the Straits of Creeks phase because the region was subaer- Mackinac, and Lakes Michigan and Huron ially exposed at this time. It is during this time were confluent. This lake is called glacial and the subsequent Chippewa phase that the Lake Algonquin, and some contend that any region's rivers carved their valleys. This in- evidence of it in the region was eroded by the cision was in response to the lower lake level subsequent mid-Holocene Nipissing high that increased the streams bed slope.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us