Imaging the Subsurface of Pit Craters

Imaging the Subsurface of Pit Craters

Imaging the subsurface structure of pit craters Craig Magee¹, Corbin L. Kling2, Paul K. Byrne2 ¹Institute of Geophysics and Tectonics, School of Earth Science and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK ([email protected]) ²Planetary Research Group, Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State Uni-versity, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA Rationale Pit crater distribution & 3D structure - preliminary results Pit craters (chains) enigmatic features on Earth, (A) Top pit craters Pit craters aligned along & Mars, Mercury, Phobos, Eros, etc... above multiple dikes (F4A) Can only view surface morphology Most pit craters within dike- driven graben (F2, 4B) Collapse of subsurface voids created by: some pit craters solely related Dilational faulting → extension, mechanical layering to tectonic faults (4B) Tensile fracturing → extension, hydrologic cycle(?) some pit craters above steep Dike intrusion → volcanic products fault (dilational?) sections (F4C) (C) Aim: (1) Quantify surface & subsurface structure (B) Top Athol Formation 3.0 3.0 of pit craters; (2) compare to examples from Mars (& elsewhere): (3) test formation models 3.2 3.2 Study areas 3.4 3.4 Exmouth Plateau, offshore NW AustraliaAUSTRALIA Exmouth Australia (F1) 3.6 3.6 Bathymetry (km) Plateau -6 0 N Time (s TWT) Dike Elevation (km) 20° - + 0 1 Dike swarm imaged in 3D (F2) F -2.69 -3.20 Variance F4: (A) Map of top pit crater plan-view geometries overlain on dyke traces. Pit crater tops occur at subtly different structural levels. (B) Two-way time structure map, overlain with Dike-related pit crater variance (measure of difference in signal traces), showing pit crater structure at Top Athol 3.8 3.8 - + Dike-driven faults & graben (F2) Formation horizon. Bright red-yellow areas = faults. (C) Seismic sections, with one overlain 100 km 110° 115° 5 km Tectonic fault-related pit crater 0.5 km Variance 0.5 km by variance showing pit crater extending down to steep section of dike-driven fault. F1: Exmouth Plateau location map. (A) Seabed (B) Chester-1 ST1 (C) Seabed N Pit crater Pit crater Time (s TWT) Dazi NW SE NW SE S α -2.96 -3.04 azi Fd L Dike trace Lazi (NW) 2 2 TM Fd - + Sp (SE) Dip Ch TJ α Ph 3 TJ TM TJ -3.00 FD 3 TA TM DD Pph 4 TA Basalt Dike tip 4 P-Pph 4 TM Plan-view Cross-section L - Long axis Ch - Crater height -3.25 S - Short axis Ph - Pit height TWT) Sill Sp - Spacing Pph - Pipe height 5 Dike Dike Dike Fd (NW) - Distance to NW fault P-Pph - Pit-pipe height B D E Fd (SE) - Distance to SE fault DD - Dike depth Time (s FD - Fault depth Dike Dike L - Long axis azimuth D E azi α - Pit slope Dazi - Dike trace azimuth 5 αazi - Angular difference between Lazi and Dazi Time (s TWT) Time TWT) TWT) -3.50 Pit craters typically funnel- 5 1 km 2 km 2.5 km Time (s Time (s shaped (F5) TJ = Top Jurassic unconformity TM = Top Mungaroo Fmn TA = Top Athol Fmn Vertical Tectonic normal faults Dike-induced normal faults Dike Pit craters (D) N exaggeration ≈3 Was surface expression at (C) formation characterized by 5 km ~10 km N Pit craters Ch or Ph? (F5) Time (s TWT) + F3 Dyke -2.7 -3.7 F Have pits been infilled (Ch < Ph) - + + Dip F5: 3D view of pit crater structure extending down to underlying dike. See F2D for location. Inset: Schematic showing structural measurements. or not (Ch = Ph) (E) R² = 0.95 R² = (A) Previous data 1 (B) Our data Literature shows correlation A B C D E F G 0.92 RMS Amplitude 10 R² = R² = R² = - + 0.30 of L to “crater depth” (F6A) 0.95 h (km) 0.95 t p 0.01 e D ] R² = 0.80 N 1 Craters infilled Ch Standard Ph similar trend with L (F6B) H R² = 0.74 (Ch < Ph) + error 0.0001 25 km (A) R² = 0.02 R² = 0.64 Ch unrelated to L (F6B) 0.1 0000.1 0.01 1 100 I ] (km) Major axis (km) + R² = Ph = “crater depth” of other work Ph R² = 0.80 0.77 R² = 0.51 0.01 Noctis pits scattered (F6B) + Borehole R² = 0.41 h” / Crater height [ R² = : (A-C) Seismic sections showing dikes, faults, and pit craters. See (D) and (E) for line locations. t F2 0.07 + p R² = 0.49 (D) Top Mungaroo structure map (Chandon 3D survey) shwoing dike-induced faults. (E) Time-slice at e (B) Gwinner et al., 2012 - Mercury 4 s TWT showing dikes as long, linear zones of low reflection brightness amplitude. Inset: Glencoe 3D / Pit height [ 0.001 R² = Cut-off marks where later survey dike map. R² = 0.79 0.76 Okubo & Martel, 1998 - Earth (Hawaii) Kling - Earth (Hawaii) Dike-related pit Ph - Earth (NW Australia) Kling - Earth (Idaho) Dike-related pit Ch - Earth (NW Australia) “Crater d Ferrill et al., 2011 - Earth (Iceland) Tectonic fault-related pit Ph - Earth (NW Australia) infill restricts “crater depth” 0.0001 Whitten et al., 2019 - Earth (Iceland - sedi. host) Tectonic fault-related pit Ch - Earth (NW Australia) 25 km Whitten et al., 2019 - Earth (Iceland - basalt host) (C) Noctic Labyrinthus - Mars measurement (F6B) (A) °W W 0° Wyrick et al., 2004 - Mars 0 ° fault 2 0 pit Scott & Wilson, 2002 - Mars Previous data (see (A)) 60° N 1 6 0.00001 0000.1 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0000.1 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Pits above dikes / faults not Long axis [L] (km) Long axis [L] (km) 14°S F6: Plots of pit long axis vs “crater depth” measured from previous studies (A), as well as Ch and Ph measured from 3D seismic reflection data (B). separated by L vs Ph (F6B) 0° B Elevation (km) -8 21 4000 km Preliminary conclusions 15°S (B) 0° e a s s 95° W 105° W 100° W o 98° 97° 96° (1) Seismic reflection data reveal pit crater subsurface structure F is t c o N 5° S Many graben, pit Noctis (2) Support systematic relationship between pit long axis (L) and crater depth (Ph) Lab yri nth us craters, & canyons (A) (B) infilling material can obscure crater depth 10° S S yria Pla num Pit crater chains we define a possible cut-off in L vs Ph space c Some pits in graben, to identify infilled craters Elevation (m) 15° S some not -725 9000 Possible dike swarm 250 km (3) Supports pit crater formation via dike- &/or : (A) Global topographic map of Mars in Robinson Projection induced faulting, and F3 F7: (A) Volatile release, contraction, magma removal from dyke tip can produce a cavity. (B) Steep section of a showing location of Noctis Labyrinthus. (B) Regional map of Noctis dilational fault-related cavity collapse (F7) fault can dilate during slip, producing a cavity. Labyrinthus showing the complex landforms present. (C) Examples pit craters of pit craters within Noctis Labyrinthus, Mars. @DrCraigMagee.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us