Stock Assessment of Vermilion Snapper off the Southeastern United States SEDAR Update Assessment Southeast Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service Report issued: October 2012 September 2012 South Atlantic Vermilion Snapper Contents 1 Executive Summary 7 2 Data Review and Update 8 2.1 Data Review . 8 2.2 Data Update . 8 3 Stock Assessment Methods 9 3.1 Overview .................................................... 9 3.2 Data Sources .................................................. 9 3.3 Model Configuration and Equations ..................................... 10 3.4 Parameters Estimated ............................................. 14 3.5 Per Recruit and Equilibrium Analyses .................................... 14 3.6 Benchmark/Reference Point Methods ................................... 15 3.7 Uncertainty and Measures of Precision ................................... 15 3.7.1 Bootstrap of observed data ..................................... 16 3.7.2 Monte Carlo sampling ......................................... 17 3.8 Projections|Probabilistic Analysis ..................................... 17 3.8.1 Initialization of projections ...................................... 18 3.8.2 Uncertainty of projections ...................................... 18 4 Stock Assessment Results 19 4.1 Measures of Overall Model Fit ........................................ 19 4.2 Parameter Estimates ............................................. 19 4.3 Stock Abundance and Recruitment ..................................... 19 4.4 Total and Spawning Biomass ......................................... 19 4.5 Selectivity .................................................... 19 4.6 Fishing Mortality, Landings, and Discards ................................. 20 4.7 Spawner-Recruitment Parameters ...................................... 20 4.8 Per Recruit and Equilibrium Analyses .................................... 20 4.9 Benchmarks / Reference Points ....................................... 20 4.10 Status of the Stock and Fishery ....................................... 21 4.10.1 Comparison to previous assessment ................................. 21 4.11 Sensitivity Analyses .............................................. 21 4.12 Projections|Probabilistic Analysis ..................................... 21 SEDAR 17 Update 2 Assessment Update Report September 2012 South Atlantic Vermilion Snapper 5 Discussion 22 5.1 Comments on the Assessment ........................................ 22 5.2 Comments on the Projections ........................................ 23 6 References 24 7 Tables 27 8 Figures 44 Appendices 106 A Abbreviations and Symbols 106 B BAM Parameter Estimates 107 SEDAR 17 Update 3 Assessment Update Report September 2012 South Atlantic Vermilion Snapper List of Tables 1 Life-history characteristics at age . 28 2 Observed time series of landings and discards . 29 3 Observed time series of indices of abundance . 30 4 Observed sample sizes of length and age compositions . 31 5 Estimated total abundance at age (1000 fish) . 32 6 Estimated biomass at age (1000 lb) . 33 7 Estimated time series of status indicators, fishing mortality, and biomass . 34 8 Selectivities by survey or fleet . 35 9 Estimated time series of fully selected fishing mortality rates by fleet . 36 10 Estimated time series of landings in numbers (1000 fish) . 37 11 Estimated time series of landings in whole weight (1000 lb) . 38 12 Estimated time series of discard mortalities in numbers (1000 fish) . 39 13 Estimated time series of discard mortalities in whole weight (1000 lb) . 40 14 Estimated status indicators and benchmarks . 41 15 Results from sensitivity runs . 42 16 Projection with P ? = 0:275 ........................................... 43 17 Projection with P ? = 0:5 ............................................ 43 SEDAR 17 Update 4 Assessment Update Report September 2012 South Atlantic Vermilion Snapper List of Figures 1 Length at age . 45 2 Observed and estimated annual length and age compositions . 46 3 Observed and estimated landings: Commercial handline . 60 4 Observed and estimated landings: Commercial historic trawl . 61 5 Observed and estimated landings: Commercial combined gears . 62 6 Observed and estimated landings: Headboat . 63 7 Observed and estimated landings: General recreational . 64 8 Observed and estimated discard mortalities: Commercial handline . 65 9 Observed and estimated discard mortalities: Headboat . 66 10 Observed and estimated discard mortalities: General recreational . 67 11 Observed and estimated index of abundance: MARMAP Florida snapper trap . 68 12 Observed and estimated index of abundance: MARMAP chevron trap . 69 13 Observed and estimated index of abundance: Commercial handline . 70 14 Observed and estimated index of abundance: Headboat . 71 15 Observed and estimated index of abundance: General recreational . 72 16 Estimated annual abundance at age . 73 17 Estimated time series of recruitment . 74 18 Estimated annual biomass at age . 75 19 Estimated time series of total biomass and spawning stock . 76 20 Selectivities of MARMAP gears . 77 21 Selectivities of commercial handline fleet . 78 22 Selectivities of commercial historic trawl fleet . 79 23 Selectivities of commercial combined gears fleet . 80 24 Selectivities of headboat fleet . 81 25 Selectivities of general recreational fleet . 82 26 Selectivities of commercial handline discards . 83 27 Selectivities of headboat and general recreational discards . 84 28 Average selectivities from the terminal assessment years . 85 29 Estimated fully selected fishing mortality rates by fleet . 86 SEDAR 17 Update 5 Assessment Update Report September 2012 South Atlantic Vermilion Snapper 30 Estimated landings in numbers by fleet . 87 31 Estimated landings in whole weight by fleet . 88 32 Estimated discard mortalities by fleet . 89 33 Spawner-recruit curves . 90 34 Probability densities of spawner-recruit quantities: R0, steepness, unfished spawners per recruit, and stan- dard deviation of recruitment residuals . 91 35 Estimated time series of static spawning potential ratio . 92 36 Yield per recruit and spawning potential ratio . 93 37 Equilibrium landings and spawning stock as functions of fishing mortality . 94 38 Equilibrium landings and discards as functions of biomass . 95 39 Probability densities of MSY-related benchmarks . 96 40 Estimated time series relative to benchmarks . 97 41 Probability densities of terminal status estimates . 98 42 Phase plots of terminal status estimates . 99 43 Age structure relative to the equilibrium expected at MSY .......................... 100 44 Comparison to previous assessment: Estimated time series of stock and fishery status . 101 45 Sensitivity to steepness and data component weights (Sensitivity runs S1 and S2) . 102 46 Sensitivity to the terminal year of fishery dependent indices of abundance (Sensitivity run S3) . 103 47 Sensitivity to trend in fishery dependent catchability (Sensitivity run S4) . 104 48 Phase plot of terminal status estimates from sensitivity runs . 105 SEDAR 17 Update 6 Assessment Update Report September 2012 South Atlantic Vermilion Snapper 1 Executive Summary This update assessment evaluated the stock of vermilion snapper Rhomboplites aurorubens off the southeastern United States1. The primary objectives of this assessment were to update the 2008 SEDAR-17 benchmark assessment of vermilion snapper and to conduct fresh stock projections. Data compilation and assessment methods were guided by methods used in SEDAR-17. The benchmark assessment included data through 2007, updated here through 2011. This assessment was conducted by the Southeast Fisheries Science Center in cooperation with regional data providers. Available data on this stock included indices of abundance, landings, discards, and samples of annual length and age compositions from fishery dependent and fishery independent sources. Five indices of abundance were fitted by the model: one from the NMFS headboat survey, one from general recreational data, one from commercial logbooks (handline), and two fishery-independent indices from MARMAP data. Landings and discards data were available from recreational and commercial fleets. The primary model used in SEDAR-17|and updated here|was the Beaufort Assessment Model (BAM), a statistical catch-age formulation. A base run of BAM was configured to provide estimates of key management quantities, such as stock and fishery status. Uncertainty in estimates from the base run was evaluated through a mixed Monte Carlo/Bootstrap (MCB) procedure. Results suggest that spawning stock has generally declined throughout the full assessment period (1946{2011). The terminal (2011) estimate of spawning stock is the lowest value of the time series, slightly below SSBMSY (SSB2011=SSBMSY =0.98), but still above MSST (SSB2011=MSST =1.26), using the Council's definition of MSST as (1 − M)SSBMSY. The estimated fishing rate has exceeded the MFMT (represented by FMSY) only rarely, and never since 1992. The terminal estimate is below FMSY (F2009−2011=FMSY = 0:67). Thus, this assessment indicates that the stock is not overfished, nor is it experiencing overfishing. These status indicators may be in qualitative agreement with management goals, but should be interpreted with two notes of caution. First, the MCB analysis indicated much uncertainty in these estimates of stock and fishery status. Second, estimated trends of decreasing biomass and (slowly) increasing F go in the wrong direction for the status indicators to hold indefinitely. The estimated trends of this update assessment are quite