Download Thesis

Download Thesis

This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Research towards a better future Neoliberalism, global citizenship and international volunteering Griffiths, Mark Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 05. Oct. 2021 Research towards a better future: neoliberalism, global citizenship and international volunteering Mark Griffiths Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a PhD in Interdisciplinary Policy Studies King’s College London 2014 Abstract This thesis discusses the British government’s construction of global citizenship on its recently launched (2011) International Citizen Service (ICS) programme that sends volunteers abroad to work on international development projects. The thesis has two objectives. The first is to understand global citizenship on the ICS programme as it takes shape in a climate of neoliberal policy making. The second is to produce a piece of ‘socially engaged’ research that looks towards a better future. The thesis unfolds as an account of global citizenship as it is produced through the discursive rationalities and circulated affects that have come to define contemporary modes of neoliberal governance. This part of the discussion argues that through ICS the government constructs a markedly neoliberalised version of global citizenship, based on “soft” understandings of development and a heavy emphasis on self-advancement. The inquiry then moves on to consider research performances and how best to conceptualise the relationship between power and people. The case is made that power-centric accounts can reinforce the dominance of power and consequently ‘a better future’ in research might explore the aspects of social life that do not defer to expressions of power. Taking this position to ethnographic data collected from ICS project sites in India the thesis then examines the ways that volunteers contest, subvert and resist the government’s version of global citizenship. As a response to the earlier exploration of rationalities and affects, the presentation of the data illustrates the ways that volunteers on the one hand critically engage with development issues while on the other establish strong affective relationships with host communities. Together, these perspectives show volunteers capable of resisting neoliberal iterations of global citizenship. Instead, the volunteers on the ICS programme practice creative and affective interpretations of global citizenship that, in important ways, transcend the impositions of power and, in so doing, look towards a better future. 2 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 7 1 Current debates in volunteering: neoliberalism, global civil society and global citizenship ..... 10 1.1 Global Citizenship .......................................................................................................................................10 1.1.1 Global citizenship and international volunteering ............................................................................15 1.1.2 Lessons from literature on volunteering and global citizenship: ambiguities and approaches to research ..............................................................................................................................................................21 1.2 Global Civil Society ......................................................................................................................................23 1.3 Understandings of neoliberalism ...............................................................................................................29 1.4 Lines of inquiry and structure of the thesis..............................................................................................34 2 Methodology and research design ............................................................................................. 38 2.1 Research for a better future: approaching issues of power ...................................................................38 2.2 Approaching power: discursive and affective aspects of neoliberal governance ..............................39 2.3 The case study and data collection ...........................................................................................................41 2.3.1 ICS-DfID iterations of global citizenship: secondary data ............................................................41 2.3.2 ICS-DfID iterations of global citizenship: ethnographic data .......................................................42 2.3.3 Analysis of data in Chapter 3 ...............................................................................................................45 2.3.4 Analysis of data in Chapter 4 ...............................................................................................................47 2.4 Volunteer understandings of global citizenship ......................................................................................49 2.4.1 Interviews and focus groups: positionality .........................................................................................53 2.4.2 Analysis of data for Chapter 6..............................................................................................................55 2.4.3 Grounded theory, ‘balance and disclosure’, and the conceptualisation of discourse .................57 2.5 Subsequent revisions to the understanding of “research towards a better future” ..........................59 2.6 Participation, the significance of question 12 and the turn to affect ...................................................59 2.6.1 Participation ............................................................................................................................................61 2.6.2 Affective methodologies: Chapter 7 ...................................................................................................62 2.6.3 The problem of representation ............................................................................................................63 2.7 Ethics .............................................................................................................................................................64 2.7.1 Disclosure and consent .........................................................................................................................65 2.7.2 Unused data ............................................................................................................................................66 2.7.2.1 Unused data from stakeholders .....................................................................................................66 2.7.2.2 Unused data from in-country volunteers .......................................................................... 68 2.8 Closing comments .......................................................................................................................................73 3 The neoliberalisations of International Citizen Service ............................................................ 75 3.1 Introduction: the Big Society agenda and the “rolling out” of International Citizen Service .........76 3.1.1 International Citizen Service ................................................................................................................79 3.2 Global Citizenship on the ICS programme .............................................................................................87 3.2.1 The coalition, development and the ‘global’ of global citizenship.................................................88 3.3 Neoliberal ideals of the self in global citizenship ...................................................................................95 3.4 Reflexive neoliberalism ............................................................................................................................ 101 3.4.1 Co-optive neoliberalism, Big Society and ICS ............................................................................... 104 3.5 Closing comments: advancing the understanding of neoliberalism and its reflexivity .................. 112 4 The affective push to global citizenship ..................................................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    282 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us