Rational Actions Associated to the Adjoint Representation

Rational Actions Associated to the Adjoint Representation

ANNALES SCIENTIFIQUES DE L’É.N.S. ERIC M. FRIEDLANDER BRIAN J. PARSHALL Rational actions associated to the adjoint representation Annales scientifiques de l’É.N.S. 4e série, tome 20, no 2 (1987), p. 215-226 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASENS_1987_4_20_2_215_0> © Gauthier-Villars (Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier), 1987, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales scientifiques de l’É.N.S. » (http://www. elsevier.com/locate/ansens) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systé- matique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fi- chier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ Ann. scient. EC. Norm. Sup., 46 serie, t. 20, 1987, p. 215 a 226. RATIONAL ACTIONS ASSOCIATED TO THE ADJOINT REPRESENTATION BY ERIC M. FRIEDLANDER (1), (2) AND BRIAN J. PARSHALL (1) In this paper we investigate the G-module structure of the universal enveloping algebra U(^) of the Lie algebra ^ of a simple algebraic group G, by relating its structure to that of the symmetric algebra S(^) on ^. We provide a similar analysis for the hyperalgebra hy(G) of G in positive characteristic. In each of these cases, the algebras involved are regarded as rational G-algebras by extending the adjoint action of G on ^ in the natural way. We prove the existence of a G-equivariant isomorphism of coalgebras U(^) ->S(^) in Section 1. (Our proof requires some restriction on the characteristic p of the base field fe.) This theorem, inspired by the very suggestive paper of Mil'ner [12], can be viewed as a G-equivariant Poincare-Birkhoff-Witt theorem. As a noteworthy conse- quence, this implies each short exact sequence 0->\J"~1 -)-U" -> S"(^) ->0 of rational G-modules is split. Then in Section 2, we provide an analogous identification (in positive characteristic) of the-hyperalgebras-of-Gand its infinitesimal kernels Gy in terms of divided power algebras on ^. _Motivated-by-the^main result of Section 1, we study in Sections 3 and 4 the invariants of S(^) [and of U(^)] under the actions of the infinitesimal kernels G,. c: G. For r= 1, Veldkamp [14] studied the invariants in U(^), regarded as the center of U(^). We adopt his methods and extend his results. We achieve this by considering the field of fractions of the G^-invariants of S(^) in Section 3. Our identification of S^)01- and \J(^)°r given in Section 4 has a form quite analogous to Veldkamp's description of the center of U(^). As we show in (4.5), this portrayal illustrates an interesting phenomenon concerning "good filtrations" (in the sense of Donkin [6]) of rational G-modules. The present paper has its origins in the authors' unsuccessful attempts to understand the proof of Mil'ner's main theorem in [12], which asserts the existence of a (filtration preserving) isomorphism U(^)-»S(^) of ^-modules for an arbitrary restricted Lie algebra ^. We are most grateful to Robert L. Wilson for providing us with the example following (1.4) below, which gives a counterexample to the key step in Mil'ner's argument ([12], Proposition 5). (1) Research supported in part by N.S.F. (2) The first author gratefully acknowledges the support of the Institute for Advanced Study. ANNALES SCIENTIFIQUES DE L'ECOLE NORMALE SUPERIEURE. - 0012-9593/87/02 215 12/$ 3.20/ © Gauthier-Villars 216 E. M. FRIEDLANDER AND B. J. PARSHALL 1. A G-invariant form of the P-B-W-theorem Let ^ be a Lie algebra over a field fe with universal enveloping algebra U(^). Recall that U(^) has a natural (increasing) filtration {U"}, where U" denotes the subspace of U(^) spanned by all products of at most n elements of ^. Also, U(^) carries the structure of a cocommutative Hopf algebra in which the elements of ^ are primitive for the comultiplication A: U (^) -^ U (^) 00 U (^). Note that each U" is actually a subcoalge- bra of U(^). The adjoint representation of ^ extends to an action of ^ on U(^) by derivations. If ^ is the Lie algebra of a linear algebraic group G, then the adjoint action of G on ^ defines in an evident way a rational action of G on U (^) by Hopf algebra automorphisms. If V is an arbitrary vector space over fe, the symmetric algebra S (V) on V carries a Hopf algebra structure in which the elements of V are primitive under the comultiplication A: S(V) -> S(V) (g) S(V). For n ^ 0, we denote by S^ "(V) the sum of the homogeneous components S^V) of S(V) with i ^ n. Note that {S^V)} is filtration of S(V) by subcoalgebras. In particular, we consider the Hopf algebra S(U(^)) based on the vector space U(^). The following result gives our interpretation (and strengthening) of Mil'ner's ([12], Proposition 1). (1.1) LEMMA. — There exists a coalgebra morphism (p: U(^S(U(^)) in \vhich (p|^ identifies mth the natural inclusion of^ c= U(^) into S1 (U (^)) =\J W and (p(Xi. .xj = (p(xi). .(p(x^) (modS^^OJ^))) for x^ . ., x^e^. The morphism (p is ^-equivariant for the adjoint action of ^ on U (^) and its extension (by derivations) to S(U(^)). Finally, (p 15 G-equivariant if<S=Lie(G) is the Lie algebra of a linear algebraic group G over fe. Proof, — If x={xi, ...,xJ is an ordered sequence of elements of ^, for I={;\ < . < fj c: N={1, . ., n} we set x^=x^ . x^eU(^). Consider the element TO=I^...^eS(U(^)), where the summation extends over all partitions I^ U . U Ijk of N into nonempty disjoint ordered subsets. (Each 1^ is an ordered subset of the ordered set N, whereas the different orderings of I^, . ., 1^ are not distinguished.) On the right hand side of the above expression, the product of the x^ is taken in S(U(^)). Thus, in S(U(^)), x^ has homogeneous degree 1, so that x^. x^ has homogeneous degree fe. In particular, the image of \|/(x) in S^ "(U(^))/S^ "^(U^)) is x^...x^. Suppose l^j<n and x^ i Xj = Xj Xj+1 + ^, for ^ e ^. Set y^{-^l» • • •? •^j'-l? •^j+l? -^/'s •^j"+2» • • •? -^nj and z={x^, . ., Xj-i? s» -^j+z? • • •? -^wj? 4" SERIE - TOME 20 - 1987 - N° 2 ADJOINT REPRESENTATION 217 and let P be the set of partitions of N in which j and 7+1 occur in the same ordered subset (which we index to be I^). Using the surjective order preserving map N—^N—1=={1, . ., n— 1} sending j and 7+1 to j to identify P with the set of partitions of N— 1, we conclude the equalities \|/(y)-\|/(x)=^(^-x^)^. .Xi,=^z^. .z^=\|/(z). p It follows from the definition of U(^) as a quotient of the tensor algebra based on ^ that \|/ defines a linear map (p: U(^) -^S(U(^)) by setting (p(l)=l and CP(XN) = (p(xi. .x^)=\|/(x) for any x=(x^, . ., ^). To see that cp is a coalgebra morphism, we note that for a sequence x={xi, . ., xj of elements in ^, we have ((p(g)(p)A(xi. .^)=((p(x)(p)(^Xi(x)xN\i)=^x^. .x^®x^. .x^. In this expression, I runs over all ordered subsets of the ordered set N, while the last summation runs over all such I and all partitions I^, . ., 1^ (respectively, J^, . ., J^) of such I (resp., N\I). (By convention, we set x^ = 1.) This term clearly equals A(p(xi. .^)=A(^XK,. .XK,). whence it follows that (p defines a coalgebra morphism. It is immediate, from its definition, that (p has the required equivariance properties. D Making use of this result, we easily obtain the following theorem, inspired by the main theorem of MiFner [12] [cf. remarks following (1.4) below]. (1.2) THEOREM. — Let ^ be a Lie algebra over a field k. There is a ^-equivariant, filtration preserving isomorphism of coalgebras P: U(^)-^S(^) if and only if the natural inclusion ^ cz U(^) splits relative to the adjoint action of^ on U(^). Furthermore, if^=Lie(G) is the Lie algebra of a linear algebraic group G, P can be taken to be G-equivariant if and only if the inclusion ^ c= U(^) splits as rational G- modules. When P exists, the associated graded map gr(P): gr(U(^)) -^gr(S(^)) ^ S(^) 15 an isomorphism of Hop f algebras. Proof. — If the isomorphism P exists, it maps ^ c U(^) isomorphically to ^=S1^) since ^ is the space of primitive elements contained in S^ 1 (^). It follows that ^ c: U(^) splits for ^ (or G if applicable). Conversely, assume that the inclusion ^ c U(^) splits for the action of ^ on U(^). Thus, there exists an equivariant projection p: U(^) -> ^ of ^-modules, which induces an equivariant morphism S(p): S(U(^)) -^S(^) of Hopf algebras. It follows that if (p is as in (1.1), then P=S(/?)°(p: U(^) ->S(^) is an equivariant, filtration preserving morphism of coalgebras. By (1.1), P induces an isomor- phism gr (P): IT/IT ~1 -> S ^ n (^)/S ^ n ~1 (^), so that P itself is necessarily an isomorphism. This establishes the first part of the theorem, while the second is obtained similarly, using (1.1). The final assertion follows from the property (p(Xi. xj = (p(xi). (p(xj (modS^-^U^Q^forcpasin^.l). Q ANNALES SCIENTIFIQUES DE L'ECOLE NORMALE SUPERIEURE 218 E. M. FRIEDLANDER AND B.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us