Griph Bulletin Volume 17, Released

Griph Bulletin Volume 17, Released

Faculty of Philosophy GRIPh Groningen Research Institute for Philosophy Bulletin Volume 17 January 2017 Publications .......................................................................... 1 Academic .................................................................................. 1 Professional ............................................................................ 10 Popular ................................................................................... 13 Other research output ............................................................. 14 Lectures .............................................................................. 15 Academic lectures ................................................................... 15 Other lectures ......................................................................... 35 Appointments & accolades ................................................. 41 Membership of PhD committees & opposition ................... 44 Travel & conferences .......................................................... 47 Miscellaneous .................................................................... 54 Publications Academic Articles • Decock, L., Douven, I., & Sznajder, M. (2016). A Geometric Principle of Indifference. Journal of Applied Logic, 19(2), 54-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jal.2016.05.002 • Dutilh Novaes, C. (2016). Reductio ad absurdum from a dialogical perspective. Philosophical Studies, 173(10), 2605-2628. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-016-0667-6 • Dutilh Novaes, C., & Duncombe, M. (2016). Dialectic and logic in Aristotle and his tradition. History and Philosophy of Logic, 37(1), 1-8. DOI: 10.1080/01445340.2015.1086624 • Evers, H., & van Smeden, G. (2016). Meaning in Life: in Defense of the Hybrid View. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 54(3), 355-371. DOI: 10.1111/sjp.12179 • Evers, D., & Deng, N. (2016). Acknowledgement and the Paradox of Tragedy. Philosophical Studies, 173(2), 337-350. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-015-0495-0 • Evers, D. (2016). Jonas Olson's Evidence for Moral Error Theory. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 13(4), 403- 418. • Friederich, S. (2016). Self-location and causal context. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 93(2), 232-258. DOI: 10.1163/18756735-09302008 1 • Hindriks, F., Douven, I., & Singmann, H. (2016). A New Angle on the Knobe Effect: Intentionality Correlates with Blame, not with Praise. Mind & Language, 31(2), 204-220. DOI: 10.1111/mila.12101 • Kleingeld, P. (2016). Kant's Moral and Political Cosmopolitanism. Philosophy Compass, 11(1), 14-23. DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12298 • Köder, F., & Maier, E. (2016). Children mix direct and indirect speech: evidence from pronoun comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 43(4), 843- 866. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000915000318 • Kooi, B. (2016). The ambiguity of knowability. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 9(3), 421-428. DOI: 10.1017/S1755020315000416 • Kuipers, T. (2016). Models, postulates, and generalized nomic truth approximation. Synthese, 193(10), 3057- 3077. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0916-9 • Lenz, M. (2016). Is Locke’s Account of Personal Identity Really Subjectivist? Kant-Studien, 107(3), 526- 535. DOI: 10.1515/kant-2016-0039 • Maier, E. (2016). A Plea against Monsters. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 93(3), 363-395. DOI: 10.1163/18756735-09303003 • Maier, E. (2016). Attitudes and Mental Files in Discourse Representation Theory. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 7(2), 473-490. DOI: 10.1007/s13164-015-0296-6 2 • Pauly, M. (2016). A Framework for Ontological Policy Reconstruction: Academic Knowledge Transfer in the Netherlands as a Case Study. Journal of Social Ontology, 2(2), 303-323. DOI: 10.1515/jso-2015-0028 • Romeijn, J., Morey, R., & Rouder, J. N. (2016). The philosophy of Bayes’ factors and the quantification of statistical evidence. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 6–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2015.11.001 • Romeijn, J., & Wenmackers, S. (2016). A New Theory about Old Evidence. Synthese, 193(4), 1225-1250. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-014-0632-x • Sangiacomo, A. (2016). Locke and Spinoza on the epistemic and motivational weaknesses of reason: the Reasonableness of Christianity and the Theological- Political Treatise. Intellectual History Review, 26(4), 477-495. DOI: 10.1080/17496977.2016.1175214 • Sangiacomo, A. (2016). From secondary causes to artificial instruments: Pierre-Sylvain Régis's rethinking of scholastic accounts of causation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part A, 60, 7-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.08.004 • Sangiacomo, A. (2016). Aristotle, Heereboord and the polemical target of Spinoza’s critique of final causes. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 54(3), 395-420. DOI: 10.1353/hph.2016.0061 • Sangiacomo, A. (2016). Before the conatus doctrine: Spinoza’s correspondence with Willem van Blijenbergh. Archiv für die Geschichte der Philosophie, 98(2), 144– 168. DOI: 10.1515/agph-2016-0007 3 • Schmidt, A. (2016). Withdrawing Versus Withholding Freedoms: Nudging and the Case of Tobacco Control. The American Journal of Bioethics, 16(7), 3–14. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1180442 • Schmidt, A. (2016). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on ‘Withdrawing Versus Withholding Freedoms: Nudging and the Case of Tobacco Control.'. The American Journal of Bioethics, 16(11), W1-3. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1222019 • Schmidt, A. (2016). The Ethics and Politics of Mindfulness-Based Interventions. Journal of Medical Ethics, 42(7), 450-454. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015- 102942 • Schmidt, A. (2016). Abilities and the Sources of Unfreedom. Ethics, 127(1), 179–207. DOI: 10.1086/687335 • Stahl, T. (2016). Indiscriminate mass surveillance and the public sphere. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(1), 33-39. DOI: 10.1007/s10676-016-9392-2 • Sterkenburg, T. (2016). Solomonoff Prediction and Occam's Razor. Philosophy of Science, 83(4), 459-479. DOI: 10.1086/687257 • Streumer, B. (2016). No, We Cannot. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 24(4), 537-546. DOI: 10.1080/09672559.2016.1203982 • Streumer, B. (2016). Why Jonas Olson Cannot Believe the Error Theory Either. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 13(4), 419-436. DOI: 10.1163/17455243-01304003 4 • Sznajder, M. (2016). What conceptual spaces can do for Carnap’s late inductive logic. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part A, 56, 62-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.12.001 • van Laar, J. A., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (2016). Fair and Unfair Strategies in Public Controversies. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 5(3), 316-348. • van Loo, H. M., Schoevers, R. A., Kendler, K. S., de Jonge, P., & Romeijn, J-W. (2016). Psychiatric comorbidity does not only depend on diagnostic thresholds: an illustration with major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 33(2), 143-152. DOI: 10.1002/da.22453 • van Mazijk, C. (2016). Kant and Husserl on the contents of perception. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 54(2), 267-287. DOI: 10.1111/sjp.12170 • van Mazijk, C. (2016). Kant and Husserl on bringing perception to judgment. Meta, 8(2), 419-441. Comment/Letter to the editor • Evers, D., & Streumer, B. (2016). Are the Moral Fixed Points Conceptual Truths? Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 1-9. 5 Contribution to Book - Chapter • Bewersdorf, G. (2016). Total Evidence, Uncertainty and A Priori Beliefs. In L. Felline, A. Ledda, F. Paoli, & E. Rossanese (Eds.), New Directions in Logic and the Philosophy of Science. (pp. 57-66). College Publications. • Boele Van Hensbroek, P. (2016). Conceptualizing ‘Land’ and ‘Nation’ in Early Gold Coast Nationalism. In A. Fleisch, & R. Stephens (Eds.), Doing Conceptual History in Africa. (pp. 162-184). [7] New York and Oxford: Berghahn. • Dutilh Novaes, C. (2016). Five questions in the philosophy of logic. In T. Lupher, & T. Adajian (Eds.), Philosophy of Logic: 5 Questions. Automatic Press/VIP. • Dutilh Novaes, C., & Uckelman, S. (2016). Obligationes. In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic. (pp. 370-395). (Cambridge Companions to Philosophy). DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107449862.016 • Kleingeld, P. (2016). Kant on ‘Good’, the Good, and the Duty to Promote the Highest Good. In T. Höwing (Ed.), The highest good in Kant's philosophy. (pp. 33-49). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110369007-006 • Maier, E. (2016). Why my I is your you: On the communication of de se attitudes. In M. García- Carpintero, & S. Torre (Eds.), About Oneself: De Se Thought and Communication. (pp. 220-245). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713265.003.0009 6 • Nauta, L. (2016). The Critique of Scholastic Language in Renaissance Humanism and Early Modern Philosophy. In C. Muratori, & G. Paganini (Eds.), Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy. (pp. 59-79). (International Archives of the History of Ideas ; Vol. 220). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32604-7_4 • Nawar, T. (2016). The Augustinian Cogito and Materialist Theories of Mind. In J. Kaukua, & T. Ekenberg (Eds.), Subjectivity and Selfhood in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. (pp. 25-35). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26914-6_3 • Peeters, J., & Romeijn, J-W. (2016). Epistemic considerations about uncertainty and model selection in computational archaeology: A case study on exploratory modeling. In M. Brouwer Burg, H. Peeters, & W. Lovis (Eds.), Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis in Archaeological Computational Modeling. (pp. 37-58). (Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology ). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-27833-9_3 • Vega, J. (2016). A Toleration of the Enlightenment: From Limiting State Power to Empowering Citizens. In P. Scotton,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    69 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us