PRESENTED TO The University of Toronto BY %fr-j2b%juz.^ <&. <Lds£Au* OUTLINES OF SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY ^ * OUTLINES OF SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY DESIGNED FOR THE USE OF THEOLOGICAL STUDENTS BY AUGUSTUS HOPKINS STRONG, D. D., LL. D. PRESIDENT AND PROFESSOR OF BIBLICAL THEOLOGY IN THE ROCHESTER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY PHILADELPHIA THE GRIFFITH & ROWLAND PRESS 1701 Chestnut Street COPYRIGHT, Bv AUGUSTUS HOPKINS STRONG. 1908. Cljrfsto 2Peo &alt>atori. " The eye sees only that which it brings with it the power of seeing."— Cicero. " Open thou mine eyes, that i may behold wondrous things out or thy law."—Psalm 119 : 18. " For with thee is the fountain of life : In thy light shall we see light."—Psalm 36 : 9. " For we know in part, and we prophesy in part ; but when that which is perfect is come, that which is in part " SHALL BE DONE AWAY. —1 Cor. 13 : 9, 10. INTRODUCTORY NOTE The present work contains the substance of my "Systematic Theology." It omits all bibliographical and illustrative material, and confines itself to bare statements of doctrine. Those readers who desire further explanation of the various points under discus- sion will find their needs supplied in the larger work, a description of which immediately follows this Introductory Note. It is thought that the present volume may have its special value as a text-book and basis for class-recitation, supplemented, as such recitation may be, by the oral expositions of the teacher. As this volume, however, contains all the large print of the larger work, it constitutes in itself a complete whole, and presents the author's views in all essential particulars. Kochester Theological Seminary, Rochester, N. Y., May 1, 1908. Vll PREFACE TO THE AUTHOR'S "SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY" IN" THREE VOLUME8. The present work is a revision and enlargement of my "Systematic Theology," first published in 1886. Of the original work there have been printed seven editions, each edition embody- ing successive corrections and supposed improvements. During the twenty years which have intervened since its first publication I have accumulated much new material, which I now offer to the reader. My philosophical and critical point of view meantime has also somewhat changed. While I still hold to the old doctrines, I interpret them differently and expound them more clearly, because I seem to myself to have reached a fundamental truth which throws new light upon them all. This truth I have tried to set " forth in my book entitled Christ in Creation," and to that book I refer the reader for further information. That Christ is the one and only Kevealer of God, in nature, in humanity, in history, in science, in Scripture, is in my judgment the key to theology. This view implies a monistic and idealistic conception of the world, together with an evolutionary idea as to its origin and progress. But it is the very antidote to pantheism, in that it recognizes evolution as only the method of the tran- scendent and personal Christ, who fills all in all, and who makes the universe teleological and moral from its centre to its circumference and from its beginning until now. Neither evolution nor the higher criticism has any terrors to one who regards them as parts of Christ's creating and educating pro- cess. The Christ in whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and ix X PREFACE. knowledge himself furnishes all the needed safeguards and limita- tions. It is only because Christ has been forgotten that nature and law have been personified, that history has been regarded as unpur- posed development, that Judaism has been referred to a merely human origin, that Paul has been thought to have switched the church off from its proper track even before it had gotten fairly started on its course, that superstition and illusion have come to seem the only foundation for the sacrifices of the martyrs and the triumphs of modern missions. I believe in no such irrational and atheistic evolution as this. I believe rather in him in whom all things consist, who is with his people even to the end of the world, and who has promised to lead them into all the truth. Philosophy and science are good servants of Christ, but they are poor guides when they rule out the Son of God. As I reach my seventieth year and write these words on my birthday, I am thank- ful for that personal experience of union with Christ which has enabled me to see in science and philosophy the teaching of my Lord. But this same personal experience has made me even more alive to Christ's teaching in Scripture, has made me recognize in Paul and John a truth profounder than that disclosed by any secular writers, truth with regard to sin and atonement for sin, that satisfies the deepest wants of my nature and that is self- evidencing and divine. I am distressed by some common theological tendencies of our time, because I believe them to be false to both science and religion. How men who have ever felt themselves to be lost sin- ners and who have once received pardon from their crucified Lord and Savior can thereafter seek to pare down his attributes, deny his deity and atonement, tear from his brow the crown of miracle and sovereignty, relegate him to the place of a merely moral teacher who influences us only as does Socrates by words spoken across a stretch of ages, passes my comprehension. Here is my test of PREFACE. XI orthodoxy : Do we pray to Jesus ? Do we call upon the name of Christ, as did Stephen and all the early church ? Is he our living Lord, omnipresent, omniscient, omnipotent ? Is he divine only in the sense in which we are divine, or is he the only-begotten Son, God manifest in the flesh, in whom is all the fulness of the Godhead bodily ? What think ye of the Christ ? is still the critical question, and none are entitled to the name of Christian who, in the face of the evidence he has furnished us, cannot answer the I ques- tion aright. Under the influence of Ritschl and his Kantian relativism, many of our teachers and preachers have swung off into a practical denial of Christ's deity and of his atonement. We seem upon the verge of a second Unitarian defection, that will break up churches and compel secessions, in a worse manner than did. that of Channing and Ware a century ago. American Christianity recovered from that disaster only by vigorously asserting the authority of Christ and the inspiration of the Scriptures. We need a new vision of the Savior like that which Paul saw on the way to Damascus and John saw on the isle of Patmos, to convince us that Jesus is lifted above space and time, that his existence antedated creation, that he conducted the march of Hebrew history, that he was born of a Virgin, suffered on the Cross, rose from the dead, and now lives forevermore, the Lord of the universe, the only God with whom we have to do, our Savior here and our Judge hereafter. Without a revival of this faith our churches will become secularized, mission enterprise will die out, and the candlestick will be removed out of its place as it was with the seven churches of Asia, and as it has been with the apostate churches of New England. " I print this revised and enlarged edition of my Systematic Theology," in the hope that its publication may do something to stem this fast advancing tide, and to confirm the faith of God's elect. I make no doubt that the vast majority of Christians still Xll PKEFACE. hold the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints, and that they will sooner or later separate themselves from those who deny the Lord who bought them. When the enemy comes in like a flood, the Spirit of the Lord will raise up a standard against him. I would do my part in raising up such a standard. I would lead others to avow anew, as I do now, in spite of the supercilious assumptions of modern infidelit}-, my firm belief, only confirmed by the experience and reflection of a half century, in the old doctrines of holiness as the fundamental attribute of God, of an original transgression and sin of the whole human race, in a divine preparation in Hebrew history for man's redemption, in the deity, preexistence, virgin birth, vicarious atonement and bodily resur- rection of Jesus Christ our Lord, and in his future coming to judge the quick and the dead. I believe that these are truths of science as well as truths of revelation that the will be ; supernatural yet seen to be most natural and that not theo- truly ; the open minded logian but the narrow minded scientist will be obliged to hide his head at Christ's coming. The present volume, in its treatment of Ethical Monism, Inspir- ation, the Attributes of God, and the Trinity, contains an antidote to most of the false doctrine which now threatens the safety of the church. I desire especially to call attention to the section on Perfection, and the Attributes therein involved, because I believe that the recent mergiDg of Holiness in Love, and the practical denial that Righteousness is fundamental in God's nature, are responsible for the utilitarian views of law and the superficial views of sin which now prevail in some systems of theology. There can be no proper doctrine of the atonement and no proper doctrine of retribution, so long as Holiness is refused its preeminence.