Question Answer Louisiana State University 4-year public All institutions Unchecked 11.0% 5.1% 6.3% Survey area of interest: Teaching and learning Checked 89.0% 94.9% 93.7% Unchecked 42.8% 48.3% 53.7% Survey area of interest: Research and scholarship Checked 57.2% 51.7% 46.3% I am not part of the institution’s faculty. 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Full-time faculty member 86.6% 82.3% 78.3% Full or part time Part-time faculty member 13.0% 17.1% 21.3% Emeritus faculty member 0.3% 0.6% 0.4% Less than 2 18.7% 21.7% 24.1% 2 to less than 5 13.7% 14.7% 13.8% 1.1 Years of experience: Full-time faculty position 5 to less than 10 12.0% 16.0% 16.6% 10 to less than 20 23.1% 24.3% 24.6% 20 or more 32.4% 23.3% 20.9% Less than 2 75.6% 65.6% 60.8% 2 to less than 5 13.0% 15.9% 16.9% 1.1 Years of experience: Part-time faculty position 5 to less than 10 7.0% 10.2% 12.1% 10 to less than 20 3.7% 6.3% 8.0% 20 or more 0.7% 1.9% 2.2% Less than 2 8.7% 8.5% 8.3% 2 to less than 5 16.4% 14.8% 14.5% 1.1 Years of experience: Any faculty position 5 to less than 10 14.4% 18.8% 19.6% 10 to less than 20 25.8% 29.5% 30.4% 20 or more 34.8% 28.4% 27.2% Unchecked 16.8% 11.5% 13.3% 1.2 Do you work with…: Undergraduate students Checked 83.2% 88.5% 86.7% Unchecked 34.9% 42.2% 52.5% 1.2 Do you work with…: Graduate students Checked 65.1% 57.8% 47.5% Unchecked 78.9% 81.7% 82.8% 1.2 Do you work with…: Professional students Checked 21.1% 18.3% 17.2% 1.2 Do you work with…: I don't typically work directly with Unchecked 95.0% 97.8% 97.1% students. Checked 5.0% 2.2% 2.9% Tenured 49.8% 47.7% 51.0% Not tenured, but on a tenure track 19.7% 20.4% 16.8% 1.3 Tenure status Not on a tenure track (ongoing appointment) 25.1% 21.3% 18.7% Not on a tenure track (temporary/fixed-term 5.4% 10.6% 13.5% Emeritus faculty 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% Professor 30.1% 27.1% 23.3% Associate professor 18.9% 22.1% 17.2% Assistant professor 21.6% 23.4% 18.0% Clinical professor 0.8% 1.7% 1.1% Research professor 2.7% 0.8% 0.6% 1.4 Academic rank Instructor 20.8% 8.6% 18.2% Lecturer/senior lecturer 0.8% 10.0% 10.7% Fixed-term adjunct 0.0% 0.2% 0.6% Adjunct with continuing appointment 0.4% 0.5% 0.6% Research associate 0.0% 1.5% 2.4% Other academic rank; please specify: 3.9% 3.9% 6.1% 1.4 Academic rank No academic rank 0.0% 0.3% 1.3% Unchecked 56.3% 54.7% 53.9% 2.1 Desktop: Own Checked 43.7% 45.3% 46.1% Unchecked 22.2% 34.0% 38.9% 2.1 Desktop: Provided Checked 77.8% 66.0% 61.1% Unchecked 93.0% 86.4% 84.8% 2.1 Desktop: Neither Checked 7.0% 13.6% 15.2% Unchecked 7.0% 13.6% 15.2% 2.1 Desktop: Either Checked 93.0% 86.4% 84.8% Unchecked 34.7% 33.3% 32.6% 2.1 Laptop: Own Checked 65.3% 66.7% 67.4% Unchecked 45.6% 45.4% 46.8% 2.1 Laptop: Provided Checked 54.4% 54.6% 53.2% Unchecked 97.2% 97.1% 97.0% 2.1 Laptop: Neither Checked 2.8% 2.9% 3.0% Unchecked 2.8% 2.9% 3.0% 2.1 Laptop: Either Checked 97.2% 97.1% 97.0% Unchecked 37.1% 36.9% 35.0% 2.1 Tablet: Own Checked 62.9% 63.1% 65.0% Unchecked 77.2% 75.2% 78.2% 2.1 Tablet: Provided Checked 22.8% 24.8% 21.8% Unchecked 78.9% 81.2% 80.6% 2.1 Tablet: Neither Checked 21.1% 18.8% 19.4% Unchecked 21.1% 18.8% 19.4% 2.1 Tablet: Either Checked 78.9% 81.2% 80.6% Unchecked 8.8% 7.2% 10.4% 2.1 Smartphone: Own Checked 91.2% 92.8% 89.6% Unchecked 97.4% 98.2% 91.6% 2.1 Smartphone: Provided Checked 2.6% 1.8% 8.4% Unchecked 93.4% 93.9% 94.1% 2.1 Smartphone: Neither Checked 6.6% 6.1% 5.9% Unchecked 6.6% 6.1% 5.9% 2.1 Smartphone: Either Checked 93.4% 93.9% 94.1% Other 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% Windows 75.6% 71.8% 74.0% Mac or OS X 19.6% 23.7% 20.1% 2.2a Desktop OS Chrome OS 1.6% 1.6% 1.7% Linux 1.2% 2.0% 3.1% Don’t know 2.0% 0.8% 0.9% Other 0.4% 0.2% 0.3% Windows 57.5% 58.5% 63.5% Mac or OS X 38.5% 37.7% 32.0% 2.2b Laptop OS Chrome OS 2.5% 2.1% 2.1% Linux 0.0% 0.9% 1.5% Don’t know 1.1% 0.5% 0.6% Other 2.7% 2.0% 1.8% iPad 63.6% 70.8% 68.5% Windows tablet 12.3% 9.4% 9.5% 2.2c Tablet type Android tablet 14.4% 12.8% 15.4% 2.2c Tablet type Amazon Fire tablet 7.0% 4.6% 4.3% Don’t know 0.0% 0.4% 0.4% iPhone 71.3% 64.1% 58.6% Android phone 25.2% 33.7% 35.8% 2.2d Smartphone type Windows phone 3.1% 1.3% 4.4% Other smartphone 0.4% 0.7% 0.9% Don’t know 0.0% 0.2% 0.3% Poor 7.4% 6.9% 6.1% Fair 17.9% 14.0% 13.2% Neutral 11.5% 11.9% 12.2% 2.3 Experiences: Classroom-based technology resources Good 37.5% 44.4% 43.8% Excellent 10.8% 14.0% 14.4% Haven’t used in the past year 11.8% 7.7% 8.5% Service not offered 3.0% 1.1% 1.7% Poor 4.7% 5.0% 4.5% Fair 10.2% 7.8% 7.6% Neutral 11.5% 11.5% 12.2% 2.3 Experiences: Laboratory or research-based technology Good 27.8% 27.2% 28.1% resources Excellent 12.2% 9.2% 9.4% Haven’t used in the past year 28.5% 34.6% 32.8% Service not offered 5.1% 4.6% 5.4% Poor 6.1% 4.5% 4.5% Fair 8.1% 9.5% 9.1% Neutral 14.5% 13.4% 14.1% 2.3 Experiences: Online collaborative spaces Good 35.4% 39.9% 38.8% Excellent 10.4% 13.9% 14.7% Haven’t used in the past year 21.9% 17.2% 16.9% Service not offered 3.7% 1.6% 2.0% Poor 5.1% 6.9% 5.9% Fair 10.8% 10.4% 10.6% Neutral 14.5% 12.7% 13.0% 2.3 Experiences: Physical collaborative spaces Good 21.6% 30.4% 30.6% Excellent 9.5% 9.8% 10.6% Haven’t used in the past year 35.5% 27.6% 26.2% Service not offered 3.0% 2.3% 3.0% Poor 2.7% 4.3% 4.2% Fair 9.5% 10.3% 10.1% Neutral 9.8% 10.8% 10.8% 2.3 Experiences: Access to institutional resources while Good 46.4% 45.2% 45.8% working from home Excellent 26.8% 24.4% 24.1% Haven’t used in the past year 3.7% 3.9% 3.9% Service not offered 1.0% 1.2% 1.2% Poor 3.4% 4.6% 4.1% Fair 11.2% 9.1% 8.4% Neutral 10.2% 10.8% 10.7% 2.3 Experiences: Access to institutional resources while Good 37.6% 35.7% 35.4% traveling or living out of state Excellent 15.6% 15.2% 15.3% Haven’t used in the past year 18.6% 21.8% 23.0% Service not offered 3.4% 2.7% 3.0% Poor 3.7% 2.8% 2.5% Fair 7.4% 8.5% 7.7% Neutral 7.1% 8.4% 8.5% 2.3 Experiences: Ability to get my work done while Good 47.5% 45.2% 45.4% working from ho,me Excellent 31.6% 32.0% 32.7% Haven’t used in the past year 1.3% 1.8% 1.9% Service not offered 1.3% 1.4% 1.3% Poor 4.0% 3.8% 3.4% Fair 7.1% 9.2% 8.2% Neutral 12.8% 10.2% 9.9% 2.3 Experiences: Ability to get my work done while while Good 41.8% 40.5% 39.2% traveling or living out of state Excellent 19.5% 18.6% 19.2% Haven’t used in the past year 11.4% 15.5% 17.6% Service not offered 3.4% 2.1% 2.6% Poor 14.1% 8.3% 7.5% Fair 15.2% 15.0% 14.0% Neutral 8.1% 10.8% 10.4% 2.3 Experiences: Reliable access to Wi-Fi networks Good 38.0% 40.4% 39.6% throughout campus Excellent 19.2% 21.6% 22.4% Haven’t used in the past year 4.7% 3.6% 5.5% Service not offered 0.7% 0.3% 0.6% Poor 3.1% 2.9% 2.6% Fair 9.5% 7.6% 7.1% Neutral 10.2% 10.0% 10.0% 2.3 Experiences: Communication technologies Good 48.8% 49.7% 49.8% Excellent 25.1% 26.8% 27.6% Haven’t used in the past year 3.1% 2.6% 2.5% Service not offered 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% Poor 7.1% 5.8% 5.4% Fair 11.8% 11.1% 9.9% Neutral 12.1% 13.5% 13.2% 2.3 Experiences: Videoconferencing technologies Good 30.3% 31.2% 30.6% Excellent 7.4% 9.5% 10.0% Haven’t used in the past year 28.3% 26.8% 28.5% Service not offered 3.0% 2.2% 2.4% Poor 6.4% 4.8% 4.8% Fair 12.1% 10.2% 9.8% Neutral 16.2% 16.4% 16.2% 2.3 Experiences: Online or virtual technologies Good 29.0% 36.4% 36.1% Excellent 9.8% 12.6% 13.0% Haven’t used in the past year 22.6% 17.9% 17.8% Service not offered 4.0% 1.8% 2.2% Poor 6.7% 6.9% 6.2% Fair 8.1% 7.5% 7.0% Neutral 10.1% 10.0% 10.9% 2.3 Experiences: Remote access to commercial software Good 15.8% 15.5% 16.7% applications Excellent 3.0% 4.9% 5.7% Haven’t used in the past year 51.3% 50.2% 48.0% Service not offered 5.0% 5.0% 5.5% Poor 9.4% 5.7% 5.4% Fair 13.5% 10.9% 10.8% Neutral 12.8% 11.9% 11.9% 2.3 Experiences: Technology support Good 32.3% 39.1% 38.9% Excellent 19.5% 22.9% 23.7% Haven’t used in the past year 10.8% 9.0% 8.6% Service not offered 1.7% 0.6% 0.7% Poor 8.8% 6.8% 6.9% Fair 9.5% 8.9% 9.4% Neutral 7.8% 12.2% 13.3% 2.3 Experiences: Professional development around the Good 20.3% 25.3% 26.2% integrated use of technology in your teaching Excellent 11.8% 10.9% 11.1% Haven’t used in the past year 36.5% 33.3% 30.5% Service not offered 5.4% 2.5% 2.6% Poor 4.0% 5.6% 5.3% Fair 5.4% 5.8% 5.7% Neutral 7.7% 9.7% 10.4% 2.3 Experiences: Support for making courses accessible to Good 17.5% 20.6% 20.1% students with disabilities Excellent 7.4% 8.7% 8.9% Haven’t used in the past year 54.5% 47.2% 46.1% Service not offered 3.4% 2.5% 3.5% Poor 4.4% 3.5% 3.5% Fair 2.0% 2.3% 2.8% Neutral 5.7% 7.1% 8.2% 2.3 Experiences: Support for making teaching courses Good 8.1% 7.8% 8.3% accessible to faculty with disabilities Excellent 4.4% 3.6% 4.2% Haven’t used in the past year 70.7% 72.0% 68.0% Service not offered 4.7% 3.8% 5.0% Poor 7.1% 6.4% 6.5% Fair 11.1% 7.4% 7.5% Neutral 10.1% 11.1% 12.1% 2.3 Experiences: Professional development around the Good 18.2% 18.6% 20.0% integrated use of technology in your research Excellent 6.4% 7.0% 7.7% Haven’t used in the past year 42.6% 45.3% 41.4% Service not offered 4.4% 4.2% 4.7% Poor 7.8% 5.5% 5.9% Fair 6.5% 6.4% 7.2% Neutral 8.2% 8.4% 9.5% 2.3 Experiences: Consultations for using technology in Good 23.1% 23.1% 23.7% teaching Excellent 12.9% 15.6% 15.1% Haven’t used in the past year 36.7% 38.3% 35.2% Service not offered 4.8% 2.7% 3.4% Poor 6.7% 6.1% 5.9% Fair 6.4% 5.7% 5.7% Neutral 9.4% 8.6% 9.3% 2.3 Experiences: Consultations for using technology in Good 10.4% 12.7% 12.9% research Excellent 9.1% 6.5% 6.6% Haven’t used in the past year 50.8% 55.8% 53.4% Service not offered 7.1% 4.7% 6.2% Poor 7.4% 6.4% 6.2% Fair 8.1% 7.2% 7.4% Neutral 11.5% 12.1% 12.7% 2.3 Experiences: Specialized teaching software Good 12.5% 17.6% 18.1% Excellent 5.4%