Effect of Diet on Creatinine Clearance and Excretion in Young and Elderly Healthy Subjects and in Patients with Renal Disease1’2

Effect of Diet on Creatinine Clearance and Excretion in Young and Elderly Healthy Subjects and in Patients with Renal Disease1’2

Effect of Diet on Creatinine Clearance and Excretion in Young and Elderly Healthy Subjects and in Patients with Renal Disease1’2 Susie Q. Lew3 and Juan P. Bosch sign of renal disease. A low creatinine clearance SQ. Lew, J.P. Bosch. Department of Medicine, Renal adjusted for urea nitrogen excretion may be a useful Division, George Washington University Medical Cen- clinical tool to assess renal function. ter, Washington, DC Key Words: Diet, creatinine clearance, urinary urea nitrogen, (J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1991; 2:856-865) protein intake, elderly S everal studies have demonstrated an important effect of diet on GFR (1-10). Acute and chronic ABSTRACT experiments in animals and humans have estab- Thirty-seven young healthy subjects with normal lished that an acute increase in protein intake in- renal function were studied to assess the quantitative duces a rapid and transient surge in GFR (1-13). effect of protein intake on creatinine clearance. A These studies were conducted to establish a cause standard 24-h urine collection and blood sample at and effect between protein intake and creatinine the end of the collection were obtained for creati- clearance in healthy subjects. A quantitative rela- nine and urea concentrations. Correlations between tionship between these two variables has not been creatinine clearance and urinary urea nitrogen ex- proposed as yet. The degree of functional impairment of the kidney has traditionally been based on GFR. It cretion (r= 0.8; P< 0.0001) and calculated protein has been assumed that a low GFR represents paren- Intake (1= 0.8; P< 0.000 1) were observed. A signifi- chymal damage, and, over a period of time, there is cant relationship between creatinine clearance and further reduction in GFR. Inulin and iothalamate urea nitrogen excretion was also demonstrated in 28 clearances or. more practically, the endogenous cre- elderly healthy subjects and 33 patients with renal atinine clearance have been used to measure GFR disease. To demonstrate a cause and effect be- (14-20). Because diet is variable from day to day and tween urea nitrogen excretion and creatinine clear- from subject to subject, should the measured GFR be ance in healthy subjects, 18 of the 37 healthy sub- controlled for protein intake? jects repeated the 24-h urine collection and blood Diet has also been shown to influence creatinine sample after ingesting 5g of urea in addition to their excretion. Approximately 10% of daily urinary cre- usual diet. Mean urinary urea nitrogen excretion in- atinine excretion is of exogenous origin (6). Long- term low-protein consumers, such as vegetarians, creased from a mean value of 9.8 ± 4.0 to 11.8 ± have urinary creatinine excretion that is lower than 4.0 g/day. There was a strong correlation between the 10% allowed for exclusion of exogenous creati- the changes in urea nitrogen excretion and the nine sources (6). Plasma creatinine and its reciprocal changes in creatinine clearance. In acute studies value (2 1-23) are dependent on a constant urinary with oral protein loading, there was a significant creatinine excretion rate for consistent interpreta- correlation between creatinine clearance and uri- tion when used to assess renal function or to follow nary urea nitrogen excretion. It was concluded that the progression of renal disease. The manner in protein Intake has a direct and quantitative effect which dietary changes Interfere with urinary creati- on creatinine clearance in healthy subjects. In nor- nine excretion, especially In the face of acute dietary mal humans, ills likely that GFR is not a fixed function. changes, renders the validity of such indirect param- Thus, a low crealinine clearance is nota categorical eters to assess GFR uncertain. In this study, the relationship between urinary urea nitrogen excretion, as an indicator of protein ReceIved November 6. 1990. Accepted May 16. 1991. Intake, and creatinine clearance was determined in 2 Th. study was presented in part at the XXth Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology in Washington. DC. in December 1987. young and elderly healthy subjects and patients with Correspondence to Dr. SQ. Lew, George Washington University, 2150 Penn- renal disease. The concept of GFR that emerges from Sylvania Avenue, NW. #4-425. Washington. DC 20037. these studies is quite contrary to traditional views. 1046-6673/0204-0856$03.0O/0 We propose that GE’R: (1) is not a fixed function, (2) Journal ot the Ameflcan Society of Nephroiogy Copyright C 1991 by the American society of Nephrology changes over time, and (3) is not necessarily synon- 856 Volume 2’ Number 4’ 1991 Lew and Bosch ymous with renal disease when a low value is ob- Acute Protein Loading Studies with Inulin tained. Clearance Twelve subjects (five young healthy subjects and MATERIAL AND METHODS seven patients with renal disease) had simultaneous Study Population measurements of inulin and creatinine clearances and urinary urea excretion during 30-mm intervals Young Healthy Subjects. Thirty-seven healthy before and after an acute oral protein load of 70 to subjects under the age of 50 were studied. Their renal 80 g of cooked red meat. The priming injection of function was normal as determined by the absence inulin was calculated as 60 mg/kg body wt. A third of a history of renal disease, the presence of a normal of this dose was infused rapidly, and the remainder urinalysis, urinary protein excretion less than 100 was infused ove’r 20 mm. The sustaining infusion mg/24 h, and a normal blood pressure. A wide range was started shortly after the priming infusion and of protein intake was studied In these subjects. Eight- delivered at a rate of 33 mg/mm by using an infusion een subjects called themselves “vegetarians” (includ- pump. Sterile pyrogen-free inulin was used (Ameri- ing lacto-ova vegetarians); 8 subjects were on a vol- can Critical Care, Decatur, Illinois). Plasma and urine untary low-protein diet (0.6 to 0.8 g/kg/day); 11 sub- insulin concentrations were measured by the method jects were on an ad libitum diet. All individuals were described by Wesson (26). on their diets for at least 6 months before the onset of the study (Table 1). Elderly Healthy Subjects. Twenty-eight elderly lothalamate Clearance Studies subjects with a mean age of 70,2 (55 to 88) yr of age GFR in 33 patients with renal disease was assessed were studied. In these subjects, the absence of renal both by a standard 24-h creatinine clearance and by disease was determined by the same criteria as out- a timed [‘25ljlothalamate clearance (27). In the latter, lined above (Table 2). after the subjects received a water load and a satu- Patients with Renal Disease. Thirty-three subjects rated solution of potassium iodine, they were given a with known renal disease were studied. The mean sc injection of 0.035 mCi of Glofil#{174}. After 60 to 90- age of these subjects was 45.6 (22 to 66) yr of age. mm, timed collections of urine and serum were ob- Renal disease was from a variety of causes (Table 3). tained. GFR was equal to the urinary clearance of the marker. Methods Data are reported as mean ± SD. Statistical analy- A standard 24-h urine collection was obtained and sis, correlation coefficient, and paired and unpaired assayed for volume and creatinine, protein, and urea t test were performed by using a computerized pro- nitrogen concentrations. A blood sample was ob- gram (Stat View 512 +; Brain Power, Calabasas. CA). tained at the completion of the urine collection, and Significance was assumed when P < 0.05. the serum was assayed for urea nitrogen and creati- nine concentrations. The patients’ weight and height RESULTS were also recorded. Creatinine concentration was de- termined by an alkaline picrate method and was Figure 1 (left panel) depicts the relationship be- measured by a Technicon RA- 1000. Urea nitrogen tween urea nitrogen excretion and creatinine clear- concentration was measured with a Kodak Ektachem ance in the 37 young healthy subjects. A significant 700. Urine protein concentration was determined by correlation between these two parameters was dem- a modified trichloroacetic acid method by using a onstrated (r = 0.8; P < 0.000 1). The wide range of turbimeter. Microalbuminuria was measured by an urea nitrogen excretion observed (from 2.0 to 17.0 g/ ELISA method. In some patients (Table 2) protein day) was the result of diet variation in the study excretion was determined with a Dipstick#{174}. population. Figure 1 (right panel) shows the same Protein intake was calculated from urea nitrogen data as the left panel of Figure 1 with the calculated appearance rate by the following equation (24,25). protein intake on the x axis (r = 0.8; P < 0.000 1). A significant number of these subjects was ingesting Estimated protein intake (g/kg/day) = 6.25 x less than the daily recommended amount of protein (urinary urea nitrogen excretion Ig/kg24 hr] + without apparent nutritional deficits. The current 0.031) recommended daily allowance of protein is 0.8 g/kg/ day (28). It is of interest that a protein intake of 1.3 Urea Loading Studies: g/kg/day corresponds to a creatinine clearance of Eighteen of the young healthy subjects repeated 120 mL/min/1 .73 m2 (Figure 1, right panel). Probably the 24-h urine collection on a day in which 5 g of 1.2 to 1.4 g/kg/day of dietary protein represents the urea was ingested between 8 a.m. and noon in addi- average protein intake in developed countries, tion to their usual diet. thereby the accepted “normal value” for creatinine Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 857 Effect of Diet on Creafinine Clearance and Excretion TABLE 1.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us