Araneae, Antrodiaetidae) : Demographics, Growth Rates , Survivorship, and Longevity

Araneae, Antrodiaetidae) : Demographics, Growth Rates , Survivorship, and Longevity

1993. The Journal of Arachnology 21 :29—39 THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE CALIFORNIA TURRET SPIDE R ATYPOIDES RIVERSI (ARANEAE, ANTRODIAETIDAE) : DEMOGRAPHICS, GROWTH RATES , SURVIVORSHIP, AND LONGEVITY Leonard S. Vincent: Division of Biological Sciences, Fullerton College, 321 E . Chapman Avenue; Fullerton, California 92632 USA ABSTRACT. A large and dense population of over 500 burrows of Atypoides riversi in a 2.0 x 3.2 m area was monitored for two years to indirectly determine demographics, growth rates, survivorship and longevity o f the spiders . Twelve size classes of spiders were designated by correlating spider size to burrow size. All size classes were present simultaneously throughout the year . Variable growth rates were recorded for spiders in eac h size class, and survivorship was lowest for spiders in the smallest size classes . It is estimated, based in large part on growth rates, that A . riversi can live at least 16 years in the field. The only long term comprehensive study of (1991) used a similar approach to study Geoly- the genealogy and demography of a large popu- cosa turricola . lation of mygalomorph spiders concerns the Aus - Additional natural history information on var- tralian ctenizid Anidiops villosus (Rainbow) (Main ious antrodiaetids can be found in Atkinso n 1978). In another study, Marples & Marple s (1886a, 1886b), Coyle (1971, 1986), Rivers (1972) observed a population of several specie s (1891), Smith (1908), Vincent (1980, 1985, 1986), of New Zealand ctenizids for six years . The dem- and Vincent & Rack (1982) . ographics of burrowing wolf spiders have bee n examined in detail by McQueen (1978, 1983) , METHOD S Humphreys (1976) and Miller & Miller (1991). Study sites.—Two study sites at the University Herein I describe the natural history of the of California's Blodgett Forest Research Station, fossorial mygalomorph spider Atypoides riversi located in the American River watershed on the O. P- Cambridge, the California turret building western slope of the Sierra Nevada in El Dorad o spider (Rivers 1892). Unlike the long term field County, approximately 10 miles west of George - studies of Main and the Marples, my objectives town and at an elevation 1275 m were chosen were to determine, in a two-year period, the dem - for their high density of burrows and uniform ographics, growth rate, survivorship, and lon- ground cover. The population dynamics of spi- gevity of A . riversi. Unlike Main (1978) and Mar- ders in both areas were similar; therefore, this pies & Marples (1972), who measured burro w paper reports on only one. Population data for and door diameters but did not correlate thes e the other study area and vegetation descriptions measurements to spider size, I measured and cor - for both are in Vincent (1980). related burrow entrance size to spider size . The study site measured 2.0 x 3 .2 m and con- McQueen (1978), Humphreys (1976) and Mille r sisted of 160 20 cm square quadrats formed by & Miller (1984) found positive correlations for a grid system composed of nylon string and certain burrowing wolf spiders . Decae et al. wooden stakes . The stakes were placed at 20 cm (1982), studying the burrow structure of a cten- increments around the perimeter of the plot, an d izid, also found a positive correlation between string was placed on or slightly above the groun d carapace length and burrow diameter but did no t connecting facing stakes. Ground cover was associate this with longevity. Using the correla- mostly pine and cedar needles with occasional tion and following all burrow size changes through pine seedlings present during the spring and sum - the two year period, I derived life history infor- mer months . A barbed-wire fence enclosed the mation comparable to following a single cohort study area to exclude deer and other large ani- ofA . riversi through its long life . Miller & Miller mals. 29 30 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOG Y Correlation of spider size and burrow entrance with silk]; (4) missing [burrow could not b e size.—A series of 15 non-metric ball bearings found]; (5) old [burrow was in a state of disrepair, ranging in diameter from 2/32 inch (1 .59 mm) the turret was stiff and/or torn or non-existent] . to 16/32 inch (12 .7 mm) in increments of 1/3 2 These and other relatively rare burrow condi- inch (0.79 mm) were hard-soldered to thin singl e tions are discussed in detail in Vincent (1980) . fiber wire "handles" . These ball bearings were Data collection dates.—Burrows were initially then used to measure the internal diameter of censused 5—23 September 1976 . On 22—24 April spider burrow entrances. The internal diameter 1977 new burrows and burrow conditions for a was considered equivalent to the diameter of th e random sample (n = 153) of previously censuse d ball bearing that fit (or came the closest to fitting ) burrows of sizes 3 through 11 were recorded . the narrowest section of the tapered burrow en - Also, burrow conditions for all burrows of sizes trance. For convenience, burrow size classes wer e 12, 13, and 14 were recorded (n = 13). The ran- designated by the numerators that fit the entranc- dom-sample size for each size class was deter- es (sizes 2—16) . Attempts to measure burrow en- mined so that the standard deviation of the es- trances accurately with a caliper or ruler prove d timated proportion would be no greater than 0 .30. to be difficult and damaging to the flexible an d Confidence intervals for the true proportions wer e fragile entrance . calculated by a formula given in Bickel & Daksu n Six to 14 burrows (n = 128) representing each (1977, formula 5 .1 .13), and modified to account size class were arbitrarily chosen near the study for sampling without replacement (Cochran 1977 , site for measurement (Vincent 1980) . After each sec. 2.15). During 28—31 July 1977, new burrows burrow was measured, the resident spider wa s were mapped and recorded, and previously re - dug from its burrow, anesthetized by cooling with corded burrows were measured again . On 20 Au- crushed ice (large spiders) or CO2 (small spiders), gust 1977 a random sample of burrows presen t and measured . Spiders were measured with a on 28—31 July, 1977 was censused to confirm the stereomicroscope fitted with an ocular microm- presence of spiders in the burrows previously eter accurate to 0 .039 mm. Measurements of sized. Sample size and confidence intervals were maximum width of both the carapace and ster- determined as above for the April 1977 random num were correlated to the internal diameter o f sample. All burrows present on 28—31 July 197 7 the burrow entrance. were recensused 19—20 May 1978 to see if the y Observation platform.—A portable observa- contained spiders . Burrows that contained spi- tion platform consisting of a 2 x 1 .33 m sheet ders on 19—20 May 1978 were recensused and of plywood was supported approximately 12 c m remeasured 3—6 August 1978, and all burrows in over the plot by planks and blocks . The leading odd-numbered rows were observed at night wit h edge of the platform coincided with the trailing a dim unfiltered flashlight as a further check o n edge of the row being examined to allow a de- spider presence. If a spider was not immediately tailed view of one 20 cm square quadrat . After visible in its burrow, I waited several minute s examining all quadrats in a row, I advanced the for it to appear; if it still did not appear, I con- platform to the trailing edge of the next row, etc. sidered the burrow abandoned. Again, all new Since A. riversi, like some other fossorial my- burrows were recorded and mapped . galomorphs, is sensitive to vibrations, successful Survivorship calculations.—Survivorship of A . observations necessitated moving slowly on the riversi was indirectly determined by subtractin g platform. Adjusting the platform caused some from the initial number of burrows censused th e spiders to retreat temporarily down their bur - number of burrows missing or considered "old" rows. during each consecutive census . Survivorship of Burrow observations.—The position of each eggs and emerging spiderlings is unknown . burrow was noted and its entrance diameter was measured . Burrows with flexible and freshly silke d RESULTS AND DISCUSSIO N turrets were measured for size class designation . Correlation of spider size and burrow entranc e The following burrow conditions were recorded: size.—Burrow entrances ranged from 3/32 inc h (1) occupied [spider was seen in its burrow] ; (2) (2.38 mm) through 14/32 inch (11 .06 mm). A abandoned [burrow appeared in use, but no spi- regression of spider size (carapace widths) agains t der was detected during the immediate obser- burrow entrance size was highly significant (P < vation period, approximately five minutes] ; (3) 0.001) (Fig . 1). closed [entrance was folded closed and sealed Assumptions .—In estimating the following VINCENT—NATURAL HISTORY OF ATYPOIDES RIVERSI 3 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 1 4 Ball Bearing Siz e Figure 1 .—Regression of ball bearing size on carapace width (Y = 8 .3X -3 .1, R2 = 0.934, P < 0 .001) . demographics, survivorship, growth rates and during most of 1977, recovered only adult male longevity for A . riversi, I assume each burrow spiders and only during the fall mating season . has had only one occupant who had enlarged an d The above observations suggest that A. riversi maintained it over time, that burrows present does not leave its burrow to enter another burro w and in good shape contain a living spider, and to evict its resident in a competitive interactio n that missing burrows are a measure of spide r (as in Riechert 1978), to search out larger vacated mortality.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us