Durham E-Theses

Durham E-Theses

Durham E-Theses A LOST LEGACY OF CRITICAL ENGAGEMENT: IBN AL-QAYYIM ON DIVINE DETERMINATION (qadar) SLITI, ABDULLAH How to cite: SLITI, ABDULLAH (2015) A LOST LEGACY OF CRITICAL ENGAGEMENT: IBN AL-QAYYIM ON DIVINE DETERMINATION (qadar), Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11615/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 A LOST LEGACY OF CRITICAL ENGAGEMENT: IBN AL-QAYYIM ON DIVINE DETERMINATION (qadar ) by ABDULLAH SLITI A thesis submitted to Durham University for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Government and International Affairs Durham University August 2015 ABSTRACT This research aims to challenge a popular contemporary Traditionalist trend of intra-Muslim theological disengagement and isolation, which is justified by a conception of a puritan Traditionalist theology entirely hypothetically based on scripture and a utopian monolithic understanding of the first three generations of Islam (the Salaf) . One of the many inevitable consequences of such a popular trend is one of intolerance and hence sectarianism. Intra-Muslim theological disengagement amongst modern Traditionalists and the problems therein will be challenged by proving that the theology of the Traditionalist scholar, Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya (d. 751/1350), whose work is a main reference for contemporary Traditionalists, is much indebted to his critical engagement and intra-Muslim dialogue with fellow non-Traditionalist theologians and philosophers. This will be evident in my analysis of Ibn al-Qayyim’s discussions on topics related to divine determination, which is a fundamental doctrine to Muslims. In fact, Ibn al- Qayyim successfully develops a compatibilist position of dual agency on the problem of free will and determinism, a traditionalist rational objectivism position in the debate on meta-ethics and a four-fold theodicy of optimism on the problem of evil. Ibn al-Qayyim’s theological developments evidently defy contemporary intra-Muslim theological disengagement and the conception of a puritan Traditionalist theology. At the core of this thesis is an implication which seeks to promote dialogue amongst contemporary Muslims and Traditionalist Islam. i Contents ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................... i Contents .......................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ vi Transliterations ............................................................................................................................. vii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 The Problem ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Aims and Objectives of Research ......................................................................................................... 3 Method and Methodology .................................................................................................................... 5 An Overview of the Research .............................................................................................................. 6 1-IBN AL-QAYYIM’S INTELLECTUAL MILIEU IN DAMASCUS ...................................... 10 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 10 The Damascus Crises ......................................................................................................................... 10 Intellectual Engagement in Damascus ................................................................................................ 11 Ibn al-Qayyim’s Background and Characteristics ............................................................................... 13 Ibn al-Qayyim’s Education and Legacy.............................................................................................. 21 Ibn al-Qayyim’s Works Related to Divine Determination ................................................................... 26 A Chronology of Ibn al-Qayyim’s Works .......................................................................................... 35 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 38 2- EARLY CRITICAL ENGAGEMENTS AND THEOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................ 39 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 39 Early Theological Differences amongst the Companions: Monolithic or Pluralistic? .......................... 39 Early Debates on Divine Determination ............................................................................................. 41 Maʿbad al-Juhanī ........................................................................................................................... 46 Ghaylān al-Dimashqī ...................................................................................................................... 51 Early Schools and Their Theological Developments ........................................................................... 52 The Muʿtazilites ............................................................................................................................. 52 The Jabrites ................................................................................................................................... 55 The Shi ʾites .................................................................................................................................... 58 The Kharijites ................................................................................................................................. 60 The Murjiʾites ................................................................................................................................ 61 ii The Māturīdites ............................................................................................................................. 62 The Ashʿarites ................................................................................................................................ 63 The Traditionalists ......................................................................................................................... 67 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 71 3- FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBILITY: IBN AL-QAYYIM’S COMPATIBILISM OF DUAL AGENCY ...................................................................................................................................... 73 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 73 Defining the Debate ........................................................................................................................... 73 Ibn al-Qayyim on the Mu ʿtazilites ...................................................................................................... 74 Ibn al-Qayyim on the Muʿtazilites’ Arguments................................................................................ 80 Ibn al-Qayyim on the Ash ʿarites ........................................................................................................ 83 Ibn al-Qayyim on the Ash ʿarites’ Arguments .................................................................................. 93 Ibn al-Qayyim on Human Agency ...................................................................................................... 96 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 102 4- IBN AL-QAYYIM’S TRADITIONALIST RATIONAL OJECTIVISM .............................. 103 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 103 Defining the Debate ......................................................................................................................... 103 Ibn al-Qayyim on the Mu ʿtazilites ...................................................................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    250 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us