Extremely Halophilic Archaeal Communities Are Resilient to Short-Term Entombment in Halite

Extremely Halophilic Archaeal Communities Are Resilient to Short-Term Entombment in Halite

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Essex Research Repository Environmental Microbiology (2020) 00(00), 00–00 doi:10.1111/1462-2920.14913 Extremely halophilic archaeal communities are resilient to short-term entombment in halite Tom J. C. Huby,† Dave R. Clark ,† Boyd A. McKew Introduction and Terry J. McGenity * Hypersaline ecosystems are diverse and globally distrib- School of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, uted. Surface environments with >20% salinity and sub- Essex, UK. jected to periodic halite precipitation are usually dominated by haloarchaea, which is the informal name Summary for Archaea in the class Halobacteria (McGenity and Oren, 2012). Haloarchaea have a competitive advantage Some haloarchaea avoid the harsh conditions pre- sent in evaporating brines by entombment in brine over many other halophiles at such high salinities, mainly ‘ ’ inclusions within forming halite crystals, where a because they adopt the salt-in strategy , with KCl as the subset of haloarchaea survives over geological time. primary osmolyte, as opposed to the more energetically However, shifts in the community structure of halite- costly biosynthesis of organic osmolytes (Oren, 2011). entombed archaeal communities remain poorly However, they have numerous other adaptations that understood. Therefore, we analysed archaeal com- allow them to grow in the presence of multiple other munities from in situ hypersaline brines collected stressors such as high temperatures, UV radiation and from Trapani saltern (Sicily) and their successional evaporation (Jones and Baxter, 2017). Coastal solar sal- changes in brines versus laboratory-grown halite terns have commonly been used to investigate succes- over 21 weeks, using high-throughput sequencing. sional community changes as salinity increases Haloarchaea were dominant, comprising >95% of the (Benlloch et al., 2002), as well as the environmental and archaeal community. Unexpectedly, the OTU rich- biogeographic factors influencing microbial communities ness of the communities after 21 weeks was indistin- in hypersaline brines (Fernández et al., 2014) and halite guishable from the parent brine and overall archaeal crystals (Clark et al., 2017). abundance in halite showed no clear temporal Halite precipitates over a range of salinities, and at the trends. Furthermore, the duration of entombment terminal stages, the remaining bittern brine becomes was less important than the parent brine from which enriched in ions such as magnesium, the chaotropic the halite derived in determining the community com- nature of which leads to denaturation of biological macro- position and relative abundances of most genera in molecules, thus restricting microbial activity (Javor, 1984; halite-entombed communities. These results show Hallsworth et al., 2007). In order to escape such that halite-entombed archaeal communities are resil- chaotropic conditions or complete desiccation, ient to entombment durations of up to 21 weeks, and haloarchaea (and other extreme halophiles) become that entombment in halite may be an effective sur- entombed within brine inclusions of halite (Norton and vival strategy for near complete communities of Grant, 1988). When the halite dissolves, for instance after haloarchaea. Additionally, the dominance of ‘halite rainfall, the haloarchaea are released back into the brine ’ specialists observed in ancient halite must occur whereupon they can resume normal growth. For exam- over periods of years, rather than months, hinting at ple, experimental pure-culture studies showed that all of long-term successional dynamics in this the 14 haloarchaeal strains entombed in halite for environment. 6 months were able to grow (Norton and Grant, 1988; Gramain et al., 2011). Brine inclusions within halite crys- − tals can be highly abundant, up to 1010 cm 3 (Roedder, 1984). Within these brine inclusions, microorganisms may meet their metabolic needs by recycling organic mol- Received 10 September, 2019; revised 6 January, 2020; accepted 6 ecules from necromass (McGenity et al., 2000; Thomas January, 2020. *For correspondence.E-mail [email protected]; Tel. (+44) 1206 872535. †These authors contributed equally to et al., 2019) or compounds leaked from other microbial this work. cells, such as glycerol (Schubert et al., 2009; Oren, © 2020 The Authors. Environmental Microbiology published by Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 2 T. J. C. Huby, D. R. Clark, B. A. McKew and T. J. McGenity 2017). Interactions between entombed microbes are composition of the brines from the three different evapo- evidenced by the improved recovery of the haloarchaeon ration ponds. Brine 1 was from a crystallizer pond where Haloquadratum walsbyi when co-entombed with the Bacte- the salt had been harvested immediately before sampling roidetes species Salinibacter ruber compared with when and had the lowest water activity (0.716) of the three entombed alone (Gramain et al., 2011). Additionally, some ponds. This was followed by brine 3 (0.734), which was haloarchaea minimize their cell size to reduce metabolic also a recently harvested crystallizer pond. Brine 2 had requirements (Fendrihan et al., 2006; Winters et al., 2015; the highest water activity of the three samples at 0.755 Jaakkola et al., 2016). Survival within halite crystals may and was derived from an evaporation pond approaching 2+ enable some haloarchaea to survive over geological time saturation. The brine of pond 1 had the highest Mg con- (McGenity et al., 2000; Fendrihan et al., 2006; Lowenstein centrations, followed by brine 3, and brine 2, while the + et al., 2011; Jaakkola et al., 2016), potentially making halo- Na concentration showed the opposite trend. philic Archaea the oldest living organisms on Earth as well Out of 87 samples (in situ and laboratory experiment), as leading candidates for astrobiological studies (Fendrihan seven did not yield archaeal amplicons. Sequences from fi et al., 2009). Notably, many studies of entombed archaeal successfully ampli ed samples were clustered into oper- communities from ancient halite show a reduction in com- ational taxonomic units (OTU) at the 97% similarity level. fi munity diversity compared to contemporary brine communi- OTUs were removed if they: identi ed as chimeras (de ties, suggesting that not all haloarchaea survive well in novo or reference-based), were <200 bp, or were single- halite (Gramain et al., 2011). Furthermore, studies of tons. After the removal of OTUs and individual samples marine-derived halite crystals that are a few years old show based on the above criteria a total of 1,715,018 archaeal that dominant members of brine communities are present in sequences remained from 75 samples. These sequences reduced abundance, or undetectable, in halite communities, represented a total of 277 OTUs prior to rarefaction, whereas others that are scarce in brines are overrepre- 77.6% of which were assigned to the class Halobacteria. Taxonomic analysis of the Archaea from in situ brine sented in halite (Henriet et al., 2014; Clark et al., 2017). and halite samples collected from pond 1 revealed that Halobacterium and Halolamina are examples of genera with communities were dominated by haloarchaea as species that are overrepresented in both culture-dependent expected (Fig. S2). Archaea from the orders and culture-independent, studies of commercial sea salt Haloferacales and Halobacteriales accounted for 96.6% (Henriet et al., 2014; Koh et al., 2015; Clark et al., 2017; of the in situ brine community and 98.3% of the in situ Gibtan et al., 2017) and ancient halite (McGenity et al., halite-entombed communities, with the genus 2000; Mormile et al., 2003; Gramain et al., 2011; Jaakkola Halorubrum alone accounting for >75% of the total halite- et al., 2016). entombed community. Notably, Halorubrum was one of a In order to address the gap in our understanding of the few genera that were relatively more abundant in the in succession of natural communities within halite over several situ halite-entombed community compared with the brine, weeks after entombment, we used brine samples from three whereas Haloquadratum, Halorientalis and solar saltern crystallizer ponds in Trapani (Sicily, Fig. 1; Halomicrobium showed the reverse trend, being rela- Fig. S1), allowed halite to form in the laboratory and analysed tively more abundant in the brine. In situ brine communi- archaeal communities over 21 weeks in halite crystals and ties were more OTU rich than the in situ halite the corresponding brines. Additionally, we compared the in communities with 60–64 OTUs per sample compared to situ brine and halite communities from one of the ponds. We 40–56 OTUs in the halite. hypothesized that, over the 21-week experiment: (i) the abun- dance of Archaea in halite would decrease through time, and in comparison to brine controls, (ii) halite communities would Changes in the abundance of halite-entombed become less diverse and more compositionally distinct communities through time through time for all three brines as the community is reduced Quantitative PCR analysis of archaeal and bacterial 16S to specialist ‘halite survivors’ and (iii) archaeal taxa would rRNA genes in the halite samples compared with the par- show differential changes

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us