Neuromodulation in Epilepsy

Neuromodulation in Epilepsy

NEUROMODULATION IN EPILEPSY Colin Van Hook, M.D., M.P.H. Ochsner Medical Center Department of Neurology International Center for Epilepsy WHAT IS NEUROMODULATION??? • “The alteration of nerve activity through targeted delivery of a stimulus, such as electrical stimulation or chemical agents, to specific neurological sites in the body.” INS definition • Chronic pain • Movement disorders • Psychiatric disorders • Stroke/Brain injury • Cardiovascular disease • Gastrointestinal disease • Genitourinary or colorectal disorders • Epilepsy NEUROMODULATION IN EPILEPSY: WHEN TO CONSIDER IT • Medically Refractory: In an analysis of 1,098 patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy at a one center between 1982 and 2006 (Brodie 2012) • 49% became seizure free on the first medication tried • 13% became seizure free on the second medication tried • 3.7% became seizure free on the third medication tried • 1/3 of patients remain medically refractory NEUROMODULATION IN EPILEPSY: WHEN TO CONSIDER IT • Non-Surgical candidates • Primary generalized epilepsy • Multiple seizure foci NEUROMODULATION IN EPILEPSY • VAGAL NERVE STIMULATOR (VNS) • RESPONSIVE NEUROSTIMULATOR (RNS/NEUROPACE) • DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION (DBS) VAGUS NERVE ANATOMY • CN X (VAGUS NERVE) • Exits jugular foramen with CN IX and CN XI then travels in the carotid sheath with the common carotid artery and the internal jugular vein • AFFERENT FIBERS = 80% • Solitary Nucleus and Spinal Trigeminal Nucleus • EFFERENT FIBERS = 20% • Originate in Dorsal Motor Nucleus and Nucleus Ambiguus • Parasympathetic fibers to the viscera • Right CNX provides significantly more innervation to heart compared to left (this is why VNS placed usually on left CN X) VAGUS NERVE ANATOMY • Projects to Nucleus Tractus Solitarius BILATERALLY (Henry, Neurology 2002) VAGUS NERVE PROJECTIONS • Vagus nerve works through Nucleus Tractus Solitarus(NTS) and Pontine Parabrahcial Nucleus (PBN) • Limbic • Amygdala: implicated in temporal lobe epilepsy • Insula: connections to orbitofrontal cortex • Autonomic • Connections to hypothalamus and periaqueductal gray (PAG) • Reticular structures • Thalamus Henry 2002. VAGUS NERVE AND SEIZURES • 1938 (Bailey and Bremer) • Stimulation of vagus nerve produced EEG changes in cats • 1952 (Zanchetti) • Intermittent vagal nerve stimulation decreased or eliminated chemically induced focal epileptiform discharges • 1960s • Repetitive stimulation of vagus nerve led to synchronize or desynchronize cortical electrical activity • Seizures caused by hypersynchronized cortical activity thus VNS could desynchronize • 1985 (Zabara) • Hypothesized that VNS antagonizes hypersynchronous states using animal studies VAGUS NERVE AND THE CORTEX • 3HZ spike-wave initiated in thalamus and propagated via pathways to the cortex • Hypothalamic hamartomas with gelastic seizures • Intracranial recordings of cerebellar dysplastic lesions show discharges originating in that structure • In several cases of frontal lobe epilepsy, seizures continued following cortical resection with subsequent seizure freedom following resection of deep structures with electrographic discharges originating in the striatum. VNS: CLINICAL EVIDENCE Design # patients Seizure type Results radomized E01/2 (1988-1992) Single-blinded 14 Partial 28% reduction in seizure frequency E03 (1990-1992) Randomized 114 Partial Mean 24.5% reduction in frequency double-blind with 31% having >50% reduction active control E04 (1991-1995) Open label, 116 Partial or Mean 21.5% reduction in frequency non-blinded generalized with 29.3% having >50% reduction E05 (1995-1996) Randomized 199 Partial Mean 27.9% reduction in frequency double-blind with 23.4% having >50% reduction active control VNS CLINICAL EVIDENCE • Reduction of seizure frequency > 50% (Morris and Mueller, Neurology 1999) • 1 year = 36.8% patients • 2 years = 43.2% patients • 3 years = 42.7% patients • Well tolerated • 75% patients continued therapy • There is a persistent VNS‐induced anticonvulsant effect and indicate that its efficacy is dependent on the cumulative stimulus duration (Takaya, Epilepsia 1996). VNS APPROVAL • In 1997, the FDA approved the VNS Therapy System for use as an adjunctive therapy in reducing the frequency of seizures in adults and adolescents over 12 years of age with partial onset seizures refractory to antiepileptic medications • In 2017, device was FDA approved for children as young as 4 due after data from Japan Post‐Approval Study (PAS) in which followed patients implanted between 2010 and 2012. • As of 2017, >100,000 patients treated with VNS VNS IN GENERALIZED EPILEPSY • Labar (Neurology 1999) showed >50% reduction in 11 of 24 patients with medically resistant IGE • Ng and Devinsky (Seizure 2004) compared seizure frequency reduced by > 50% in partial vs. symptomatic generalized vs. idiopathic generalized • Partial (PE)= 47.1% patients (N=138) • Symptomatic generalized (SGE)= 46.1% patients (N=13) • Idiopathic generalized (IGE) = 57.1% patients (N=14) • Furthermore, higher proportion of patients with IGEable to achieve 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency and reduced antiepileptic drug • Partial = 9.4% • Symptomatic generalized = 7.7% • Idiopathic generalized = 35.7 VNS AND DEPRESSION • Reduction in depression scores was noted in E03/5 and two subsequent studies (Harden 2000 and Elger 2000) showed trend to depression reduction was INDEPENDENT of seizure reduction • One year trial of VNS for patients with depression (n=185) or bipolar I/II (n=20) refractory to at least 2 medications showed a significant reduction in symptoms on the 24 item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. (Rush 2005) • Five year open-label, non-randomized trial of patients with treatment resistant depression showed reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in patients with VNS (n=494) versus treatment as usual (n=301). (Aaronson 2017) • In 2005 FDA approved VNS for adjunct treatment in depression but coverage denied by US Committee on Medicare and Medicaid Services VNS AND QUALITY OF LIFE • PuLsE (Open Prospective Randomized Long-term Effectiveness) trial showed significant improvement in Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-89 total score (QOLIE-89) in 61 patients with VNS versus 61 patient with medical therapy only (Ryvlin 2017) • VNS patients with autism showed improved alertness, verbal communication, memory, and school performance (Levy 2010) VNS OPERATIONS • Battery powered device • Leads placed in carotid sheath around left vagus nerve and connected to subcutaneous programmable pacemaker • Typical battery life is 5-10 years based on settings VNS OPERATIONS Pulse width Signal frequency Output current Amount of electrical current delivered in a single pulse of stimulation Signal frequency Number of pulses per second (measured in Hz) Pulse width Duration of a single pulse within a stimulation period VNS OPERATIONS Parameter Units Range Typical Output current milliamps 0–3.5 1.25 Signal frequency hertz 1–30 20-30 Pulse width microseconds 130–1000 250-500 ON time seconds 7–60 30 OFF time minutes 0.2–180 5 Magnet Settings Output current milliamps 0–3.5 1.50 Pulse width microseconds 130–1000 500 ON time seconds 7–60 60 VNS OPERATIONS: CYCLING AND DUTY CYCLE • Initial settings typically: • Several small studies do not support increased efficacy for “Rapid Cycling” typically Output current 0.25mA • connotating 7 seconds “on” and 30 seconds • Signal frequency 30Hz “off” • Pulse Width 250-500 microseconds • Not recommended as this will wear down • “On” 30 seconds battery faster • “Off” 5 minutes • Duty cycle should be <50% ON time + 4 seconds ON time + OFF time VNS MAGNET • Patient or other swipes magnet on generator for 1 second which gives additional current/stimulation to stop or shorten seizure • Morris. Epilepsy and Behavior 2003. • Patients in E03 trial with active magnets were more likely to report improved seizure control than patients with inactive magnets • In the E04 trial, 22% of patients using the magnet reported seizure termination and 31% reported seizure diminution • Magnet output current should always be higher (usually 0.25mA higher) than parameter output VNS SAFETY • Side Effects • Data from E0S trials • Voice alteration/hoarseness 66.3 % • Cough 45.3% • Pharyngitis 34.7% • Dyspnea 24.2% • Most resolved after 1-2 years of continued treatment • Mild increase in hypopnea and apnea in patients with OSA, may unmask latent OSA (Marzed, Edwards, Sagher. Epilepsia 2003) VNS: MANAGING SIDE EFFECTS • Reduce pulse width from 500 to 250 • Reduce frequency from 30 to 20 • TAPE MAGNET OVER DEVICE TO AVOID VOICE CHANGE VNS AND MRI • Safe for brain, lumbar spine, and extremities! • NOT SAFE for cervical and thoracic spine • PRIOR to MRI reprogram • Output current = 0.0 • Magnet current = 0.0 • Autostimulation = 0.0 • AFTER imaging • Reset to previous parameters • Perform diagnostic, should show IMPEDENCE = OK TRANSCUTANEOUS VNS (T-VNS) • Stimulation applied to auricular branch of CNX at the tragus • 5 of 7 patients showed a reduction in seizure frequency at 9 months (Stefan 2012) • Randomized, double-blind controlled trial (cMPsE02) showed no statistical difference in change in seizure frequency between high and low stimulation groups at 20 weeks (Bauer 2016). • NEMOS system is approved in Europe • LOW THRESHOLD FOR APPROVAL – EFFICACY NOT NEEDED VNS: WHO TO CONSIDER? PRO CON • Option for anyone who is not a candidate for resection • Surgery required • No cognitive side effects • Battery replacement 5-10 years • Compliance is not an issue • Still need AEDs •

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    44 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us