Sound emission and annihilations in a programmable quantum vortex collider W. J. Kwon,1, 2, ∗ G. Del Pace,1, 2 K. Xhani,1, 2 L. Galantucci,3 A. Muzi Falconi,1, 2 M. Inguscio,1, 2, 4 F. Scazza,1, 2, y and G. Roati1, 2 1European Laboratory for Nonlinear Spectroscopy (LENS), 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy 2Istituto Nazionale di Ottica del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR-INO), 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy 3Joint Quantum Centre (JQC) Durham-Newcastle, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Physics, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom 4Department of Engineering, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy (Dated: June 11, 2021) In quantum fluids, the quantisation of circulation forbids the diffusion of a vortex swirling flow seen in classical viscous fluids. Yet, a quantum vortex accelerating in a superfluid may lose its energy into acoustic radiation1,2, in a similar way an electric charge decelerates upon emitting photons. The dissipation of vortex en- ergy underlies central problems in quantum hydrodynamics3, such as the decay of quantum turbulence, highly relevant to systems as varied as neutron stars, superfluid helium and atomic condensates4,5. A deep understand- ing of the elementary mechanisms behind irreversible vortex dynamics has been a goal for decades3,6, but it is complicated by the shortage of conclusive experimental signatures7,8. Here, we address this challenge by realising a programmable quantum vortex collider in a planar, homogeneous atomic Fermi superfluid with tun- able inter-particle interactions. We create on-demand vortex configurations and monitor their evolution, taking advantage of the accessible time and length scales of our ultracold Fermi gas9,10. Engineering collisions within and between vortex-antivortex pairs allows us to decouple relaxation of the vortex energy due to sound emission and interactions with normal fluid, i.e. mutual friction. We directly visualise how the annihilation of vortex dipoles radiates a sound pulse in the superfluid. Further, our few-vortex experiments extending across different superfluid regimes suggest that fermionic quasiparticles localised inside the vortex core contribute significantly to dissipation, opening the route to exploring new pathways for quantum turbulence decay, vortex by vortex. Quantized vortices are a ubiquitous form of topological ex- fluenced by the fermionic or bosonic nature of superfluids4. citation in quantum matter. Their motion governs the resis- In fermionic superfluids, pair-breaking excitations become tive behaviour of superconductors11,12, as well as the emer- energetically accessible, and vortices have intricate struc- gence of many dissipative collective phenomena in superflu- tures filled up with quasiparticle bound states even at zero ids, ranging from vortex lattices to the quantum turbulence temperature32–35. Fermionic quasiparticle states in the vortex of chaotic vortex tangles3. In any quantum fluid, the super- core are thought to provide an additional dissipation sink by flow circulation around a vortex can only take discrete val- absorbing the vortex kinetic energy36, which may in turn com- ues, making vorticity intrinsically robust. However, travel- pete with dissipation via phonon emission4. This is in stark ling vortices interact with the normal component and expe- contrast to weakly interacting bosonic superfluids, where the rience mutual friction13, which causes dissipation of the su- empty vortex core is directly connected to the vanishing order perflow. Even in the absence of a normal fluid, it has been parameter. proposed that vortex-sound interactions may lead to the trans- In this work, we study the fundamental mechanisms of vor- formation of incompressible kinetic energy of the superflow tex energy dissipation by realising a versatile 2D vortex col- associated with vortices into compressible sound energy, pro- lider in homogeneous atomic superfluids. We unveil vortex- viding the ultimate mechanism behind the decay of quantum sound interactions by observing the conversion of the energy 14–16 turbulence . In three-dimensional (3D) vortices, the emis- of vortex swirling flow into sound energy during vortex colli- sion of sound waves is triggered by the accelerated motion sions. We directly visualise vortices annihilating into sound 17 of vortex rings and lines at sufficiently short scales, result- waves, i.e. the ultimate outcome of small-scale four-vortex 18–20 ing from vortex reconnections , and helical Kelvin-wave collisions, and find good agreement with theoretical simula- 15,16,21–23 cascades . In a similar manner, accelerating two- tions, shedding light on such fundamental process37,38. Tun- dimensional (2D) point vortices may dissipate energy by emit- ing our system away from the bosonic regime into a super- ting sound waves, much like an accelerated electric charge fluid of weakly bound fermion pairs, we find indications of 1 arXiv:2105.15180v2 [cond-mat.quant-gas] 10 Jun 2021 radiates electromagnetic waves . In such analogy, which be- the essential role played by vortex-core-bound fermionic ex- comes apparent by considering the mathematical description citations, breaking down a picture based solely on sound- of the 2D Bose superfluid and (2+1)D electrodynamics, vor- mediated vortex energy dissipation at low temperatures, as tices and phonons play the roles of electric charges and pho- well as highly influencing mutual friction. For our studies, 24–27 tons, respectively . we follow a bottom-up approach reminiscent of other atomic Despite prolonged efforts in superfluid helium28–30, sound- platforms featuring control at the single quantum level, and mediated dissipation of vortex energy remains elusive due to gain exquisite control of individual 2D vortices to assemble the scarcity of convincing experimental proofs7,31. Another them one-by-one in arbitrary arrangements. Such controllable central question is how vortex-sound interactions could be in- 2D vortex systems, where vortex line excitations have only a 2 39 moderate role , allow us to efficiently track vortex trajecto- 1 a b d vd ries and hunt for visual evidence of low-energy acoustic ra- N diation. The building blocks of our collider are individual 0 0 0.1 0.2 vortex dipoles, namely self-propelling vortex-antivortex pairs v/cs carrying a constant linear fluid momentum. A single dipole 12 1 φ is ideal for precisely probing the effect of mutual friction, un- θ d12 c der whose action it gradually shrinks in size and may eventu- σ 0 2 6 7 8 9 d12 (μm) ally self-annihilate. Injecting another dipole triggers a dipole- 1 dipole collision19, providing a minimalistic, yet effective way 2 8 # realizations z 20 μm to promote vortex acceleration, favouring in turn vortex en- y 0 ergy dissipation. Thereby, we progress toward a complete mi- x 80 90 100 croscopic description of the complex dissipative dynamics of φ (°) e x (μm) both single and colliding vortex-antivortex pairs, which is at -20 -10 0 10 20 the heart of the hydrodynamic relaxation of nonequilibrium 30 8 states in bosonic and fermionic quantum fluids3,5,8–10. 1 ) ) F k Our experiment starts with thin, uniform superfluids of t m 0 μ 6 0 ( (1/ paired fermionic Li atoms trapped inside a circular box of y y 45 µm radius (Fig.1a,b) at a temperature T ' 0:3(1) Tc, where Tc is the critical temperature of the superfluid tran- 2 -30 -8 sition. Tuning the s-wave scattering length a between two -80 -40 0 40 80 different atomic states, we access three different coupling x (1/kF) regimes, namely a Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer superfluid of f 60 g h 0.04 fermionic pairs (BCS, 1=kF a ' −0:31), a unitary Fermi 8 gas (UFG, 1=kF a ' 0:04), and a Bose-Einstein condensate 40 m) μ α ( (ms) 0.02 of tightly bound molecules (BEC, 1=kF a ' 2:5). Here, 12 τ 7 2 1=3 20 d kF = (6π n) is the Fermi wave vector, estimated from the central sample density n along the z axis. To deterministically 0 6 0 create a vortex dipole in a desired position and propagation 3 4 5 6 0 20 40 60 0 1 2.5 d12 (μm) t (ms) 1/kF a direction, we implement the so-called chopstick method42, il- lustrated in Fig.1a. We initially pierce the cloud with a Gaus- 2 FIG. 1. Deterministic generation and frictional dissipation of sian repulsive obstacle focused on the sample with 1=e radius single vortex dipoles. a, Illustration of the dipole generation pro- σ = 1:3(1) µm ≈ 2ξ ≈ 5=kF , where ξ = 0:68(2) µm is the tocol: we move two obstacles with velocity v and relative angle θ healing length of our molecular BEC and 1=kF = 0:27(1) µm through a thin, homogeneous superfluid, pinning a vortex-antivortex is the characteristic Fermi length at unitarity. We split the pair. b, In-situ image of the UFG sample with obstacles in their final initial obstacle into two and simultaneously move them with positions. c, Time-of-flight image (Methods) of the UFG acquired af- ter obstacles have been removed, revealing a single vortex-antivortex velocity v by 10 µm in oblique directions at a tuning angle ◦ θ (Methods). A vortex-antivortex pair of separation d is pair. d, Properties of generated vortex dipoles in UFGs for θ ' 20 : 12 mean dipole number N , inter-vortex separation d , and direction created and pinned around the final positions of the obsta- vd 12 '. The histograms are obtained with v=cs ' 0:2 and obstacle height cles (Fig.1b), appearing as clear holes in the density of the V0/µ ' 2:2, where cs is the sound speed and µ the pair chemi- expanding cloud (Fig.1c). When v exceeds a critical value, cal potential. e, Trajectory of single dipoles in UFGs, prepared with ◦ our preparation generates a single dipole with near-unit prob- d12 = 6:9(6)µm and ' = 90(5) (see d).