Final Business Case North Blackburn Part 6

Final Business Case North Blackburn Part 6

6 GROWTHM65 & DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS NORTH BLACKBURN in patnership with Persimmon Homes - 85 dwellings under construction 1 rn TS Proposed Signal 6 Improvements Potential Future Housing - 6 Mixed Ownership Approximately 150 homes 6 2 Wainhomes - 3 burn TS 272 Dwellings 6 Roe Lee Park To Commence Construction in 2018 Miller Homes - 34 Dwellings Under Construction Pleckgate 4 Hippo Motor Group Blackburn TS High School Outline Planning Permission Granted for 75 Houses 5 7 10 8 9 Pets Choice St Mary’s Proposed Signal College Improvements 11 5 Corporation Park KEY: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITES: Housing Land Allocation Parsonage Road - Persimmon Homes Roe Lee South Clarendon Road Employment Land Allocations Proposed Highway 5 9 Policy 16 - Council Ownership 1 Allocation: N/A 2.3 (ha) Policy 13 - Council Ownership Improvements Allocation: 16/1 3.6 (ha) Allocation: 16/3 3.5(ha) M65 North East Blackburn Future Housing Rugby Club and surrounding land Whitebirk Development Site Employment Land Allocations 2 6 10 Housing Land Allocation Allocation: 4/1 91 (ha) Allocation: 16/2 10.9(ha) Allocation: 13/1 7.5 (ha) Policy 16 - Private Ownership Policy 13 - Private Ownership BlackburnRoe Lee North Yew Tree Drive - Wainhomes Challenge Way 3 7 11 Housing Land Allocation 5 Mixed Use Proposals – Policy 16 Allocation: 16/3 8.8 (ha) Allocation: 16/2 14.7 (ha) Allocation: N/A 1 (ha) Policy 16 - Mixed Ownership – Private / Council Ownership Roe Lee Farm - Miller Homes 5 4 8 Lammack Road Allocation: 16/3 1.2 (ha) Allocation: N/A 2.4 (ha) BwD Growth Programme Growth Pipeline No Project Title Growth Land Local Plan App Delivery Stage Council Ward Site Site No. Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Theme Promoter Plan Ref Details Area Area Housing 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 (Ha) (Acre) Units Actual Actual Forecast Summar y 32 Clarendon Road Housing Site Housing Council - - Site Promotion Little Harwood & Whitebirk 2.26 5.58 50 - 25 25 85 Lammack Road - Old Blackburnians Housing Private - - Site Promotion Billinge and Beardwood 2.35 5.81 75 - 25 25 25 97 North Blackburn - Phase 1 Whinney Lane Housing Private 16/2 10/17/0578 Pre-Construction Billinge and Beardwood 14.86 36.72 272 7 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 98 North Blackburn - Phase 2 Rugby Club Housing Private 16/2 - Pre-Planning Roe Lee 5.00 12.36 165 - 10 13 13 13 13 13 99 North Blackburn - Phase 3 Other Housing Private 16/2 - Site Promotion Billinge and Beardwood 6.00 14.83 115 - 13 13 13 13 13 102 Parsonage Road Housing Private 16/1 10/14/0547 Construction Roe Lee 3.61 8.92 85 19 27 39 116 Roe Lee - Phase 1 North Site Housing Council 16/4 - Pre-Planning Roe Lee 9.66 23.87 150 - 20 30 30 30 30 10 117 Roe Lee - Phase 2 Farm Site Housing Private 16/3 10/16/1398 Construction Roe Lee 1.14 2.82 33 10 23 118 Roe Lee - Phase 3 Mill 1 Site Housing Private 16/3 - Site Promotion Roe Lee 0.75 1.85 40 - 20 20 119 Roe Lee - Phase 4 South (Farthings Pub) Housing Private 16/3 - Site Promotion Roe Lee 1.20 2.97 25 - 10 15 147 North East Blackburn - Whalley Old Road Site Housing Private - - Feasibility Little Harwood & Whitebirk 7.00 17.30 150 - 187 Whalley New Road Apartments (nr Brownhill Roundabout) Housing Private - 10/10/1017 Stalled Roe Lee 0.10 0.25 12 - 12 Appendix L – Organogram CS095977-CAP-TPL-XX-RP-TP-001 REV 05 BC BwDBC Growth & Development Board North Blackburn Project Sponsor Legend Capita Project Director Capita PMO BwDBC PMO Design Delivery John Bryan Andrew Turner Blackburn with Darwen Timo Murphy Borough Council (BwDBC) PMO Support Ghazala Sulaman- Butt Planning Refresh Construction Detailed Design & Business Case & Phasing Strategy & Tender Strategy Leads Project Lead Timo Project Manager Timo Murphy & Murphy Dan Vipham Alan Niemeyer Geo Statement Transport Walter Civils Jon Higgins Aspinall Dan Vipham Business Case & Contracts and Lighting Transport Statement Works Supervision Jim Huyton Walter Aspinall Environmental & Land Ownership Ecology Trevor James Tabatha Boniface Traffic Flood Risk Chris Pearson Paul Pennington Principle Designer Detailed Design & John Bryan Tender CapitaCastleway House, 17 Preston New Road, Blackburn, BB2 1AU capitaproperty.co.uk Appendix M – Gateway Review CS095977-CAP-TPL-XX-RP-TP-001 REV 05 BC COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE Growth Deal 3 – North Blackburn Detailed Design Gateway Review Wednesday 1st August 2018 Old Town Hall 1. Introduction The purpose of the Gateway Review was to highlight risk and issues, which if not addressed, would threaten the success of delivery. It was an internal peer review undertaken by the Programme Management Office to provide quality assurance and test whether project management principles are being applied. This report is based on evidence submitted prior and during the review and also through discussion. The review focused on the current status of the Furthergate project and how well place it is to move forward to the next stage. Table 1 below identifies the RAG rating that has been applied to the items considered as part of the review and also the Programme Management Office view of the overall delivery confidence of the scheme. RAG Criteria Description Successful delivery of the project to time, cost and quality appears highly likely and there are no major outstanding issues that at this stage appear to threaten delivery significantly Successful delivery appears feasible but significant issues already exist requiring management attention. These appear resolvable at this stage and if addressed promptly, should not present a cost/schedule overrun Successful delivery of the project appears to be unachievable. There are major issues on project definition, schedule, budget required quality or benefits, which at this stage do not appear to be manageable or resolvable. The project may need re-baselining and/or overall viability re-assessed Table 1 2. Overall Confidence Assessment The outcome of the review finds that the overall rating of the project is green. “Successful delivery of the project to time, cost and quality appears highly likely and there are no major outstanding issues that at this stage appear to threaten delivery significantly” Table 2 below identifies those elements of the project which were reviewed, the findings, RAG status, recommendations or agreed actions with assigned timescales from the date of the Gateway Review. Ref Item Under Review RAG 01 Project Overview Junctions and Phasing The scheme is successfully progressing through detailed design and the 3D modelling is now complete, although there have been some minor changes to the design (reflected in the revised drawings) including: Extensions of footpath and carriageway resurfacing Widening of crossings to Toucan crossings Amendments to duct requirements for traffic signals after CCTV survey Changes to signs at Brownhill junction Possibility of design change at Brownhill Actions: 1. Continue progress on ‘Do Minimum’ option for Brownhill - Dan Vipham 2. Draft options for scheme to the north of Brownhill, towards shops/residential, in time for Public Consultation – Dan Vipham 02 Confirmation of Meeting the Brief The scheme meets the requirement of the client brief. 03 Cost Review The scheme costs include a 30% risk allowance (including optimism bias). The costs reflect the whole scheme costs which include fees and surveys. DV discussed potentials for reduction in surfacing requirement at Whalley Old Road junction if costs are too high. Possibility of surfacing extensions if costs come in lower than expected and Business Case is met. Maintenance of 3000 series items has increased to five years to maximise Contractor contribution. Actions: 1. Provide updated cost plan once tender BoQs completed. – Dan Vipham within 2 weeks of tender date 04 Funding There is a clear understanding of the funding available for the scheme and how this is made up from the LEP and LTP. The LEP funding is subject to approval of the Final Business Case. Contribution for North Blackburn split: LEP - £2.3m BwD - £0.3m 05 Programme A Microsoft Project Programme is in place with key milestones and critical path activities identified. The programme is a standing agenda item at all project team meetings and is reviewed regularly. The programme is tight with minimum float and has strict LEP funding approval timescales. The timeline for the LEP approvals and Council approvals have been confirmed as this will impact on the appointment of a contractor. EOI has already been issued to BwD Contractor Framework and meetings have taken place with three of the interested tenderers. 06 Risk Register and Risk Management It is evident that there are processes in place for the management of risk. The risk register is a standing item on all project team meetings and is reviewed regularly. There is a risk register in place and this uses a RAG status. The risk register assigns costs to risks where possible, identifies owners and rates risk post mitigation to determine whether the mitigation measures are adequate. Actions: 1. Update Risk Register – Dan Vipham within 2 weeks 07 Survey Strategy Trial pits complete, no outstanding risks. Ecology survey complete – no major hazards identified. 08 Procurement Strategy The procurement strategy has been confirmed with utilisation of the Council’s Contractor and Development Framework. Agreed process for tender upload to the chest through BwD procurement. Target date for upload is 06/08/17. 09 Planning Strategy Works all within the highway boundary - no planning application is required. 10 Team Resources The necessary people are in place to deliver the scheme. There are no gaps in team resources.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us