DRAF 2013 2013 River Protection Workgroup for the Piedra River Final Report July 2013 An initiative of the River Protection Workgroup 1 http://ocs.fortlewis.edu/riverprotection The River Protection Workgroup (RPW) project was formed as an outgrowth of discussions starting in 2006 among various regional water planning and resource protection organizations where a need became apparent for a collaborative process to select long-term, reliable, federal and/or state and/or other measures to protect the identified values of regional streams while allowing water development to continue. A project steering committee formed and then met for over a year to design the process model, get organized and begin to work at the community level for the following five river/stream segments: Hermosa Creek, upper Animas River, upper San Juan River, Vallecito Creek and the upper Pine River, and the upper Piedra River. The first step for each river and stream segment was to organize a meeting at the community level to see if there was interest in forming a public workgroup – one that would entail learning, discussions and issuing a final report of findings, agreements and conclusions. The River Protection Workgroup for the Piedra kicked off in October of 2011 and concluded its work in June 2013. Each of the RPW Workgroups’ reports can be found on the project website along with meeting notes, handouts, maps, and more: http://ocs.fortlewis.edu/riverprotection/ For more information, please refer to Attachment A which gives detailed information including the next step which is a “Regional Discussion.” Website: http://ocs.fortlewis.edu/riverprotection/ (click on “River Protection Workgroup for the Piedra River” on the left side) Contacts:Tami Graham, Facilitator 970-759 9716 or [email protected] and/or Bruce Whitehead or Steve Fearn, Southwestern Water Conservation District (970-247-1302 or [email protected] and/or Jimbo Buickerood, San Juan Citizens Alliance (970-259-3583 or [email protected] River Protection Workgroup Basin Area & Rivers of Interest A note of thanks is extended to Jim Mimiaga, meeting recorder, as well as Kathy Sherer and Jane Maxson, project assistants. Also, the San Juan RC&D and the Dolores Water Conservancy District are thanked for serving as the fiscal agents for this project. 2 THANK YOU! THAN! The River Protection Workgroup Steering Committee would like to thank the Colorado Water Conservation Board for its support, funding and technical assistance, as well as all other funders and contributors. The following members of the River Protection Workgroup for the Piedra River are thanked for their time, interest and work. The Workgroup was made up of people who represented various groups or interests and also comprised of individuals who brought their own perspectives to the group and did not represent a formal entity. Terra Anderson Coy Ross Ray Ball Troy Ross Mark Bracich Mike Reid Sharon Bracich Suzanne Sellers Jimbo Buickerood Tripp Shawver Bob Case Shelley Silbert Wanda Cason Buck Skillen Cindy Dozier Cynthia Toner Steve Fearn John Taylor Bob Formwalt Jean Taylor Preston Goetzke Susan Thompson David Guilliams Cynthia Toner Randy Halls Vilma Valdez Pete Kasper Doug Vanderlouw Bob Kleckner Chuck Wanner Rob Lindner Bev Warburton Casey Lynch Stan Whinnery Darlene Marcus Jim White Wendy Bruce Whitehead McDermott Mely Whiting Ann Oliver Michael Whiting Mike Remke Jeff Widen Warren Rider Members of the Piedra River Protection Workgroup, following our June 2013 meeting. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page(s) Overview of the River Protection Workgroup……………………. 2 Thank You to Supporters and Participants……………………….. 3 Area of Focus and Map………………………………………………... 5-6 Executive Summary…………………………………………………… 7 Getting Started and Process…………………………………………. 8-9 Education and Invited Speakers……………………………………… 10-12 Values and Information Sheet……………………………………….. 12-13 Segment-by-Segment Work, and Workgroup Findings and Conclusions…………………………………………………….. 13-20 Workgroup Desired Outcomes: Areas of Consensus……………. 21-23 Range of Ideas for Future Actions………..………………………….. 24-25 Conclusion……………………………………………………………….. 25 Guide to Attachments A – Information on the RPW and Regional Discussion… 26-27 B – Information Sheet for the upper Piedra River………. 28-44 First Box, Piedra Main Stem 4 Area of Focus The area of focus that the Workgroup discussed over its 19-month span of meetings includes th main stem of the Piedra river (above US Highway 160), the East and Middle Forks of the Piedra, Weminuche Creek and Williams Creek. Please find a detailed, 14-page “Information Sheet” in Attachment B, which covers values, a description of the area, river protections currently in place, water information, foreseeable economic development, and numerous other issues. The area spans three counties – Archuleta County in the southern portion, Hinsdale in the northern portion, and Mineral County in the eastern portion and includes both public and private land. This system of rivers and creeks helps define a region with a rich history of agricultural use and an increasingly popular area for recreationists with many interests including world-class rafting and kayaking, angling, hiking, horsebacke riding, hunting, mountain biking and off-highway vehicle travel. The San Juan Public Lands (USFS/BLM) 2007 Draft Land Management Plan found 3 river segments totaling 50.12 miles in the Piedra Watershed above Highway 160 to be “Preliminarily Suitable” for the Wild and Scenic River (WSR) status. The Workgroup discussed this tool at length in its meetings. More details and information about this particular river protection tool can be found in this report, in the minutes, and on the Web site. This river protection tool is one of numerous tools discussed. Hiking, fishing and rafting in the Piedra canyon 5 6 Executive Summary The River Protection Workgroup for the Piedra River met 19 times from October of 2011 to July of 2013. In addition to a vast amount of printed material, the group gleaned information from area residents who have made a living in this area for generations, numerous presenters and two field trips. Through these means, all five segments (Piedra main stem, East and Middle forks, Weminuche and Williams creeks) shown on page 6 were studied in detail. The group focused on values (what people care about), current protections in place, and brainstormed a list of ideas for future protections. Through these in-depth discussions, the group arrived at numerous conclusions and findings. These findings, including areas of consensus, are more fully detailed in the underlined statements on pages 21-23, and are summarized below: *Below is a package of consensus items related to future legislation to create a Special Management Area surrounding the Piedra Area and including the contiguous Colorado Roadless Areas: √ Preserve the existing character of the area; √ Prohibit any new major impoundments on the main stem, above highway 160, on East Fork or Middle Fork of the Piedra River, on Weminuche Creek, or on Williams Creek (downstream from 1/4 mile below the dam). The northern boundary of the main stem is identified as 100 yards above the USFS Road 631 bridge; √ Mineral withdrawal on federal lands, including locatable, saleable (i.e., sand and gravel) and leasable (i.e.,oil and gas) resources; and √ Remove Wild & Scenic Rivers Act eligibility and suitability in the basin. * See pages 22-23 for more detail on this package. Other areas of consensus: √ Consensus that there was at need for additional State in-stream flows was eliminated, as a result of the additional protections that would be in place with the creation of a SMA. √ The group reached consensus that it would focus on preserving the health of the Piedra River watershed as a whole. √ The group reached consensus that agricultural diversion structures and decreed water rights were a value that should be protected. Also, the group acknowledged the importance of protecting the ability of landowners, farmers and ranchers to continue agricultural practices. √ The group agreed that encouraging cooperation with water right holders and water districts to help maintain minimum flows in the stream and avoid dewatering is a worthwhile effort. 7 This report summarizes the work of the Piedra River Workgroup, a diverse and committed group of individuals with varied backgrounds and interests. The spectrum of values, interests, and ideas for the future of the area of focus is reflected herein. Members of the Piedra Workgroup on field trips (left - Weminuche valley, right - First box) Getting Started The River Protection Workgroup for the Piedra River kicked off in the fall of 2011 as part of a regional effort called the River Protection Workgroup (RPW). More information about the RPW and the model the Workgroup used can be found in Attachment A. Over 35 people attended the first meeting which kicked off in October in Pagosa Springs. Following the initial meeting, roughly 25-30 people attended each of the following 18 meetings which were all publicized and open to the public. Extensive outreach was conducted to invite groups and individuals to the process. At the first meeting, the group was asked who they felt needed to be invited and those individuals and groups were then contacted prior to the next meeting. For each meeting, public service announcements were sent to area radio stations and were placed in Archuleta and La Plata County newspapers. In addition, notices were sent to the email tree and also placed on the project website. The Workgroup received several documents in the beginning for orientation and education purposes including a Glossary of Water Terms and Agencies, a beginning list of river and stream protection tools, and information on the regional RPW effort. This report does not attempt to document each entity or participant’s specific concerns; detailed comments made by members; details about protections tools or ideas that were not agreed to; or extensive details about each river protection tool discussed. Rather, this report sums up the process and focuses on values, ideas and agreements.