The Final Flow: Istanbul’s Fountains in Nineteenth-Century European Narratives by Sharon Mizbani A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations Department University of Toronto © Copyright by Sharon Mizbani 2016 The Final Flow: Istanbul's Fountains in Nineteenth-Century European Narratives Sharon Mizbani Master of Arts Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations Department University of Toronto 2016 Abstract This thesis explores how developments in hydraulic technology and mentalities in Europe and the Ottoman Empire affected European depictions of Istanbul’s water system, particularly the fountain. This study advances our understanding of how the fountain came to be recognized by the late nineteenth century primarily for its artistic merit, and decontextualized from its role in the greater water network of the city. By comparing and analysing early nineteenth-century travelogues and news articles on fountains and water-systems to those from later on in the century, within the greater context of water history, we can uncover how these narratives were driven not only by “orientalizing” tendencies, but also a new, more hygienic focused “hydromentality.” This contextualization of European narratives lies less in asserting their reliability as testimony to the changes in Istanbul’s water system, but rather how their writings were a reflection of the changing attitudes and predilections of Europeans. ii Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to all my mentors at the University of Toronto, particularly my Supervisor, Professor Victor Ostapchuk. Thank you for your dedicated support and continued encouragement, and for introducing me to the world of proper formatting. I would also like to thank Professor Milena Methodieva and Professor James Reilly, who inspired my interest in Ottoman Studies, and showed me that I could always count on their support. Thank you to all my friends and peers in Canada and Turkey; I could not have imagined enduring such trying times without their constant love and friendship. Finally, I am extremely grateful to my husband, Erik Blackthorne O’Barr, for giving me the confidence to pursue my education, for his invaluable support in the conception of this research, and for his assistance throughout all stages of this project. This research was generously funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Turkish Community Scholarship, and Mary H. Beatty Fellowship. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................v 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction and Purpose of Research ................................................................................1 1.2 Literature Review .................................................................................................................3 1.3 Methodology and Primary Sources .....................................................................................5 2 Water History of Istanbul and the Emergence of Fountains ................................................7 2.1 Roman and Byzantine Contributions ...................................................................................7 2.1.1 European Narratives of Roman/Byzantine Contributions .....................................11 2.2 Early and Classical Ottoman Contributions to the Water System .....................................14 2.3 The Tulip Era and Water Networks in the Eighteenth Century and Beyond .....................25 3 European History and Narratives of Water Networks ........................................................34 3.1 European Water History ....................................................................................................34 3.2 Early Nineteenth-Century European Travellers and their Narratives ..............................40 3.3 Sanitation Movement in Europe .........................................................................................45 3.4 Levantines’ Engagement with European Hydromentality .................................................55 3.5 Private Water Companies in Istanbul ................................................................................64 3.6 The Changing Discourse of Fountains by European Travellers .......................................69 4 The Final Flow: Fountains as an Emblem of Ottomans ......................................................77 4.1 Post-Ottoman Cities’ Water Systems and Fountains .........................................................77 4.2 Nationalizing the Ottoman Fountain .................................................................................82 5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................90 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................92 Primary Sources ........................................................................................................................92 Secondary Sources ....................................................................................................................93 Figures..........................................................................................................................................100 iv List of Figures Figure 1: Su Terazisi Depicted by DeKay (DeKay, 1831) ......................................................... 100 Figure 2: The Fountain with Namazgah (Giulio, 1827) ............................................................. 101 Figure 3: View of Tophane Square and the Fountain of Sultan Mahmud I (Pardoe, 1838) ....... 102 Figure 4: Column Fountain, Tarabya 1831 (Open Source, 1921) .............................................. 103 Figure 5: Laleli Fountain (Brian McKee, 2015) ......................................................................... 104 Figure 6: The Opening Ceremony for Maçka Fountain (Open Source, 1902) ........................... 105 Figure 7: Hamidiye Yedikule Fountain (Open Source, Nineteenth/Early Twentieth Century) . 106 Figure 8: Sebil of Nuruosmaniye (Saglar Onay, 2009)............................................................... 107 v 1 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction and Purpose of Research “Among the objects which attract attention, as one moves through the streets, are the public fountains scattered over the city. They are found everywhere, and are often remarkable for their architectural beauty.”1 Alexander Van Millingen, a professor at Roberts College, wrote in his 1895 travel log about Istanbul’s water infrastructure and, in particular, the city's fountains. Interestingly, by the time he wrote his account in 1895, most of the city had, either in place or in active development, the infrastructure of privatized piped water. For Millingen, this modern technology was unbefitting his image of the Orient, and disrupted the romanticized narrative he wished to create. The fountain, on the other hand, was the perfect piece of oriental architecture that, as he says, “took one far back in the ways of the world.”2 Millingen was not alone among European travellers and observers of the Ottoman Empire to comment upon Istanbul’s fountains and water systems. In fact, the fountain was a constant figure in European representations of the Islamic world, and the Ottoman Empire in particular. Yet the image of the Ottoman fountain in European discourse did not remain static, and while certain themes were unchanging, as cities in the West came to be molded by discourses of sanitation, privatization, and industrialization, the fountain acquired additional connotations that reflected a new dichotomy between “east” and “west,” traditional and modern. As Edhem Eldem writes, this dichotomy is imagined in the context of cultural “success/failure” and by retrospectively projecting this distinction to the past, the discourse of modern versus traditional becomes formalized.3 The public fountain, once an emblem of Ottoman difference, and often a model for Europe, acquired throughout the nineteenth century the symbolic charges of picturesque decay, technological insufficiency, and resistance to modernity. These changes in the discourse did not arrive spontaneously, but were in fact actively promoted by and intertwined with the growing influence of European capital in the Ottoman 1 Alexander van Millingen, Constantinople Painted by Warwick Globe: Described by Alexander Van Millingen, (London: A&C Black, 1906), 217. 2 van Millingen, Constantinople Painted by Warwick Globe, 217-218. 3 Edhem Eldem, “Istanbul: from Imperial to Peripheralized Capital,” in The Ottoman City: Between East and West, Aleppo, Izmir and Istanbul, ed. Edhem Eldem et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 201. 2 Empire. The gradual obsolescence of the Ottoman fountain as a water delivery system worked to benefit certain local actors and foreign corporations, which both promoted, invested in, and profited from the construction