Characterization of Landsat-7 to Landsat-8 Reflective Wavelength and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index Continuity David P

Characterization of Landsat-7 to Landsat-8 Reflective Wavelength and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index Continuity David P

South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange GSCE Faculty Publications Geospatial Sciences Center of Excellence (GSCE) 11-2016 Characterization of Landsat-7 to Landsat-8 Reflective Wavelength and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index Continuity David P. Roy South Dakota State University, [email protected] V. Kovalskyy South Dakota State University, [email protected] Hankui Zhang South Dakota State University, [email protected] Eric F. Vermote NASA Goddard Space Center Lin Yan Dr. South Dakota State University, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/gsce_pubs Part of the Geographic Information Sciences Commons, Physical and Environmental Geography Commons, Remote Sensing Commons, and the Spatial Science Commons Recommended Citation Roy, David P.; Kovalskyy, V.; Zhang, Hankui; Vermote, Eric F.; Yan, Lin Dr.; Kumar, Sanath Sathyachandran; and Egorov, Alexey V., "Characterization of Landsat-7 to Landsat-8 Reflective Wavelength and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index Continuity" (2016). GSCE Faculty Publications. 34. http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/gsce_pubs/34 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geospatial Sciences Center of Excellence (GSCE) at Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in GSCE Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors David P. Roy, V. Kovalskyy, Hankui Zhang, Eric F. Vermote, Lin Yan Dr., Sanath Sathyachandran Kumar, and Alexey V. Egorov This article is available at Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/gsce_pubs/34 Remote Sensing of Environment 185 (2016) 57–70 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Remote Sensing of Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rse Characterization of Landsat-7 to Landsat-8 reflective wavelength and normalized difference vegetation index continuity D.P. Roy a,⁎,V.Kovalskyya,H.K.Zhanga,E.F.Vermoteb,L.Yana,S.S.Kumara,A.Egorova a Geospatial Science Center of Excellence, South Dakota State University Brookings, SD 57007, USA b NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Terrestrial Information Systems Branch, MD 20771, USA article info abstract Article history: At over 40 years, the Landsat satellites provide the longest temporal record of space-based land surface observa- Received 26 May 2015 tions, and the successful 2013 launch of the Landsat-8 is continuing this legacy. Ideally, the Landsat data record Received in revised form 4 December 2015 should be consistent over the Landsat sensor series. The Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) has improved Accepted 17 December 2015 calibration, signal to noise characteristics, higher 12-bit radiometric resolution, and spectrally narrower Available online 12 January 2016 wavebands than the previous Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM+). Reflective wavelength differences fl fi Keywords: between the two Landsat sensors depend also on the surface re ectance and atmospheric state which are dif cult Landsat to model comprehensively. The orbit and sensing geometries of the Landsat-8 OLI and Landsat-7 ETM+ provide Continuity swath edge overlapping paths sensed only one day apart. The overlap regions are sensed in alternating backscat- Reflectance ter and forward scattering orientations so Landsat bi-directional reflectance effects are evident but approximate- Ndvi ly balanced between the two sensors when large amounts of time series data are considered. Taking advantage of OLI this configuration a total of 59 million 30 m corresponding sensor observations extracted from 6317 Landsat-7 ETM+ ETM+ and Landsat-8 OLI images acquired over three winter and three summer months for all the conterminous United States (CONUS) are compared. Results considering different stages of cloud and saturation filtering, and filtering to reduce one day surface state differences, demonstrate the importance of appropriate per-pixel data screening. Top of atmosphere (TOA) and atmospherically corrected surface reflectance for the spectrally corre- sponding visible, near infrared and shortwave infrared bands, and derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), are compared and their differences quantified. On average the OLI TOA reflectance is greater than the ETM+ TOA reflectance for all bands, with greatest differences in the near-infrared (NIR) and the short- wave infrared bands due to the quite different spectral response functions between the sensors. The atmospheric correction reduces the mean difference in the NIR and shortwave infrared but increases the mean difference in the visible bands. Regardless of whether TOA or surface reflectance are used to generate NDVI, on average, for vegetated soil and vegetation surfaces (0 ≤ NDVI ≤ 1), the OLI NDVI is greater than the ETM+ NDVI. Statistical functions to transform between the comparable sensor bands and sensor NDVI values are presented so that the user community may apply them in their own research to improve temporal continuity between the Landsat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-8 OLI sensor data. The transformation functions were developed using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and were fit quite reliably (r2 values N 0.7 for the reflectance data and N0.9 for the NDVI data, p-values b 0.0001). © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). 1. Introduction acquisition conditions and by different sensors may have reflectance in- consistencies introduced by factors including atmospheric and cloud At over 40 years, the Landsat satellites provide the longest temporal contamination (Kaufman, 1987, Masek et al., 2006), variable sun- record of space-based land surface observations, and the successful surface-sensor geometry (Roy et al., 2008, Nagol et al., 2015, Ju et al., 2013 launch of Landsat-8 carrying the Operational Land Imager (OLI) 2010), sensor degradation and calibration changes (Markham & and the Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) is continuing this legacy Helder, 2012), between sensor spectral band pass and spatial resolution (Irons, Dwyer, & Barsi, 2012; Roy, Wulder, et al., 2014). Multi- differences (Steven, Malthus, Baret, Xu, & Chopping, 2003; Tucker et al., temporal optical wavelength satellite data acquired under different 2005), and data processing issues (Roy et al., 2002). The need for multi- year consistent data records for both research and applications is well established. For example, the global coverage Moderate Resolution ⁎ Corresponding author. Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) products have been generated http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.024 0034-4257/© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). 58 D.P. Roy et al. / Remote Sensing of Environment 185 (2016) 57–70 from 2000 to present (Justice et al., 1998) and have been reprocessed into account the per-pixel spectral saturation status that we show is several times using improved calibration and geometric knowledge important. and refined product generation algorithms (Masuoka et al., 2011). Sim- In this study, a total of 59 million 30 m corresponding sensor ob- ilarly, substantial research effort has been developed to generate global servations extracted from 6316 Landsat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-8 OLI long term data records derived from coarse resolution Advanced Very images acquired over three winter and three summer months for High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) observations available since all the conterminous United States (CONUS) are examined. Statisti- 1981, although those that are publically available are subject to scientif- cal calibrations are derived to document between sensor differences ic debate (Myneni, Tucker, Asrar, & Keeling, 1998; Pedelty et al., 2007; for TOA and also surface reflectance and derived NDVI. The transfor- Beck et al., 2011; Fensholt & Proud, 2012; Pinzon & Tucker, 2014). mations are provided so that the user community may apply them in Unlike past AVHRR sensors, which carried no onboard reflective wave- their own research to improve temporal continuity of reflectance length calibration capability, the Landsat Thematic Mapper, ETM+ and and NDVI between the Landsat OLI and ETM+ sensors. First, the OLI sensors are well calibrated (Markham & Helder, 2012) and with the Landsat data and pre-processing required to allow their meaningful free Landsat data availability the systematic generation of consistent comparison are described, then the analysis methodology and results global long-term Landsat products has been advocated (Roy, Wulder, are described, followed by concluding remarks with implications and et al., 2014). recommendations. The primary Landsat-8 mission objective is to extend the Landsat re- cord into the future and maintain continuity of observations so that 2. Data Landsat-8 data are consistent and comparable with those from the previous Landsat systems (Roy,Wulder,etal.,2014). Because of the im- The Landsat-8 OLI has narrower spectral bands, improved calibra- portance of continuity, the Landsat legacy is one in which there has

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    16 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us