VOLUME SXIV No. 3 Round Robin M 1°7S 9 cie> tu to fs <a ü ©1 15 © m e H it in d R.© secreh TABLE OFCONTENTS INVESTMENT BANKERS BLOCK LAET1ILE From the National Health Federation Bulletin, February 1978. ........ .1-5 THOTHMA, BUILDER OF THE GREAT PYRAMID From '‘Oahspe", by John Newbrough ..... 6 - 9 DON’T SUFFER THE PSYCHIC WA1FARE OF ARMAGEDDON, by Mary and Dean Hardy. 1-0 - 13 CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND By Ray Bradbury. ............ 14 - 16 "THEY COME AND THEY GO, F1OM THE SEEMING NOTHINGNESS OF SPACE" By Raja Natcha ............. 17 - 20 CLIPS, QUOTES & COMMENTS Fifth Dimensional Patterns of Creative Thought, As Seen By Claude Bragdon, Fifth Dimensional Mind Over Matter, Auto«Suggestion of Self- Hypnosis, Fifth Dimensin nealing by a Buddhist Priest, Preising The Russians With Silence?, Help! Russia Is Ready To Take Us Over!, Psycho­ logical Warfare Against The People, They Say The Gold Is Gone From Ft. Knox, The Backward Involutionary Pull Of The Lunar Pitris, The Higher Mind, A Setback To Ordered Development, The "Imprisonment" Of Women, Looeamong’s Agents Refus-e To Provide Alternatives (To Abortion), George W. Van Tassel: In Memoriam, "Ether-Tech­ nology" A Rational Approach. To Gravity Control, Vitality Transfusions, Pathoclast Instruction Book and BSRF Literature ........21 - 36 THE JOURNAL OF BORDEILAW RESEARCH BMff No. 1 Published by Borderland Sciences-Research Foundation, Inc., PO Box 548, Vista, California 92083 USA. Edited by the Director, Riley Hansard Crabb, Doctor h: ^<tnvsics in the Society of St. Luke the Physician. The Journal is published six issues a year with tht: e cf tim Associates, at the Director's home, 1’0 Bobowwc Drive, Vista. It is printed, 36 pages an issue. The Foundation is incorporated under California law, May 21, 1951, #254263 sne ha.j * zea in contin- uous existence since then. Address all correspondence to the PO Box. The Journal is included in the Foundation membership of $8.50 a year. Single copies and back issues of the Journal ar# fr. 00 each, If you dont care to join you may receive the Journal by donating $8 »50 a year or more to the Foundation. The Directci - ■ f ‘zs. Judith Crabb, is office manager and Secretary-Treasurer. PURPOSES OF BSRF: This is a non-profit Organization of people who take an active interest in unusual Happenings along the borderland between the visible and inv.- worlds. In the words of the late Meade Layne, founder and director of BSRA from 1946 to 1959: ”BSRÄ publications are seien* : „a approach but employ few technical expressions. They de- i significant phenomena which orthodox science cannot or will not investig^te. For example: The Fortean falls of objects from the sky. Telepor- tation, Radiesthesia, PK effects, Undergrouro -'ces, Mysterious Biseppearances, Occult and Psychic Phenomena, Photography of the In- visible, Nature of the Ethers and the probier- -c'' Aerofoxms (Fly­ ing Saucers). In the year 1946 BSRA obtained an Interpretation of the phenomena which since has come to be known as the Etheric or 4-D Interpretation, and which has not been radically altere-d since that time. This continues to be the only explanation which makes good science, sound metaphysics and- cornmon sense." The chief present concern of the Foundation is to make this kind of unusual information available as a publis Service at reasonable cost. Headquarters acts as a receiving, corrdinating and distributing center. An important part of the Director*s work is to give recog- nition, understanding and encouragement to people who are having unusual experiences of the borderland type and' w mducting research in any of the above fields. For consultation on borderland ?roblmss or for Spiritual healing through prayer, write or phone 14-724-2043 for help or for an appointment. Donatibns and bequests toward Foundation research programs and expenses are ' Jzxne. The 31-page list of BSRF publications is available from Headquarters for $1.00 in check, bill or stamps. This includes brochures on bor­ derland subjects, tape recordings of Mr. Crabb*s lecture; ' * »mbers of the Inner Circle talking through trance-medium Mark Pro­ bert. Write to BSRF, PO Box 548, Vista, California 92083 USA. THE INVESTMENT BANKERS WHO BLOCK LAETRILE From the National Health Federation Bull­ etin, February 1978 and from Sloan-Ketter­ ing ‘'Second Opinion" "Second Opinion" is the house organ of Memorial Sloan-Ketter- Cancer Center, New York for the rank-and-file employees. Editor for the house organ was Ralph Moss, assistant director for pub­ lic affairs for MSKCC, at $20,000 a year. He was fired from the job last fall because he wrote and published in "Second Opinion" an article critical of Sloan-Kettering for covering up successful research of the effects of Laetrile on cancer. Moss was an insider. He was in a position to know, and to teil. He names-names -- of the powerful men at the top who de- liberately block development and exploitation of effective cancer eures because this would jeopardize their .massive Investments in the Sick Industry. National Health Federation officials thought Moss*es revelations in his Special Report were worthy of reproduc- tion in their Journal. So do we. Here they are: (In a country) "in which the profit motive is king. the comptetitive, dog-eat-dog spirit also pervades the world of medi­ cine. While some doctors are truly devoted to their patients* welfare, all too often the doctor*s concern for the sick loses out to his own seif-interest. The medical profession as a whole is organized to defend its own narrow economic Interests. "In fact, the medical profession reacts with knee-jerk rapi- dity against anything which could overturn the apple cart and bring about sweeping changes in the way medicine is practiced, or which would undermine the almost-complete monopoly the profession possess in all matters of health. "This general atmosphere- in medicine helps to explain what is happening to Laetrile. This not to say that Laetrile is an ef- rective anti-cancer agent. but no one can'hohestl-y deny that the theory behind it is not provocative and challenging. "This closed-mind attitude can be illustrated by an incident that- took place at Sloan-Kettering several years ago, A person prominent in the Laetrile' movement was quietly invited to speak to a select group of doctors« After he finished presenting his ’trophoblastic theory of cancer’ -- which holds that cancer is a single disease rather than many different diseases and that Lae- May-Jun^ 1978 RR, Page 1 trile is the sweeping preventive and eure -- a leading SKI chemo- therapist exclaimed: ^Well, if that’s the case, there isn't a need for Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center anymore, is there?* He proceeded to storm out of the room. THE EXTENSIVE CANCER BUREAUCSACY "But doctors alone are not reponsible for Laetrile"s Sup­ pression. For with the passage of the National Cancer Act and the disbursement of billions of dollars in research funds (Nixon4s great ripoff of the taxpayers for the benefit of the Sick Industry, RHC) an .extensive cancer bureaucracy had grown up to administer those funds. "These bureaucrats at the National Cancer Institute, the Ameri­ can Cancer Society, the Food and Druef Administration, and Sloan- Kettering itself are enmeshed in their own continual, narrow power plays and jealously guard their own ground. We do not believe that anybody is deliberately and maliciously sitting on a eure. Rather, bureaucracy engenders a generally stupefying conservatism. Issues are avoided, and no one wants to be the 'bearer of ill ti-" dings’. "There is an unhealthy skepticism, and even cynicism, about anyone else's Claims to progress, especially if it relates to ther- apy. This is understandable in bureaucrats and fund-raisers who must promote their own Institution’s work above all others. Even about your own work, it is far safer to talk in general terms about the progress that is being made than to make specific Claims that can be proven or disproven. "Rather than a conscious conspiracy you often find a blanket of apathy or fear about new things. The chronology of the Laetrile tests illustrates this, we think. Why, for example, did it take five years to publish this paper (which still isn’t officially pub­ lished, as"of this writing)? Why did it take six months for two experienced researchers (Stock and Martin) to design- the first ‘blind4 test? Sadly, this foot-dragging and fearfulness, vacilla- tion, cynicism and delay are all too common at Sloan-Kettering and we suspect, at other large, centralized research centers as well. "Scientlsts suffer in this Situation. Whether or not they realize it, they are surrounded by ‘electric fences*. So long as a scientist sticks to a safe topic, on well-trod ground, and de- velops cozy relationships with .his peers, he will be rewarded with grants and contracts. "When a lab‘s work progresses to the point where it has medical implications, the difficulties really begin. The safe thing is to draw back, go back to your test tubes and ’further studies’. If the scientist persists with a new therapeutic idea, he is bound to run into heavy Opposition from those who already occupy the space he is vying for. He finds he cannot get patients to try his new compounds ‘on, even if they themselves are willing. He cannot get Cooperation from other departments. He cannot get funds, labora- May-June 1978 RR, Page 2 tory space, even government grantsi '‘There are a number of exciting, imaginative and worthwhile therapeutic ideas presently ’kicking around' Sloan-Kettering. Ex­ perience has shown that few will ever be given a fair test, much less become established forms of treatment.