Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan Adopted March 2011 GLENWOOD SPRINgs COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MARCH 2011 Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan i Table of Contents PROLOGUE / EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 THE EVOLUTION OF A COMMUNITY 1 CURRENT CHALLENGES 2 FINDING AGREEMENT ON COMPLEX ISSUES 4 SUSTAINABILITY 4 KEY DIREctIONS OF THE PLAN 5 CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION TO COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING 9 PLANNING AREA 9 THE 2011 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE PROCESS 10 WHAT IS A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & HOW WILL IT BE USED? 10 FLEXIBILITY OF THE PLAN 11 CONSISTENCY AND PREDIctABILITY 12 USING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH OTHER PLANS 12 AccOMPLISHMENTS OF PREVIOUS PLANS 14 WHO WILL USE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN? 14 PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS 14 CHAPTER 2 - FUTURE LAND USE 19 THE GLENWOOD SPRINGS VISION STATEMENT 19 THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP 19 MAPPED PLAN CONCEPTS 20 CHAPTER 3 - COMMUNITY CHARACTER AND FORM 31 VALUES AND VISION FOR COMMUNITY CHARActER AND FORM 31 COMMUNITY GOALS SUPPORTED BY COMMUNITY CHARActER AND FORM 31 POLICIES TO ENHANCE COMMUNITY CHARActER AND FORM 33 STRATEGIES AND ActIONS TO PROMOTE COMMUNITY CHARActER AND FORM 34 CHAPTER 4 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 49 VALUES AND VISION FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 49 COMMUNITY GOALS SUPPORTED BY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 50 POLICIES TO ENHANCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 50 STRATEGIES AND ActIONS TO PROMOTE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 50 CHAPTER 5 - TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY 57 VALUES AND VISION FOR TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY 57 COMMUNITY GOALS SUPPORTED BY TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY 58 POLICIES TO ENHANCE TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY 58 STRATEGIES AND ActIONS TO PROMOTE TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY 59 CHAPTER 6 - HOUSING 71 VALUES AND VISION FOR HOUSING 71 COMMUNITY GOALS SUPPORTED BY HOUSING 72 ii Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan POLICIES TO ENHANCE HOUSING 72 STRATEGIES AND ActIONS TO PROMOTE HOUSING 73 CHAPTER 7 - PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 81 VALUES AND VISION FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 81 COMMUNITY GOALS SUPPORTED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 82 POLICIES TO ENHANCE PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 82 STRATEGIES AND ActIONS TO PROMOTE PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 82 CHAPTER 8 - PARKS AND RECREATION 89 VALUES AND VISION FOR PARKS AND RECREATION 89 COMMUNITY GOALS SUPPORTED BY PARKS AND RECREATION 90 POLICIES TO ENHANCE PARKS AND RECREATION 90 STRATEGIES AND ActIONS TO PROMOTE PARKS AND RECREATION 90 CHAPTER 9 - NATURAL RESOURCES 97 VALUES AND VISION FOR NATURAL RESOURCES 97 COMMUNITY GOALS SUPPORTED BY NATURAL RESOURCES 98 POLICIES TO ENHANCE NATURAL RESOURCES 98 STRATEGIES AND ActIONS TO PROMOTE NATURAL RESOURCES 98 CHAPTER 10 - CULTURAL RESOURCES AND THE ARTS 103 VALUES AND VISION FOR CULTURAL RESOURCES AND THE ARTS 103 COMMUNITY GOALS SUPPORTED BY CULTURAL RESOURCES AND THE ARTS 106 POLICIES TO ENHANCE CULTURAL RESOURCES AND THE ARTS 106 STRATEGIES AND ActIONS FOR PROMOTING CULTURAL RESOURCES AND THE ARTS 106 APPENDIX 1 - COMMUNITY SETTING AND PROFILE 111 APPENDIX 2 - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE PUBLIC OUTREACH 117 APPENDIX 3 - COMMUNITY CHARACTER AND FORM 121 APPENDIX 4 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 127 APPENDIX 5 - TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY 133 APPENDIX 6 - HOUSING 139 APPENDIX 7 - PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 143 APPENDIX 8 - PARKS AND RECREATION 153 APPENDIX 9 - NATURAL RESOURCES 159 APPENDIX 10 - CULTURAL RESOURCES AND THE ARTS 173 APPENDIX 11 - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS 177 APPENDIX 12 - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE PUBLIC COMMENT RECORD 179 APPENDIX 13 - GLOSSARY 181 Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan iii Acknowledgements City Council Planning and Zoning Commission Bruce Christensen, Mayor Patrick Barker Dave Sturges, Mayor Pro-Tem Bruce Barth Russ Arensman Michael Blair Stephen Bershenyi Tim Bottger Shelley Kaup Marco Dehm Leo McKinney John Duven Matthew Steckler Mary Elizabeth Geiger Judy Gillespie Colleen Long Barney Mulligan Kathryn Trauger Steering Committee The Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee was made up of the City Planning Commission along with representatives of many of the City’s Boards and Commissions, and two City Council members. David Alcott, Transportation Commission Patrick Barker, Planning and Zoning Commission Bruce Barth, Planning and Zoning Commission Michael Blair, Planning and Zoning Commission Tim Bottger, Planning and Zoning Commission Allan Cunningham, Housing Commission Marco Dehm, Planning and Zoning Commission Marice Doll, Historic Preservation Commission John Duven, Planning and Zoning Commission Mary Elizabeth Geiger, Planning and Zoning Commission Judy Gillespie, Planning and Zoning Commission Jeremy Heiman, River Commission Colleen Long, Planning and Zoning Commission Leo McKinney, City Council Barney Mulligan, Planning and Zoning Commission Barbara Sexauer Corcoran, Parks and Recreation Commission Dave Sturges, City Council Kathryn Trauger, Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Andrew McGregor, Community Development Director Gretchen Ricehill, Senior Planner Jill Peterson, Planner A’Lissa Gerum, Planner Planning Consultant Team Winston Associates RPI Consulting Charlier Associates Leslie Bethel Ignacio Correa-Ortiz RRC Associates iv Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan PROLOGUE / EXECUTIVE SUMMARY any of the issues confronting Glenwood Springs are not new. Many Mhave been around, debated, and studied for years, some for decades. Some have been successfully addressed and resolved. Others remain, searching for solutions that can find the balance between technical and financial feasibility, and community support. This Comprehensive Plan is truly an update. It builds on the foundation laid by previous plans. The vision, and many of the concepts proposed, can be found in previous plans. Some aspects of this update are new and reflect issues and solutions that have not previously been identified or adopted. All of the components of the Plan, both old and new, have been given an extensive public airing, in a variety of ways, and have been confirmed (and re-confirmed) by the public and decision-makers. THE EVOLUTION OF A COMMUNITY Communities evolve over time. Glenwood Springs is different today than it was 20 years ago, and different than it will be 20 years into the future. The past 20 years of growth have brought new stores, bigger better schools, and a large hospital. Growth has also brought traffic congestion, different kinds of building styles, and higher taxes for services. The challenge of “change of course” is to have the positive impacts outweigh the negative ones. Surveys and public input conducted with this Plan update indicate that most people, on the whole, feel that Glenwood has gotten better since they’ve lived here. The Comprehensive Plan is intended to help the city embrace its evolution by identifying key elements that need to be preserved and recommending or suggesting changes to those elements that need to be modified. What makes a great, livable community? There are many interrelated factors—a “kit of parts.” Each part of the Comprehensive Plan addresses community issues in numerous ways. Each part, or element, of the Plan interacts with the others to achieve the preferred future. All of the parts have been considered for their individual functions as well as how they operate as a whole. Figure P-1: Aerial view of Glenwood Springs Prologue / Executive Summary Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan 1 CURRENT CHALLENGES Specific current challenges for Glenwood Springs include: Competition in the Role as a Regional Commercial Center of the County Over the last decade Rifle has eclipsed Glenwood Springs in population, and has attracted major retailers as well as businesses. The potential growth from New Castle to Parachute means that the western portion of Garfield County will continue to attract both retail and residential development. Vitality The need to grow to maintain vitality is compounded by a lack of land for the community to expand. This forces an introspective look at all opportunities for infill and redevelopment—growing inward and upward instead of outward. Significant but Uncertain Impacts From Increased Energy Exploration/Development in Garfield County A dramatic, decade-long buildup of energy-related workers living in Garfield County (including those working in Rio Blanco County) made it more difficult to attract employees to non-energy industry jobs. Due to the lack of available housing, energy workers were finding temporary housing in area hotels and motels, thereby reducing the available supply of rooms for the tourism industry. However, this was followed in 2008/9 by a sudden drop in energy prices, exploration and the workforce. Revised projections indicate a period of slow growth before energy exploration expands significantly. Ultimately, energy-related jobs are expected to level off in Garfield County. This has spurred renewed interest in the diversification of the economy in order to lessen the impacts of a single industry decline. The Lack of Affordable Housing for its Workforce, Both Rental and For-Sale Housing The affordability and availability of housing is acknowledged to be a regional issue that requires a regional response. However, currently each community within the Roaring Fork and Colorado river valleys are addressing their individual housing needs. According to the 2004 Local and Regional Travel Patterns Study, of those working in Glenwood Springs, only 32% live in Glenwood Springs. Of those living in Glenwood Springs, 41% commute to work somewhere else. A 2005 housing study indicated that the city needs 2,885 additional dwelling units between 2005 and 2015 Figure P-2: The Downtown is seen as the heart of the