Jennifer Clements From: Becky Garza Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 8:56 AM To: Dan Pope Cc: Courtney Paz; Jennifer Clements Subject: RE: City Council Public Hearing Nov 17 2020 my comments AGAINST proposed "sanctuary city" ordinance Thank you. We will include this with the other citizen comment emails we have received (330+ so far). From: Dan Pope Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 7:01 AM To: Becky Garza Subject: Fwd: City Council Public Hearing Nov 17 2020 my comments AGAINST proposed "sanctuary city" ordinance Dan Pope Mayor City of Lubbock 806‐775‐2050 Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Mary Crites Date: November 1 To: Dan Pope >, Juan Chadis , Jeff Griffith < , Steve Massengale >, Latrelle Joy >, Shelia Patterson Harris >, Randy Christian Subject: City Council Public Hearing Nov 17 2020 my comments AGAINST proposed "sanctuary city" ordinance Hello, My name is Mary Crites and I live at 4617 8th St, Lubbock, TX 79416. In an effort to do my part to reduce the spread of COVID‐ 19, I will not be attending the public hearing scheduled for this Tuesday night. However I do want to be heard on this important matter. Please have my comments read during the hearing as I feel very strongly that the council and public should hear from citizens who do NOT support the proposed ordinance that would create a “sanctuary city” and effectively bon abortion in Lubbock. This is a thinly veiled attempt to deny women their legal right to this necessary and legal medical procedure. I fully support and was pleased with the City Council’s previous decision to not act on this proposed ordinance. This is not a city issue. The decision about when or if an abortion should occur is deeply personal and should be between your constituent and their physician. Locally 1 elected government officials should not be creating policy that conflicts or interferes with this personal decision and with established law. The proposal to essentially ban abortion by creating a “sanctuary city” will waste city funds legally defending this policy. I would prefer our tax dollars be used for legitimate city functions such as parks, libraries and the local health department who is currently doing a yeoman’s job managing the COVID‐19 crisis here in Lubbock. I strongly urge the city council to vote against adopting this ordinance. Respectfully, Mary K. Crites, AIA ARCHITECT Lubbock, Texas 806.790.7114 WARNING: This message was sent from outside the City of Lubbock's email system. It could contain harmful attachments or links to harmful web pages. 2 5409 21st Street Lubbock, TX 79507 806-795-4502 home 806-790-1228 mobile Comments to be read: To the Mayor and City Council of Lubbock: I am sending this email because I do not feel it is wise for me to attend the Council meeting in person due to the widespread community outbreak of COVID-19. I regret not being able to address the council in person. I want to express my opposition to passing a Sanctuary for the Unborn ordinance. I realize that the petition submitted by Charles Perry and other supporters have forced the issue despite your attempts to explain the legal complexity involved. I had hoped that by the Council’s getting an outside legal opinion, the group would drop their attempt, but instead, they submitted a legal petition. Now they are forcing each of you to vote on an issue that is likely unconstitutional unless/until Roe v. Wade is overturned. Abortion is still a legal medical procedure in the U.S., though each state has varying restrictions. There are several reasons to vote no on this Sanctuary ordinance. First is the obvious legal issues and the expense of a law suit which will surely be filed against the city, if passed. As for the private enforcement aspect of the ordinance, allowing private citizens to sue doctors and/or clinics who perform legal abortions, that is quite problematic. Second, such an ordinance will cause further division in Lubbock when we are in the midst of a pandemic and have recently concluded a divisive national election. We need to be pulling together, not fighting over the issue of reproductive rights within our city limits. If some people complain that wearing a mask is a threat to their freedom; then what about controlling women’s reproductive decisions? Third, passing this ordinance will bring negative publicity to Lubbock, and major companies will not look favorably on a city which tries to restrict the freedom of women and to usurp the federal courts. There is a reason no large city has passed such an ordinance. Would the Lubbock Chamber of Commerce market this ordinance in their national recruitment advertising? Would Texas Tech? Fourth, the Constitution set up a secular government. That was the first thing I taught to my American government classes. We do not have theocratic government at any level — city, county, state or national. People are free to have diverse religious views but those views should not be codified into law. Some pro-life advocates want to force their 2 beliefs on everyone. Pro-choice advocates allow people to make individual choices. Separation of church and state protects the freedom of both entities. After the required public hearing, please carefully consider the many ramifications before you cast your vote on this ordinance. I encourage you to vote NO. Sincerely, Grace Rogers WARNING: This message was sent from outside the City of Lubbock's email system. It could contain harmful attachments or links to harmful web pages. 3 Jennifer Clements From: Kathryn Smith Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 6:59 PM To: Citizen Comments Subject: Public Hearing 11/17/2020 Good evening council members, I would like to express my opposition and concern regarding the proposed ordinance regarding anti-abortion propaganda. This is an unconstitutional petition that is outside the scope of the Lubbock City Council’s responsibilities, and does not reflect the entirety of the Lubbock population’s system of beliefs. Please reject this ordinance as inappropriate, unenforceable, and ill-conceived. Lubbock has the opportunity to be a model for the surrounding West Texas communities to show how differing political and religious values can function in healthy and prosperous cooperation. Please elect not to vote on this ordinance which only satisfies a small enclave of the city of Lubbock that chooses judgement and shame over tolerance, acceptance, and support in this incredibly personal and difficult decision with which many women are forced to reckon. Thank you in advance for providing equal representation for all members of this city. Cheers, Katie Smith 2604 25th Street WARNING: This message was sent from outside the City of Lubbock's email system. It could contain harmful attachments or links to harmful web pages. 1 Jennifer Clements From: Carol Douglass < Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 4:55 PM To: Citizen Comments Subject: Sanctuary city I am opposed to the city council naming Lubbock as a sanctuary city. This is not the duty of a city council. Please follow legal council’s opinion and vote no. I believe that it nears violation of US Supreme Court law as well. Thank you Carol Douglass Sent from my iPad 2 Jennifer Clements From: Nick Smith < Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 10:11 AM To: Citizen Comments Subject: Please do not consider the anti-abortion ordinance Dear Lubbock City Council Members, I am writing to voice my support for the City Council’s decision to not act on the anti-abortion ordinance. As you know, abortion procedures are legal medical procedures in the United States of America. It is out of the purview of the Council to make medical decisions on behalf of their constituents. Please refrain from participating in this act of political theatre and do not consider the proposed ordinance. Thank you, Nick Smith Constituent of Lubbock, TX District 3 3 Jennifer Clements From: Linda Shough Sent: Thursday, Nove To: Citizen Comments Subject: anti-abortion petition I support the City Council's previous decision to not act on this ordinance. It is outside the purview of council concerns. Local elected government officials should not be charged with making personal, medical decisions for their constituents. And women have a right to decide what happens with their bodies. If men would stay with women and not abandon them with babies, this would not be an issue. Linda Shough 1904 64th St Lubbock, TX 79412 WARNING: This message was sent from outside the City of Lubbock's email system. It could contain harmful attachments or links to harmful web pages. 4 Jennifer Clements From: on behalf of Allison Wright < Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 5:25 PM To: Citizen Comments Subject: Oppose City Abortion Ban Dear Lubbock Citizen Comment Email, I am emailing in opposition to the proposed ordinance to ban abortion in the city of Lubbock. I urge you to not use City Council resources on a state political agenda. A city ban would be divisive, expensive and conflict with state and federal policies. Please continue to focus on urgent city business such as protecting Lubbock citizens from the COVID pandemic, including insuring access to healthcare for all who need it and minimizing the economic harm to the local community. I urge you to carefully consider the impact any decisions or actions regarding this issue will have. An abortion is a personal decision and the city of Lubbock cannot dictate to a woman what she can or cannot do with her body. Access to a safe and legal abortion is guaranteed under Roe V Wade and to take away access will only cause people to travel further or seek illegal means for an abortion.