ANCIENT PILLAR STONES OF SCOTLAND; ®inii anb §!earitiig rni (Etjjiitligir,' 818S5 0^^ BY GEORGE MOORE, M.D. M.R.O.P. bon:d., etc. EDINBURGH : EDMONSTONE AND DOUGLA^E^, WYLLIE AND SON. ■ o PREF’ Ac C^' 1, The ScU^-ptured Stones of Seoifcland are the mos-t remarkable in the world, and of these the most singular is that known as the ISeeWc^n Stone. This is uniqu^e, being inscribed wi'th characters unlike any found in Eu^i’ope, and which, though recognised as Oriental, have hitherto defied interpretation. To this stone and its inscriptions, thei'cfore, the especial att^ention o ^^Ire reader is invited, since the interest of the whole inquiry, as conducted in this volume, turns upon the significance ascribed, to this puzzling monument. 'To the serious diversion of visi'ting some Of the mos^ ancie:^^ pillar-stones of Aberdeenshire, and hunting for their mea^ning, the writer is indebted for a good holiday and the renewal of vigour for liis professional duty. He writes with a touch of gra­ titude, not only to kind friends who directed him to the old ston^es, but, so to say, to the grim old creatures themselves ; for their very hoariness bore a refreshing aspect, and, though reminding one of the -tomb, they uttered no coim^tlaint, however ti’eated, and the mystery ab^^t ttli<i^i& was withal o vi PREFACE. w^-fcho^'t prel^ent^i^ousness. To ran the finger along lines and letters rubbed in by human hands some two thousand years ago was like reaching back and puttying onesel^f en rappo^'t wi’th the dead and buried ages, tin the venerable memorials became alive wi'th interests thick and close as the grey lichen that covered them. It is good to enlarge our humani'ty by tidying to co^inec^ the far, still Past ^ith the hurrying Present, and to hear wha^ the ancie:nts intend to say t^o us in their monuments. If the reader derive > any degree t^he same profit and pleasure from the effo]^^ that the writer has expe­ rienced, both will have reason to be thankful, for both will be the better for it. The philological argument which is naturally asso^^i^'ted wi'th the inquiry thu^s, wi'th all due deference, presented to the public, is ,.^c^o extensive to be included in this volume, add must be reserved for the separate and, especial treatment which its importance demands and deserves. “For every word men may not chide or pleine, • For in this world certainne ne wight ther is That he ne doth or sayth sometime amii^^.” Dan Geffrv. G. M. Ha^-^ings, July 28, 1865. Lord Aberdeen’s letter to John Stuarts, Esq., con- ce:rning the Newton Stone, will form a sufF^(^^^;^rt inti’oduction to this inquiry. Haddo House, September 10,1^855. My dear Sir, I think it in the year 1804 that I first saw the Ne^wton Stone, the inscription on which I believe had been discovered by some shepherd-boys in the preceding year. The stone, at that time, was situated in a fir plantation, a few paces from the high road, and near to the Pitmachie turnpike. The trees have since been cut down, and the stone removed to the House of N'ewton. It may ap^ar strange that this monument, which has stood exposed for many centuries on an open moor (for the plantation was not more than fifty years old), should not earlier have received more parti^c^ulii^’ attention.* Indeed, this circumstance has led some to imagine that the inscription may be altogether of modern dal^e; but for this supposition there can be no real foundation. The stone, at the time to which I refer, might have been passed by thousands without the characters being at all observed. The rugged surface, and the rude manner in which the letters are inscribed, rendered them little likely to attract notice; and being encrusted with the * It may be remarked that the Great North Koad had only been recentl^^ opened, and the turnpike gate set down in the vicinity of the stone, the old road having been on the opposite side of the Gady. This circumstance doubtless increased the number of observers, and assisted to bring the stone into gotice. (Note by J. Stuart, Esq.) o INTBOl^-hl3TION. t I _ hard grey lichen, of precisely the same '' colour as the stone its^^W, they were, in fact, scarcely di^t^^^i^gui^sslis^l^l'e. It may he observedl. that the existence of this iKc^^h^n is an mdisputabl'e of the an1^i^qfl^i.itjr of the inscrii^l^ii^n' ; and it is important to- record the appearance of the stone .at this time, becau!^e,--in conseqitii^i^^c^'o:f the frc^qifii^i^'t tracings and rubbing off to which the - letters have - been submitted, they have entirely lost their ancient surface.* This monument is pro'bably the most interesting of the sculptured stones discovered in Scotland ; and, al^though it has engaged the attention of yai'ious antiicj^uaVies and ' learn^cdl' men, it has not hitherto received any sa^i^s^lO^cjfajyy explanation. I hope the authentic of thiae inscription in our Transactions may exeite the iute^i^iss^^'!SI^' of those who -arie qualified to enter , into such inquiries, atid may lead to some elucidation of these mysterious characters. I am, my dear Sir, ' Very truly yours, John Stuart, Esq. L * The lichen .being very -hard and closely attached to the stone stiU appears in m^ist of the letters.—6-. M. THE . N EWT O N STONE AND ITS . IN S C K TD:: £3. "When the true antiquary sees some grand old stone lifting its head as if to speak of- the past, the sight warms his heart. He immediately begins to imagine he sees also the people who erected it, and proceeds at oi^ce to - inquire into their character and cusi^oms, wi'th the hope of as^^iTtai^Qing what they me^-nt by their memorial. He is vexed when his inquiry receives no answer. But when he sees a mon^j^ith like the Newton Stone, wi'th graven words upon its face, which ca:nn^^ be deciphered, he feels as if the dead rose up to reproach the living for their ignorance. In this case the words ai’e boldly and clearly visible, being deeply cut into the hardest and mod; lasting of stones—a close-j^;rained gneiss. Were not this rec^^d vastly prehistoric, some clue to its meaning would be easily found ; but as yet it remains a mystery, af^f^ir^iing only a lesson in patience at the expense of our lui^t^h in the learned. Many able minds have been exeirting B 2 THE NEWTON STONE their ingenxdty on the mysterious lines, but they are still unread. If, then, the prese:^^ waiter -ms been urged to attempt their interpretai^ion, he does n^^ claim to be possessed of more learning than those who have already failed in the task, but simply that his studies have been incidentally di­ rected to subjects that enable him to see the appa­ rent value of the characters inscribed on this stone, and to distinguish the words they form. Of the chara^^er and age the stone itself, and of an^^her having symbols carved on it that stands near, Dr. Nicol, Piotessor of Natural History in the Universi-ty of Aberdeen, writes* as :— “ It is a quart^zose gneiss, quite like many other stones in the vicinity. Both stones have, besides, an^^her peculiar chara^^er which puts their Eastern origin altogether out of the field, T^h^ey are glacier boulders which have bee:n rubbed arid worn smooth by ice-action before the inscription and ca^rving were cut on them. Taking all things into con­ sideration, I ther^efore have no doub't that the stones are true natives of the Garioclh.-f “ There are some other curious points in their history which t^he stones themselves appear to tell us tolerably clearly. Thus, the lettered stone has had a large chip ' broken off one side before the ins^^^ip^tion was cut on it—prc^ljriljly when it was raised ou^ of t^he ea^th. ’ Then they have been dug * In a letter to Alex. Thomson, Esq., of Banchory, t A distriqt in the centre of Aberdeenshire, in which Newton is situated—ancie^^ly “ Garvyanch,” i.e. “ the rough land.’’ AND ITS INSCRIPTIONS. s and se'fc up abo^'fc the time the carving was done, and not much earlier. Again, the whole of the .inscription, and also the so-c^ed Oghams on the lettered stone are of the same or nearly the same date.” There is no reason to douh^ that the lines cut across the edge of the stone form an inscription in the Ogham character, as will be shown in an^^her plac^; the other inscription, however, demands our f^irs^ c^^side^ation. The history of the prese^^ attempt is thiis:—I saw an engraving o^ the inscription in Dr. D. • Wilson’s “Prehistoric Annals of Scotland,” and before reading what was said ab^^'fc it, I was struck with the general resemblance o;f the characters to t^^ose I had seen on certain coins known as Bactrian, and also to th^se of the so-called Arian and Pali ■ rock-records of Nort^-wes^ern l^^d^^a, and recognised as Buddhist^ic.