Baryonic Distributions in Galaxy Dark Matter Haloes I: New Observations

Baryonic Distributions in Galaxy Dark Matter Haloes I: New Observations

MNRAS 000, 1–31 (2016) Preprint 5 November 2018 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Baryonic Distributions in Galaxy Dark Matter Haloes I: New Observations of Neutral and Ionized Gas Kinematics Emily E. Richards,1⋆ L. van Zee,1† K. L. Barnes,1 S. Staudaher,2 D. A. Dale,2 T. T. Braun,1 D. C. Wavle,1 J. J. Dalcanton,3 J. S. Bullock4 and R. Chandar5 1Indiana University, 727 East 3rd Street, Swain West 318, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA 2University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University, Dept 3905, Laramie, WY 82071, USA 3University of Washington, Box 351580, U.W., Seattle, WA 98195, USA 4University of California, Irvine, Department of Physics & Astronomy, 4129 Frederick Reines Hall, Irvine, CA 92697, USA 5University of Toledo, 2801 West Bancroft Street, Toledo, OH 43606, USA Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ ABSTRACT We present a combination of new and archival neutral hydrogen (HI) observations and new ionized gas spectroscopic observations for sixteen galaxies in the statistically representative EDGES kinematic sample. HI rotation curves are derived from new and archival radio synthesis observations from the Very Large Array (VLA) as well as processed data products from the Westerbork Radio Synthesis Telescope (WSRT). The HI rotation curves are supplemented with optical spectroscopic integral field unit (IFU) observations using SparsePak on the WIYN 3.5 m telescope to constrain the central ionized gas kinematics in twelve galaxies. The full rotation curves of each galaxy are decomposed into baryonic and dark matter halo components using 3.6µm images from the Spitzer Space Telescope for the stellar content, the neutral hydrogen data for the atomic gas component, and, when available, CO data from the litera- ture for the molecular gas component. Differences in the inferred distribution of mass are illustrated under fixed stellar mass-to-light ratio (M/L) and maximum disc/bulge assumptions in the rotation curve decomposition. Key words: galaxies: kinematics and dynamics – galaxies: structure 1 INTRODUCTION early observations is now part of the ΛCDM cosmology, which provides a strong framework within which one can The past three decades have led to many advances in trace the evolution of small perturbations in the early uni- our understanding of galaxy rotation curves and a stag- verse to the diverse range of morphological types found in gering accumulation of observational data. Radio synthe- nearby galaxies (e.g. Springel et al. 2006; Martig et al. 2012; sis observations of the 21 cm line of neutral hydrogen Aumer & White 2013). have historically been and continue to be the primary arXiv:1605.01638v1 [astro-ph.GA] 5 May 2016 Although progress is being made in producing realistic method for tracing the outer gravitational potential of galax- galaxies at z = 0 in ΛCDM simulations (e.g. Crain et al. ies (e.g. Bosma 1981b; Begeman et al. 1991; Broeils 1992; 2015), well known tensions between the models and obser- Sanders 1996; Verheijen & Sancisi 2001; Walter et al. 2008; vations still exist. For example, there is a persistent discrep- van der Hulst et al. 2001; McGaugh 2012). The advent of ancy between the diversity of rotation curves in observed integral field spectroscopic (IFS) data has further improved galaxies for a given maximum rotation velocity, V , and our ability to measure galaxy kinematics, especially in the max the little variation seen in simulated galaxies with the same central regions (e.g. Cappellari et al. 2011; Bundy et al. V . Low mass dwarf galaxies, in particular, typically have 2015; Garc´ıa-Lorenzo et al. 2015). Using galaxy kinemat- max much lower circular velocities in the inner regions than ex- ics to decompose the rotation curves has long been a pri- pected from ΛCDM, leading to a significant mass deficit mary method for investigating the mass components of (Oman et al. 2015). Rotation curve decomposition analysis galaxies (e.g. Bosma 1978; Rubin et al. 1982; Persic et al. continues to be a powerful observational tool for constraining 1996). The dynamically inferred missing matter from these theoretical predictions of the distribution of mass on galaxy scales. ⋆ E-mail: [email protected] Despite the mountain of kinematic observations, there † E-mail: [email protected] are still challenges in constraining and interpreting the dis- c 2016 The Authors 2 E. E. Richards et al. tributions of mass components in galaxies. The stellar mass, stellar and gas content, including deep near-infrared (NIR) in particular, is difficult to estimate due to uncertainties images taken at 3.6µm from the Spitzer Space Telescope to in mass-to-light ratio (M/L) leading to the use of max- trace the extended stellar populations. Moderate depth op- imum disc fits to rotation curves (van Albada & Sancisi tical broadband B and R and narrowband Hα provide in- 1986) despite evidence which suggests discs are submaxi- formation about the dominant stellar populations and star mal (e.g. Courteau & Rix 1999; Bershady et al. 2011). Much formation activity. Finally, archival molecular gas observa- attention has been given to determining the stellar M/L tions complement the HI to better estimate the total gas so that the degeneracy between the scaling of the stel- content in the galaxies. Tables 1, 2 and 3 provide a sum- lar contribution and dark matter halo model in rotation mary of observed, corrected and radial properties derived curve decomposition analysis may be broken. There is rel- from this multifrequency dataset. All reported magnitudes atively good consensus among different methods estimating are calculated using the Vega system. A discussion of dis- the stellar M/L at 3.6µm, which suggest a M/L of about tance estimates used in the present study is given below in 0.5 (e.g. Eskew et al. 2012; McGaugh & Schombert 2015a; addition to brief summaries of the data acquisition and pro- Lelli et al. 2016). Estimates of the stellar M/L in the K- cessing. band result in a larger range of values between ∼0.3-0.6, depending on the method used (e.g. den Heijer et al. 2015; 2.1 Distance Estimates Martinsson et al. 2013; Just et al. 2015). Even with con- straints on the stellar M/L, uncertainties in the distance Many of the forthcoming results, including the primary re- estimates still hinder our ability to accurately resolve the sults from the mass decomposition analysis, depend on the true baryonic contribution in the context of rotation curve adopted distance to each galaxy. For the mass decomposi- decomposition analysis (see Section 2.1). tion, an accurate determination of the total baryon content These challenges can cause considerable uncertainties in galaxies requires an accurate distance so that the mass in the results of individual galaxies. Therefore, it is ideal surface densities are scaled correctly when they are con- to interpret such results in the context of a larger statis- verted into circular rotational velocities. Uncertainty in the tical sample. We utilize a statistical sample of about 40 distance is often absorbed into the uncertainty of the stel- nearby galaxies defined from the Extended Disk Galaxy Ex- lar M/L, particularly for more massive galaxies where the plore Science (EDGES) Survey (van Zee et al. 2012) in an total baryon mass is dominated by the stellar component. effort to investigate the distribution of mass in galaxies in In order to be able to compare the distribution of mass in the context of galaxy formation and evolution. Data for the galaxies at fixed stellar M/L, we must rely on relatively ac- EDGES Survey includes deep 3.6µm observations from the curate distance estimates to remove at least some of this Spitzer Space Telescope of 92 galaxies spanning a wide range uncertainty. of morphology (S0 to Im), luminosity (-14 > MB > -21) For nearby galaxies, we cannot rely on Hubble flow dis- and environment (cluster, group and isolated). Galaxies in tance estimates, as their peculiar velocities may be large EDGES were selected to have distances between 2 – 20 Mpc relative to their systemic velocities. Therefore, we are lim- and include the Ursa Major cluster, but exclude Virgo. We ited to using independent distance estimates derived from have defined a kinematic sub-sample from EDGES which in- methods such as Type Ia supernovae (SNIa) and surface cludes all galaxies that have intermediate inclination angles brightness fluctuations (SBF). Six galaxies in the present ◦ ◦ (between 30 and 68 ) estimated from optical axial ratios study have distance estimates from these more robust inde- so that both accurate rotation curves and surface density pendent methods (see Table 2). For the remaining 10 galax- profiles may be determined. The complete kinematic sam- ies we adopt the Luminous Tully-Fisher Relation (LTFR) ple preserves the unbiased representative nature of the full from McGaugh & Schombert (2015b), so that the galaxies EDGES sample allowing us to investigate correlations be- are on a consistent distance scale. The sample from which tween the distribution of baryonic and non-baryonic matter the LTFR was derived is a better match to the kinematic in a statistical manner. sample than other Tully-Fisher samples (e.g. Sorce et al. In this study, we are presenting galaxies in the kinematic 2014). It also does not introduce as much circularity into sample for which we have new HI radio synthesis observa- the analysis as the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation (BTFR; tions from the VLA and new ionized gas kinematics from the McGaugh et al. 2000) since it uses luminosity at 3.6µm (Sec- SparsePak IFU on the WIYN 3.5 m telescope. The obser- tion 2.5) rather than baryonic mass and is, therefore, inde- vational data products are discussed in Section 2. Rotation pendent of stellar M/L. curve decomposition results are shown in Section 3.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    47 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us