Border Conflicts: How Leafhoppers Can Help Resolve Ecoregional Viewpoints in Canada and the USA K.G.A

Border Conflicts: How Leafhoppers Can Help Resolve Ecoregional Viewpoints in Canada and the USA K.G.A

Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods) Border Conflicts: How Leafhoppers Can Help Resolve Ecoregional Viewpoints in Canada and the USA K.G.A. Hamilton Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6 [email protected] Reprinted from Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods) Volume 28, No. 2, pp. 41–54 (This newsletter is available online at http://www.biology.ualberta.ca/bsc/english/newsletters.htm) Vol. 28, No. 2 41 Border Conflicts: How Leafhoppers Can Help Resolve Ecoregional Viewpoints in Canada and the USA K.G.A. Hamilton Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6 [email protected] Abstract Introduction coregions are defined using different Biologists from the days of Darwin have Eparameters and assumptions in Canada and been fascinated by biogeographic patterns of the USA. The only ecoregion composite (pub- biota. Early classifications of North Ameri- lished in 1999) minimizes the differences but can floras and faunas (summarized in Scudder needs to be tested against an impartial data set 1979) emphasized climate and dominant veg- spanning the borders. Leafhoppers, which are etation as ruling factors in such regional pat- speciose in the northern states and southern terns. Biotic maps in Canada are usually based Canada, have been extensively collected and on 12 forest regions (e.g., Hosie 1969) while analysed for distribution patterns. These pat- in the U.S.A. the dominant vegetational types terns tend to follow those of their plant hosts, were designated as 106 regions of “potential and therefore reflect ecoregional patterns of natural vegetation” (Küchler 1964). Other clas- lower trophic levels. In general, leafhopper dis- sifications stressing endemism are little used tribution patterns agree with the 1999 synthesis in Canada since postulated glacial refugia are but differ in some significant details, especially considered significant only for arctic and alpine on the prairies where agriculture has exten- insects, having been too close to glaciers to sively disrupted presettlement ecosystems. account for most of Canada’s endemic species found in more temperate areas (Scudder 1979, fig. 3.44). Instead, substrate has been used as a measurable test for the extent of 15 large Fig. 1. Southern Canadian Ecozones (Smith et al. 1996) compared to biomes in adjacent U.S.A. 42 Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods) biotic areas in Canada (Fig. 1). These areas holdings to approximately 300,000 identified are called Ecozones, and their subdivisions specimens. are Ecoprovinces, Ecoregions and Ecodistricts Analyses have been published of “short- (Smith et al. 1996). A subsequent analysis com- horned” bug faunas for the islands of New- bined these various criteria into a single map foundland and Cape Breton in Nova Scotia of North American terrestrial Ecoregions (Fig. (Hamilton and Langor 1987), for the Yukon 2) based equally on regional distinctions and (Hamilton 1997a), and for the Prairie Ecozone endemism (Ricketts et al. 1999). The compilers (Hamilton 2004a, b) while unpublished synop- did not provide lists of biota upon which it was ses have been prepared for each of the other based, but seem to have emphasized botani- southern ecozones. These studies find consid- cal and vertebrate distributions with other data erable cross-border disjunctions in the present from some beetles and macrolepidoptera. It is Ecoregional classification. Evidently, new data evidently a compromise classification using a is needed to bring cohesion to the ecoregions of mixture of criteria with many of the Canadian southern Canada and the northern U.S.A. “Ecoprovinces” converted into equivalents of “Ecoregions” further south. Understanding biogeographic patterns This study examines a rich fauna of insects Ecoregions are based on two kinds of data not previously utilized in defining regional bio- that correlate well with both biotic and abiotic tas. Records are based mainly on specimens ecological conditions: overall biodiversity and of leafhoppers and their relatives, or “short- regional endemism. In this study, large-scale horned” bugs (Fig. 3) in the Canadian National patterns of overall biodiversity emerge (Maw Collection (CNC), Ottawa. Arctic and subarc- et al. 2000) and high levels of endemism and tic areas were sampled in 1947-1961 during the some curiously disjunct populations are noted Northern Insect Survey at 64 arctic and subarc- in specific areas of Canada (Bouchard et al. tic localities (Cody et al. 1986). Boreal and far 2002; Paiero et al. 2003; Hamilton 1995, 2002a, north sites represented in the CNC were mapped b, 2004a). by Huckett (1965, figs. 1-7) and representation of southern localities typical of “short-horned” Regional faunas vary with ecological con- bugs are summarized by Hamilton (1982, map ditions in various distinct ways that may be 1). Since 1963, 45 years of sampling leafhop- interpreted through the relative proportions pers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) and related of endemics to total biodiversity. Simple cli- insects at more than 1000 sites across Canada nal distributions (e.g., from wet to dry areas) and the northern U.S.A. has increased CNC will support both the highest biodiversity and highest endemism in places of optimal condi- Fig. 2. Ecoregions of southern Canada and the northern USA (Ricketts et al. 1999). Vol. 28, No. 2 43 Fig. 3. Examples of families of short-horned bugs in Canada. Cicadidae: Okanagana ornata Van Duzee, found in California, Oregon and at D’Arcy, B.C.; Cicadellidae: Zygina flammigera (Fourcroy), a wind-dispersed microleafhopper imported from Europe to coastal B.C.; Cercopidae: Clastoptera atrapicata Hamilton, a B.C. endemic; Membracidae: Ceresa alta Walker, a North American pest; 5, Derbidae: Otiocerus degeerii Kirby, restricted to southern localities; Achilidae: Synecdoche constellata (Ball), a Pacific coast species also known from two inland sites; Delphacidae: Toya propinqua (Fieber), a migratory introduced species; Cixiidae: Oliarus coconinus Ball, a disjunct in the Okanagan Valley; Fulgoridae: Scolops abnormis Ball, an endemic of the Okanagan Valley; Caliscelidae: Bruchomorpha beameri Doering, a prairie species also widespread in the intermontane valleys of B.C. Photographs courtesy of Gernot Kunz, Tom Murray, Charles Schurch Lewallen and Werner Eigelsreiter. 44 Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods) Fig.4. Total biodiversity and diversity of endemics as a measure of biotic systems across environmental gradients (e.g., aridity). Ecoregions may have clinal distributions of environmental conditions, in which case both biodiversity and endemism are expected to be highest in areas with least severe conditions. Recently developed overlaps between ecoregions (ecotones) share total faunas, so biodiversity is higher than in either ecoregion alone, but endemics are rare. Where the reverse is true (endemism high, biodiversity low) the evidence points towards a relict biota. But where environmental conditions fluctuate greatly, both the fauna and flora are reduced to only highly tolerant and widespread species, and a biotic hiatus results. tions, usually those far removed from extremes hiatus of low biodiversity and also low ende- (Fig. 4, cline). Such distributions are common micity occurs (Fig. 4, hiatus). within ecoregions. If, however, the biodiversity “Well-developed ecotonal communi- and endemism are both highest near both ends ties” differ from most ecotones in containing of the ecological cline, as happens across the endemics adapted to an admixture of condi- boreal forest zone with maximum numbers of tions (Odum 1971) such as prairie grasses species and endemics in Newfoundland (Ham- growing in partial shade, or animals foraging ilton and Langor 1987) and in Beringia (Hamil- in open areas but retreating to forested patches ton 1997) then at least two separate ecoregions for nesting. Well developed communities of are represented along the gradient. Where bio- endemics in ecotonal conditions indicate that diversity is high on either side of an anomalous these conditions have lasted for much longer area, and endemism is highest in that anomaly periods than the present interglacial and are (Fig. 4, relict), this represents a site where a therefore equivalent to ecoregions. It is nota- former ecoregional fauna persists embedded in ble that “aspen parkland” (ecotonal between an unfavorable ecological area, such as a san- prairie and boreal forest) has one of the richest dhill surrounded by land overgrown with for- faunas of endemic short-horned bugs in Can- est. If the fauna of two biomes overlap at an ada. A second such ecotone rich in endemics ecotone or “tension zone,” biodiversity will be is the belt of sand plain, alvar and oak savan- higher there than in either adjacent area (Odum nah extending from Lake Huron to the interlake 1971), but endemism should be lower (Fig. 4, district of Manitoba. This area contrasts with ecotone). This study reports a rare additional that found in the prairie-forest transition zone case: where climate cycles over a multi-year extending from southern Ontario to Texas, the periodicity, as does rainfall on the Canadian habitat of the massasauga rattlesnake Sistrurus steppe (Sauchyn et al. 2004), endemic species catenatus (Ref.), but few other endemics. Two characteristic of adjacent areas cannot establish other and much less biodiverse well-developed populations adapted to either extremes, and an Vol. 28, No. 2 45

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    15 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us