Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS – Appendix R2, Data Supporting Volume IV

Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS – Appendix R2, Data Supporting Volume IV

Appendix R2.6 Groundwater, Water Supply, and Water Quality Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX R2.6. GROUNDWATER, WATER SUPPLY, AND WATER QUALITY Appendix R2.6 Groundwater, Water Supply, and Water Quality This appendix presents data supporting the analysis in Volume IV, Chapter IV.6. This appendix is organized as follows. Section R2.6.1 – No Action Alternative: Tables R2.6-1 through R2.6-5 Section R2.6.2 – Preferred Alternative: Tables R2.6-6 through R2.6-13 Section R2.6.3 – Alternative 1: Tables R2.6-14 through R2.6-20 Section R2.6.4 – Alternative 2: Tables R2.6-21 through R2.6-27 Section R2.6.5 – Alternative 3: Tables R2.6-28 through R2.6-34 Section R2.6.6 – Alternative 4: Tables R2.6-35 through R2.6-41 Note on Rounding of Data. The following general rounding rules were applied to calculated values: values greater than 1,000 were rounded to nearest 1,000; values less than 1,000 and greater than 100 were rounded to the nearest 100; values of 100 or less were rounded to the nearest 10, and therefore totals may not sum due to rounding. in cases where subtotals are provided, the subtotals and the totals are individually rounded. the totals are not a sum of the rounded subtotals; therefore the subtotals may not sum to the total within the table. Appendix R2 R2.6-1 August 2014 Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX R2.6. GROUNDWATER, WATER SUPPLY, AND WATER QUALITY R2.6.1 No Action Alternative Table R2.6-1 Potential Acres of Groundwater Basin Impacts by Technology Type and Subarea – No Action Alternative Potential Groundwater Basin Impacts by Technology Type (acres) Groundwater Basin in Subarea (acres) Solar† Wind‡ GT* Transmission Cadiz Valley and Chocolate Mountains Arroyo Seco Valley 256,000 400 0 0 0 Cadiz Valley 240,000 400 0 0 0 Calzona Valley 78,000 80 0 0 0 Chocolate Valley 72,000 1,000 0 0 0 Chuckwalla Valley 593,000 16,000 0 0 8,000 Orocopia Valley 17,000 700 0 0 900 Palo Verde Mesa 225,000 9,000 0 0 4,000 Palo Verde Valley 73,000 2,000 0 0 700 Quien Sabe Point Valley 25,000 900 0 0 0 Rice Valley 187,000 4,000 0 0 0 Vidal Valley 128,000 400 0 0 0 Ward Valley 353,000 1,000 0 0 0 Imperial Borrego Valley Amos Valley 127,000 20 0 0 0 Borrego Valley 140,000 2,000 5,000 200 0 Coachella Valley - Indio 1,000 10 20 0 0 Coyote Wells Valley 135,000 2,000 4,000 200 500 East Salton Sea 172,000 400 400 20 2,000 Imperial Valley 957,000 10,000 17,000 700 8,000 Ocotillo-Clark Valley 211,000 3,000 6,000 200 600 Vallecito-Carrizo Valley 97,000 30 50 0 0 West Salton Sea 87,000 1,000 3,000 100 700 Kingston and Funeral Mountains Appendix R2 R2.6-2 August 2014 Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX R2.6. GROUNDWATER, WATER SUPPLY, AND WATER QUALITY Table R2.6-1 Potential Acres of Groundwater Basin Impacts by Technology Type and Subarea – No Action Alternative Potential Groundwater Basin Impacts by Technology Type (acres) Groundwater Basin in Subarea (acres) Solar† Wind‡ GT* Transmission California Valley 58,000 800 0 0 0 Death Valley 43,000 10 0 0 0 Greenwater Valley 60,000 20 0 0 0 Ivanpah Valley 196,000 1,000 0 0 0 Kelso Valley 115,000 50 0 0 0 Lower Kingston Valley 142,000 400 0 0 0 Mesquite Valley 88,000 1,000 0 0 0 Middle Amargosa Valley 389,000 5,000 0 0 0 Pahrump Valley 93,000 1,000 0 0 0 Riggs Valley 10,000 300 0 0 0 Silver Lake Valley 3,000 40 0 0 0 Soda Lake Valley 100,000 200 0 0 0 Upper Kingston Valley 177,000 1,000 0 0 0 Mojave and Silurian Valley Caves Canyon Valley 55,000 0 0 0 400 Coyote Lake Valley 88,000 0 0 0 200 Cronise Valley 126,000 0 0 0 0 Lower Mojave River Valley 200,000 10 0 0 1,000 Superior Valley 120,000 0 0 0 10 Owens River Valley (No Groundwater Basins Affected) Panamint Death Valley (No Groundwater Basins Affected) Pinto Lucerne Valley and Eastern Slopes Ames Valley 108,000 100 10 0 10 Bessemer Valley 39,000 0 60 0 0 Chuckwalla Valley 8,000 0 0 0 0 Copper Mountain Valley 30,000 70 0 0 0 Appendix R2 R2.6-3 August 2014 Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX R2.6. GROUNDWATER, WATER SUPPLY, AND WATER QUALITY Table R2.6-1 Potential Acres of Groundwater Basin Impacts by Technology Type and Subarea – No Action Alternative Potential Groundwater Basin Impacts by Technology Type (acres) Groundwater Basin in Subarea (acres) Solar† Wind‡ GT* Transmission Dale Valley 123,000 200 0 0 0 Deadman Valley - Surprise Spring 29,000 10 0 0 0 Iron Ridge Area 5,000 0 20 0 10 Johnson Valley - Soggy Lake 77,000 10 500 0 40 Joshua Tree 27,000 30 0 0 0 Kane Wash Area 6,000 0 50 0 0 Lower Mojave River Valley 15,000 0 70 0 0 Lucerne Valley 147,000 0 1,000 0 200 Means Valley 15,000 0 40 0 0 Middle Mojave River Valley 57,000 0 400 0 20 Morongo Valley 7,000 10 0 0 0 Orocopia Valley 800 0 0 0 0 Pinto Valley 170,000 10 0 0 0 Pipes Canyon Fault Valley 3,000 10 0 0 0 Twentynine Palms Valley 62,000 100 0 0 0 Upper Mojave River Valley 129,000 0 800 0 200 Warren Valley 23,000 40 0 0 0 Piute Valley And Sacramento Mountains (No Groundwater Basins Affected) Providence And Bullion Mountains Bristol Valley 481,000 2,000 0 0 60 Broadwell Valley 92,000 3,000 0 0 300 Cady Fault Area 7,000 100 0 0 0 Caves Canyon Valley 18,000 600 0 0 0 Kelso Valley 10,000 10 0 0 0 Lavic Valley 90,000 2,000 0 0 400 Lower Mojave River Valley 33,000 1,000 0 0 200 Appendix R2 R2.6-4 August 2014 Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX R2.6. GROUNDWATER, WATER SUPPLY, AND WATER QUALITY Table R2.6-1 Potential Acres of Groundwater Basin Impacts by Technology Type and Subarea – No Action Alternative Potential Groundwater Basin Impacts by Technology Type (acres) Groundwater Basin in Subarea (acres) Solar† Wind‡ GT* Transmission Soda Lake Valley 14,000 50 0 0 0 West Mojave And Eastern Slopes Antelope Valley 953,000 6,000 40,000 0 2,000 Brite Valley 2,000 10 300 0 0 Cuddeback Valley 76,000 300 600 0 0 El Mirage Valley 73,000 200 0 0 100 Fremont Valley 317,000 2,000 51,000 0 1,000 Harper Valley 401,000 3,000 7,000 0 200 Indian Wells Valley 361,000 40 900 0 20 Kelso Lander Valley 11,000 40 1,000 0 0 Kern River Valley 4,000 0 100 0 0 Lower Mojave River Valley 37,000 300 0 0 100 Middle Mojave River Valley 154,000 1,000 0 0 30 Tehachapi Valley East 24,000 200 4,000 0 0 Tehachapi Valley West 15,000 60 2,000 0 0 Upper Mojave River Valley 275,000 400 0 0 1,000 Upper Santa Ana Valley - Cajon 200 0 0 0 0 Total 15,755,000** 89,000 145,000 1,000 33,000 † Includes ground-mounted distributed generation ‡ Project Area * Project Area ** Total acreage includes all groundwater basins in all subareas, however only those basins impacted by renewable energy projects are listed in Table R2.6-1. Appendix R2 R2.6-5 August 2014 Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX R2.6. GROUNDWATER, WATER SUPPLY, AND WATER QUALITY Table R2.6-2 Estimated Acres of Groundwater Basin in Conservation by Subarea– No Action Alternative Groundwater Basin Existing BLM Conservation in Subarea Protected Areas Designations Percent in Subarea/Groundwater Basin (acres) (acres) (acres) Conservation Cadiz Valley and Chocolate Mountains Amos Valley 3,000 200 400 20% Arroyo Seco Valley 256,000 10,000 83,000 36% Bristol Valley 100 100 0 95% Cadiz Valley 240,000 84,000 0 35% Calzona Valley 78,000 900 2,000 3% Chocolate Valley 72,000 3,000 24,000 38% Chuckwalla Valley 593,000 167,000 132,000 50% Ogilby Valley 500 10 0 2% Orocopia Valley 17,000 800 9,000 58% Palo Verde Mesa 225,000 2,000 1,000 1% Palo Verde Valley 73,000 600 0 1% Pinto Valley 2,000 2,000 0 95% Quien Sabe Point Valley 25,000 2,000 0 9% Rice Valley 187,000 72,000 0 39% Vidal Valley 128,000 18,000 38,000 44% Ward Valley 353,000 117,000 47,000 47% Yuma Valley 22,000 7,000 0 33% Imperial Borrego Valley Amos Valley 127,000 13,000 2,000 12% Borrego Valley 140,000 40,000 6,000 33% Coyote Wells Valley 135,000 20,000 34,000 40% Appendix R2 R2.6-6 August 2014 Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX R2.6. GROUNDWATER, WATER SUPPLY, AND WATER QUALITY Table R2.6-2 Estimated Acres of Groundwater Basin in Conservation by Subarea– No Action Alternative Groundwater Basin Existing BLM Conservation in Subarea Protected Areas Designations Percent in Subarea/Groundwater Basin (acres) (acres) (acres) Conservation East Salton Sea 172,000 1,000 0 1% Imperial Valley 957,000 23,000 80,000 11% Ocotillo-Clark Valley 211,000 83,000 10,000 44% Ogilby Valley 133,000 2,000 600 2% Vallecito-Carrizo Valley 97,000 90,000 200 93% West Salton Sea 87,000 28,000 0 32% Yuma Valley 102,000 2,000 30 2% Kingston and Funeral Mountains California Valley 58,000 22,000 2,000 43% Death Valley 43,000 36,000 0 83% Gold Valley 3,000 3,000 0 95% Greenwater Valley 60,000 56,000 0 94% Ivanpah Valley 196,000 103,000 32,000 69% Kelso Valley 115,000 107,000 0 93% Lower Kingston Valley 142,000 117,000 2,000 84% Mesquite Valley 88,000 37,000 7,000 50% Middle Amargosa Valley 389,000 183,000 16,000 51% Pahrump Valley 93,000 55,000 0 60% Rhodes Hill Area 14,000 12,000 0 92% Riggs Valley 10,000 0 0 0% Silver Lake Valley 3,000 1,000 0 42% Soda Lake Valley 100,000 87,000 4,000 91% Appendix R2 R2.6-7 August 2014 Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX R2.6.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    68 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us