FREE STATE PROFILE (South Africa) Lochner Marais University of the Free State Bloemfontein, SA OECD Roundtable on Higher Education in Regional and City Development, 16 September 2010 [email protected] 1 Map 4.7: Areas with development potential in the Free State, 2006 Mining SASOLBURG Location PARYS DENEYSVILLE ORANJEVILLE VREDEFORT VILLIERS FREE STATE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT VILJOENSKROON KOPPIES CORNELIA HEILBRON FRANKFORT BOTHAVILLE Legend VREDE Towns EDENVILLE TWEELING Limited Combined Potential KROONSTAD Int PETRUS STEYN MEMEL ALLANRIDGE REITZ Below Average Combined Potential HOOPSTAD WESSELSBRON WARDEN ODENDAALSRUS Agric LINDLEY STEYNSRUST Above Average Combined Potential WELKOM HENNENMAN ARLINGTON VENTERSBURG HERTZOGVILLE VIRGINIA High Combined Potential BETHLEHEM Local municipality BULTFONTEIN HARRISMITH THEUNISSEN PAUL ROUX KESTELL SENEKAL PovertyLimited Combined Potential WINBURG ROSENDAL CLARENS PHUTHADITJHABA BOSHOF Below Average Combined Potential FOURIESBURG DEALESVILLE BRANDFORT MARQUARD nodeAbove Average Combined Potential SOUTPAN VERKEERDEVLEI FICKSBURG High Combined Potential CLOCOLAN EXCELSIOR JACOBSDAL PETRUSBURG BLOEMFONTEIN THABA NCHU LADYBRAND LOCALITY PLAN TWEESPRUIT Economic BOTSHABELO THABA PATSHOA KOFFIEFONTEIN OPPERMANSDORP Power HOBHOUSE DEWETSDORP REDDERSBURG EDENBURG WEPENER LUCKHOFF FAURESMITH houses JAGERSFONTEIN VAN STADENSRUST TROMPSBURG SMITHFIELD DEPARTMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT & HOUSING PHILIPPOLIS SPRINGFONTEIN Arid SPATIAL PLANNING DIRECTORATE ZASTRON SPATIAL INFORMATION SERVICES ROUXVILLE BETHULIE GARIEP DAM 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 I Kilometers COMPILED BY: SW Slabbert 2 SOURCE: CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES DATE: May 2006 1 Lesson learned from the Self evaluation report: who are we and what is happening • The Free State’s land-locked, arid/semi-arid climate, historical dependence on agriculture and mining, peripheral location, and its apartheid history have all shaped the region • Population growth / economic growth lower than national averages • Middle of the range provinces in South Africa • Lack of a secondary sector – negative impact on HEIs • Planning systems promote competition not collaboration 3 The Higher Education System • Regional engagement not part of national policy guidelines • Huge expectation of HEIs not matched by funding • Role of unstable politics • Emphasis on internationalisation without seeing the link with regional engagement • Change vs stability 4 2 Loss? FREE STATE SCHOOLS School count 2008 / Learner count 2007 Primary Secondary Combined Intermediate Special and Headcount Headcount (Grade 1-7) (Grade 8-12) (Grade 1-12) (Grade R-9) Specialised for Primary for Schools Secondary Schools 1 040 255 96 244 20 385 850 265 181 HEIs: 37 000 1) GAP? FREE STATE FET COLLEGES FREE STATE HE2) INSTITUTIONS No real 2008 (Universities) 2008 intermediary Institution HeadcountFET: Student 28 000Institution Headcount Enrolment Student Enrolment3) Declining Motheo 13 000 (3 campuses) Sec: 265 000UFS 26 188trends Goldfields 5 000 Main 3) 23Limited 298 capa- (2 campuses) Primary: 385 Qwaqwa000 2 806 Flavius Mareka 6 700 city Vista (South) 84 (3 campuses) 4) Inability to Maluti 3 000 CUT 10 895 (7 campuses) Main impl.8 579 policy Welkom 2 109 Total 27 700 Kimberley 207 Research • In terms of research output, the region compares fairly well with the rest of South Africa. • The numbers of regional NRF-rated researchers, patents and THRIP facilitated industry collaborations compare less satisfactory to other regions • Most research funding mechanisms are managed from a national level, and although these systems are open to regional innovation and utilisation, they are not necessarily aligned to regional development objectives. • No articulated and/or coordinated long-term collaboration between HEIs; which results in limited alignment of regional R&D needs and specific research agendas of HEIs. 6 3 Teaching and Learning • The regional education, training and labour- market systems lack coherence. • Various formal and informal learning programmes that address issues of regional priority - these were neither specifically planned nor were they related to a strategic focus on regional issues by a department or a faculty • School system in crisis • Intermediary sector not functioning well 7 Social, cultural and environmental development • Community engagement is not well-defined, underfunded. • It is still done on an ad hoc basis. • To some degree it is difficult to distinguish between community engagement and some of the teaching and research activities undertaken by HEIs. • Very few (if any) of the programmes are multi- disciplinary in nature. • There is very little monitoring and evaluation of programmes in this respect. • Existing programmes are seldom made visible. 8 4 Capacity building and cooperation • Some successes in terms of Recognition of Prior Learning • Generally collaboration is ad hoc • Two universities struggle to work together • Statutory framework is required 9 Next Steps • OECD Review visit in October 2010 10 5 .