MOISA 2: Fostering Regional Partnerships and Innovation for Maritime Security, Safety, and Resilience September 2015 Version 1.1 Prepared by the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the University of Washington Prepared for the Department of Homeland Security Interagency Operations Center, the National Maritime Intelligence-Integration Office, and the Program Manager for the Information Sharing Environment Copyright © 2015 University of Washington PREPARED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY INTERAGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER, THE NATIONAL MARITIME INTELLIGENCE-INTEGRATION OFFICE, AND THE PROGRAM MANAGER FOR THE INFORMATION SHARING ENVIRONMENT, BY THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN CENTERED DESIGN & ENGINEERING This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. First printing, September 2015 TITLE PAGE IMAGES US Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Nathan Bradshaw. (2012). “Petty Officer 1st Class Ramona Mason, an operations specialist and VTS Puget Sound watchstander, monitors vessel traffic in the Strait of Juan de Fuca.” http://coastguard.dodlive.mil/2012/10/40-years-of-safe-navigation-in-americas- waterways/#sthash.7cVlSTwF.dpuf King County Sheriff’s Office. (no date). http://www.kingcounty.gov/safety/sheriff/Enforcement/Specialized/MarinePatrol.aspx USCG. (2014). “Air Station/ Sector Field Office (SFO) Port Angeles, WA.” http://www.uscg.mil/d13/ sfoportangeles/Photo_Gallery/ i Version Control Table 1: Table of Changes Version Effective Date Approved By Change 1.0 9/30/2015 Mark Haselkorn Initial Report 1.1 1/27/2016 Mark Haselkorn Minor amendments to verbiage ii Acknowledgements The University of Washington acknowledges the contributions made to the research and publication of the MOISA Year 2 Report. We would like to thank the Puget Sound maritime community for their participation. Specifically, we thank the: • Air Station/Sector Field Office (SFO) - Port • Pierce County Sheriff’s Office Angeles, WA • Pierce County Emergency Management • APM Terminals • Port of Everett • Area Maritime Security Committee – Puget • Port of Tacoma Sound • Puget Sound Area Maritime Security • Canadian Coast Guard Committee • Clallam County Sheriff • Puget Sound Marine Exchange • Customs and Border Protection – Border • Royal Canadian Mounted Police Patrol - Blaine, WA • Skagit County Sheriff • Customs and Border Protection – Office of Air and Marine – Bellingham, WA • Snohomish County Sheriff • Coupeville Marshal’s Office • USCG District Thirteen • Drug Enforcement Agency • USCG Sector Puget Sound • East Jefferson Fire Rescue • USCG Station Seattle • Homeland Security Division for Washington • US Drug Enforcement Agency – Seattle, WA State Patrol • Washington State Department of Fish and • Jefferson County Sheriff Wildlife • King County Sheriff • Washington State Fusion Center • King County Sheriff’s Aviation Support Unit • Washington State Patrol • Marine Exchange of Puget Sound • Western Air Defense Sector • Northwest Maritime Center • Whatcom County Sheriff We would also like to thank the sponsors for their support and contributions as partners in this project. • Department of Homeland Security Interagency Operation Center • National Maritime Intelligence-Integration Office • Program Manager for the Information Sharing Environment iii MOISA CONTRIBUTORS Graduate Students: Melissa Braxton and Maura Rowell Consultants: Christena Little and Anne Tyler (CDR, USN Retired) UW Staff: Chris Hussein, Elizabeth Kirby, Sonia Savelli, and Brian Zito (LCDR, USN Retired) PI Team: Dr. Keith Butler, Dr. Mark Haselkorn, and Dr. Mark Zachry iv Table of Contents Version Control .................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................iii Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................. v List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ ix List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................... x 1 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 1 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 5 3 Background ................................................................................................................................... 9 4 Sensors and Sensor Opportunities ............................................................................................ 12 4.1 Puget Sound Sensor Survey ............................................................................................... 12 4.1.1 Survey Purpose ............................................................................................................ 12 4.1.2 Survey Geographical Scope ........................................................................................ 13 4.1.3 Survey Sensor Type Scope .......................................................................................... 14 4.1.4 Survey Data Fields ....................................................................................................... 15 4.1.5 Survey Response .......................................................................................................... 15 4.1.6 Maritime Security Operations Centre ........................................................................ 16 4.1.7 Summary of Sensor Survey ......................................................................................... 16 4.2 Community Sensor Workshop Analysis ........................................................................... 17 4.2.1 Workshop Information ................................................................................................ 17 4.2.2 Sensors the Community Uses ..................................................................................... 21 4.2.3 Key Ideas ...................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.4 Desired Information Sharing Environment ............................................................... 27 4.2.5 Other Barriers to Sharing ............................................................................................ 30 v 4.2.6 Way Forward ............................................................................................................... 35 5 Technology Analysis: IMDE/CSS and Related Regional Systems in Use ............................. 37 5.1 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 37 5.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 38 5.3 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 38 5.4 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 39 5.5 User Base .............................................................................................................................. 41 5.6 Functionality ........................................................................................................................ 44 5.7 Mobility Solutions ............................................................................................................... 49 5.8 Architecture ......................................................................................................................... 50 5.9 Entitlement and Identity Management (Security) ............................................................ 53 5.10 Data Fusion .......................................................................................................................... 55 5.11 Licensing/Maintenance/Training/User Groups ................................................................ 57 5.12 Opportunities and Constraints .......................................................................................... 59 6 Use Cases ...................................................................................................................................