Dam Mitigation Reference List

Dam Mitigation Reference List

A Strategy for Removing or Mitigating Dams in New York State and Lessons Learned in the Upper Susquehanna Watershed Appendix E APPENDIX E Dam Removal/Mitigation References This list was developed from a bibliography compiled by American Rivers (black) and references added by USFWS (blue). Aadland, LP, TM Koel, WG Franzen, KW Stewart and P Nelson. 2005. Changes in Fish Assemblage Structure of the Red River of the North. Am. Fisheries Soc. 45: 293-321. Ahearn, DS and RA Dahlgren. 2005. Sediment and Nutrient Dynamics Following Low Head Dam Removal at Murphy Creek, CA. Limnology and Oceanography 50(6): 1752-1762. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 2005. A Summary of Existing Research on Low-Head Dam Removal Projects. Prepared by ICF Consulting, 33 Hayden Ave., Lexington, MA. 77 pp. American Rivers, Friends of the Earth, Trout Unlimited. 1999. Dam Removal Success Stories, Restoring Rivers Through Selective Removal of Dams that Don't Make Sense. American Rivers. 2000. Paying for Dam Removal, A Guide to Selected Funding Sources. American Rivers, 1025 Vermont Avenue, Suite 720, Washington, D.C. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 1997. Task Committee on Guidelines for Retirement of Dams and Hydroelectric Facilities of the Hydropower Committee of the Energy Division of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Guidelines for Retirement of Dams and Hydroelectric Facilities. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY. Anderson, JD. 1991. Predicted Fluvial Response to Dam Removal in the Kalamazoo River Valley, Michigan. Hydraulic Engineering: Proceedings of the 1991 National Conference. Nashville, TN. 686-691. Arnould, M. 1997. Loire Dams to be Dismantled for Salmon. World Rivers Review. International Rivers Network: Vol. 12(4): 10. Austin, RJ. 1998. Reaching the End of the Road. International Water Power and Dam Construction. 50(1):25-27. A Strategy for Removing or Mitigating Dams in New York State and Lessons Learned in the Upper Susquehanna Watershed Appendix E Babbit, B. 2002. What Goes Up May Come Down. Bioscience 52(8). Bartholow, JM, SG Campbell and M Flug. 2004. Predicting the Thermal Effects of Dam Removal on the Klamath River. Environmental Management, 2004 Dec, 34(6):856-74 Battige, DS, BL Fields and DL Sowers. 1997. Removal of Stronach Dam. Proceedings of the International Conference on Hydropower. Part 2 (of 3) Aug 5- 8. Atlanta, GA. 2:1341-1350. Baxter, RM. 1977. Environmental Effects of Dams and Impoundments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 8:255-283. Beasley, CA and JE Hightower. 1998. Effects of the Quaker Neck Dam on the Distribution and Characteristics of Spawning Habitat Selected by Striped Bass and American Shad in the Neuse River, North Carolina. Final Report to the Marine Fisheries Commission. Beck, RW, Inc. May 1998. Condit Hydroelectric Project Removal: Summary Report, Engineering Considerations. To Pacificorp. Draft. Bednarek, AT. 2001. Un-damming Rivers: A Review of the Ecological Impacts of Dam Removal. Environmental Management 27(6):803-814. Berkamp, G., M McCartney, P Dugan, J McNeely and M Acreman. 2000. Dams, Ecosystem Functions and Environmental Restoration Thematic Review II.1 prepared as an input to the World Commission on Dams,Cape Town, www.dams.org. Bevelhimer, M., V Alavian, B Miller and G Hauser. 1997. Modeling Thermal Effects of Operational and Structural Modifications at a Hydropower Facility on a Premiere Trout Stream in Southwestern Montana. Proceedings of the International Conference on Hydropower-Waterpower. 1:40-49. Bigford, TE . 2004. AFS Draft Study Report and Policy Statement on Dam Removal. Fisheries Vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 34-35. Jul 2004. Blumm, MC, LJ Lucas, DB Miller, DJ Rohlf and GH Spain. 1998. Saving Snake River Water and Salmon Simultaneously: the Biological, Economic, and Legal Case for Breaching the Lower Snake River Dams, Lowering John Day Reservoir, and Restoring Natural River Flows. Environmental Law (Portland) [Environ. Law (Portland)]. Vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 997-1054. Born, SM, TL Filbert, KD Genskow, N Hernandez-Mora, ML Keefer and KA White. 1996. The Removal of Small Dams: An Institutional Analysis of the A Strategy for Removing or Mitigating Dams in New York State and Lessons Learned in the Upper Susquehanna Watershed Appendix E Wisconsin Experience. Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Wisconsin-Madison/Extension. Extension Report 896-1, 52 pp. Born, SM, KD Genskow, TL Filbert, N Hernandez-Mora, ML Keefer and KA White. 1998. Socioeconomic and Institutional Dimensions of Dam Removals: The Wisconsin Experience. Environmental Management. Vol. 22(3): 359-370. Bowman, M. 1996. River Renewal: Restoring Rivers through Hydropower Dam Relicensing. American Rivers; Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program; National Park Service. Washington, DC. Bowman, M. 2001. Legal Perspectives on Dam Removal. Presented at the Ecological Society of America Dam Removal Symposium, August 10, 2001. Also BioScience 52(8). Brick, C. 2003. Preliminary Groundwater Modeling To Estimate Effects of Dam and Sediment Removal on the Alluvial Aquifer in Milltown, Montana. Clark Fork Coalition 24p. Bureau of Reclamation. 1996. Geologic Design Data Report for Removal of Elwha Dam. Elwha Technical Series PN-95-6.Boise, Idaho. 51p. Bureau of Reclamation, Lower Colorado Region, Boulder City, Nevada. 1995. Rindge Dam Removal Study: An Effort to Reduce the Decline of the Malibu Creek Steelhead Trout Population in Southern California. Appraisal Report. To California Department of Fish and Game. Bushaw-Newton, KL, JT Ashley and DJ Velinsky. 2005. Assessing Ecological Effects of a Proposed Dam Removal. Hydro Review, May 2005. Bushaw-Newton, KL, DD Hart, JE Pizzuto, JR Thomson, J Egan, JT Ashley, TE Johnson, RJ Horwitz, M Keeley, J Lawrence, D Charles, C Gatenby, DA Kreeger and T Nightengale, et al. 2002. An Integrative Approach Towards Understanding Ecological Responses to Dam Removal: The Manatawny Creek study. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38 (6): 1581-1599. Cantelli, A, C Paola and G Parker. 2004. Experiments on Upstream-migrating Erosion Narrowing and Widening of an Incisional Channel Caused by Dam Removal. Water Resources Research, vol. 40, no. 3, 12 pp., [URL:http://www.agu.org/journals/wr/]. Casper, AT, JH Thorp, SP Davies and DL Courtemanch. 2001. Initial Response of Benthic Primary Consumers to Dam Removal in the Kennebec River, ME. Bull. North American Benthological Society 18:177. A Strategy for Removing or Mitigating Dams in New York State and Lessons Learned in the Upper Susquehanna Watershed Appendix E Chang, F. 2005. Sediment Transport and Channel Adjustment Associated with Dam Removal. Dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Chatterjee, P. 1997. Dam Busting. New Scientist. Pg. 34-37. Cui Y., TE Lisle, JE Pizzuto and G Parker. 1998. Experiments on Sediment Pulses in Mountain Rivers. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 79(45):F304. [abstract on Forest Service web page]. Cui, Y, C Braudrich, WC Diefrich, B Cluer and G Parker. 2003. Dam Removal Express Assessment Models (DREAM). J. Hydraulic Research. Collie, J, S Saila, C Walters, S Carpenter, CC Mann and ML Plummer. 2000. Of Salmon and Dams. Science. 3 November 2000: 933-934. Collier, M., RJ Webb and JC Schmidt. 1996. Dams and Rivers: A Primer on the Downstream Effects of Dams. US Geological Survey, Circular 1126. 94 pp. Dadswell, MJ. 1996. The Removal of Edwards Dam, Kennebec River, Maine: Its Effects on the Restoration of Anadromous Fishes. Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Kennebec River, Maine, Appendices 1-3. Dalal, MS and JL Florsheim. 2004. Monitoring Channel Initiation in Sediment Formerly Impounded Upstream of a Small Dam Removed on Murphy Creek, San Joaquin County, CA. Geological Society of America, 2004 annual meeting, Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 285, Nov 2004. Dambacher, JM, PA Rossignol, HW Li, JM. Emlen, P Kareiva, M Marvier and M McClure (2001). Dam Breaching and Chinook Salmon Recovery. Science 291: 939a-939. Department of the Interior. 1987. Environmental Assessments and Addendums, Electric Distribution System Replacement and Cascade Dam Removal. Yosemite National Park, CA. 24p. Department of the Interior. 1987. Environmental Assessment, Upper Dam Removal, Lost Man Creek. Redwood National Park. 28p. Department of the Interior. 1994. Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration. Draft Environmental Impact Statement. NPS D-253. Department of the Interior. 1995. Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration. Final Environmental Impact Statement. NPS D-253A. A Strategy for Removing or Mitigating Dams in New York State and Lessons Learned in the Upper Susquehanna Watershed Appendix E Department of the Interior. 1996. Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Implementation. Draft Environmental Impact Statement. NPS D-271. Department of the Interior. 1996. Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Implementation. Final Environmental Impact Statement. NPS D-271A. Department of the Interior. May 1996. Removal of Elwha and Glines Canyon Dams. Elwha Technical Series PN-95-7. Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Project, Washington, Bureau of Reclamation, Pacific Northwest Region, Boise, ID. Department of the Interior. October 1996. Sediment Analysis and Modeling of the River Erosion Alternative. Elwha Technical Series PN-95-9. National Park Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Boise, ID. Department of the Interior, Department of Commerce, Lower Elwha S’Klallam Tribe. September 1993. The Elwha Report:

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    19 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us