Yang–Mills Theory of Gravity

Yang–Mills Theory of Gravity

Article Yang–Mills Theory of Gravity Malik Al Matwi Department of Mathematical Science, Ritsumeikan University, 4-2-28, Kusatsu-Shi, Shiga 525-0034, Japan; [email protected] Received: 25 June 2019; Accepted: 22 October 2019; Published: 12 November 2019 Abstract: The canonical formulation of general relativity (GR) is based on decomposition space–time manifold M into R × S, where R represents the time, and S is the three-dimensional space-like surface. This decomposition has to preserve the invariance of GR, invariance under general coordinates, and local Lorentz transformations. These symmetries are associated with conserved currents that are coupled to gravity. These symmetries are studied on a three dimensional space-like hypersurface S embedded in a four-dimensional space–time manifold. This implies continuous symmetries and conserved currents by i Noether’s theorem on that surface. We construct a three-form Ei ^ DA (D represents covariant exterior a i derivative) in the phase space (Ei , Aa) on the surface S, and derive an equation of continuity on that surface, and search for canonical relations and a Lagrangian that correspond to the same equation of 0a i continuity according to the canonical field theory. We find that Si is a conjugate momentum of Aa and ab i i Si Fab is its energy density. We show that there is conserved spin current that couples to A , and show mni i i i that we have to include the term Fmni F in GR. Lagrangian, where F = DA , and A is complex SO(3) mni i connection. The term Fmni F includes one variable, A , similar to Yang–Mills gauge theory. Finally we couple the connection Ai to a left-handed spinor field y, and find the corresponding beta function. Keywords: gravitational Lagrangian; complex connection Ai; left-handed spinor field 1. Introduction Gravity can be formulated based on gauge theory by gauging the Lorentz group SO(3, 1) [1]. For this purpose, we need to fix some base space and consider that the Lorentz group SO(3, 1) acts locally on Lorentz frames which are regarded as a frame bundle over a fixed base space. We can consider this base space as an arbitrary space–time manifold M with coordinates xm, and consider the local Lorentz frame as an element in the tangent frame bundle over M. By that we have two symmetries; invariance under continuous transformations of local Lorentz frame, SO(3, 1) group, and invariance under diffeomorphism of the space–time M, which is originally considered as a base space [2]. Since the group SO(3) is a subgroup of SO(3, 1), the Lagrangian of gravity has an internal gauge symmetry group SO(3). Thus the elements of SO(3) act locally on some spacial Lorentz orthonormal frames (e1, e2, e3), we consider these frames as a basis of the tangent vector bundle on the three-dimensional space-like hypersurface S. Using some local coordinate system sa, a = 1, 2, 3 on S, we expand these i i a i i j basis vectors into e = eads , so defining the gravitational field ea with metric gab = dijeaeb on S. Using i the isomorphism between Lie algebra of SU(2) and that of SO(3), one can regard ea also as a local su(2)-valued one-form. So we have an SU(2) vector bundle with real spin connection wij [3]. These facts can be generated into self-dual and anti-self-dual formalism of general relativity (GR) with complex i connection A and complex conjugate one-form field Ei. Physics 2019, 1, 339–359; doi:10.3390/physics1030025 www.mdpi.com/journal/physics Physics 2019, 1 340 This paper proceeds as follows: We start with the four-dimensional (4D) Palatini Lagrangian and perform a 3 + 1 decomposition based on the decomposition M ! R × S, where R represents the time, and S is the three-dimensional (3D) space-like surface, thus we specify the Lagrangian part L1(gab) on S. Then we try to show that L1(gab) is independent of time on this surface, we try to prove this fact using the d fact that there are no dynamics in the space-like region of M. After that we use dt L1(gab) = 0 to get an equation of continuity on S, and search for canonical relations and Lagrangian that correspond to the same 0a equation of continuity according to the canonical field theory. We find that Si is a conjugate momentum i ab i i of Aa and Si Fab is its energy density. We obtain a Lagrangian for the connection A in 4-manifold M, then we couple it to a left-handed fermion field and find the beta function. 2. Decomposition Space–Time Manifold M into R × S The formulation of GR based on decomposition space–time manifold M into R × S is needed for expressing the metric of space–time as a solution of an equation for time evolution, such as in the Hamiltonian formulation. Thus the time evolution is the changing of the geometry of this surface. This decomposition preserves the continuous symmetries (gauge invariance and diffeomorphism invariance) of GR and its canonical quantization, so we can use it for the gauge theory of GR [4–7]. I I m We define gravitational field as a one-form e = em(x)dx that is related with metric gmn(x) on an I J IJ 1 arbitrary space–time manifold M by gmn = hIJemen, with spin connection w (x) 2 W (M, so(3, 1)), where so(3, 1) is Lie algebra of Lorentz group SO(3, 1). The spin connection defines covariant derivative Dm that acts on all fields which have Lorentz indices (I, J, ...): I I I J Dmv = ¶mv + wmJv . We start with the GR Lagrangian of the form −1 m n IJ L(e, w) = (16pG) eI eJ (Rmn) e, (1) where IJ IJ I KJ R = dw + w K ^ w m I m I is the Riemannian curvature tensor and eI satisfies emeJ = dJ . By the decomposition M ! R × S, we decompose this Lagrangian into −1 a b ij −1 a b 0J −1 0 a IJ L(e, w) = (16pG) ei ej (Rab) e + (16pG) e0eJ (Rab) e + (16pG) eI eJ (R0a) e, (2) where i and j are Lorentz indices for I = i = 1, 2, 3, and a = 1, 2, 3. The part −1 a b ij L1 = (16pG) ei ej (Rab) e has the gauge symmetry of the group SO(3), which is a subgroup of SO(3, 1), it also relates to the geometry a a a ij of the surface S(s ) under the variation in the direction of S(s ) subject to de0 = 0, dw0 = 0, since it i j a depends only on the metric gab = dijeaeb which is defined on S(s ), which is intrinsic geometry. ij k Since (Rab) is an anti-symmetric tensor, we can introduce a new one-form field Ec , the Hodge dual i j a i i a of e ^ e in the internal spin space on the surface S(s ); E = Eads , it is called the gravitational electric field [8,9] 1 eaeb − eaeb = #abc# Ek. 2 i j j i ijk c Physics 2019, 1 341 a In self-dual formalism of GR, Ei is complex given by [10,11] 1 Eia = #abcPi eI eJ, with Ei = Si = Pi eI eJ (3) 2 IJ b c ab ab IJ a b i where PIJ is a self-dual projector given by 1 i Pi = #i , for I = i, J = j, and Pi = −Pi = di, for I = 0, J = j 6= 0. (4) IJ 2 jk 0j j0 2 j 1a 1 abc 2 3 0 1 For example E = 2 # (ebec + iebec ). a For the Lagrangian part L1 on S(s ), we use the first one: −1 k abc ij L1 = (16pG) Ec # #ijk(Rab) e. (5) The remaining part −1 a b 0J −1 0 a IJ L2 = (16pG) e0eJ (Rab) e + (16pG) eI eJ (R0a) e, associates with the time evolution under the variation in the normal direction of S(sa), it is subject to a ij a dei = 0, dwa = 0, and changes the geometry of the surface S(s ) during the time. Dynamics, such as 0 2 m n propagation gab(x) ! gab(x ) in the time-like region (Dx) = gmn(x)Dx Dx < 0, and determines how the surface S(sa) is embedded into the 4D manifold M, which is extrinsic geometry. But the surface S(sa) a is embedded in a space-like region in M; V1, V2 2 TpS(s ), g(V1, V2) > 0, so there are no dynamics on a TpS(s ). We can see this fact by noting that rtgab = 0 (the covariant derivative of the metric is zero), so dL1(gab) ¶L1(gab) dt = rtgabdt = 0. dt ¶gab a b a a a b We will rewrite rtgab = 0 as t t rtgab = 0, for t 2 TpSt(s ). The formula t t rtgab = 0 is more ∗ a ∗ a a general than rtgab = 0 since there is rtgab 2/ G (T St(s ) × T St(s )), and so its projection onto TpS(s ) is zero. This case appears in the diffeomorphism maps of S(sa) into another space-like surface, as we will see. We can study the embedding of S(sa) by letting the time derivative of a position vector on its tangent a space be in the direction of the normal to this tangent space TpS(s ). We can see this by considering a a a a a a a a position vector t 2 TpSt(s ) that satisfies t˙ ta = t˙at = 0.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    21 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us