Download PDF (57.4

Download PDF (57.4

JOBNAME: Booton PAGE: 1 SESS: 4 OUTPUT: Tue May 9 09:51:56 2017 Table of cases Abbott Laboratories Ltd v Evysio Medical Devices UCL [2008] EWHC 800 (Ch) ............................................................................................................ 225 Acorn Computers v MCS Microcomputer Systems (1985) 4 IPR 214 (Federal Court ofAustralia) ................................................................................................. 74 Actavis Ltd v Eli Lilly and Co [2015] EWHC 3294 (Pat) .................................... 225 Actavis Ltd v Merck & Co Inc [2008] EWCA Civ 444 ........................................ 128 Actavis Ltd v Novartis AG [2010] EWCA Civ 82 ................................................ 133 Adam Opel AG v Autec AG (C-48/05) [2007] ETMR 33 ..... 234, 235, 238, 239, 240, 241, 247 Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd and Macrossan’s Application [2006] EWCA Civ 1371 ............................................................... 70, 126, 129, 132, 134, 139, 140 Aerotel Ltd v Wavecrest Group Enterprises Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 408 ............. 226 A-G v Guardian Newspapers (No. 2) [1990] 1AC 109 ....................................... 113 Allmanna Svenska Elektriska A/B v The Burntisland Shipbuilding Co Ltd (1952) 69 RPC 63 ......................................................................................................... 34 American Cyanamid Co (Dann’s) Patent [1971] RPC 425 ................................. 135 American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975]AC 396 .................................... 84, 87 Anheuser-Busch v Budejovický Budvar,Národní Podnik (C-245/02) [2005] ETMR 27 ........................................................................................... 240, 242 Antiquesportfolio.com Plc v Rodney Fitch & Co Ltd [2001] FSR 23 .................. 201 Apimed Medical Honey Ltd v Brightwake Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 5 .................... 225 Apple Corps Ltd v Apple Computer Inc [2006] EWHC 996 (Ch) ................ 237, 238 Arsenal Football Club Plc v Reed [2001] RPC 922 ..................................... 237, 238 Arsenal Football Club Plc v Reed (C-206/01) [2003] RPC 144 .......... 176, 234, 238, 240, 241, 251, 255 Arsenal Football Club Plc v Reed (No. 2) [2002] EWHC 2695 (Ch) ................... 238 Arsenal Football Club Plc v Reed (No. 2) [2003] EWCA Civ 696 ...................... 238 Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1142 ......... 39, 44, 45, 113, 230 Association for Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics 569 US __ (2013) (US Supreme Court) .......................................................................................... 119 Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers (No. 2) [1990] 1AC 109 .................. 113 Autospin (Oil Seals) Ltd v Beehive Spinning [1995] RPC 683 ............................ 216 Availability to the Public (G1/92) [1993] EPOR 241 .......................................... 151 Baigent v Random House Group [2007] EWCA Civ 247 .................... 206, 207, 216 Baschet v London Illustrated Standard Co [1900] 1 Ch 73 ................................. 112 Beloit Technologies v ValmetPaper Machinery Inc [1997] RPC 489 .................. 225 Benmax v Austin Motor Co Ltd [1955]AC 370 ............................................... 34, 42 Die BergSpechte Outdoor,Reisen und Alpinschule Edi Koblmüller GmbH v Günter Guni, trekking.at Reisen GmbH (C-278/08) [2010] ETMR 33 ................... 243 vii David Booton - 9781783470556 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/29/2021 01:33:31AM via free access Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Booton-Form_in_intellectual_property / Division: Tables /Pg. Position: 1 / Date: 27/4 JOBNAME: Booton PAGE: 2 SESS: 4 OUTPUT: Tue May 9 09:51:56 2017 viii Form in intellectual property law Bezpecˇnostní softwarová asociace – Svaz softwarové ochrany v Ministerstvo kultury (C-393/09) [2011] ECDR 3 ..................................... 161, 165, 212, 221 Billhöfer Maschinenfabrik v Dixon [1990] FSR 105 ................................... 216, 248 Biogen Inc v Medeva Plc [1993] RPC 475 ............................................................ 81 Biogen Inc v Medeva Plc [1995] RPC 25 ............................................................ 150 Biogen Inc v Medeva Plc [1997] RPC 1 ....................................... 34, 42, 55, 94, 150 Bleistein v Donaldson Lithographing Co 188 US 239 (1903) (US Supreme Court) ......................................................................................................... 203 Bristol Myers Squibb Co v Baker Norton Pharmaceuticals Inc [1999] RPC 253 ............................................................................................................. 129 Bristol Myers Squibb v Paranova (C-427/93) [1996] ETMR 1 ........................... 264 Bristol-Myers Co (Johnson’s) Application [1975] RPC 127 ............................... 172 British Westinghouse v Braulik (1910) 27 RPC 209 ............................................ 225 Brugger v Medic-Aid [1996] RPC 635 ................................................................ 157 Burke and Margot Burke Ltd v Spicers Dress Designs [1936] Ch 400 ................ 210 Cadbury-Schweppes Pty Ltd v The Pub Squash Co Ltd [1981] RPC 429 ............ 280 Cairnstores Ltd v Aktiebolaget Hassle [2002] FSR 35 ........................................ 170 Campina Melkunie BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau (C-265/00) [2004] ETMR 821 ................................................................................................. 250 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc (C-39/97) [1999] RPC 117 ............................................................................................. 100, 236 Cantor Fitzgerald International v Tradition (UK) Ltd [2000] RPC 95 ........ 205, 213 Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Herbert Smith (No. 2) [1969] 2 Ch 276 ................................ 72 Catnic Components Ltd v Hill and Smith Ltd [1982] RPC 183 ...................... 15, 209 CBS Songs v Amstrad [1988]AC 1013 ............................................................... 216 Céline SARL v Céline (C-17/06) [2007] ETMR 1320 ................................. 234, 240 CFPH LLC’s Application [2005] EWHC 1589 ........................ 68, 69, 131, 133, 135 Chappell & Co Ltd v Colombia Graphophone Co [1914] 2 Ch 745 ...................... 78 Chiron Corporation v Organon Teknika Ltd (No. 3) [1994] FSR 202 ................. 225 Chiron Corporation v Organon Teknika Ltd (No. 10) and Chiron Corporation v Murex Diagnostics Ltd (No. 10) [1995] FSR 325 .............................. 79, 80, 81 Cnl-Sucal v Hag (C-10/89) [1990] 3 CMLR 571 ................................................ 264 Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Muller and Co’s Margarine Ltd (1901)AC 217 ............................................................................................................... 66 ConAgra Inc v McCain Foods (Aust) Pty Ltd [1992] FCA 176 (Federal Court of Australia) ..................................................................................................... 66 Conor Medsystems Inc v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc [2006] EWHC 260 (Pat) ........................................................................................................... 156 Conor Medsystems Inc v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc [2007] EWCA Civ 5 ................................................................................................. 32, 61, 94 Conor Medsystems Inc v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc [2008] UKHL 49 ....... 38, 62, 63, 152 Cooper v Baedeker (1900) 17 RPC 209 .............................................................. 154 Couture Tech Ltd’s Application (R 1509/2008-2) [2010] ETMR 774 .......... 115, 116 Cramp & Sons Ltd v Smythson Ltd [1944]AC 329 .............................................. 195 Crane v Price (1842) 4 MAN & G 580 ........................................................ 154, 156 Crossley v The Derby Gas Light Co (1834) 4 LT 25 .............................................. 76 Davis (J&S) Holdings v Wright Health Group [1988] RPC 403 ......................... 216 David Booton - 9781783470556 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/29/2021 01:33:31AM via free access Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Booton-Form_in_intellectual_property / Division: Tables /Pg. Position: 2 / Date: 27/4 JOBNAME: Booton PAGE: 3 SESS: 4 OUTPUT: Tue May 9 09:51:56 2017 Table of cases ix Designer Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2001] FSR 113 .... 37, 43, 167, 205, 206, 207, 211 Dow Corning Corporation’s Application [1969] FSR 338 ................................... 64 Dun’s Licensing/Estimating Sales Activity (T154/04) [2007] EPOR 38 ............. 132 Dyson Appliances Ltd v Hoover Ltd [2001] RPC 473 ........................................... 56 Dyson Appliances Ltd v Hoover Ltd (No. 2, ‘Springboard’Relief) [2001] RPC 544 ...................................................................................................... 4, 77, 78 Dyson Appliances Ltd v Hoover Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1440 ........................ 56, 57 eBay v MercExchange LLC 547 US 388 (2006) (US Supreme Court) .................. 79 Elanco Products v Mandops [1979] FSR 46 .......................................... 85, 209, 220 Enterprise Holdings v Europcar Group UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 2498 (Ch) ......... 101 Erven Warnink Besloten Vennootschap v Townend & Sons (Hull) Ltd [1979] AC 731 ............................................................................................. 49, 50, 52 Esure Insurance v Direct Line Insurance [2008] RPC 34 ............................ 101, 175 Fenty v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us