Anuran Radiations and the Evolution of Tadpole Morphospace

Anuran Radiations and the Evolution of Tadpole Morphospace

Anuran radiations and the evolution of tadpole morphospace Kim Roelantsa,1, Alexander Haasb, and Franky Bossuyta aUnit of Ecology and Systematics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium; and bBiozentrum Grindel und Zoologisches Museum, Universität Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany Edited by David B. Wake, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved April 19, 2011 (received for review January 13, 2011) Anurans (frogs and toads) are unique among land vertebrates in ages in the Late Cretaceous/Early Tertiary, for example, marked possessing a free-living larval stage that, parallel to adult frogs, the origin of today’s largest and most diverse neobatrachian diversified into an impressive range of ecomorphs. The tempo and clades, which in recent taxonomic revisions (14, 21), are defined mode at which tadpole morphology evolved through anuran as Nobleobatrachia [also known as Hyloidea in previous studies history as well as its relationship to lineage diversification remain (11, 13, 16), including (among others) Bufonidae, Dendrobatidae, elusive. We used a molecular phylogenetic framework to examine Hylidae, and Leptodactylidae], Afrobatrachia (containing Arthro- patterns of morphological evolution in tadpoles in light of observed leptidae, Hemisotidae, and Hyperoliidae), Microhyloidea [Micro- episodes of accelerated lineage diversification. Our reconstructions hylidae sensu (13–16, 22)], and Natatanura [Ranidae sensu (13–16, show that the expansion of tadpole morphospace during the basal 22)]. If these lineages indeed took opportunistic advantage of anuran radiation in the Triassic/Early Jurassic was unparalleled by ecological niche availability during periods of ecological change, the basal neobatrachian radiation in the Late Jurassic/Early Creta- we would expect intensified morphological evolution correspond- ceous or any subsequent radiation in the Late Cretaceous/Early ing with instances of increased lineage diversification. Tertiary. Comparative analyses of radiation episodes indicate that There is an alternative indication, however, that larval mor- the slowdown of morphospace expansion was caused not only by phological diversity has been largely determined by an early dif- a drop in evolutionary rate after the basal anuran radiation but ferentiation into basic trophic niches. In the 1950s, Orton (23, 24) also by an overall increase in homoplasy in the characters that defined four basic free-living tadpole morphotypes (numbered I– did evolve during later radiations. The overlapping sets of evolving IV) differing mainly by oral and opercular architecture and spiracle characters among more recent radiations may have enhanced position. Morphotype I [Xenoanura, including Pipidae and Rhi- tadpole diversity by creating unique combinations of homoplastic nophrynidae (14)] and morphotype II (most Microhyloidea) lack traits, but the lack of innovative character changes prevented the keratinized mouthparts and primarily feed on suspended (plank- exploration of fundamental regions in morphospace. These com- tonic) food particles. Morphotype III [Ascaphus and all known plex patterns transcend the four traditionally recognized tadpole larvae of Costata, including Alytes, Bombina,andDiscoglossus (14)] morphotypes and apply to most tissue types and body parts. and morphotype IV [Anomocoela, including Megophryidae, Pelo- dytidae, Pelobatidae, and Scaphiopodidae (14), and most Neo- key feature that distinguishes anurans from any other living batrachia except most Microhyloidea] have keratinized mouthparts Aland vertebrate is a biphasic life history in which larval (tad- adapted to scrape food particles from substrate. The four mor- pole) and adult (frog) stages are characterized by strikingly dif- photypes arguably present an oversimplified picture of the extant ferent body plans (1, 2). Because the anuran tadpole is “essentially tadpole diversity (8, 25), but the fact that three of them (I, III, and a free living embryo” (3) adapted to feed, respirate, move, and IV) characterize early-diverged lineages may indicate a basal period avoid predation while undergoing drastic developmental changes, of intense morphological innovation. it provides a unique vertebrate model to investigate the evolu- Here, we reconstruct the history of anuran tadpole morpho- tionary interaction between ontogenesis and ecology. Parallel to space by mapping evolutionary changes in a comprehensive set of adult frogs, tadpoles diversified into a wide range of aquatic and larval characters on a molecular scaffold tree inferred by in- semiterrestrial habitats, and now, they constitute a wide diversity of tegrating previous phylogenetic information with multigene ecomorphs worldwide (4). Insights in the morphological diversifi- analyses. To investigate observed morphospace patterns in light cation of the larval body plan are compromised by the paucity of of the phylogenetic diversification of frogs, we compare evolu- the anuran fossil record and the long-term absence of a robust tionary rates and levels of homoplasy across successive and par- consensus for anuran phylogeny. The former is particularly true allel anuran radiations. Our analyses illustrate how distinct for tadpoles, because their generally small sizes and incompletely anuran radiation events differentially affected tadpole diversity ossified skeletons reduce the chance of fossilization (1, 5). The and reveal a long-term pattern that cannot be explained in terms latter was enhanced by the fact that evolutionary studies of larval of cladogenesis alone. morphological characters made use of conflicting phylogenetic hypotheses, some of which were inferred from the very same lar- Results val characters (6–10). Recent molecular studies using different Evolution of Anuran Larval Morphospace. We reanalyzed the data- data sources and methods have converged on very similar phylo- set by Haas (26), which includes 131 discrete characters sampled genetic hypotheses for Anura (11–18). Together, they provide across the major tissue types and body parts of tadpoles. Sam- a consensus tree that allows us to explore patterns of morpholog- pled taxa represent the major anuran lineages and cover a broad ical variation among extant tadpoles with unprecedented accuracy and detail. One evolutionary scenario that seems plausible from an eco- Author contributions: K.R. and F.B. designed research; K.R. and A.H. performed research; logical perspective is that the morphological diversity of tadpoles K.R. analyzed data; and K.R., A.H., and F.B. wrote the paper. increased mostly during periods of adaptive radiation (19). Re- The authors declare no conflict of interest. cent molecular studies have shown that the rise of the anuran This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. order was episodic and that the radiation of several lineages co- 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. EVOLUTION incided with periods of global environmental change and biotic This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. turnover (13, 15, 20). The radiation of four neobatrachian line- 1073/pnas.1100633108/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1100633108 PNAS | May 24, 2011 | vol. 108 | no. 21 | 8731–8736 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 ecological diversity (26). The evolution of larval characters was these domains were invaded during the basal anuran radiation in reconstructed by constraining maximum parsimony (DELTRAN the Triassic and Early Jurassic (green branches in Fig. 1B) and and ACCTRAN optimization) and Bayesian analyses with a mo- locally explored during later radiation episodes. A notable ex- lecular scaffold tree (Methods, SI Methods,andFig. S1). Because ception is the domain invaded by the stem lineage of Micro- the results were very similar for any reconstruction method, we only hyloidea, which represented a major additional morphospace report on the DELTRAN-inferred patterns. The molecular scaf- extension in the Late Cretaceous. These domains are largely fold tree is composed of clades that received high support by congruent with the taxonomic distribution of the four tadpole maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrapping and Bayesian analyses of morphotypes described by Orton (8, 23–26). Additionally, several 5 mitochondrial and 12 nuclear genes (Dataset S1) and clades that anuran clades, whose tadpoles are classified as Orton’s morpho- were consistently recovered by previous molecular studies (Figs. S2 type IV (Anomocoela, Nobleobatrachia, Natatanura, and Afro- and S3). Bayesian relaxed clock analyses of the multigene dataset batrachia), occupy contiguous or even overlapping regions in are congruent with previous studies (13, 15, 16, 27) and support morphospace. Together, these clades are estimated to contain anuran radiation episodes in the Triassic/Early Jurassic (basal an- over 80% of modern anuran species (22), implying that the ma- uran radiation), Late Jurassic/Early Cretaceous (basal neobatrachian jority of extant tadpoles are concentrated in a relatively small part radiation), and Late Cretaceous/Early Tertiary (Afrobatrachia, of morphospace. Microhyloidea, Natatanura, and Nobleobatrachia) (Fig. 1A, Fig. S4, and Table S1). The younger age estimates for early anuran Patterns of Evolutionary Rate. The multidirectional morphospace divergences produced by two recent studies (17, 20) are unlikely expansion during the basal anuran radiation followed by more lo- to alter the implications of our morphological analyses. calized morphospace exploration during

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us