Coal Train Traffic Impact Study OCTOBER 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary

Coal Train Traffic Impact Study OCTOBER 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary

Coal Train Traffic Impact Study OCTOBER 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................... ii Overview ................................................................................................................... 1 Affected Area ......................................................................................................... 2 Stakeholders ........................................................................................................... 4 Planned Infrastructure and Service Improvements ....................... 5 Existing Rail Operations ................................................................................... 6 Study Area Railroad Crossing Information ........................................... 7 Daily Vehicle Volumes at Railroad Crossings ....................................... 9 Pedestrian Volumes at Railroad Crossings ........................................... 11 Railroad Track Schedule ................................................................................... 13 Queues at Railroad Crossings ...................................................................... 16 Rail Capacity............................................................................................................ 18 Collisions ................................................................................................................... 18 Emergency Vehicle Access ............................................................................ 19 Potential Crossing Improvements ............................................................ 19 i DRAFT Executive Summary • Safety – In the past 10 years, trains were directly involved STUDY PURPOSE EFFECTS OF INCREASED RAIL in a total of four collisions at Broad Street, Wall Street, and The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impacts of coal OPERATIONS Holgate Street. A total of 127 improper crossings were train operations on existing train operations, traffic operations • Crossing Delays/Gate Down Time - Daily gate down recorded within a 24-hour period at the Broad Street, South and affected stakeholders in Seattle’s North Waterfront and times at railroad crossing would increase with coal train Holgate Street, and South Lander Street crossings involving South Downtown (SODO) districts. Findings from this initial operations. The increase is dependent on the length of vehicles, bicycles and/or pedestrians. Improper crossings transportation study will inform the Seattle City Council, train, how fast it is travelling, and how many daily trains are when vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians cross the tracks City management, interested stakeholders and the general are scheduled. as the red lights start to flash or the railroad gates are down. public of the potential range and magnitude of impacts the - In 2015, the estimated additional daily gate down time for This type of behavior could increase with more delays coal train proposal could have on travel patterns and existing coal trains could be 31 to 83 minutes. This could represent and could increase the potential for train collisions with transportation infrastructure. an increase in daily gate down time of approximately 18% vehicles, pedestrians, or bicyclists, and blocking incidents. to 49% at Broad Street and 15% to 39% at both Holgate • Emergency Vehicle Access – Blockage from the proposed COAL TRAIN OPERATIONS and Lander Street. coal trains would impact emergency vehicle trips to and Coal trains were assumed to be 7,000 feet long in 2015 and - In 2026, the estimated additional daily gate down time from the waterfront. Delays not only affect local area are expected to be up to 8,500 feet long in the future. In 2015, for coal trains could be approximately 67 to 183 minutes. responses, but also affect the ability to send more resources 10 total coal train trips (5 round trips) are expected each day, This could represent an increase in daily gate down of from one area of the city to another area. Blocked train which is approximately one train approximately every 2.4 approximately 39% to 108% at Broad Street and 31% to crossings affect response time for fire responses, technical hours at crossings through Seattle. In 2026, the number of 86% at Holgate and Lander Streets. rescue groups, hazardous materials responses, and daily trains would increase to 18 total daily trips (9 round trips), • Vehicle Queues at Railroad Crossings - Overall vehicle emergency medical responses where rapid response times which is approximately one train every 1.3 hours. queue lengths at railroad crossings vary depending on are especially important. when trains, including coal trains, arrive in relation to other trains. Freight trains longer than the coal trains AFFECTED AREA POTENTIAL CROSSING The North Waterfront study area included evaluation of four already operate today. The maximum number of vehicles IMPROVEMENTS at-grade crossings: Broad Street, Clay Street, Vine Street, and queuing from a single train would not increase provided Grade separation of Broad Street and South Lander Street, and Wall Street. The SODO study area included evaluation of four coal trains are operating at 20 mph or greater. Coal the closure of South Holgate Street have been evaluated in at-grade crossings: South Holgate Street, South Lander Street, trains added to the current demand would increase the past studies and could be considered if freight and passenger South Horton Street and South Spokane Street. number and frequency of vehicles waiting in a queue. rail activity reaches a threshold warranting such a commitment • Port of Seattle • Edgewater Hotel Depending on the time between gate closures, vehicle of capital funds. While the addition of coal trains alone in the queues may not fully dissipate before the next gate • Cruise Ships • Marriott Waterfront Hotel near future does not appear to increase traffic delays to a level closing. This would result in longer vehicle queues for warranting such large-scale investments, a number of smaller • Olympic Sculpture Park • SODO businesses some of the coal train trips. scale improvements at specific crossing locations could be • Victoria Clipper • Industries implemented to improve safety and accessibility at and around • Waterfront businesses • Stadiums crossing locations. • Freight Community • Washington State Ferries • Area Residents ii DRAFT Overview PROJECT BACKGROUND Pacific International Terminals, a subsidiary of SSA Marine, is Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map proposing to develop the Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point, Washington. This terminal, located north of Bellingham, Cherry Point would be capable of exporting 48 to 54 million dry metric tons of coal per year. The likely route of the coal delivery trains Bellingham would be from Wyoming/Montana, through Spokane, along the Columbia River and north through Seattle to Cherry Point. Full build out of the coal export facility is scheduled for 2026, this would result in up to 9 fully-loaded northbound train trips per day (or 18 total trips) along the Burlington Northern Santa Fe mainline (Project Information Document, 2011). Each train would be approximately 7,000 feet in length. In 2015 there Seattle would be approximately 10 total coal train trips. Coal train arrivals through Seattle were assumed to be evenly spaced throughout a 24-hour period, resulting in approximately one train every 2.4 hours in 2015 and one train every 1.3 hours in 2026. STUDY PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impacts of coal train operations on existing train operations, traffic operations and affected stakeholders in Seattle’s North Waterfront and South Downtown (SODO) districts. Findings from this initial transportation study will inform the Seattle City Council, City management, interested stakeholders and the general Coal Train operational public of the potential range and magnitude of impacts the information used to build coal train proposal could have on travel patterns and existing the analysis assumptions transportation infrastructure. An expanded transportation for this report can be found impact analysis may be conducted as part of a more detailed in the Project Information project review to comply with the State Environmental Policy Document (February Act (SEPA). 28,2011), which can be found at: www.coaltrainfacts.org/pid 1 DRAFT Affected Area The federal inventory of railroad crossings identifies nearly 200 rail and spur crossings within Figure 2. North Waterfront District the Seattle city limits. Of these, nine at-grade railroad crossings are affected by through-haul trains in the North Waterfront and South Downtown (SODO) districts in Seattle. Olympic Sculpture Park NORTH WATERFRONT Seattle’s north waterfront district is located at the north end of downtown along the Elliott Bay shoreline. There are four at-grade crossings in this location, which are also Quiet Zones (see Broad Street Figure 2): • Broad Street Western Avenue • Clay Street Clay Street • Vine Street • Wall Street Pier 70 Elliott Avenue Stakeholders • Port of Seattle • Cruise ships Alaskan Way • Olympic Sculpture Park Vine Street • Victoria Clipper Pier 69 • Waterfront businesses • Freight Community • Area residents Wall Street • Edgewater Hotel Elliott Bay • Marriott Waterfront Hotel • Washington State Ferries 99 Edgewater Hotel Pier 66 LEGEND Study Area Intersection 2 DRAFT AFFECTED AREA SODO Figure 3. SODO District Seattle’s South Downtown district, commonly referred to as SODO, is primarily

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    24 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us